Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:45:35.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An iron-haematein stain

With remarks on the Giemsa stain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Harald Seidelin
Affiliation:
(From the Lister Institute, Zoological Department.)

Extract

For general purposes, especially in haematological work, the Giemsa method, based on the Romanowsky principle, is certainly the most satisfactory stain for Protozoa. For certain structures, however, and in general as a control of the Giemsa stain, it is always necessary to have at one's disposal another method which will give particularly clear pictures of the nuclear elements (see e.g. Minchin, 1909). Of the different methods which are employed for this object the iron-haematoxylin stain is probably the most valuable and the most frequently used. There are, however, several circumstances which are unfavourable to its use as a universal stain. Its principal disadvantage is, that a differentiation is essential: the preparation is first deeply over-stained and the colour is afterwards extracted to the degree which is deemed convenient in each particular case. This extraction is always somewhat irregular, so that the observation, especially of intra-corpuscular parasites, is sometimes made very difficult, and it is not often possible to obtain in a single specimen a satisfactory stain of all the different elements. This difficulty is enhanced by the fact, that the red blood-corpuscles generally retain a deep grey, or almost black, colour. Further, a rather serious drawback is that in sections where greater masses of blood, and particularly blood-clots, are present, it is almost impossible to distinguish either intra- or extra-corpuscular parasites; to make such masses of blood transparent it is necessary to differentiate so much, that the nuclei are also decolourized. A certain inconvenience is also experienced because of the long duration of the staining process, at least 30 hours when the original Heidenhain's method (1896) is adhered to; and although the more recent modifications, especially that of Rosenbusch (1908), have to a great extent overcome this difficulty, they still suffer from the two other disadvantages referred to.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1911

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Giemsa, G. (1910). Ueber die Färbung von Schnitten mittelst Azur-Eosin. Deutsche med. Wochenschr. No. 12, p. 550.Google Scholar
Giemsa, G.Zur Färbung von Feuchtpräparaten und Schnitten mit der Azureosin-methode. Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. u. Parasitenk. Abt. 1, Orig. Vol. liv. p. 489.Google Scholar
Hansen, Fr. C. C. (1898). Eine zuverlässige Bindegewebsfärbung. Anat. Anz. Vol. xv. p. 151.Google Scholar
Heidenhain, M. (1896). Noch einmal über die Darstellung der Centralkörper etc. Zeitschr. f. wissenschaftl. Mikr. Vol. xiii. p. 186.Google Scholar
Leishman, W. B. (1904). A method of producing chromatin-staining in sections. Journ. of Hygiene, Vol. iv. p. 434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minchin, E. A. (1909). The structure of Trypanosoma lewisi in relation to Microscopical Technique. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci. Vol. liii. p. 755.Google Scholar
Rosenbusch, F. (1908). [Verhandl. d. deutschen tropenmedizinischen Gesellschaft.] Beihefte z. Arch.f. Schiffs- u. Tropen-Hygiene, Vol. xii. p. 277.Google Scholar
Weigert, K. (1907). Eine kleine Verbesserung der Haematoxylin—van Gieson— Methode. Zeitschr. f. wissenschaftl. Mik. Vol. xxi. p. 1.Google Scholar