Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:53:40.858Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rates of anagenetic evolution and selection intensity in Middle and Upper Ordovician species of the bryozoan genus Peronopora

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Joseph F. Pachut  and
Robert L. Anstey
Joseph F. Pachut
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, 723 West Michigan Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202-5132, U.S.A. E-mail: jpachut@iupui.edu
Robert L. Anstey
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Michigan State University, 206 Natural Science Building, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1115, U.S.A. E-mail: anstey@msu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Evolutionary rates and selection intensities in eight cladistically defined species-level evolutionary sequences of the Middle and Upper Ordovician bryozoan genus Peronopora were calculated for comparison with values published for fossil and living taxa. Calculations were restricted to statistically significant unidirectional segments of anagenetic series to minimize the mixing of different modes, directions, and rates of evolutionary change.

Rates and selection intensities ranged from 10−7 to 10−6 darwins and from 10−6 to 10−5 haldanes. Across characters, the weighted mean evolutionary rate equaled 5.86 × 10−7 darwins and the mean selection intensity was 6.44 × 10−7. Mean rates of 2.15 × 10−6, 4.31 × 10−6, and 8.61 × 10−6 haldanes, and corresponding mean selection intensities equaling 2.39 × 10−6, 4.78 × 10−6, and 9.56 × 10−6, were calculated for generation lengths of 0.5, 1, and 2 years, respectively.

The magnitudes of positive and negative evolutionary rates and selection intensities do not differ statistically, individual characters display no consistent pattern of positive or negative values, and no character complexes were detectable. A mosaic pattern of change occurs across characters in evolutionary sequences.

Eighty percent of analyzed evolutionary series were multispecies lineages. Both individual and mean values provide direct estimates of the rates of evolution within those lineages at the moment of speciation.

Rates of anagenetic evolution in Peronopora were low and similar to published rates for a variety of fossil protists, invertebrates, and vertebrates. However, earlier rate calculations did not isolate the effect of unidirectional anagenesis from that of stasis, random walks, trend reversals, or rate variations. Eight percent of characters in Peronopora produced anagenetic series that were statistically significant, a percentage similar to the 5% calculated in a study of 251 sequences of evolving traits in 53 fossil lineages (Hunt 2007). Stasis and mutation-drift are the most common patterns detectable in the fossil record, although anagenesis remains a potentially important force in shaping the course of both micro- and macroevolution.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , Summer 2012 , pp. 403 - 423
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, R. P., and Handley, C. O. Jr. 2002. Dwarfism in insular sloths: biogeography, selection, and evolutionary rate. Evolution 56:1045–1058.Google ScholarPubMed
Anstey, R. L., and Bartley, J. W. 1984. Quantitative stereology: an improved thin section biometry for bryozoans and other colonial organisms. Journal of Paleontology 58:612–625.Google Scholar
Anstey, R. L., and Pachut, J. F. 2004. Cladistic and phenetic recognition of species in the Ordovician bryozoan genus Peronopora. Journal of Paleontology 78:651–674.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrick, J. E., Yu, D. S., Yoon, S. H., Jeong, H., Oh, T. K., Schneider, D., Lenski, R. E., and Kim, J. F. 2009. Genome evolution and adaptation in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli. Nature 461:1243–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartley, J. W., and Anstey, R. L. 1987. Growth of monilae in the Permian trepostome Tabulipora carbonaria: evidence for periodicity and a new model of stenolaemate wall calcification. Pp. 9–16inRoss, J. R. P., ed. Bryozoa: present and past. Western Washington University, Bellingham.Google Scholar
Bell, M. A., Baumgartner, J. V., and Olson, E. C. 1985. Patterns of temporal change in single morphological characters of a Miocene stickleback fish. Paleobiology 11:258–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bone, E., and Farres, A. 2001. Trends and rates of microevolution in plants. Genetica 112–113:165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bookstein, F. L. 1987. Random walk and the existence of evolutionary rates. Paleobiology 13:446–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bookstein, F. L. 1988. Random walk and the biometrics of morphological characters. Evolutionary Biology 23:369–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, B. 1984. Some quantitative methods for studying evolutionary patterns in single characters. Paleobiology 10:308–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheetham, A. H., and Jackson, J. B. C. 1995. Process from pattern: tests for selection versus random change in punctuated bryozoan speciation. Pp. 184–207inErwin, D. H., and Anstey, R. L., eds. New approaches to speciation in the fossil record. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Cheetham, A. H., Jackson, J. B. C., and Hayek, L-A. 1993. Quantitative genetics of bryozoan phenotypic evolution. I. Rate tests for random change versus selection in differentiation of living species. Evolution 47:1526–1538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheetham, A. H., Jackson, J. B. C., and Hayek, L-A. 1994. Quantitative genetics of bryozoan phenotypic evolution. II. Analysis of selection and random change in fossil species using reconstructed genetic parameters. Evolution 48:360–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheetham, A. H., Jackson, J. B. C., and Hayek, L-A. 1995. Quantitative genetics of bryozoan phenotypic evolution. III. Phenotypic plasticity and the maintenance of genetic variation. Evolution 49:290–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crow, J. F. 1986. Basic concepts in population, quantitative, and evolutionary genetics. W. H. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
Darimont, C. T., Carlson, S. M., Kinnison, M. T., Paquet, P. C., Reimchen, T. E., and Wilmers, C. C. 2009. Human predators outpace other agents of trait change in the wild. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106:952–954. Data athttp://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0809235106/DCSupplemental.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eldredge, N., and Gould, S. J. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. Pp. 82–115inSchopf, T. J. M., ed. Models in paleobiology. Freeman-Cooper, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Ellner, S., Hairston, N. G. Jr., Kearns, C. M., and Babaï, D. 1999. The roles of fluctuating selection and long-term diapause in microevolution of diapause timing in a freshwater copepod. Evolution 53:111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S. 1973. Replicated selection for body weight in mice. Genetical Research 22:291–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Futuyma, D. J. 1998. Evolutionary biology. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 1974. Size variability of teeth in living mammals and diagnosis of closely related sympatric species. Journal of Paleontology 48:895–902.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 1983. Rates of evolution: effects of time and temporal scaling. Science 222:159–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gingerich, P. D. 1993. Quantification and comparison of evolutionary rates. American Journal of Science 293A:453–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 2001. Rates of evolution on the time scale of the evolutionary process. Genetica 112–113:127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 2003. Land-to-sea transition in early whales: evolution of Eocene Archaeoceti (Cetacea) in relation to skeletal proportions and locomotion of living semiaquatic mammals. Paleobiology 29:429–454.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 2009. Rates of evolution. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 40:657–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Eldredge, N. 1977. Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology 3:115–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, P. R. 1986. Ecology and evolution of Darwin's finches. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Grant, P. R., and Grant, B. R. 2002. Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches. Science 296:707–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, J. R., and Reisdorph, S. 2009. Multivariate morphometry and rates of morphologic evolution within the Pennsylvanian fusulinid Beedeina (Ardmore Basin, Oklahoma, USA). Palaeoworld 18:120–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hageman, S. J., Bayer, M. M., and Todd, C. D. 1999. Partitioning phenotypic variation: genotypic, environmental and residual components from bryozoan skeletal morphology. Journal of Natural History 33:1713–1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hairston, N. G. Jr., and Dillon, T. A. 1990. Fluctuating selection and response in a population of freshwater copepods. Evolution 44:1796–1805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hairston, N. G., Ellner, S. P., Geber, M. A., Yoshida, T., and Fox, J. A. 2005. Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time. Ecology Letters 8:1114–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. 1949. Suggestions as to quantitative measurement of rates of evolution. Evolution 3:51–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallam, A. 1975. Evolutionary size increase and longevity in Jurassic bivalves and ammonites. Nature 258:493–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T. and Ryan, P. D. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4:1–9. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm. [Checked August 2011.].Google Scholar
Hendry, A. P., and Kinnison, M. T. 1999. The pace of modern life: measuring rates of contemporary microevolution. Evolution 53:1637–1653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendry, A. P., Farrugia, T. J., and Kinnison, M. T. 2008. Human influences on rates of phenotypic change in wild animal populations. Molecular Ecology 17:20–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hickey, D. R. 1987. Skeletal structure, development, and elemental composition of the Ordovician trepostome bryozoan Peronopora. Palaeontology 30:691–716.Google Scholar
Hickey, D. R. 1988. Bryozoan astogeny and evolutionary novelties: their role in the Origin and systematics of the Ordovician monticuliporid trepostome genus Peronopora. Journal of Paleontology 62:180–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, G. 2007. The relative importance of directional change, random walks, and stasis in the evolution of fossil lineages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104:18404–18408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurst, H. E. 1951. Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 116:770–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C., and Cheetham, A. H. 1990. Evolutionary significance of morphospecies: a test with cheilostome Bryozoa. Science 248:579–583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinnison, M. T., and Hendry, A. P. 2001. The pace of modern life II: from rates of contemporary microevolution to pattern and process. Genetica 112–113:145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtén, B. 1959. Rates of evolution in fossil mammals. Cold Springs harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 24:205–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. 1976. Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30:314–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. 1985. Expected time for random genetic drift of a population between stable phenotypic states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 82:7641–7645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. 1987. The dynamics of peak shifts and the pattern of morphological evolution. Paleobiology 12:343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerman, A. 1965. On rates of evolution of unit characters and character complexes. Evolution 19:16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M. 1990. The rate of morphological evolution in mammals from the standpoint of the neutral expectation. American Naturalist 136:727–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. R. 1995. Stratigraphy, the true order of species originations and extinctions, and testing ancestor-descendant hypotheses among Caribbean Neogene bryozoans. Pp. 208–235inErwin, D. H., and Anstey, R. L., eds. New approaches to speciation in the fossil record. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. 1988. Games, sex and evolution. Harvester-Wheatsheaf, Hemel-Hempstead, U.K.Google Scholar
Newton, G. B. 1971. Rhabdomesid bryozoans of the Wreford Megacyclothem (Wolfcampian, Permian) of Nebraska, Kansas, and Oklahoma. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Article 56 (Bryozoa 2).Google Scholar
Norell, M. A., and Novacek, M. J. 1992. Congruence between superpositional and phylogenetic patterns: comparing cladistic patterns with fossil records. Cladistics 8:319–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pachut, J. F. 1982. Morphologic variation within and among genotypes in two Devonian bryozoan species: an independent indicator of paleostability? Journal of Paleontology 56:703–716.Google Scholar
Pachut, J. F. 1989. Heritability and intraspecific heterochrony in Ordovician bryozoans from environments differing in diversity. Journal of Paleontology 63:182–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pachut, J. F., and Anstey, R. L. 2002. Phylogeny, systematics, and biostratigraphy of the Ordovician bryozoan genus Peronopora. Journal of Paleontology 76:607–637.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pachut, J. F., and Anstey, R. L. 2007. Inferring evolutionary order and durations using both stratigraphy and cladistics in a fossil lineage (Bryozoa: Peronopora). Palaios 22:476–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pachut, J. F., and Anstey, R. L. 2009. Inferring evolutionary modes in a fossil lineage (Bryozoa: Peronopora) from the Middle and Late Ordovician. Paleobiology 35:209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purugganan, M. D., and Fuller, D. Q. 2010. Archaeological data reveal slow rates of evolution during plant domestication. Evolution 65:171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, C. 1991. Bryozoans. Pp. 135–138inGiese, A. C., Pearse, J. S., and Pearse, V. B., ed. Reproduction of marine invertebrates, Vol. VI. Echinoderms and lophophorates. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Reznick, D. N., Shaw, F. H., Rodd, F. H., and Shaw, R. G. 1997. Evaluation of the rate of evolution in natural populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Science 275:1934–1937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roopnarine, P. D. 2001. The description and classification of evolutionary mode: a computational approach. Paleobiology 27:446–465.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roopnarine, P. D. 2003. Analysis of rates of morphologic evolution. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34:605–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roopnarine, P. D., Byars, G., and Fitzgerald, P. 1999. Anagenetic evolution, stratophenetic patterns, and random walk models. Paleobiology 25:41–57.Google Scholar
Roopnarine, P. D., Murphy, M. A., and Buening, N. 2004. Microevolutionary dynamics of the Early Devonian conodont Wurmiella from the Great basin of Nevada. Palaeontologia Electronica 8:1–16. http://papaeo-electronica.org/paleo/2005_2/dynamics/issue2_05.htm.Google Scholar
Sidor, C. A., and Hopson, J. A. 1998. Ghost lineages and “mammalness”: assessing the temporal pattern of character acquisition in the Synapsida. Paleobiology 24:254–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1944. Tempo and mode in evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B. 1994. Systematics and the fossil record: documenting evolutionary patterns. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1975. A theory of evolution above the species level. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 72:646–650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stebbing, A. R. D. 1971. Growth of Flustra foliacea (Bryozoa). Marine Biology 9:267–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, W. 1984. Graphic correlation of upper Middle and Upper Ordovician rocks, North American Midcontinent Province, U.S.A. Pp. 23–36inBruton, D. L., ed. Aspects of the Ordovician System. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar
Swofford, D. L. 2000. PAUP∗. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (∗ and other methods). Version 4.0b4a. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. 1974. Two modes of evolution. Nature 252:298–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wickström, L. M., and Donoghue, P. C. J. 2005. Cladograms, phylogenies and the veracity of the conodont fossil record. Special Papers in Palaeontology 73:185–218.Google Scholar
Wright, S. 1982. Character change, speciation, and the higher taxa. Evolution 36:427–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed