Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:39:05.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mammal-like reptiles: spreading the word

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

John A. Ruben*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331

Extract

It is somewhat dismaying, if not surprising, that so many trained biologists know that dinosaurs may have been “hot-blooded,” yet are completely unaware of even the existence of the mammal-like reptiles, the Therapsida. The reasons for the dearth of widespread knowledge of the therapsids are probably fairly mundane: the mammal-like reptiles are less spectacular in appearance than dinosaurs, and good therapsid fossil localities are restricted primarily to the southern hemisphere. As a result, therapsids seldom become the subjects of museum displays or classroom student presentations. Moreover, biology textbooks, whether at the high school or college level, almost invariably devote more space for recounting the “dinosaur story” than to discussing the therapsid reptiles (1). Consequently, although application of biological systems data to the fossil record has become increasingly popular and useful in the last decade, many neontologists who might potentially make substantial contributions to our knowledge of therapsid biology remain oblivious to the significance of these animals. This is particularly unfortunate—therapsids are, of course, the direct predecessors of mammals, and, as such, the more we understand the mammal-like reptiles the more likely we are to understand the origins and functions of our own anatomical, physiological, and behavioral systems.

Type
Current Happenings
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1Boolootian, R. and Stiles, K. 1981. College Zoology. 803 pp. Macmillan Publishing Co.; New York.Google Scholar
2Romer, A. S. 1961. Synapsid evolution and dentition. Pp. 956. In: Int. Colloq. on the Evolution of Mammals. Kon. Vlaamse Acad. Wetensch. Lett. Sch. Kunsten Belgie, Brussels. Part 1.Google Scholar
3Boonstra, L. D. 1963. Early dichotomies in the therapsids. S. Afr. J. Sci. 59:176195.Google Scholar
4Fleischer, G. 1978. Evolutionary principles of the mammalian middle ear. Adv. in Anat., Embryol. and Cell Biol. 55(5):170.Google Scholar
5Allin, E. F. 1975. Evolution of the mammalian middle ear. J. Morphol. 147:403438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Crompton, A. W. and Parker, P. 1978. Evolution of the mammalian masticatory apparatus. Am. Sci. 66:192201.Google ScholarPubMed
7Olson, E. C. 1971. Vertebrate Paleozoology. 839 pp. John Wiley & Sons; New York.Google Scholar
8Robinson, P. L. 1972. Paleoclimatology and continental drift. Pp. 451476. In: Tarling, D. H. and Runcorn, S., eds. Implications of Continental Drift to the Earth Sciences. Vol. I. Academic Press; London & New York.Google Scholar
9Crompton, A. W. and Jenkins, F. A. Jr. 1979. Origin of mammals. Pp. 5973. In: Lillegraven, J. A., Kielan-Jaworowska, Z. and Clemens, W. A., eds. Mesozoic Mammals. Univ. Calif. Press; Berkeley, Calif.Google Scholar
10Feder, M. E. 1981. A cold look at paleophysiology. Paleobiology. 7:144148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Colbert, E. H. 1965. The Age of Reptiles. 228 pp. Norton & Co.; New York.Google Scholar
12Barghusen, H. R. 1973. The adductor jaw musculature of Dimetrodon (Reptilia, Pelycosauria). J. Paleontol. 47:823834.Google Scholar