Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T08:13:26.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Communicating about the end of life: The path of prognostic awareness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2025

Jacopo D’Andria Ursoleo
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
Alice Bottussi
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
Andrew S. Epstein
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Viviana Teresa Agosta
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
Fabrizio Monaco*
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
William E. Rosa
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
*
Corresponding author: Fabrizio Monaco; Email: monaco.fabrizio@hsr.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Editorial
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Patients with cancer are surviving longer, and therefore have more time both living as well as for end-of-life (EOL) planning (Bergenholtz et al. Reference Bergenholtz, Missel and Timm2020). Major concerns for dying patients relate to issues such as dealing with pain and other distressing symptoms, as well as the loss of autonomy, agency, and functional independence (Steinhauser et al. Reference Steinhauser, Christakis and Clipp2000). Lack of control over the future is another common cause of anxiety and related suffering (Jackson and Emanuel Reference Jackson, Emanuel and O’Malley2024). Consequently, accurate prognostic understanding can enhance informed shared decision-making, improve quality of life and mood, and give patients the time and opportunity to make longer-term decisions for themselves, and arrangements for family members and caregivers (Jackson and Emanuel Reference Jackson, Emanuel and O’Malley2024). Unfortunately, fewer than 20% of cancer patients reports accurate prognostic awareness (PA) over the course of their illness, highlighting the need for a better focus on communicating prognostic information early and effectively (Loučka et al. Reference Loučka, Vlčková and Tučková2021). Furthermore, due to the inherently challenging nature of these discussions, clinicians still find it difficult to engage in conversations about serious news, prognosis, goals of care, and dying and death (Hancock et al. Reference Hancock, Clayton and Parker2007; Schenker Reference Schenker2024; Smith and Longo Reference Smith and Longo2012). These hurdles can be more easily overcome by enhancing the skills and confidence of clinicians through effective communication strategies (Parry et al. Reference Parry, Land and Seymour2014).

The path to acceptance

In the face of advanced cancer, it is frequent for patients to oscillate between feelings of hopefulness, resignation, and realism (Avis et al. Reference Avis, Stroebe and Schut2021; Kübler Ross Reference Kübler Ross1969). At the EOL, hope and coping abilities are strongly interrelated: when facing the uncertain, holding hope fosters coping, and hope itself is, in a way, fostered by the underlying cognitive coping processes (Folkman Reference Folkman2010). Clinicians may believe that hope and the process of “personalizing the odds” (i.e., improving them in the light of personal or environmental attributes, existential beliefs, or on the basis of external information) could lead to patients’ being in a state of denial. Yet “unrealistic” hope (as deemed by clinicians) could still be considered an important part of the patient’s coping process (Folkman Reference Folkman2010). And, hope can take many forms – not just for a cure, but for other things, such as freedom from uncontrolled pain, more time, family time, and more. As such, clinicians should not only take advantage of patients’ hopes but also explore for what they hope, alongside showing empathy (Pollak et al. Reference Pollak, Arnold and Jeffreys2007) and slowly navigating the patient and their caregivers through the acknowledgement, recognition, and diversification of their hopes (Rosenberg et al. Reference Rosenberg, Arnold and Schenker2021). Carrying out iterative conversations over time allows the patient to achieve and sustain a deeper understanding of their condition, as well as to transition hope from unrealistic to realistic ones, which may be supported by newly acquired coping mechanisms (Folkman Reference Folkman2010; Jackson and Emanuel Reference Jackson, Emanuel and O’Malley2024). The clinicians’ aim is to guide the patient to reach the level of acceptance in adequate time for them to manage and prioritize the time they have left in a way that aligns with the patient’s values. Clinicians must also remember that for many patients, acceptance of dying may not truly occur early, consistently, or sometimes ever (Puri Reference Puri2023).

Prognostic awareness

Prognostic awareness (PA), defined as the capacity of the patient to develop both cognitive understanding of their condition and the ability to cope with it emotionally, may be one of the most important – albeit moving – targets to be addressed in the EOL setting (Jackson et al. Reference Jackson, Emanuel and O’Malley2024, Reference Jackson, Jacobsen and Greer2013).

However, for multifaceted reasons (e.g., hope, anxiety, a belief in miracles, or even the nature of the PA questions themselves) (Derry et al. Reference Derry, Maciejewski and Epstein2019b; Epstein et al. Reference Epstein, Knezevic and Romano2023; George et al. Reference George, Balboni and Maciejewski2020a; Smith and Longo Reference Smith and Longo2012), many patients with cancer exhibit an inaccurate comprehension of their prognosis and of the most likely trajectory of their illness (Epstein et al. Reference Epstein, Prigerson and O’Reilly2016; Jackson et al. Reference Jackson, Jacobsen and Greer2013). On the other hand, it is also well established that PA and – more generally – awareness of disease status are often achieved through participation in iterative discussions with health-care professionals (Epstein et al. Reference Epstein, Prigerson and O’Reilly2016; Finlayson et al. Reference Finlayson, Rosa and Mathew2024).

In this setting, the adoption of advanced communication techniques (Baile et al. Reference Baile, Buckman and Lenzi2000; Derry et al. Reference Derry, Epstein and Lichtenthal2019a; Epstein et al. Reference Epstein, Kakarala and Reyna2021; Pollak et al. Reference Pollak, Arnold and Jeffreys2007; van Vliet and Epstein Reference Van Vliet and Epstein2014) by clinicians should aim to progressively enhance the capacity of the patient to develop PA regarding their condition (Jackson et al. Reference Jackson, Emanuel and O’Malley2024, Reference Jackson, Jacobsen and Greer2013). The earlier and more frequently that these clinician–patient conversations occur, the more likely a patient’s PA is to improve, as is a subsequent acknowledgment of prognosis and a reduction in anxiety from a feeling of lack of control (George et al. Reference George, Maciejewski and Epstein2020b; Jackson et al. Reference Jackson, Emanuel and O’Malley2024).

The adoption of appropriate communication techniques (e.g., tailored, empathetic communication) is crucial to achieve an individualized and holistic EOL care while nurturing and fostering the development of PA (Finlayson et al. Reference Finlayson, Rosa and Mathew2024). Though strategies such as advance care planning (ACP) have not been consistently shown to improve patient coping strategies (Bergenholtz et al. Reference Bergenholtz, Missel and Timm2020; Korfage et al. Reference Korfage, Carreras and Arnfeldt Christensen2020) recent studies of a patient/caregiver dyadic approach have shown promising results (Gray et al. Reference Gray, Forst and Nipp2021; Liu et al. Reference Liu, Ho and Wang2024). Specialist input from palliative care may increase PA, and the early integration of palliative care interventions has been found to improve quality of life (Jackson et al. Reference Jackson, Emanuel and O’Malley2024), which may stem from palliative care’s holistic approach to all care domains (i.e., physical, psychological, spiritual, social) (Khayal and Barnato Reference Khayal and Barnato2022).

Similarly, clinicians need to strike a balance between establishing and strengthening a patient’s understanding of their condition and their ability to cope and adapt to news of a poor prognosis (Back et al. Reference Back, Arnold and Quill2003). Conversations should be framed to ask questions both about patients’ understanding of their illness and how they feel about it, such as: “What do you know about your condition?” with “When you think about what lies ahead, what are you most worried about?” (Jackson et al. Reference Jackson, Emanuel and O’Malley2024; van Vliet and Epstein Reference Van Vliet and Epstein2014). Table 1A features 2 sets of questions with the goal of best supporting patients while trying to cultivate PA.

Table 1. (A) Communication strategies for cultivating prognostic awareness. (B) Best practices on how to communicate with a patient about terminal illness. CPR: cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Building PA

Even when the clinician has clarified the nature of the cancer and limited treatment options available, patients may persist in overestimating their chances of survival. In such instances, it is imperative for the clinician to share in the hopes of the patient while actively supporting the patient to manage the important decisional milestones ahead. Clinicians should try to establish whether these beliefs are primarily due to a lack of clinical information or related to emotional or physical distress (Barnett Reference Barnett2006). Patients with terminal cancer are more likely to suffer from anxiety and depression if they were experiencing physical pain and were concerned about how these symptoms would affect their loss of autonomy and reliance on others (Barnett Reference Barnett2006). Consequently, clinicians need to take a patient’s physical discomfort into account alongside their psychological condition when assessing PA.

Depending on life expectancy, PA needs to be slowly developed to allow the patient time in coming to terms, as best as possible, with their condition. Rather than abruptly dispelling all unrealistic expectations with frank statements (e.g., “Miracles don’t happen”), the clinician needs to acknowledge and explore any such hopes with the patient empathically, allowing time for them to assimilate the information and reconcile it (Brenner et al. Reference Brenner, Greer and Jackson2022). Over time, this ultimately enables patients to trust their clinicians, feel heard and understood, and express themselves emotionally, all which may help them develop a better understanding of their condition (Yanwei et al. Reference Yanwei, Dongying and Zhuchen2017).

The clinician’s approach

Patients often report a lack of clinician sensitivity and/or empathy in how they discuss EOL (Bernacki and Block Reference Bernacki and Block2014; Parker et al. Reference Parker, Clayton and Hancock2007) while respect and empathy should be of the highest priority in all conversations (Jackson et al. Reference Jackson, Emanuel and O’Malley2024). Repeated and bidirectional conversations over time allow the patient and their caregivers to have the time needed to reframe their hopes and to acknowledge the terminal nature of their illness, while developing adequate coping skills and the ability to fully understand their condition (Jackson et al. Reference Jackson, Emanuel and O’Malley2024). In this scenario, ACP may prove beneficial by fostering the development of a trust-based therapeutic alliance and by supporting shared decision-making. Nevertheless, it is imperative for clinicians to note that this is – again – an iterative process, and one in which the patient’s expressed preferences may change along with both the course of the disease and the fluctuations in their understanding of their illness (Rosa et al. Reference Rosa, Izumi and Sullivan2023a). In such conversations, the manifestation of strong emotions is to be expected and should be acknowledged, as opposed to met with factual explanations, justifications, or avoidant behaviors (Rosa et al. Reference Rosa, Levoy and Doyon2023b). The timing and place of clinician/patient conversations should also be considered according to the needs of individual patients. While some patients will report a lack of privacy where the conversations take place, others may not want to hear a poor diagnosis when alone and prefer to receive news in the presence of a caregiver (Bergenholtz et al. Reference Bergenholtz, Missel and Timm2020). As such, an early part of the clinician/patient rapport should be documenting such information preferences and sharing them across involved care teams to enable more effective, person-centered later communication. This would involve asking questions such as: “Are you comfortable talking here?” or “Would you like a family member present when we have conversations?” from the first contact. Table 1B summarizes the main communicative aspects to be implemented by clinicians when informing a patient of the terminal nature of their illness.

As such, when approaching a clinical encounter with a patient affected by a life-limiting disease, the clinician should first consider and explore the patient’s cultural, spiritual, and social background and beliefs. By understanding the patient’s context, the clinician can better help the patient and respond to the patient’s and caregiver’s desire to discuss specific aspects of a serious illness. Each patient, at any moment in their life, may benefit from conversations focused on treatment and care options, developing a therapeutic alliance, or fostering connection and coping (Desai et al. Reference Desai, Klimek and Chow2018). Clinicians should ideally be able to adjust the course of the encounter and navigate these topics accordingly, ensuring a mutually beneficial and productive conversation. Adequate closure of the encounter is also crucial and requires providing space for questions, confirming mutual understanding, and planning future discussions to revisit important aspects of EOL care (Rosa et al. Reference Rosa, Levoy and Doyon2023b).

In conclusion, the goal of the clinician is to help the patient express their values and personhood while balancing their hopes with clinical realism. This process should be engendered with empathy and a seeking to understand who the patient is as a person, and what is most important to them so that clear goals and decisions can be established. Clinicians can create environments that also support patients to develop psychological and adaptive coping strategies as their PA changes over time. Timely disclosure of all possible outcomes, both positive and negative, constitutes an opportunity for patients to develop high levels of PA in the early stages of their illness, well before the EOL. Such a proactive approach enables patients to cope emotionally, make decisions, and address practical considerations over an extended timeframe.

Data availability statement

Further information is available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Kate Gralton for English language editing.

Author contributions

Jacopo D’Andria Ursoleo, M.D.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing – Original Draft and Writing – Review & Editing. Alice Bottussi, M.D.: Investigation, Data Curation and Writing – Original Draft.Andrew S. Epstein, M.D.: Investigation, Data Curation and Writing – Review & Editing. Viviana Teresa Agosta, M.D.: Investigation, Data Curation and Writing – Original Draft. Fabrizio Monaco, M.D.: Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing.William E. Rosa, PH.D., MBE, APRN: Supervision, Investigation an Writing – Review & Editing.

Fabrizio Monaco, M.D. andWilliam E. Rosa, PH.D., MBE, APRN share senior authorship.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests

William E. Rosa, PH.D., MBE, APRN is an associate editor of Palliative & Supportive Care journal. The other authors declare no competing interest.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

References

Avis, KA, Stroebe, M and Schut, H (2021) Stages of grief portrayed on the internet: A systematic analysis and critical appraisal. Frontiers in Psychology 12, . doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.772696CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Back, AL, Arnold, RM and Quill, TE (2003) Hope for the best, and prepare for the worst. Annals of Internal Medicine 138(5), 439443. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-138-5-200303040-00028CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baile, WF, Buckman, R, Lenzi, R, et al. (2000) SPIKES – a six-step protocol for delivering bad news: Application to the patient with cancer. The Oncologist 5(4), 302311. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.5-4-302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, MM (2006) Does it hurt to know the worst?–psychological morbidity, information preferences and understanding of prognosis in patients with advanced cancer. Psycho-Oncology 15(1), 4455. doi:10.1002/pon.921CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergenholtz, H, Missel, M and Timm, H (2020) Talking about death and dying in a hospital setting - a qualitative study of the wishes for end-of-life conversations from the perspective of patients and spouses. BMC Palliative Care 19(1), . doi:10.1186/s12904-020-00675-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernacki, RE and Block, SD (2014) Communication about serious illness care goals: A review and synthesis of best practices. JAMA Internal Medicine 174(12), 19942003. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brenner, K, Greer, JA, Jackson, V, et al. (2022) Development of a prognostic awareness impact scale for patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Palliative Medicine 25(3), 445454. doi:10.1089/jpm.2021.0238CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derry, HM, Epstein, AS, Lichtenthal, WG, et al. (2019a) Emotions in the room: Common emotional reactions to discussions of poor prognosis and tools to address them. Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy 19(8), 689696. doi:10.1080/14737140.2019.1651648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derry, HM, Maciejewski, PK, Epstein, AS, et al. (2019b) Associations between anxiety, poor prognosis, and accurate understanding of scan results among advanced cancer patients. Journal of Palliative Medicine 22(8), 961965. doi:10.1089/jpm.2018.0624CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desai, AV, Klimek, VM, Chow, K, et al. (2018) 1-2-3 Project: A quality improvement initiative to normalize and systematize palliative care for all patients with cancer in the outpatient clinic setting. Journal of Oncology Practice 14(12), e775e785. doi:10.1200/JOP.18.00346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, AS, Kakarala, SE, Reyna, VF, et al. (2021) Development of the Oncolo-GIST (‘Giving Information Strategically & Transparently’) Intervention Manual for Oncologist Skills Training in Advanced Cancer Prognostic Information Communication. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 62(1), . doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.11.023CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, AS, Knezevic, A, Romano, DR, et al. (2023) Patient portals to elicit essential patient-reported elements of communication supporting person-centered oncologic care: A pilot study of the PERSON approach. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics 7, . doi:10.1200/CCI.23.00125Google Scholar
Epstein, AS, Prigerson, HG, O’Reilly, EM, et al. (2016) Discussions of life expectancy and changes in illness understanding in patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 34(20), 23982403. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.63.6696CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finlayson, CS, Rosa, WE, Mathew, S, et al. (2024) Awareness of disease status among patients with cancer: An integrative review. Cancer Nursing 47(3), 189197. doi:10.1097/NCC.0000000000001170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folkman, S (2010) Stress, coping, and hope. Psycho-Oncology 19 (9), 901908. doi:10.1002/pon.1836CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, LS, Balboni, TA, Maciejewski, PK, et al. (2020a) “My doctor says the cancer is worse, but I believe in miracles”—When religious belief in miracles diminishes the impact of news of cancer progression on change in prognostic understanding. Cancer 126(4), 832839. doi:10.1002/cncr.32575CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, LS, Maciejewski, PK, Epstein, AS, et al. (2020b) Advanced cancer patients’ changes in accurate prognostic understanding and their psychological well-being. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 59(5), 983989. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.12.366CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, TF, Forst, D, Nipp, RD, et al. (2021) Prognostic awareness in caregivers of patients with incurable cancer. Journal of Palliative Medicine 24(4), 561569. doi:10.1089/jpm.2020.0236CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hancock, K, Clayton, JM, Parker, SM, et al. (2007) Truth-telling in discussing prognosis in advanced life-limiting illnesses: A systematic review. Palliative Medicine 21(6), 507517. doi:10.1177/0269216307080823CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, VA, Emanuel, L and O’Malley, PG (2024) Navigating and communicating about serious illness and end of life. The New England Journal of Medicine 390(1), 6369. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp2304436CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, VA, Jacobsen, J, Greer, JA, et al. (2013) The cultivation of prognostic awareness through the provision of early palliative care in the ambulatory setting: A communication guide. Journal of Palliative Medicine 16(8), 894900. doi:10.1089/jpm.2012.0547CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khayal, IS and Barnato, AE (2022) What is in the palliative care ‘syringe’? A systems perspective. Social Science & Medicine 305, . doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115069CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korfage, IJ, Carreras, G, Arnfeldt Christensen, CM, et al. (2020) Advance care planning in patients with advanced cancer: A 6-country, cluster-randomised clinical trial. PLoS Medicine 17(11), . doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kübler Ross, E (1969) On Death and Dying. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Liu, X, Ho, M-H, Wang, T, et al. (2024) Effectiveness of dyadic advance care planning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 67(6), e869e889. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.01.027CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loučka, M, Vlčková, K, Tučková, A, et al. (2021) Prognostic awareness in advanced cancer patients and their caregivers: A longitudinal cohort study. Psycho-Oncology 30(9), 14491456. doi:10.1002/pon.5704CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, SM, Clayton, JM, Hancock, K, et al. (2007) A systematic review of prognostic/end-of-life communication with adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness: Patient/caregiver preferences for the content, style, and timing of information. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 34(1), 8193. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.09.035CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parry, R, Land, V and Seymour, J (2014) How to communicate with patients about future illness progression and end of life: A systematic review. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care 4(4), 331341. doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000649CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollak, KI, Arnold, RM, Jeffreys, AS, et al. (2007) Oncologist communication about emotion during visits with patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 25(36), 57485752. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.12.4180CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puri, S (2023) As a doctor, I know being ready to die is an illusion. The New York Times .Google Scholar
Rosa, WE, Izumi, S, Sullivan, DR, et al. (2023a) Advance care planning in serious illness: A narrative review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 65 (1), e63e78. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.08.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosa, WE, Levoy, K, Doyon, K, et al. (2023b) Integrating evidence-based communication principles into routine cancer care. Supportive Care in Cancer 31(10), . doi:10.1007/s00520-023-08020-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, A, Arnold, RM and Schenker, Y (2021) Holding hope for patients with serious illness. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association 326 (13), 12591260. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.14802CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schenker, Y (2024) Talking about dying. JAMA Internal Medicine 184(1), 1112. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.5843CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, TJ and Longo, DL (2012) Talking with patients about dying. The New England Journal of Medicine 367(17), 16511652. doi:10.1056/NEJMe1211160CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinhauser, KE, Christakis, NA, Clipp, EC, et al. (2000) Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA 284(19), 24762482. doi:10.1001/jama.284.19.2476CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Vliet, LM and Epstein, AS (2014) Current state of the art and science of patient-clinician communication in progressive disease: Patients’ need to know and need to feel known. Journal of Clinical Oncology 32(31), 34743478. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.56.0425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yanwei, L, Dongying, L, Zhuchen, Y, et al. (2017) A double-edged sword: Should stage IV non-small cell lung cancer patients be informed of their cancer diagnosis? European Journal of Cancer Care 26(6), . doi:10.1111/ecc.12665CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. (A) Communication strategies for cultivating prognostic awareness. (B) Best practices on how to communicate with a patient about terminal illness. CPR: cardiopulmonary resuscitation