Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:19:51.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The epidemiology of Schistosoma spindale Montgomery, 1906 in cattle in Sri Lanka

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. De Bont ,
J. Vercruysse ,
D. Van Aken ,
V. R. Southgate ,
D. Rollinson  and
C. Moncrieff
J. De Bont
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, State University of Gent, Casinoplein 24, 9000 Gent, Belgium
J. Vercruysse
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, State University of Gent, Casinoplein 24, 9000 Gent, Belgium
D. Van Aken
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, State University of Gent, Casinoplein 24, 9000 Gent, Belgium
V. R. Southgate
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, South Kensington, London SW7 5BD, UK
D. Rollinson
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, South Kensington, London SW7 5BD, UK
C. Moncrieff
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, South Kensington, London SW7 5BD, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

During 1988 and 1989, the mesenteric veins of 901 cattle were examined for the presence of schistosomes at the Kandy slaughterhouse (Sri Lanka). The overall prevalence of infection was 31·2%. Animals younger than 2 years were less infected (21·3%) than those older than 5 years (47·9%). Based on the number of paired worms counted, three intensities of infection were recognized: low (1–20 pairs), moderate (21–100 pairs) and heavy (> 100 pairs). Intensities increased with the age of the animals but remained low (average 10 worm pairs). The worm burden increased by approximately 20% for each step in age group. The number of miracidia/100 g faeces was measured in 85 animals of all age groups and intensities of infection; 77% of the samples contained less than 100 miracidia. Miracidia counts decreased with age; moderately and heavily infected animals in each age group had the highest and the lowest counts, respectively. This may be due to a host immune response. The results raise questions on the sensitivity of faecal egg counts as a diagnostic method for visceral schistosomiasis in cattle.

Keywords

Schistosoma spindaleepidemiologyresistancecattle
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 102 , Issue 2 , April 1991 , pp. 237 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bushara, H. O., Majid, A. A., Saad, A. M., Hussein, M. F., Taylor, M. G., Dargie, J. D., Marshall, T. F. DE C. & Nelson, G. S. (1980). Observations on cattle schistosomiasis in the Sudan, a study in comparative medicine. II. The experimental demonstration of naturally acquired resistance to Schistosoma bovis. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 29, 442–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushara, H. O., Majid, B. Y. A., Majid, A. A., Khitma, I., Gameel, A. A., Karib, E. A., Hussein, M. F. & Taylor, M. G. (1983 a). Observations on cattle schistosomiasis in the Sudan, a study in comparative medicine. V. The effect of praziquantel therapy on naturally acquired resistance to Schistosoma bovis. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 32, 1370–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushara, H. O., Gameel, A. A., Majid, B. Y. A., Khitma, I., Haroun, E. M., Karib, E. A., Hussein, M. F. & Taylor, M. G. (1983 b). Observations on cattle schistosomiasis in the Sudan, a study in comparative medicine. VI. Demonstration of resistance to Schistosoma bovis challenge after a single exposure to normal cercariae or to transplanted adult worms. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 32, 1375–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, M. (1935). Report of the Government Veterinary Surgeon. Ceylon Administrative Reports 1934, IV: H6–H7.Google Scholar
De Bont, J., Van Aken, D. & Vercruysse, J. (1990). Survey on smallholder dairy farms in the Mid-Country, Sri Lanka. Tropicultura (in the Press).Google Scholar
De Bont, J., Van Aken, D., Vercruysse, J., Fransen, J., Southgate, V. R. & Rollinson, D. (1989). The prevalence and pathology of Schistosoma nasale Rao, 1933 in cattle in Sri Lanka. Parasitology 98, 197–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deelder, A. M., De Jonge, N., Boerman, O. C., Fillie, Y. E., Hilberath, G. W., Rotmans, J. P., Gerritse, M. J. & Lex Schut, D. W. O. (1989). Sensitive determination of circulating anodic antigen in Schistosoma mansoni infected individuals by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using monoclonal antibodies. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 40, 268–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Jonge, N., Gryseels, B., Hilberath, G. W., Polderman, A. M. & Deelder, A. M. (1988). Detection of circulating anodic antigen by ELISA for seroepidemiology of schistosomiasis mansoni. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 82, 591–4.Google Scholar
Dissanayake, A. S. & Jayasuriya, D. J. C. (1959). Some parasites hitherto unreported from pigs and cattle in Ceylon. Ceylon Veterinary Journal 7, 30–3.Google Scholar
Fransen, J., De Bont, J., Vercruysse, J., Van Aken, D., Southgate, V. R. & Rollinson, D. (1990). Pathology of natural infections of Schistosoma spindale Montgomery, 1906 in cattle. Journal of Comparative Pathology (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Islam, K. S. (1975). Schistosomiasis in domestic ruminants in Bangladesh. Tropical Animal Health and Production 7, 244.Google Scholar
Kassuku, A., Christensen, N. O., Monrad, J., Nansen, P. & Knudsen, J. (1986). Epidemiological studies on Schistosoma bovis in Iringa Region, Tanzania. Acta Tropica 43, 153–63.Google Scholar
Kulkarni, H. V., Rao, S. R. & Chaudhari, P. G. (1954). Unusual outbreaks of schistosomiasis in bovines due to Schistosoma spindale associated with heavy mortality in Bombay State. Bombay Veterinary College Magazine 4, 3–15. (Abstracted in Helminthological Abstracts 23, 373.)Google Scholar
Lawrence, J. A. (1973). Schistosoma mattheei in cattle: the host–parasite relationship. Research in Veterinary Science 14, 400–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, J. A. (1977). Schistosoma mattheei in the ox: observations on the parasite. Veterinary Parasitology 3, 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, J. A. (1978). Bovine schistosomiasis in Southern Africa. Helminthological Abstracts 47, 261–70.Google Scholar
McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J. A. (1983). Generalized Linear Models. New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Majid, A. A., Marshall, T. F. DE C., Hussein, M. F., Bushara, H. O., Taylor, M. G., Nelson, G. S. & Dargie, J. D. (1980). Observations on cattle schistosomiasis in the Sudan, a study in comparative medicine. I. Epizootiological observations on Schistosoma bovis in the White Nile Province. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 29, 435–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medley, G. & Anderson, R. M. (1985). Density-dependent fecundity of Schistosoma mansoni infections in man. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 79, 532–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, R. W., Lane, P. W., Ainsley Bicknell, A. E., Digby, P. G. N., Harding, S. A., Leech, P. K., Simpson, H. R., Todd, A. D. & Verrier, P. J. (1987). Genstat 5 Reference Manual. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Saad, A. M., Hussein, M. F., Dargie, J. D., Taylor, M. G. & Nelson, G. S. (1980). Schistosoma bovis in calves: the development and clinical pathology of primary infections. Research in Veterinary Science 28, 105–11.Google Scholar
Upatoom, N., HÖrchner, F. & Leidl, K. (1988). Therapy against Schistosoma spindale infestation in cattle and buffalo. Veterinary Medical Review 59, 171–4.Google Scholar
Wilkins, H. A. (1987). The epidemiology of schistosome infections in man. In The Biology of Schistosomes: from Genes to Latrines (ed. Rollinson, D. & Simpson, A. J. G.), pp 379–97. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar