Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T11:06:57.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nested patterns in parasite component communities of a marine fish along its latitudinal range on the Pacific coast of South America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2005

M. T. GONZÁLEZ  and
R. POULIN
M. T. GONZÁLEZ
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología y Evolución, Universidad Austral de Chile, Casilla 567-Valdivia, Chile
R. POULIN
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A major goal of community ecology is to identify and explain non-random patterns of species composition. To date, the search for nested patterns in parasite component communities of the same fish host species has not been attempted, despite the fact that this higher hierarchical level is more relevant to nestedness analyses. The aims of this study are first, to determine the structure of component communities – considering ectoparasites and endoparasites separately – of a marine fish (Sebastes capensis) with an extended geographical distribution along the southeastern Pacific and, second, to explain these patterns by taking into account the extrinsic factors associated with the distribution of this host fish. From April to September 2003 and from April to August 2004, 537 fish were captured from different latitudes along the southeastern Pacific. The component communities of both ectoparasites and endoparasites of this fish host showed significant nested subset patterns. However, the type of nestedness pattern differed between ectoparasites and endoparasites. Ectoparasite component communities of S. capensis show higher species richness between latitude 30°S and 40°S, whereas endoparasite component communities show higher species richness between 40°S and 52°S. A nested pattern in ectoparasite component communities of S. capensis result from the gradual loss of some ectoparasites species southward and northward of the central part of their latitudinal distribution, which can be explained by the interaction of S. capensis with other host fish species from the central Chilean coast. Nestedness in endoparasite component communities of S. capensis is produced by the gains and losses of species toward the south of their latitudinal distribution, caused by changes in their prey-items (intermediate hosts) along their latitudinal distributional range.

Keywords

nestednesscomponent communitieslatitudinal rangesoutheastern PacificSebastes capensisbiogeographical areas
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 131 , Issue 4 , October 2005 , pp. 569 - 577
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atmar, W. and Patterson, B. D. ( 1993). The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologia 96, 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atmar, W. and Patterson, B. D. ( 1995). The nestedness temperature calculator: a visual basic program, including 294 presence-absence matrices. AICS Research, Inc., University Park, NM and The Field Museum, Chicago, Il. http:/www.aics-research.com/nestedness/tempcalc.html.
Brattström, H. and Johanssen, A. ( 1983). Ecological and regional zoogeography of the marine benthic fauna of Chile. Sarsia 68, 289–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, J. C. ( 1974). Marine Zoogeography. McGraw-Hill Co., New York.
Bush, A. O., Lafferty, K. D., Lotz, J. M. and Shostak, A. W. ( 1997). Parasitology meets ecology in its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology 83, 575–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvete, C., Blanco-Aguiar, J. A., Virgós, E., Cabeza-Díaz, S. and Villafuerte, R. ( 2004). Spatial variation in helminth community structure in the red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa L): effects of definitive host density. Parasitology 129, 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvajal, J., González, L. and George-Nascimento, M. ( 1998). Native sea lice (Copepoda: Caligidae) infestation of salmonids reared in netpen systems in southern Chile. Aquaculture 166, 241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvajal, J. and Sepúlveda, F. ( 2002). Udonella australis n. sp. (Monogenea), an epibiont on sea-lice from native fish off southern Chile. Systematic Parasitology 52, 67–74.Google Scholar
Eschmeyer, E. ( 1998). Catalog of Fishes. California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco.
Fernández, J. and Villalba, C. ( 1986). Contribución al conocimiento del género Caligus Müller, 1785 (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida) en Chile. Gayana Zoologia 50, 37–62.Google Scholar
González, M. T. and Acuña, E. ( 1998). Metazoan parasites of Sebastes capensis from northern Chile. Journal of Parasitology 84, 753–757.Google Scholar
Gotelli, N. J. and Rohde, K. ( 2002). Co-ocurrence of ectoparasites of marine fishes: a null model analyses. Ecology Letters 5, 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guégan, J. F. and Hugueny, B. A. ( 1994). Nested parasite species subset patterns in tropical fish host as major determinant of parasite infracommunity structure. Oecologia 100, 184–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hugueny, B. and Guégan, J. F. ( 1997). Community nestedness and the proper way to assess statistical significance by Monte-Carlo tests: some comments on Worthen and Rohde's (1996) paper. Oikos 80, 572–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, I. ( 1985). Revisión de las especies chilenas de Sebastes (Osteichthyes, Scorpaeniformes, Scorpaenidae). Estudios Oceanologicos 4, 21–75.Google Scholar
Lancellotti, D. A. and Vásquez, J. A. ( 1999). Biogeographical patterns of benthic macroinvertebrates in the Southeastern Pacific littoral. Journal of Biogeography 26, 1001–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLain, D. K. and Pratt, A. E. ( 1999). Nestedness of coral reef fish across a set of fringing reefs. Oikos 85, 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, C. A., Duarte, W. E. and Zamorano, J. H. ( 1979). Variación latitudinal del número de especies de peces en el sublitoral rocoso: una explicación ecológica. Archivos de Biología y Medicina Experimental (Chile) 12, 169–178.Google Scholar
Morand, S., Rohde, K. and Hayward, C. ( 2002). Order in ectoparasite communities of marine fish is explained by epidemiological processes. Parasitology 124 (Suppl.), S57–S63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojeda, P., Labra, F. and Muñoz, A. ( 2000). Patrones biogeográficos de los peces litorales de Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 73, 625–641.Google Scholar
Oliva, M. E. and González, M. T. ( 2004). Metazoan parasites of Sebastes capensis from two localities in northern Chile as tools for stock identification. Journal of Fish Biology 64, 170–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, B. D. and Atmar, W. ( 1986). Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagos. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 28, 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, B. D., and Brown, J. H. ( 1991). Regionally nested patterns of species composition in granivorous rodent assemblages. Journal of Biogeography 18, 395–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pequeño, G. ( 2000). Delimitaciones y relaciones biogeográficas de los peces del Pacífico Suroriental. Estudios Oceanológicos 19, 53–76.Google Scholar
Poulin, R. ( 1996). Richness, nestedness, and randomness in parasite infracommunity structure. Oecologia 105, 545–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R. ( 1997). Parasite Faunas of Freshwater Fish: The Relationship Between Richness and the Specificity of Parasites. International Journal for Parasitology 27, 1091–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R. ( 2001). Interactions between species and the structure of helminth communities. Parasitology 122 (Suppl.), S3–S11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R. and Guégan, J. F. ( 2000). Nestedness, anti-nestedness, and the relationship between prevalence and intensity in ectoparasite assemblages of marine fish: a spatial model of species coexistence. International Journal for Parasitology 30, 1147–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R. and Morand, S. ( 1999). Geographical distances and the similarity among parasite communities of conspecific host populations. Parasitology 119, 369–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R. and Valtonen, E. T. ( 2001). Nested assemblages resulting from host size variation: the case of endoparasite communities in fish hosts. International Journal for Parasitology 31, 1194–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R. and Valtonen, E. T. ( 2002). The predictability of helminth community structure in space: a comparison of fish populations from adjacent lakes. International Journal for Parasitology 32, 1235–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, M. A. and Kruse, G. O. ( 1982). The Collection and Preservation of Animal Parasites. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Retamal, M. A. ( 1981). Catálogo ilustrado de los crustáceos decápodos de Chile. Gayana Zoología 44, 1–110.Google Scholar
Rohde, K., Hayward, C. and Heap, M. ( 1995). Aspects of the ecology of metazoan ectoparasites of marine fishes. International Journal for Parasitology 25, 945–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K., Worthen, W. B., Heap, M., Hugueny, B. and Guégan, J. F. ( 1998). Nestedness in assemblages of metazoan ecto-and endoparasites of marine fish. International Journal for Parasitology 28, 543–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timi, J. T. and Poulin, R. ( 2003). Parasite community structure within and across host populations of a marine pelagic fish: how repeatable is it? International Journal for Parasitology 33, 1353–1362.Google Scholar
Valdovinos, C., Navarrete, S. and Marquet, P. ( 2003). Mollusk species diversity in the Southeastern Pacific: why are there more species towards the pole? Ecography 26, 139–144.Google Scholar
Valtonen, E. T., Pulkkinen, K., Poulin, R. and Julkunen, M. ( 2001). The structure of parasite component communities in brackish fishes of the northeastern Baltic Sea. Parasitology 122, 471–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidal-Martínez, V. and Poulin, R. ( 2003). Spatial and temporal repeatability in parasite community structure of tropical fish hosts. Parasitology 127, 387–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthern, W. D. ( 1996). Community composition and nested-subset analyses: basic descriptors for community ecology. Oikos 76, 417–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthen, W. B. and Rohde, K. ( 1996). Nested subset analyses of colonization-dominated communities: metazoan ectoparasites of marine fishes. Oikos 75, 471–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthen, W. B., Carswell, M. L. and Kelly, K. A. ( 1996). Nested subset structure of larval mycophagous fly assemblages: nestedness in a non-island system. Oecologia 107, 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D. H. and Reeves, J. H. ( 1992). On the meaning and measurement of nestedness of species assemblages. Oecologia 92, 416–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D. H., Patterson, B. D., Mikkelson, G. M., Cutler, A. and Atmar, W. ( 1998). A comparative analysis of nested subset patterns of species composition. Oecologia 113, 1–20.Google Scholar
Zar, J. ( 1999). Biostatistical Analysis, 4th Edn. Prentice-Hall Inc., NJ, USA.