Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:23:32.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biology, morphology and anatomy of aphidophagous syrphid larvae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Madan Lal Bhatia
Madan Lal Bhatia
Affiliation:
From the Molteno Institute of Biology and Parasitology, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The paper deals with the biology, morphology and anatomy of seven species of syrphid larvae viz. Syrphus luniger Meig., S. balteatus De Greer, S. ribesii Linne, Catabomba pyrastri Linne, Sphaerophoria flavicauda Zett., Sph. scripta Linne, and Platychirus scutatus Meig.

The habitat, mode of progression, aphidophagous habits and characteristic coloration are described for each species.

It is shown that the larvae of all the above species, like larvae of other cyclorrhaphous Diptera, definitely pass through three stages separated by two moults. The mode of dehiscence of the puparium is described briefly.

Each of the species, except Catabomba pyrastri, has three generations in the breeding season which lasts from May to October. Platychirus scutatus hibernates only in the larval stage, but the other species may be found in both the larval and pupal stages during the winter.

The larvae of all the above species, except Syrphus balteatus, are commonly parasitized by ichneumonid larvae.

The morphology of the egg, the three larval stages and the puparium of S. luniger is described in detail.

The characters common to the third stage larvae of all the species dealt with are summarized and short descriptions of the third stage larvae and puparia of the individual species are given. The general appearance of the living larvae and details of the buccopharyngeal armature, spiracles and puparia of each of the species is represented in figures.

In connexion with the pupae a number of new structures are described and it is suggested that some of them are concerned with the formation of the characteristic shape of the puparium and with the dehiscence of the puparium.

Internal pupal spiracles are present in all the species dealt with, but external pupal spiracles are present only in Platychirus scutatus.

The anatomy of P. scutatus is described and figured, an account being given of all the structures except the musculature of the body wall. Study of the anatomy affords evidence as to the carnivorous mode of life of the larvae and also indicates that the larvae have evolved from aquatic forms.

The comparative morphology of the Syrphinae is discussed with respect to the relationship of the Syrphinae to other Aschiza and to the cyclorrhaphous Diptera.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , April 1939 , pp. 78 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldrich, J. M. (1905). A catalogue of North American Diptera. Smithson. misc. Coll. 46, see p. 363.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, E. N. (1900). Catabomba pyrastri bred from lepidopterous pupae. Ent. mon. Mag. 36, 244.Google Scholar
Burtt, E. T. (1937). On the corpora allata of dipterous insects. Proc. roy. Soc. B, 124, 13.Google Scholar
De Meijere, J. C. H. (1900). Ueber die Larve von Lonchoptera. Zool. Jb. 14, 87.Google Scholar
Folsom, J. W. (1909). The insect pests of clover and alfalfa. Bull. Ill. agric. Exp. Sta. 134, 147.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, G. (1935). A hormone causing pupation in the blow-fly Calliphora erythro-cephala. Proc. roy. Soc. B, 118, 1.Google Scholar
Ganin, M. (1876). Materials for a knowledge of the post-embryonal development of Insects. Abs. in Amer. Nat. (1877), 11, 423.Google Scholar
Henneguy, F. (1906). Les modes d'insertion des muscles sur la cuticule chez les arthropodes. C.R. Assoc. Anat. 8th Réunion (Bordeaux), p. 133.Google Scholar
Hewitt, C. G. (1914). The House Fly: Musca domestica. Camb. Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Keilin, D. (1911). Recherches sur la morphologie larvaire des Diptères du genre Phora. Bull. Sci. Fr. Belg. 7e série, 44, 29.Google Scholar
Keilin, D. (1915). Recherches sur les larves Diptères Cyclorrhaphes. Bull. Sci. Fr. Belg. 7e série, 49, 15.Google Scholar
Keilin, D. (1917). Recherches sur les Anthomyides à larves carnivores. Parasitology, 9, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keilin, D. (1919). On the life history and larval anatomy of Melinda cognata Meigen (Diptera Calliphorinae) parasitic in the snail Helicella (Heliomanes) virgata De Costa, with an account of the other Diptera living upon Molluses. Parasitology, 11, 430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keilin, D. (1921). On the calcium carbonate and calcospherites in malpighian tubes and the fat body of dipterous larvae and the ecdysial elimination of these products of excretion. Quart. J. micr. Sci. 65, 611.Google Scholar
Keilin, D. (1924). On the life history of Neottiophilum praeustum (Meigen 1826) (Diptera-acalypterae) parasitic on birds, with some general considerations on the problem of myiasis in plants, animals and man. Parasitology, 16, 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krüger, F. (1926). Biologie und Morphologie einiger Syrphidenlarven. Z. wiss. Biol. 6, 83.Google Scholar
Künckel d'Herculais, J. (1875). Recherches sur l'organisation et le développement des volucelles insectes Diptères de la famille des Syrphides. Paris: Imprimerie de E. Martinet.Google Scholar
Lowne, B. T. (1890–1895). The Blow-fly (Calliphora erythrocephala), 1 and 2. London.Google Scholar
Lubback, J. (1862). On the development of Lonchoptera. Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. Ser. 3, 1, 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundbeck, (1916). Diptera Danica, 5. Copenhagen: G.E.C. Gad.Google Scholar
Metcalf, C. L. (1913). Syrphidae of Ohio. Bull. Ohio State Univ. 17, 1.Google Scholar
Metcalf, C. L. (1916). Syrphidae of Maine. Bull. Me agric. Exp. Sta. 253, 193.Google Scholar
Metcalf, C. L. (1917). Syrphidae of Maine, Second Report. Bull. Me agric. Exp. Sta. 263, 154.Google Scholar
Mik, J. (1898). Dipterologische Miscellen. Wien. Ent. Ztg, 17, see pp. 169–71.Google Scholar
Pantel, J. (1898). Caractères extérieurs, la biologie et l'anatomie d'une larve parasite du groupe des Tachinaires. Cellule, 15, 7.Google Scholar
Pantel, J. (1913). Recherches sur les Diptères à larves entomobies. Cellule, 29, 7.Google Scholar
Perez, C. (1910). Recherches histologiques sur la métamorphose des Muscides. Arch. Zool. exp. gén. Série 4, 1.Google Scholar
Rothschild, J. (editor) (1878). Les Insectes. Musée Entomologique, Histoire Naturelle. Iconographique des Insects. Publiée par une Réunion d'Entomologistes Français et Étrangers, 3.Google Scholar
Saunders, W. W. (1858–1861). On Elaphomyia, a genus of remarkable insects of the Order Diptera. Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 5, 413.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E. (1924). Anatomy and metamorphosis of the apple maggot Rhagoletis pomonella Walsh. J. agric. Res. 28, 1.Google Scholar
Thompson, W.R. (1920). Recherches sur les Diptères parasites (les larves des Sarcophagidae) Bull. Biol. 54, 313.Google Scholar
Verrall, G. H. (1901). British Flies: Syrphidae, 8. London: Gurney and Jackson.Google Scholar
Vine, H. C. A. (1894). Predacious and parasitic enemies of aphids. J. Micr. nat. Sci. 4, 337.Google Scholar
Wandolleck, B. (1898). Die Fühler der cycloraphen Dipterenlarven. Zool. Anz. 21, 283.Google Scholar
Weismann, A. (1864). Die nachembryonale Entwicklung der Musciden nach Beobachtungen an Musca vomitoria und Sarcophaga carnaria. Z. wiss. Zool., 14, 187.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1934). The physiology of ecdysis in Rhodnius prolexus (Hemiptera). II. Factors controlling moulting and metamorphosis. Quart. J. micr. Sci., 77, 191.Google Scholar