Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:01:37.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Sound-Poetry of the Instability of Reality: The audio reality effect and mimesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2017

Charles Francis Underriner IV
Charles Francis Underriner IV*
Affiliation:
Music Department, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, USA
*
Email: charles.underriner@unt.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article proposes the audio reality effect as a meaningful translation of Roland Barthes’s literary reality effect to the sonic realm. This refinement of transcontextuality and source recognition is applied to electroacoustic music and soundscape composition using the works and writings of Emmerson, Truax, Wishart, Smalley, Fischman, Young, Norman and Field. Lastly, this study mimetically analyses 2 seconds / b minor / wave by Michael Pisaro and Taku Sugimoto in order to demonstrate the relevance of mimesis and the audio reality effect for understanding current musical practice.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 22 , Special Issue 1: Context-based Composition , April 2017 , pp. 20 - 31
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Barthes, R. 1982. The Reality Effect. French Literary Theory Today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, J. 1994. Simulacra and Simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. 1990. The Logic of Sense. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Drever, J. 2001. Phonographies: Practical and Theoretical Explorations into Composing with Disembodied Sound. Thesis, Goldsmiths, University of London, London.Google Scholar
Emmerson, S. 1986. The Relation of Language to Materials. In S. Emmerson (ed.) The Language of Electroacoustic Music. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Ferreira, G. 1997. A Perceptual Approach to the Analysis of J. C. Risset’s Sud: Sound, Structure and Symbol. Organised Sound 2(2): 97–106.Google Scholar
Field, A. 2000. Simulation and Reality: The New Sonic Objects. In S. Emmerson (ed.) Music, Electronic Media and Culture. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Fischman, R. 2008. ‘Mimetic Space – Unravelled’. Organised Sound 13(2): 111–122.Google Scholar
Gann, K. 2010. No Such Thing as Silence: John Cage’s 4′33″. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. and Gilmore, J. n.d. Realism. Encyclopedia of Aesthetics. Oxford Art Online. www.oxfordartonline.com/subscriber/article/opr/t234/e0432 (accessed 17 December 2015).Google Scholar
Kahn, D. 1999. Noise, Water, Meat. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, P. 2003. Realism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moszynska, A. n.d. Abstract Art. Grove Art Online, Oxford Art Online. www.oxfordartonline.com/subscriber/article/grove/art/T000238 (accessed 17 December 2015).Google Scholar
Norman, K. 1996. Real-World Listening as Composed Listening. Contemporary Music Review 15(1): 1–27.Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, J. 2015. Mimetic Instrumental Resynthesis. Organised Sound 20(2): 231–240.Google Scholar
Plourde, L. 2008. Disciplined Listening in Tokyo: Onkyō and Non-intentional Sounds. Ethnomusicology 52(2): 270–295.Google Scholar
Potolsky, M. 2006. Mimesis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Prendergast, C. 1986. The Order of Mimesis: Balzac, Stendhal, Nerval, Flaubert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Priest, E. 2013. Boring Formless Nonsense: Experimental Music and the Aesthetics of Failure. New York: Bloomsburg Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risset, J. C. 1996. Real-World Sounds and Simulacra in My Computer Music. Contemporary Music Review 15(1): 29–47.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. H. n.d. Realism. Grove Art Online, Oxford Art Online. www.oxfordartonline.com/subscriber/article/grove/art/T070996 (accessed 17 December 2015).Google Scholar
Russolo, L. 1916. The Art of Noises Futurist Manifesto. Trans. Barclay Brown. In The Art of Noises. New York: Pendragon Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Schwartz, H. 1996. The Culture of the Copy. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1997. Spectromorphology: Explaining Sound-shapes. Organised Sound 2(2): 107–126.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 2009. The Listening Imagination: Listening in the Electroacoustic Era. Contemporary Music Review 13(2): 77–107.Google Scholar
Truax, B. 2012. Sound, Listening and Place: The Aesthetic Dilemma. Organised Sound 17(3): 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underriner, C. 2016. The Sound-Poetry of the Instability of Reality: Mimesis and the Reality Effect in Music, Literature and Visual Art. PhD thesis, University of North Texas, Denton.Google Scholar
Weiss, A. 2008. Varieties of Audio Mimesis: Musical Evocations of Landscape. Audio Issues Vol. 3. Canada: Gauvin Press, Errant Bodies Press.Google Scholar
Wishart, T. 1996. On Sonic Art. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.Google Scholar
Young, J. 1996. Imagining the Source: The Interplay of Realism and Abstraction in Electroacoustic Music. Contemporary Music Review 15(1): 73–93.Google Scholar

Discography

Dunn, D. 2006. The Sound of Light in Trees. EarthEar records.Google Scholar
Martats. 2011. ‘Big Waterfall’. http://freesound.org/people/martats/sounds/128049/ (accessed 10 August 2016).Google Scholar
Pisaro, M. and Sugimoto, T. 2010. 2 seconds / b minor / wave. Erstwhile Records, ERSTWHILE 061.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1992. Wind Chimes (1987). On Impacts intérieurs. Montreal: Empreintes Digitales, IMED-9209-CD.Google Scholar
Tokernholdt, J. 2014. ‘Daily Routines: Shower’. www.freesound.org/people/Tokernholdt/sounds/254018/ (accessed 15 November 2015).Google Scholar
Truax, B. 2001. Pendlerdrøm (1997). On Islands. Cambridge Street Records, CSR-CD 0101.Google Scholar

Underriner supplementary material

Sound-example-1

Download Underriner supplementary material(Video)
Video 9.8 MB

Underriner supplementary material

Sound-example-1

Download Underriner supplementary material(Audio)
Audio 3.5 MB

Underriner supplementary material

Sound-example-2

Download Underriner supplementary material(Video)
Video 2.7 MB

Underriner supplementary material

Sound-example-2

Download Underriner supplementary material(Audio)
Audio 953.5 KB

Underriner supplementary material

Sound-example-3

Download Underriner supplementary material(Video)
Video 7.1 MB

Underriner supplementary material

Sound-example-3

Download Underriner supplementary material(Audio)
Audio 2.6 MB

Underriner supplementary material

Sound-example-4

Download Underriner supplementary material(Video)
Video 5.3 MB

Underriner supplementary material

Sound-example-4

Download Underriner supplementary material(Audio)
Audio 2 MB

Underriner supplementary material

Sound-example-5

Download Underriner supplementary material(Video)
Video 1.2 MB

Underriner supplementary material

Sound-example-5

Download Underriner supplementary material(Audio)
Audio 433.7 KB

Underriner supplementary material

Sound-example-6

Download Underriner supplementary material(Video)
Video 8.9 MB

Underriner supplementary material

Sound-example-6

Download Underriner supplementary material(Audio)
Audio 3.2 MB

Underriner supplementary material

Sound-example-7

Download Underriner supplementary material(Video)
Video 11.5 MB

Underriner supplementary material

Sound-example-7

Download Underriner supplementary material(Audio)
Audio 4.1 MB