Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T05:10:37.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of the juvenile shell of Lingula anatina (Brachiopoda: Linguliformea) provides insight into the evolution of life cycles of fossil brachiopods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2020

Anna A. Madison Open the ORCID record for Anna A. Madison [Opens in a new window] ,
Tatyana V. Kuzmina  and
Elena N. Temereva
Anna A. Madison
Affiliation:
Borisyak Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 117997Russian Federation. E-mail: sunnyannmad@yahoo.com
Tatyana V. Kuzmina
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991Russian Federation. E-mail: kuzmina-t@yandex.ru
Elena N. Temereva
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991Russian Federation; and Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 101000Russian Federation. E-mail: temereva@mail.ru
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Inferences on the development and morphology of extinct brachiopods must be informed by the ontogeny and shell ornamentation of extant brachiopods. Although the adult shells of extant brachiopods are well studied, detailed descriptions of the embryonic and juvenile shells of extant lingulides are lacking. Here, we describe in detail the shells of juveniles of Lingula anatina Lamarck, 1801 from Vietnam and the Republic of the Philippines. The following previously unknown properties of the lingulide shell are described: (1) a distinct border between the protegulum and the brephic shell; (2) drapes that develop on both the protegulum and brephic shell; and (3) the notched anterior margin of the brephic shell. The drapes and cogs on the brephic shell may be caused by the formation of setal follicles during the planktonic stage. Specimens of L. anatina from the Philippines have larger brephic shells than those from Vietnam, probably because the former have a longer planktonic stage. Based on comparisons of the first-formed shells of extant brachiopods with published data on fossil brachiopods, we suggest that the life cycle of extant lingulides, in which planktotrophic juveniles with a shell hatch from the egg envelope, is the most evolutionarily advanced brachiopod life cycle and appeared in the early Silurian. We suggest criteria for determining the type of life cycle based on the structure of the first-formed shell of brachiopods. Finally, we consider hypothetical scenarios of life cycles of fossil brachiopods, including true planktotrophic larvae in the Cambrian linguliforms.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , January 2021 , pp. 134 - 148
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baliński, A. 2001. Embryonic shells of Devonian linguloid brachiopods. Pp. 93–101 in Brunton, C. H. C., Cocks, L. R. M., and Long, S. L., eds. Brachiopods past and present. Proceedings of the Millennium Brachiopod Congress. Systematics Association Special Volume Series 63. Taylor and Francis, London.Google Scholar
Balthasar, U. 2009. The brachiopod Eoobolus from the Early Cambrian mural formation (Canadian Rocky Mountains). Paläontologische Zeitschrift 83:407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beecher, C. E. 1891. Development of the Brachiopoda. Part I. Introduction. American Journal of Science, series 3 43:343–357.Google Scholar
Bitner, M. A., Logan, A., and Gischler, E.. 2008. Recent brachiopods from the Persian Gulf and their biogeographical significance. Scientia Marina 72:279–285.Google Scholar
Bruguière, J. G. 1797. Vers, coquilles, mollusques et polypiers. Pp. 190–286 in Tableau Encyclopédique et Méthodique Des Trois Règnes de la Nature, Vol. 2. Agasse, Paris.Google Scholar
Chuang, S. H. 1977. Larval development in Discinisca (inarticulate brachiopod). Integrative and Comparative Biology 17:39–53.Google Scholar
Collin, R., Venera-Pontón, D. E., Driskell, A. C., Macdonald, K. S., and Boyle, M. J.. 2019. Planktotrophic brachiopod larvae from the Pacific and Caribbean of Panama. Diversity 11:1–13.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1870. A revision of the Terebratulidae and Lingulidae, with remarks on and descriptions of some Recent forms. American Journal of Conchology 6:88–168.Google Scholar
Freeman, G. 1995. Regional specification during embryogenesis in the inarticulate brachiopod Glottidia. Developmental Biology 172:15–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, G. 1999. Regional specification during embryogenesis in the inarticulate brachiopod Discinisca. Developmental Biology 209:321–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, G., and Lundelius, J. W.. 2005. The transition from planktotrophy to lecithotrophy in larvae of Lower Palaeozoic rhynchonelliform brachiopods. Lethaia 38:219–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalke, T. 2006. Ecological implications of molluscan ontogenetic strategies—examples from aquatic ecosystems of the Cenozoic Iberian Peninsula. Lethaia 39:195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzmina, T. V., Malakhov, V. V., and Temereva, E. N.. 2019. Larval development of the brachiopod Coptothyris grayi (Davidson, 1852) (Terebratulida: Rhynchonelliformea) and the evolution of brachiopod life cycles. Invertebrate Zoology 16:27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. 1801. Systime des animaux sans vertibres, ou tableaux gintral des classes, des ordres et des genres de ces animaux. Deterville, Paris.Google Scholar
Lüter, C. 2001. Brachiopod larval setae—a key to the phylum's ancestral life cycle? Pp. 46–55 in C. H. C. Brunton, L. R. M. Cocks, and S. L. Long, eds. Brachiopods past and present. Proceedings of the Millennium Brachiopod Congress. Systematics Association Special Volume Series 63. Taylor and Francis, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, A. A. 2004. The first finds of larval shells in Ordovician orthids. Doklady Earth Sciences 396:488–491.Google Scholar
Madison, A. A. 2009. Structure of the first-formed shell of the Middle Ordovician orthid-like brachiopods from the Leningrad region. Paleontological Journal 43:1469–1476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, A. A., and Kuzmina, T. V.. 2019a. Early Paleozoic brachiopod larva: true larva, not a juvenile. Invertebrate Zoology 16:41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, A. A., and Kuzmina, T. V.. 2019b. The tube-like structures on the juvenile shells of earliest strophomenides and billingsellides as evidence of their life cycles. Lethaia 53:91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malakhov, V. V., Bogomolova, E. V., Kuzmina, T. V., and Temereva, E. N.. 2019. Evolution of metazoan life cycles and the origin of pelagic larvae. Russian Journal of Developmental Biology 50:303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malchus, N. 2000a. Evolutionary significance of fossil larval shell characters: a case study from the Ostreoidea (Bivalvia: Pteriomorphia). Geological Society of London Special Publication 177:303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malchus, N. 2000b. Post-larval and larval shells of Juranomia Fürsich & Werner 1989, and Anomia Linnaeus 1758 (Anomiidae, Bivalvia). Palaontologische Zeitschrift 74:239–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, C. 1991. The development of the brachiopod Crania (Neocrania) anomala (OF Müller) and its phylogenetic significance. Acta Zoologica 72:7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, R. T. 1963. Ecology of the brachiopod Glottidia pyramidata. Ecology Monographs 33:187–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skovsted, C. B., Ushatinskaya, G. T., Holmer, L. E., Popov, L. E., and Kouchinsky, A.. 2015. Taxonomy, morphology and early ontogeny of Pelmanotreta nom. nov. from the Lower Cambrian of Siberia. GFF 137:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smirnova, T. N., Ushatinskaya, G. T., Zhegallo, E. A., and Panchenko, I. V.. 2015. Lingularia Biernat et Emig, 1993 from the Upper Jurassic of Western Siberia: larval and embryonic shells and shell microstructure. Paleontological Journal 49:125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimpson, W. 1860. A trip to Beaufort, North Carolina. American Journal of Science 39:442–445.Google Scholar
Stricker, S. A., and Reed, C. G.. 1985a. The ontogeny of shell secretion in Terebratalia transversa (Brachiopoda, Articulata) I. Development of the mantle. Journal of Morphology 183:233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stricker, S. A., and Reed, C. G.. 1985b. The ontogeny of shell secretion in Terebratalia transversa (Brachiopoda, Articulata) II. Formation of the protegulum and metamorphic shell. Journal of Morphology 183:251–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tapanila, L., and Holmer, L. E.. 2006. Endosymbiosis in Ordovician–Silurian corals and stromatoporoids: a new lingulid and its trace from eastern Canada. Journal of Paleontology 80:750–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ushatinskaya, G. T. 1997. New Middle and Late Cambrian lingulids and paterinids (Brachiopoda) from the north of the Siberian Platform. Paleontological Journal 31:489–497.Google Scholar
Ushatinskaya, G. T. 2016. Protegulum and brephic shell of the earliest organophosphatic brachiopods. Paleontological Journal 50:141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A. 1997. Shell structure. Pp. H267–H320 in Williams, A. et al. , Brachiopoda 1: Introduction. Part H of R. L. Kaesler, ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colo., and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Williams, A., and Holmer, L. E.. 1992. Ornamentation and shell structure of acrotretoid brachiopods. Palaeontology 35:657–692.Google Scholar
Williams, A., Mackay, S., and Cusack, M.. 1992. Structure of the organo-phosphatic shell of the brachiopod Discina. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 337:83–104.Google Scholar
Williams, A., Popov, L. E., Holmer, L. E., and Cusack, M.. 1998. The diversity and phylogeny of the paterinate brachiopods. Palaeontology 41:221–262.Google Scholar
Williams, A., Lüter, C., and Cusack, M.. 2001. The nature of siliceous mosaics forming the first shell of the brachiopod Discinisca. Journal of Structural Biology 134:25–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, A. D. 1963. The fauna of the Portrane Limestone. 1. The inarticulate brachiopods. Bulletin of the British Museum, Natural History (Geology Series) 8:221–254.Google Scholar
Wright, A. D., and Nõlvak, J.. 1997. Functional significance of the spines of the Ordovician lingulate brachiopod Acanthambonia. Palaeontology 40:113–119.Google Scholar
Yatsu, N. 1902. On the development of Lingula anatina. Journal of the College of Science, Imperial University 17:1–112.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., Popov, L. E., Holmer, L. E., and Zhang, Z.. 2018. Earliest ontogeny of Early Cambrian acrotretoid brachiopods—first evidence for metamorphosis and its implications. BMC Evolutionary Biology 18:42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed