Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:52:30.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Description of Embadomonas n.spp. from Blatta orientalis, Rana temporaria, Bufo vulgaris, Salamandra maculosa; with a Note upon the “Cyst” of Trichomonas batrachorum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Ann Bishop
Ann Bishop
Affiliation:
From the Molteno Institute for Research in Parasitology, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Embadomonas blattae a new species from the hind gut of Blatta orientalis is described. The flagellate measures 6–9 μ × 5–7 μ and the cysts 5–6 μ × 4–5 μ.

2. An Embadomonas from Rana temporaria, Bufo vulgaris, and Salamandra maculosa has been cultivated and described. I propose to call it E. dobelli. It differs from other known species of this flagellate in shape, and in absence of a definite karyosome. The flagella and their basal granules are duplicated first at division, and a centrodesmose is formed between one of each pair of basal granules. The cytostome disappears and new ones are reorganised after nuclear division is completed. Definite chromosomes were never seen. Double individuals and occasionally individuals with three nuclei were seen.

3. Cysts of E. dobelli were obtained in culture. They are uninucleate. A karyosome is formed; the peripheral chromatin of the nucleus stains intensely and becomes elongated. The lip of the cytostome can often be distinguished, and sometimes the glagella. These cysts are the same as those described originally by Dobell as cysts of Eutrichomastix batrachorum and Trichomonas batrachorum.

4. Cysts of Trichomonas batrachorum have never been found in faeces or in cultures.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , July 1931 , pp. 286 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexeieff, A. (1911). Sur la nature des formations dites kystes de Trichomonas intestinalis. Comp. Rend. Soc. Biol. 71, 296.Google Scholar
Bishop, A. (1931). The morphology and methods of division of Trichomonas. Parasitol. 23, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broughton-Alcock, W. and Thomson, J. G. (1922). Embadomonas intestinalis (Wenyon and O'Connor 1917). Description of the cysts and free forms found in a case in England. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med.; Sect. Trop. Dis. Parasitol. 15, 8.Google Scholar
Brug, S. L. (1917). Trichomonascysten. Geneesk. Tijdschr. Nederl. Ind. 57, 347.Google Scholar
Brug, S. L. (1922). Quelques observations sur les protozoaires, parasites intestinaux de l'homme et des animaux. Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 15, 132.Google Scholar
Collier, J. and Boeck, W. C. (1926). The morphology and cultivation of Embadomonas cuniculi n.sp. J. Parasitol. Urbana, 12, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobell, C. C. (1909). Researches on the Intestinal Protozoa of Frogs and Toads. Quart. J. Micr. Sci. 53, 201.Google Scholar
Dobell, C. [C.] and O'Connor, F. W. (1921). The Intestinal Protozoa of Man. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faust, E. C. (1923). Notes on Embadomonas sinensis, Faust and Wassell, 1921. J. Parasitol. Urbana, 9, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
da Fonseca, O. O. R. (1920). On some parasitic Flagellata. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 12, 48.Google Scholar
Galli-Valerio, B. (1900). Notes de Parasitologie. Centralb. Bakt. I, 27, 307.Google Scholar
Galli-Valerio, B. (1903). Notes de Parasitologie. Centralb. Bakt. 35, 81.Google Scholar
Grassé, P. P. (1926). Contribution à l'étude des flagellés parasites. Arch. Zool. exp. gén. 65, 345.Google Scholar
Hegner, R. W. and Schumaker, E. (1928). Some intestinal flagellates from the chimpanzee, three-toed sloth, sheep, and guinea-pig. J. Parasitol. Urbana, 15, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogue, M. J. (1921). Waskia intestinalis; its cultivation and cyst formation. J. Amer. Med. Ass. 77, 112.Google Scholar
Hogue, M. J. (1922). A study of Trichomonas hominis, its cultivation, its inoculation into animals and its staining reactions to vital dyes. Johns Hopkins Hosp. Bull. 33, 437.Google Scholar
Jepps, M. W. (1923). Observations on Human Intestinal Protozoa in Malaya. Parasitol. 15, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuczynski, M. H. (1914). Untersuchungen an Trichomonaden. Arch. Protistenk. 33, 119.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, D. L. (1911). On some more protozoan parasites from Trichoptera. Parasitol. 4, 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackinnon, D. L. (1915). Studies on Parasitic Protozoa. III. Notes on the flagellate Embadomonas. Quart. J. Micr. Sci. 61, 105.Google Scholar
Mayer, M. (1920). Zur Cystenbildung von Trichomonas muris. Arch. Protistenk. 40, 290.Google Scholar
Pringault, E. (1920). Étude biologique de Trichomonas intestinalis. Bull. Soc. Path. exotique, 13, 800.Google Scholar
Wenrich, D. H. (1921). The structure and division of Trichomonas muris (Hartmann). J. Morph. 36, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenyon, C. M. (1907). Observations on the Protozoa in the Intestine of Mice. Arch. Protistenk. Suppl. I, 169.Google Scholar
Wenyon, C. M. (1926). Protozoology. London.Google Scholar
Wenyon, C. M. and O'Connor, F. W. (1917). Human intestinal Protozoa in the Near East. London.Google Scholar