Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:18:20.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The development of Hymenolepis diminuta in primary and secondary infections in mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

C. Adrian Hopkins
Affiliation:
Wellcome Laboratories for Experimental Parasitology, University of Glasgow, Bearsden, Glasgow
G. Subramanian
Affiliation:
Wellcome Laboratories for Experimental Parasitology, University of Glasgow, Bearsden, Glasgow
Helen Stallard
Affiliation:
Wellcome Laboratories for Experimental Parasitology, University of Glasgow, Bearsden, Glasgow

Extract

Over 90% of Hymenolepis diminuta cysts administered by stomach tube become established in CFLP, and Porton strains of mice. The rate of growth of single worm infections in terms of dry weight and length was determined. The rate of growth of H. diminuta in mice is slower than in rats even in worms only a few mm long. In most mice growth ceases abruptly on day 10±1 day when the worm is 4–30 cm long, destrobilation usually occurs leaving a scolex and neck often 0·5–2 mm in length. Destrobilated worms can survive for at least 47 days but little if any regrowth occurs unless the worms are surgically transplanted into rats or previously uninfected mice. Normal growth appears to be resumed within hours in both recipient hosts. The cause of destrobilation is probably not physiological; position of establishment and forward migration during growth of the worm in mice is similar to that in a rat. Destrobilation occurs well before the worm fills the small intestine lengthwise. Strong evidence of an immunological response being involved is given by the fate of a secondary infection given 22 and 28 days after the primary. Lower % recoveries were recorded in secondary infections killed 6–9 days later, and the worms were severely stunted. The various lines of evidence are discussed and it is concluded no reasonable doubt exists that H. diminuta is rejected by CFLP and Porton mice as a result of an immunological response.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Braåten, T., & Hopkins, C. A., (1969). The migration of H. diminuta in the rat's intestine during normal development and following surgical transplantation. Parasitology 59, 891905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crompton, D. W. T., & Whitfield, P. J., (1968). A hypothesis to account for the anterior migrations of adult Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda) and Moniliformis dubius (Acanthocephala) in the intestine of rats. Parasitology 58, 227–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodchild, C. G., & Moore, T. L., (1963). Development of Hymenolepis diminuta (Rudolphi, 1819) in mice made obese by aurothioglucose. Journal of Parasitology 49, 398402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, C. A., (1970 a). Diurnal movement of Hymenolepis diminuta in the rat. Parasitology 60, 255–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, C. A., (1970 b). Location-specificity in adult tapeworms with special reference to Hymenolepis diminuta. Journal of Parasitology 56, 561–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Jarrett, E. E. E., Jarrett, W. F. H., & Urquhart, G. M., (1968). Quantitative studies on the kinetics of establishment and expulsion of intestinal nematode populations in susceptible and immune hosts. Nippostrongylus brasiliensis in the rat. Parasitology 58, 625–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Read, C. P., (1955). Intestinal physiology and the host-parasite relationship. In Some Physiological Aspects and Consequences of Parasitism, ed. Cole, W. H.New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press. (Quoted from Goodchild & Moore 1963.)Google Scholar
Read, C. P., & Voge, M., (1954). The size attained by Hymenolepis diminuta in different host species. Journal of Parasitology 40, 88–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turton, J. A., (1968). The growth and development of Hymenolepis diminuta and H. nana in vitro and in vivo. Ph.D. thesis, University of Glasgow, Scotland.Google Scholar
Weinmann, C. J., (1966). Immunity mechanisms in cestode infections. In Biology of Parasites, (ed. Soulsby, E. J. L.), 301–16. Philadelphia: Academic Press.Google Scholar