Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:53:57.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dwelling and the Sacralisation of the Air: A note on acousmatic music

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2011

Martin Parker Dixon*
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Music, School of Culture and Creative Arts, University of Glasgow, 14 University Gardens, Glasgow G12 8QH

Abstract

This paper adapts Martin Heidegger's philosophy of ‘dwelling’ in order to effect a liaison between acousmatic music and ecological concern. I propose this as an alternative to both the propagandist use of music as a means of protest and to using the science of ecology as a domain that might furnish new compositional means. I advance the interpretation that acousmatic music ‘occupies the air’ in ways that transform the meaning of that dimension. It allows the sky to be sky and the earth, earth. I use the precedent of bell ringing as an example of sonic activity that occupies the air in order to further dwelling.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Corbin, A. 1998. Village Bells: Sound and Meaning in the Nineteenth Century French Countryside, trans Martin Thom. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, T. 1993. ‘Poetry as Invocation’. New Literary History 24(3): 495517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, C. 2004. Growth Fetish. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Harman, G. 2002. Tool-being: Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Objects. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1993. Basic Writings, ed. David Farrell Krell. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 2001. Poetry, Language, Thought, trans. Albert Hofstader. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Rigby, K. 2004. Earth, World, Text: On the (Im)possibility of Ecopoiesis. New Literary History 35(3): 427442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar