Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T17:36:44.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A functional analysis of flying and walking in pterosaurs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Kevin Padian
Kevin Padian*
Affiliation:
Department of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An analysis of the structure and kinematics of the forelimbs and hindlimbs of pterosaurs, and functional analogy with recent and fossil vertebrates, supports a reappraisal of the locomotory abilities of pterosaurs. A hypothesis of structural, aerodynamic, and evolutionary differences distinguishing vertebrate gliders from fliers is proposed; pterosaurs fit all the criteria of fliers but none pertaining to gliders. The kinematics of the reconstructed pterosaur flight stroke reveal a down-and-forward component found also in birds and bats; structural features of the shoulder girdle and sternum unique to pterosaurs may be explained in light of this motion. The recovery stroke of flight was accomplished, in birdlike fashion, by a functional reversal of the action of the M. supracoracoideus by the pronounced enlargement of the acrocoracoid process, which acted as a pulley. The wing membrane was supported and controlled through a system of stiffened, intercalated fibers, which were oriented like the main structural elements in the wings of birds and bats.

The hindlimbs of pterosaurs were independent of the wing membrane, and articulated like those of other advanced archosaurs and birds, not like those of bats. The gait was parasagittal and the stance digitigrade. Because of limitations on the motion of the forelimb at the shoulder, pterosaurs could not have walked quadrupedally. However, bipedal locomotion appears to have been normal and quite sufficient in all pterosaurs. There is nothing batlike about pterosaur anatomy; on the other hand, pterosaurs bear close structural resemblances to birds and dinosaurs, to which they are most closely related phylogenetically.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , Summer 1983 , pp. 218 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Abel, O. 1925. Geschichte und Methode der Rekonstruktion vorzeitlicher Wirbeltiere. Gustav Fischer; Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Arthaber, G. V. 1919. Studien über Flugsaurier auf Grund der Bearbeitung des Weiner Exemplares von Dorygnathus banthensis Theod. sp. Denkschr. Akad. Wiss. Wien, math.-naturwiss. Kl. 97:391–464.Google Scholar
Arthaber, G. V. 1922. Uber Entwicklung, Ausbildung und Absterben der Flugsaurier. Paläont. Z. 4(1):1–47.Google Scholar
Bramwell, C. D. and Whitfield, G. R. 1974. Biomechanics of Pteranodon. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B267:503–581.Google Scholar
Brown, R. J. H. 1961. Flight. In: Marshall, A. J., ed. Biology and Comparative Physiology of Birds. Academic Press; New York.Google Scholar
Bryant, M. D. 1945. Phylogeny of Nearctic Sciuridae. Am. Midl. Nat. 33(2):257–390.Google Scholar
Caple, G., Balda, R. P., and Willis, W. R. 1983. The physics of leaping animals and the evolution of preflight. Am. Nat. 121(4):455–467.Google Scholar
Coombs, W. P. Jr. 1978. Theoretical aspects of cursorial adaptations in dinosaurs. Quart. Rev. Biol. 53:393–418.Google Scholar
Cox, C. B. 1980. Trimming the pterosaur's wings. Nature (London). 254:400–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, P. J. and Padian, K. 1983. A new pterosaur record from the Judith River (Oldman) Formation of Alberta. J. Paleontol. 57:599–600.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. 1812. Recherches sur les Ossemens Fossiles. Paris.Google Scholar
Desmond, A. J. 1979. Designing the dinosaur: Richard Owen's response to Robert Edmond Grant. Isis. 70:224–234.Google Scholar
Eaton, G. F. 1910. Osteology of Pteranodon. Mem. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci. 2:1–38.Google Scholar
Feduccia, A. and Tordoff, H. B. 1979. Feathers of Archaeopteryx: asymmetric vanes indicate aerodynamic function. Science. 203:1021–1022.Google Scholar
George, J. C. and Berger, A. J. 1966. Avian Myology. Academic Press; New York.Google Scholar
Hankin, E. H. and Watson, D. M. S. 1914. On the flight of pterodactyles. Aeronaut. J. 72:1–12.Google Scholar
Headley, F. W. 1895. The Structure and Life of Birds. MacMillan; New York.Google Scholar
Herzog, K. 1968. Anatomie und Flugbiologie der Vögel. Gustav Fischer; Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hess, G. 1946. Der Vögel. Gutenberg-Buchenpl; Zurich.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, , 1982. Analysis of Vertebrate Structure. 2d Ed.Wiley; New York.Google Scholar
Hudson, G. E. and Lanzillotti, P. J. 1955. Gross anatomy of the wing muscles in the Family Corvidae. Am. Midl. Nat. 53:1–44.Google Scholar
Jenkins, F. A. Jr. 1970. Limb movements in a monotreme (Tachyglossus aculeatus): a cineradiographic analysis. Science 168:1473–1475.Google Scholar
Jepsen, G. L. 1970. Bat origins and evolution. In: Wimsatt, W. K., ed. Biology of Bats. Vol. 1. Academic Press; New York.Google Scholar
Johnson-Murray, J. L. 1977. Myology of the gliding membranes of some petauristine rodents (genera: Glaucomys, Pteromys, Petinomys, and Petaurista). J. Mammal. 58(3):374–384.Google Scholar
McGowan, C. 1979. Selection pressure for high body temperatures: implications for dinosaurs. Paleobiology. 5(3):285–295.Google Scholar
Meyer, H. von. 1837. (Letter to Professor Brown). Jb. Mineral. 1837:314–316.Google Scholar
Ostrom, J. H. 1976a. Some hypothetical anatomical stages in the evolution of avian flight. In Olsen, S. L., ed. Collected Papers in Avian Paleontology. Smithson. Contr. Paleob. 27; 1–21.Google Scholar
Ostrom, J. H. 1976b. Archaeopteryx and the origin of birds. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 8(2):91–182.Google Scholar
Owen, R. 1851. A Monograph on the Fossil Reptilia of the Cretaceous Formations. Palaeontogr. Soc; London.Google Scholar
Owen, R. 1859. Supplement I. Palaeontogr. Soc; London.Google Scholar
Owen, R. 1861. Supplement II. Palaeontogr. Soc; London.Google Scholar
Owen, R. 1870. A Monograph on the Fossil Reptilia of the Liassic Formations. III. Paleontogr. Soc; London.Google Scholar
Padian, K. 1979. The wings of pterosaurs: a new look. Discovery (New Haven). 14:20–29.Google Scholar
Padian, K. 1980. Studies of the structure, evolution, and flight of Pterosaurs. Ph.D. thesis, Yale Univ.Google Scholar
Padian, K. 1983. Description and reconstruction of new material of Dimorphodon macronyx (Buckland) (Pterosauria: Rhamphorhynchoidea) in the Yale Peabody Museum. Postilla. 189:1–44.Google Scholar
Padian, K. and Olsen, P. E.In press. The track of Pteraichnus: not a pterosaur, but a crocodiloid. J. Paleontol.Google Scholar
Rayner, J. M. V. 1979. A new approach to animal flight mechanics. J. Exp. Biol. 80:17–54.Google Scholar
Rayner, J. M. V. 1981. Flight adaptations in vertebrates. In Day, M. H., ed. Vertebrate Locomotion. Symposium 28. Zool. Soc. London. Academic Press; New York.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. A. 1975. The locomotion of plesiosaurs. N. Jb. Geol. Pal. Abh. 149(3):286–332.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1964. The inference of function from structure in fossils. Brit. J. Philos. Sci. 15(57):27–40.Google Scholar
Savile, D. B. O. 1962. Gliding and flight in vertebrates. Am. Zool. 2:161–166.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, B. 1941. The morphological and functional evolution of the tarsus in amphibians and reptiles. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 78:395–472.Google Scholar
Seeley, H. G. 1870a. The Ornithosauria: an elementary study of the bones of Pterodactyles. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Seeley, H. G. 1870b. Remarks on Professor Owen's Monograph on Dimorphodon. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 6:129.Google Scholar
Seeley, H. G. 1901. Dragons of the air: an account of extinct flying reptiles. Methuen; London.Google Scholar
Sharov, A. G. 1971. New flying reptiles from the Mesozoic of Kazakhstan and Kirgizia. Akad. Nauk SSR Trudy Paleont. Inst. 130:104–113. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Soemmerring, S. Th. von. 1817. Über einen Ornithocephalus brevirostris der Vorwelt. Denkschr. Kgl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss., math.-phys. Cl. 6:89–104.Google Scholar
Spoczynska, J. O. I. 1971. Fossils: a study in evolution. Rowman & Littlefield; Totowa, N.J.Google Scholar
Stahl, B. 1974. Vertebrate history: problems in evolution. McGraw-Hill; New York.Google Scholar
Stokes, W. L. 1957. Pterodactyl tracks from the Morrison formation. J. Paleontol. 31:952–954.Google Scholar
Stresemann, E. 1927–1934. Funfte Klasse der Craniota. Zweite und zugleich letzte Klasse der Sauropsida. Aves = Vögel. Handb. Zool. 7. Bd. 2. Halfte. W. de Gruyter; Berlin.Google Scholar
Sy, M. 1936. Funktionell-anatomische Untersuchungen am Vogelflugel. J. Ornithol. 84:199–296.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. D. K. and Olson, E. C., eds. 1980. A Cold Look at the Warm-blooded Dinosaurs. AAAS Selected Symposium 28. Westview; Boulder, Colo.Google Scholar
Vaughan, T. 1970a. The skeletal system. In: Wimsatt, W. A., ed. Biology of Bats, Vol. 1, Academic Press; New York.Google Scholar
Vaughan, T. 1970b. The muscular system. In: Wimsatt, W. A., ed. Biology of Bats, Vol. 1, Academic Press; New York.Google Scholar
Vaughan, T. 1970c. Flight patterns and aerodynamics. In: Wimsatt, W. A. ed. Biology of Bats, Vol. 1, Academic Press; New York.Google Scholar
Wellnhofer, P. 1970. Die Pterodactyloidea (Pterosauria) der Oberjura Plattenkalke Süddeutschlands. Abh. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. N.F. 141:1–133.Google Scholar
Wellnhofer, P. 1974. Campylognathoides liasicus (Quenstedt), an Upper Liassic pterosaur from Holzmaden. The Pittsburgh specimen. Ann. Carnegie Mus. 45(2):5–34.Google Scholar
Wellnhofer, P. 1975a. Die Rhamphorhynchoidea (Pterosauria) der Oberjura Plattenkalke Süddeutschlands. I. Allgemeine Skelettmorphologie. Paläontographica. A148:1–33.Google Scholar
Wellnhofer, P. 1975b. II. Systematische Beschreibung. Paläontographica. 148:132–186.Google Scholar
Wellnhofer, P. 1975c. III. Palökologie und Stammesgeschichte. Paläontographica. 149:1–30.Google Scholar
Wellnhofer, P. 1978. Hanbuch der Paläoherpetologie. Teil 19. Pterosauria. Gustav Fischer; Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Wild, R. 1973. Die Triasfauna der Tessiner Kalkalpen. XXIII. Tanystropheus longobardicus (Bassani) Neue Ergebnisse). Schweizer. Paläontol. Abh. 95:1–162.Google Scholar
Wild, R. 1978. Die Flugsaurier (Reptilia, Pterosauria) aus der Oberen Trias von Cene bei Bergamo, Italien. Boll. Soc. Pal. Ital. 17(2):176–256.Google Scholar
Williston, S. W. 1903. On the osteology of Nyctosaurus (Nyctodactylus) with notes on American pterosaurs. Pubs. Field Mus. Nat. Hist. (Geol. Ser.) 2(3):125–163.Google Scholar
Wiman, C. 1928. Einige Beobachtungen an Flugsauriern. Paleobiologica. 1:363–370.Google Scholar
Zambelli, R. 1973. Eudimorphodon ranzii gen. nov., sp. nov., uno pterosauro triassico. Ist. Lombardo (Rend. Sci.) B107:27–32.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. von. 1882. Über Flugsaurier aus dem lithographischen Schiefer Bayerns. Paläontographica. 29:47–80.Google Scholar