Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T23:21:04.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The response to desiccation of eggs of Trichostrongylus colubriformis and Haemonchus contortus (Nematoda: Trichostrongylidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

P. J. Waller
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Health, C.S.I.R.O., McMaster Laboratory, Glebe, N.S.W., Australia
A. D. Donald
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Health, C.S.I.R.O., McMaster Laboratory, Glebe, N.S.W., Australia

Extract

Eggs of T. colubriformis and H. contortus were separated from faeces. Their response to desiccation was compared by subjecting them, at different stages of development, to a range of relative humidities. Many eggs of T. colubriformis at all stages of development survived desiccation at relative humidities down to 75%, whereas the only H. contortus eggs to survive were those exposed to the highest relative humidity and which had already undergone a substantial amount of development before desiccation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, F. L. & Levine, N. D. (1968). Effect of desiccation on survival of the free-living stages of Trichostrongylus colubriformis. Journal of Parasitology 54, 117–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berberian, J. F. & Mizelle, J. D. (1957). Developmental studies on Haemonchus contortus Rudolphi (1803). American Midland Naturalist 57, 421–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, A. D. (1968). Ecology of the free-living stages of nematode parasites of sheep. Australian Veterinary Journal 44, 139–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Ellenby, C. (1968 a). Desiccation survival in the plant parasitic nematodes, Heterodera rostochiensis Wollenweber and Ditylenchus dipsaci (Kühn) Filipjev. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 169, 203–13.Google Scholar
Ellenby, C. (1968 b). Desiccation survival of the infective larva of Haemonchus contortus. Journal of Experimental Biology 49, 469–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mönnig, H. O. (1930). Studies on the bionomics of the free-living stages of Trichostrongylus spp. and other parasitic nematodes. Report on Veterinary Research Department of Agriculture, Union of South Africa 16, 175–98.Google Scholar
Rose, J. H. (1963). Observations on the free-living stages of the stomach worm Haemonchus contortus. Parasitology 53, 469–81.Google Scholar
Silverman, P. H. & Campbell, J. A. (1959). Studies on parasitic worms of sheep in Scotland. I. Embryonic and larval development of Haemonchus contortus at constant conditions. Parasitology 49, 2338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shorb, D. A. (1944). Factors influencing embryonation and survival of eggs of the stomach worm Haemonchus contortus. Journal of Agricultural Research 69, 279–87.Google Scholar
Veglia, F. (1915). The anatomy and life history of the Haemonchus contortus (Rud.). Report on Veterinary Research Department of Agriculture, Union of South Africa 3, 349500.Google Scholar
Winston, P. W. & Bates, D. H. (1960). Saturated solutions for the control of humidity in biological research. Ecology 41, 232–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitlock, H. V. (1959). The recovery and identification of the first stage larvae of sheep nematodes. Australian Veterinary Journal 35, 310–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar