Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T09:18:01.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anoplocephalid tapeworms in mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei) inhabiting the Volcanoes National Park, Rwanda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2023

Barbora Červená
Affiliation:
Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic Department of Pathology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
Tereza Prokopová
Affiliation:
Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic Department of Pathology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
Rita Maria Cameira
Affiliation:
Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic Department of Pathology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
Barbora Pafčo
Affiliation:
Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
Peter Samaš
Affiliation:
Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
Dušan Romportl
Affiliation:
Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic Department of Physical Geography and Geoecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Carine Uwamahoro
Affiliation:
Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund, Musanze, Rwanda
Jean Bosco Noheri
Affiliation:
Gorilla Doctors (MGVP, Inc.), Davis, CA, USA
Adrien Emile Ntwari
Affiliation:
Gorilla Doctors (MGVP, Inc.), Davis, CA, USA
Méthode Bahizi
Affiliation:
Gorilla Doctors (MGVP, Inc.), Davis, CA, USA
Gaspard Nzayisenga
Affiliation:
Gorilla Doctors (MGVP, Inc.), Davis, CA, USA
Julius Nziza
Affiliation:
Gorilla Doctors (MGVP, Inc.), Davis, CA, USA
Kirsten Gilardi
Affiliation:
Gorilla Doctors (MGVP, Inc.), Davis, CA, USA
Winnie Eckardt
Affiliation:
Gorilla Doctors (MGVP, Inc.), Davis, CA, USA
Felix Ndagijimana
Affiliation:
Rwanda Development Board, Kigali, Rwanda
Antoine Mudakikwa
Affiliation:
Rwanda Development Board, Kigali, Rwanda
Richard Muvunyi
Affiliation:
Rwanda Development Board, Kigali, Rwanda
Prosper Uwingeli
Affiliation:
Rwanda Development Board, Kigali, Rwanda
Michael Cranfield
Affiliation:
Gorilla Doctors (MGVP, Inc.), Davis, CA, USA
Jan Šlapeta
Affiliation:
Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Klára Judita Petrželková
Affiliation:
Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic Liberec Zoo, Liberec, Czech Republic
David Modrý*
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources/CINeZ, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
*
Corresponding author: David Modrý; Email: modrydav@sci.muni.cz

Abstract

Cestodes of the family Anoplocephalidae parasitize a wide range of usually herbivorous hosts including e.g. rodents, ungulates, primates, elephants and hyraxes. While in some hosts, the epidemiology of the infection is well studied, information is lacking in others. In this study of mountain gorillas in the Virunga Massif, an extensive sample set comprising adult cestodes collected via necropsies, proglottids shed in feces, and finally, fecal samples from both night nests and identified individuals were analysed. Anoplocephala gorillae was the dominant cestode species detected in night nest samples and individually known gorillas, of which only 1 individual hosted a Bertiella sp. It was shown that the 2 species can be distinguished through microscopy based on egg morphology and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for diagnostics of both species were provided. Sequences of mitochondrial (cox 1) and nuclear (ITS1, 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA) markers were used to evaluate the phylogenetic position of the 2 cestodes detected in mountain gorillas. Both types of fecal samples, from night nests and from identified individuals, provided comparable information about the prevalence of anoplocephalid cestodes, although the analysis of samples collected from identified gorilla individuals showed significant intra-individual fluctuation of A. gorillae egg shedding within a short period. Therefore, multiple samples should be examined to obtain reliable data for wildlife health management programmes, especially when application of anthelmintic treatment is considered. However, while A. gorillae is apparently a common symbiont of mountain gorillas, it does not seem to impair the health of its host.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Cestodes of the family Anoplocephalidae which typically use mites as their intermediate hosts parasitize various vertebrates, typically herbivorous, across the globe (Beveridge, Reference Beveridge, Khalil, Jones and Bray1994; Deplazes et al., Reference Deplazes, Eckert, Mathis, von Samson-Himmelstjerna and Zahner2016). The genus Anoplocephala Blanchard, 1848 is known from a wide range of hosts including perissodactyls, primates, elephants and hyraxes, which possibly suggests a long association between hosts and parasites (Beveridge, Reference Beveridge, Khalil, Jones and Bray1994). On the other hand, there is considerable evidence for multiple host switching in the taxa parasitizing rodents and transfer among primates, dermopterans and marsupials has been recorded for the members of the genus Bertiella Stiles & Hassall, 1902 and Progamotaenia Nybelin, 1917 (Beveridge, Reference Beveridge1985a, Reference Beveridge, Khalil, Jones and Bray1994; Haukisalmi et al., Reference Haukisalmi, Wickström, Henttonen, Hantula and Gubány2004, Reference Haukisalmi, Hardman, Hardman, Rausch and Henttonen2008, Reference Haukisalmi, Henttonen, Hardman, Hardman, Laakkonen, Murueva, Niemimaa, Shulunov and Vapalahti2009; Wickström et al., Reference Wickström, Haukisalmi, Varis, Hantula and Henttonen2005; Hardman et al., Reference Hardman, Haukisalmi and Beveridge2012). These cestodes are characterized mainly by an absent rostellum and unarmed suckers, a condition that is probably plesiomorphic and the 4 subfamilies could be a polyphyletic assemblage of taxa (Beveridge, Reference Beveridge, Khalil, Jones and Bray1994) as already confirmed by phylogeny of partial cox1 (Sharma et al., Reference Sharma, Lyngdoh, Roy and Tandon2016).

Besides a range of studies on anoplocephalids in Arctic rodents (Haukisalmi et al., Reference Haukisalmi, Wickström, Hantula and Henttonen2001, Reference Haukisalmi, Wickström, Henttonen, Hantula and Gubány2004, Reference Haukisalmi, Hardman, Hardman, Rausch and Henttonen2008, Reference Haukisalmi, Henttonen, Hardman, Hardman, Laakkonen, Murueva, Niemimaa, Shulunov and Vapalahti2009; Wickström et al., Reference Wickström, Haukisalmi, Varis, Hantula and Henttonen2005) and Australian marsupials (Beveridge, Reference Beveridge1985a, Reference Beveridge1985b; Beveridge et al., Reference Beveridge, Shamsi, Hu, Chilton and and Gasser2007; Hardman et al., Reference Hardman, Haukisalmi and Beveridge2012), Anoplocephala perfoliata infections have been well studied in horses due to growing incidence of resulting disease (Meana et al., Reference Meana, Pato, Martín, Mateos, Pérez-García and Luzón2005; Back et al., Reference Back, Nyman and Osterman Lind2013). Great apes, including humans, and other primates from South America, Africa and South-East Asia are most commonly hosts of Bertiella, Anoplocephala and Moniezia Blanchard, 1891, but occasional infections by Mathevotaenia Akhumian, 1946 and Thysanotaenia Beddard, 1911 have also been reported (Beveridge, Reference Beveridge, Khalil, Jones and Bray1994; Sapp and Bradbury, Reference Sapp and Bradbury2020). Occurrence of anoplocephalids in free-ranging non-human primate populations is usually not associated with clinical disease (Doležalová, Reference Doležalová, Modrý, Pafčo, Petrželková and Hasegawa2018; Sapp and Bradbury, Reference Sapp and Bradbury2020), although gastrointestinal disturbances, diarrhoea, abdominal pain, anorexia, weight loss, vomit and constipation are reported from humans (Sapp and Bradbury, Reference Sapp and Bradbury2020).

In 1927, Nybelin described Anoplocephala gorillae based on material collected from a necropsied mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringei beringei) in the region of Mount Sabiniyo in Virunga range (Nybelin, Reference Nybelin1927). Ever since, the parasite has been reported in all parasite surveys conducted in both the Bwindi and Virunga mountain gorilla populations, based mainly on presence of typical anoplocephalid eggs and/or detection of proglottids (Redmond, Reference Redmond and Fossey1983; Ashford et al., Reference Ashford, Reid and Butynski1990, Reference Ashford, Lawson, Butynski and Reid1996; Hastings et al., Reference Hastings, Gibbons and Williams1992; Sleeman et al., Reference Sleeman, Meader, Mudakikwa, Foster and Patton2000; Mudakikwa et al., Reference Mudakikwa, Cranfield, Sleeman, Eilenberger, Robbins, Sicotte and Stewart2001; Kalema-Zikusoka et al., Reference Kalema-Zikusoka, Rothman and Fox2005; Rothman et al., Reference Rothman, Pell and Bowman2008; Petrželková et al., Reference Petrželková, Uwamahoro, Pafčo, Červená, Samaš, Mudakikwa, Muvunyi, Uwingeli, Gilardi, Nziza, Noheri, Eckardt, Ndagijimana, Ssebide, Okwirokello, Nizeyimana, Syaluha, Nzayisenga, Girón, Bahizi, Ntwari, Lukusa, Tumushime, Mangura, Mapilanga, Kalonji, Aruho, Stryková, Tehlarová, Cameira, Lowenstine, Šlapeta, Romportl, Ferrari, Cranfield and Modrý2021). Certain aspects of the ecology/epidemiology of cestode infection were studied in the Bwindi population by Ashford et al. (Reference Ashford, Lawson, Butynski and Reid1996). However, only Doležalová et al. (Reference Doležalová, Vallo, Petrželková, Foitová, Nurcahyo, Mudakikwa, Hashimoto, Jirků, Lukeš, Scholz and Modrý2015) attempted to characterize mountain gorilla cestodes using DNA markers supporting identification at the species-level. The sequences of nuclear (ITS2 and 28S rRNA) and mitochondrial (cox1 and nad1) genes obtained from anoplocephalid eggs from mountain gorilla feces clustered with primate Bertiella spp., and thus opened a question about spectrum of anoplocephalid cestodes occurring in mountain gorillas (Doležalová et al., Reference Doležalová, Vallo, Petrželková, Foitová, Nurcahyo, Mudakikwa, Hashimoto, Jirků, Lukeš, Scholz and Modrý2015).

Our overall research has aimed to better understand the degree to which parasite burdens contribute to morbidity and mortality in this endangered great ape and patterns of helminth infections have been analysed across the mountain gorilla population (Petrželková et al., Reference Petrželková, Uwamahoro, Pafčo, Červená, Samaš, Mudakikwa, Muvunyi, Uwingeli, Gilardi, Nziza, Noheri, Eckardt, Ndagijimana, Ssebide, Okwirokello, Nizeyimana, Syaluha, Nzayisenga, Girón, Bahizi, Ntwari, Lukusa, Tumushime, Mangura, Mapilanga, Kalonji, Aruho, Stryková, Tehlarová, Cameira, Lowenstine, Šlapeta, Romportl, Ferrari, Cranfield and Modrý2021, Reference Petrželková, Samaš, Romportl, Uwamahoro, Červená, Pafčo, Prokopová, Cameira, Granjon, Shapiro, Bahizi, Nziza, Noheri, Syaluha, Eckardt, Ndagijimana, Šlapeta, Modrý, Gilardi, Muvunyi, Uwingeli, Mudakikwa, Mapilanga, Kalonji, Hickey and Cranfield2022). While strongylid egg counts significantly differed among individual sectors and vegetation types, no clear patterns were found for cestode infections (Petrželková et al., Reference Petrželková, Uwamahoro, Pafčo, Červená, Samaš, Mudakikwa, Muvunyi, Uwingeli, Gilardi, Nziza, Noheri, Eckardt, Ndagijimana, Ssebide, Okwirokello, Nizeyimana, Syaluha, Nzayisenga, Girón, Bahizi, Ntwari, Lukusa, Tumushime, Mangura, Mapilanga, Kalonji, Aruho, Stryková, Tehlarová, Cameira, Lowenstine, Šlapeta, Romportl, Ferrari, Cranfield and Modrý2021, Reference Petrželková, Samaš, Romportl, Uwamahoro, Červená, Pafčo, Prokopová, Cameira, Granjon, Shapiro, Bahizi, Nziza, Noheri, Syaluha, Eckardt, Ndagijimana, Šlapeta, Modrý, Gilardi, Muvunyi, Uwingeli, Mudakikwa, Mapilanga, Kalonji, Hickey and Cranfield2022). Therefore, the present study aimed to provide a deeper insight into selected aspects of the tapeworm infections in a sub-population of G. beringei beringei in the Volcanoes National Park (VoNP), the Rwandan part of the Virunga Massif. The specific aims of the study were: (i) improvement of diagnostic tools for detection of anoplocephalid cestodes in mountain gorillas, (ii) determining and characterizing the anoplocephalid cestodes in mountain gorillas based on adults collected from necropsies and proglottids and eggs shed in feces, including morphological features and genetic diversity, and, (iii) describing the epidemiology of the infections by analysing the prevalence and variation in egg shedding within and among the mountain gorilla individuals and groups in the VoNP, Rwanda.

Materials and methods

Study site

The study was conducted in the VoNP, the Rwandan section of a complex of protected areas spanning the borders of Rwanda, Uganda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) called the Virunga Massif (451 km2). The habitat in the VoNP has been characterized in detail elsewhere (Owiunji et al., Reference Owiunji, Nkuutu, Kujirakwinja, Liengola, Plumptre, Nsanzurwimo, Fawcett, Gray and Mcneilage2005; Hickey et al., Reference Hickey, Granjon, Vigilant, Eckardt, Gilardi, Cranfield, Musana, Masozera, Babaasa, Ruzigandekwe and Robbins2019; Petrželková et al., Reference Petrželková, Uwamahoro, Pafčo, Červená, Samaš, Mudakikwa, Muvunyi, Uwingeli, Gilardi, Nziza, Noheri, Eckardt, Ndagijimana, Ssebide, Okwirokello, Nizeyimana, Syaluha, Nzayisenga, Girón, Bahizi, Ntwari, Lukusa, Tumushime, Mangura, Mapilanga, Kalonji, Aruho, Stryková, Tehlarová, Cameira, Lowenstine, Šlapeta, Romportl, Ferrari, Cranfield and Modrý2021), but briefly, the altitude, ranging between 1600 and 4500 m, determines various vegetation types (Fig. 1) and gorillas normally range in zones where temperatures drop to 0°C. The park's climate consists of 2 rainy (March–May and September–November) and 2 dry seasons (December–February and June–August). The VoNP area is surrounded by a dense human population of up to 1000 people km−2 (Bush et al., Reference Bush, Ikirezi, Daconto, Gray and Fawcett2010), whereas the mountain gorilla density in the VoNP is estimated to be 1.7 individuals per km2 (Hickey et al., Reference Hickey, Granjon, Vigilant, Eckardt, Gilardi, Cranfield, Musana, Masozera, Babaasa, Ruzigandekwe and Robbins2019).

Fecal sample collection

Nineteen habituated mountain gorilla groups ranging in the VoNP with an estimated 278 individually known gorillas were targeted in 2018–2019. The location, demography, and behaviour of these groups are monitored on a daily basis by the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund (DFGF) and Rwanda Development Board (RDB) park rangers, while the health of the gorillas is regularly monitored by Gorilla Doctors (GD) veterinarians and daily by park personnel (DFGF and RDB) trained by the GD. GD also provide in situ veterinary care to mountain gorillas. Data on group size (number of individuals), age and sex of individually sampled gorillas were obtained from RDB and DFGF.

In 2018 and 2019, fresh fecal samples were collected from habituated mountain gorilla groups by trained staff of RDB, DFGF and GD across the VoNP in 4 sampling periods: in the dry seasons (December–February and June–August), and in the wet seasons (March–May and September–November). Two types of fecal samples were collected: night nest samples from the previous night and samples from identified individuals obtained during group visits. The methodology of nest and individual sample collection is described in detail elsewhere (Petrželková et al., Reference Petrželková, Uwamahoro, Pafčo, Červená, Samaš, Mudakikwa, Muvunyi, Uwingeli, Gilardi, Nziza, Noheri, Eckardt, Ndagijimana, Ssebide, Okwirokello, Nizeyimana, Syaluha, Nzayisenga, Girón, Bahizi, Ntwari, Lukusa, Tumushime, Mangura, Mapilanga, Kalonji, Aruho, Stryková, Tehlarová, Cameira, Lowenstine, Šlapeta, Romportl, Ferrari, Cranfield and Modrý2021; Sinayitutse et al., Reference Sinayitutse, Modry, Slapeta, Nyiramana, Mudakikwa, Muvunyi and Eckardt2021). All samples were placed into plastic bags, labelled with date and time of collection and group name. The samples were also labelled with name of the individual (when available) and sex/age class (dominant silverback/silverback >12 years; blackback 8–12 years; adult >8 years; subadult/juvenile 3.5–8 years; infant 0–3.5 years) (Sinayitutse et al., Reference Sinayitutse, Modry, Slapeta, Nyiramana, Mudakikwa, Muvunyi and Eckardt2021).

Fecal samples (n = 1500) were immediately transported to the GD field laboratory in Musanze, stored in a refrigerator, and examined within a maximum of 48 hours after defecation. Any unusual appearance of the feces, such as diarrhoea or presence of tapeworm proglottids (Fig. 2A) was recorded. Proglottids found in feces were collected and stored in 96% pure ethanol. Three sub-samples of feces were taken: (i) 1 g of feces was preserved in 96% ethanol for DNA analyses (ii) a total of 3 g of feces were preserved in formalin for storage and potential further microscopic examination; and (iii) the last aliquot was immediately processed by Mini FLOTAC© (see below).

Figure 2. Anoplocephalid cestodes collected from mountain gorillas. (A) Individual proglottids recovered from mountain gorilla feces. Scale 1 cm. (B) Adults inside the mountain gorilla small intestine as recovered at necropsy.

Coproscopic analyses and parasite quantification

Anoplocephalid tapeworm eggs in fresh feces were quantified in situ by Mini-FLOTAC© as described in Petrželková et al. (Reference Petrželková, Uwamahoro, Pafčo, Červená, Samaš, Mudakikwa, Muvunyi, Uwingeli, Gilardi, Nziza, Noheri, Eckardt, Ndagijimana, Ssebide, Okwirokello, Nizeyimana, Syaluha, Nzayisenga, Girón, Bahizi, Ntwari, Lukusa, Tumushime, Mangura, Mapilanga, Kalonji, Aruho, Stryková, Tehlarová, Cameira, Lowenstine, Šlapeta, Romportl, Ferrari, Cranfield and Modrý2021). The egg counts expressed as eggs per gram of feces (EPG) were recorded. When a sample was evaluated as cestode-negative by Mini-FLOTAC©, the formalin-preserved aliquot was re-examined by a sedimentation-based technique (Doležalová et al., Reference Doležalová, Pafčo, Modrý, Jirků-Pomajbíková, Modrý, Pafčo, Petrželková and Hasegawa2018) providing the quantification as eggs per gram of fecal sediment (EPGS). The EPGS is not equal to the EPG as the fecal sediment obtained after sieving of the feces does not contain the bigger, usually fibrous particles. In our experience, EPGS is about 1.7 times higher than EPG (data not shown). We took the weight of fecal sediment during the Mini-FLOTAC© examination, which enabled us to calculate EPGS also for the samples examined in situ by Mini-FLOTAC©.

Egg morphology analyses

Formalin-preserved aliquots of samples identified as A. gorillae or Bertiella sp. positive based on DNA barcoding (see below) were used for detailed egg morphology investigation. Modified Sheather's sugar flotation technique (Jirků-Pomajbíková and Hůzová, Reference Jirků-Pomajbíková, Hůzová, Modrý, Pafčo, Petrželková and Hasegawa2018) was used to concentrate the eggs. Egg measurements and microphotographs were taken using an Olympus BX53 microscope equipped with Nomarski differential contrast, an Olympus DP73 digital camera and CellSense Dimension software (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Maximum egg and oncosphere dimensions (Fig. 3) and type of pyriform apparatus (PA) classified using a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 refers to Bertiella-like PA (brush like, forming thin filaments), whereas 10 refers to the Anoplocephala-like PA (bifurcated), were recorded. To evaluate the morphological differences between Anoplocephala and Bertiella eggs statistically, we used a general linear mixed model with normal distribution (hereafter: LMM).

Figure 3. Depicting of how the measurements were taken from anoplocephalid eggs. As many anoplocephalid eggs are asymmetrical, egg and oncospherical diagonals (dashed lines) were introduced as maximal dimensions used for morphology investigation.

Adult cestodes collection

As a part of veterinary surveillance, all deceased animals that are recovered from the forest are necropsied by GD veterinarians following standardized protocols. Various tissue and other biological samples (e.g., ingesta, feces, urine) are collected, including adult parasites observed anywhere in the carcass (Fig. 2B). For purposes of this study, a collection of 53 adult cestodes (obtained from 5 gorillas between 2015 and 2018) from the GD biobank was available. Adult anoplocephalid cestodes were collected mainly from the small intestine, but also from the caecum and colon. The specimens were subsequently preserved in 96% ethanol or 10% formalin. The morphology of adults was studied using a stereomicroscope Olympus SZ51 and a microscope Olympus BX53 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The specimens were determined using taxonomic keys and available publications (Nybelin, Reference Nybelin1927; Stunkard, Reference Stunkard1962; Beveridge, Reference Beveridge, Khalil, Jones and Bray1994; Sapp and Bradbury, Reference Sapp and Bradbury2020; Servián et al., Reference Servián, Zonta, Cociancic, Falcone, Ruybal, Capasso and Navone2020).

DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from feces, from proglottids obtained from gorilla feces and from adult cestodes, all stored in ethanol. For fecal samples, aliquots of 0.5 g of feces were put in a thermoblock at 37°C overnight for ethanol evaporation. Then, the DNA was extracted using the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), with a single modification to the manufacturer's instructions: the incubation steps were prolonged to 30 min. For the proglottids and adult cestodes, approximately 1 cm of proglottid tissue was minced and the total genomic DNA was extracted by NucleoSpin Tissue Kit (Macherey–Nagel, Düren, Germany). The tissue was lysed in Proteinase K overnight and the DNA was eluted to 100 μL of elution buffer. An adult of A. perfoliata from a horse from the Czech Republic was used as comparative material. This tapeworm was obtained during a standard necropsy performed at the Department of Pathology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno and preserved in 96% ethanol until further processing.

Nuclear ribosomal and mitochondrial DNA amplification

DNA extracted from adult cestodes was used for amplification of partial small ribosomal subunit gene (18S rDNA) and the region spanning the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1), 5.8S rRNA (5.8S) gene, and internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2). Partial 18S rDNA and complete ITS1 were amplified in all collected proglottids. A subset of proglottids obtained from feces and adult tapeworms was used for amplification of partial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene (cox1) and gene for large ribosomal subunit (28S rDNA). Detailed information on primers, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reaction composition and cycling conditions is provided in supplementary files, Table ST1. All PCR products were separated in 1% agarose gel with Midori Green (NIPPON Genetics EUROPE, Germany) and visualized on an UV illuminator. The PCR products were purified using Gel/PCR DNA Fragments Kit (Geneaid, New Taipei City, Taiwan) either directly or from bands cut from the gel and sent for commercial Sanger sequencing (Macrogen Europe B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands).

PCR assays for detection of anoplocephalid tapeworms

The nested PCR protocol described by Drogemuller et al. (Reference Drogemuller, Beelitz, Pfister, Schnieder and von Samson-Himmelstjerna2004) for A. perfoliata was tested using the DNA extracted from 2 adult gorilla tapeworms and 2 proglottids from feces as the source of template DNA. The external primers S18 (F) and L3 T (R) amplify the whole ITS1, 5.8S and ITS2 region, while the internal primers AP-ITS2-2F and AP-ITS2-3R target ITS2 only. The PCR reaction composition and cycling conditions are specified in supplementary material (Table ST1). When a band of corresponding size and Sanger sequencing confirmed a successful DNA amplification from adult cestodes, a set of 10 samples of DNA extracted from fecal samples with various anoplocephalid cestode EPG scores (>1000 EPG, n = 4; <100 EPG, n = 6) was used to test applicability of the assay on fecal DNA. All amplicons were sequenced to confirm the specificity of the assay.

While testing this PCR assay, 1 sample did not produce any band, despite having a high EPG value. Using less specific primers targeting the ITS1 region (McLennan et al., Reference McLennan, Hasegawa, Bardi and Huffman2017) (Table ST1), we obtained a 300 bp amplicon sequence that revealed presence of a Bertiella sp. in this sample (see details in the Results section, Chapter ‘Bertiella sp. detected in one mountain gorilla individual’). Using newly obtained Bertiella and Anoplocephala sequences and sequences of Anoplocephala and Bertiella spp. available in GenBank, Bertiella-specific primers were designed in Geneious Prime v.2021.0.1 (https://www.geneious.com). The PCR assay was optimized, and its specificity tested by using the DNA from Anoplocephala proglottids and from Anoplocephala-positive and Bertiella-positive fecal samples (Table ST2).

A subset of cestode-negative samples as revealed by Mini-FLOTAC© examination was examined by both PCR assays and sedimentation method (samples listed in supplementary material Table ST2) to compare the sensitivity of both diagnostic approaches.

Sequences and phylogenetic analyses

All sequences obtained were checked for quality and trimmed manually using Geneious Prime v.2021.0.1 (https://www.geneious.com). The identity of sequences was validated using the BLAST software (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool; Altschul et al., Reference Altschul, Gish, Miller, Myers and Lipman1990). The alignments were performed by Clustal Omega implemented in Geneious Prime and the same software was used for calculation of pairwise sequence distances. For the phylogenetic analyses, sequences of available anoplocephalid tapeworms (18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, ITS1, cox1) were downloaded from GenBank and aligned with our sequences (Supplementary file SF5). The maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees were calculated by IQ-TREE (Trifinopoulos et al., Reference Trifinopoulos, Nguyen, von Haeseler and Minh2016). The most suitable model was chosen by ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al., Reference Kalyaanamoorthy, Minh, Wong, von Haeseler and Jermiin2017) implemented in IQ-TREE based on the highest Bayesian information criterion scores and weights. The tree topology was tested by 1000 replicates of ultrafast bootstrap (Minh et al., Reference Minh, Nguyen and von Haeseler2013) and Shimodaira–Hasegawa (SH)-like approximate likelihood ratio test (Anisimova et al., Reference Anisimova, Gil, Dufayard, Dessimoz and Gascuel2011). The trees were visualized using the software iTOL v6 (Letunic and Bork, Reference Letunic and Bork2021).

Results

Proglottids and adult cestodes confirmed to be A. gorillae

Fifty-three adult tapeworms originating from 5 individual gorillas were examined. The length of strobilae varied between 1.5 and 13 cm by 0.8–1.4 cm in width. Four circular suckers (2 mm in diameter) were observed terminally on a small scolex (Fig. 4A). The proglottids in the strobilae were extended transversely, significantly wider than longer (length 0.5–2 mm, width 8–14 mm) and craspedote. No signs of a rostellum were observed (Fig. 4B). The individual proglottids collected from feces were usually curled or folded (Fig. 2A), on average 4 mm long and 15 mm wide, thin and had undulated edges. A collection of specimens used in this study was deposited to the Museum of Environment, Karongi District, Rwanda.

Figure 4. Adult Anoplocephala recovered from the mountain gorilla small intestines and preserved in ethanol. (A) Scolexes with 4 circular suckers, very short neck and proximal part of strobila. Note the craspedote proglottids, which are significantly wider than longer. Scale 0.5 cm. (B) Detail of scolex with circular suckers. No rudiments of a rostellum are visible. Scale 2 mm.

In total, 1500 fecal samples were collected in 2018 and 2019 (Fig. 5), and 69 proglottids from 69 fecal samples were retrieved. More proglottids in 1 fecal sample were observed sometimes, however the number of proglottids was not recorded and only 1 proglottid per sample was preserved. Five proglottids were compressed between 2 microscope slides to examine the eggs, but no eggs were observed. Single genital pore was distinguished in all 5 proglottids. All listed morphological features corresponded to the morphology of A. gorillae as described by Nybelin (Reference Nybelin1927). Egg counts in the fecal samples containing proglottids varied from 15 to 8190 EPG (eggs per gram of feces) and most feces looked normal (i.e., not diarrhoeic or haemorrhagic), only in 1 case, presence of mucus was recorded.

Figure 5. Diagram picturing the workflow of the anoplocephalid cestode diagnostic procedure in mountain gorilla fecal samples. Out of 99 Mini-FLOTAC©-cestode-negative samples, 19 were found as falsely-negative.

PCR detected more cestode-positive samples than microscopy

The nested-PCR assay originally designed to target the ITS2 region of A. perfoliata was efficient in A. gorillae DNA amplification, despite 1 mismatch in each of the internal primers. Amplicons of expected size were obtained using DNA extracted from samples with 8 to 4260 EPG and no non-specific amplification was detected. When using PCR assay targeting Bertiella ITS1 region, amplicons of expected size were obtained from samples containing Bertiella sp. eggs, while no amplicon was observed using DNA extracted from Anoplocephala spp. proglottids or from fecal samples containing A. gorillae DNA. Protocols for both PCR assays are specified in supplementary material Table S1.

Out of the 99 cestode-negative samples as detected by Mini-FLOTAC©, the sedimentation method revealed 14 samples containing cestode eggs in quantities ranging from 5 to 2139 eggs per gram of fecal sediment (EPGS) (Table S2, Fig. 5). In 12 of the 14 samples, egg morphology corresponded to A. gorillae, while eggs in the remaining 2 samples were of the Bertiella morphotype (see chapter on Anoplocephala and Bertiella egg morphology).

PCR assay targeting Anoplocephala detected 16 positive samples, of which 5 samples were initially evaluated as cestode negative by sedimentation (i.e., negative by 2 microscopy-based methods), while in the other 11 PCR-positive samples, Anoplocephala eggs were observed using the same technique (Fig. 5).

All amplicons obtained from fecal DNA samples were sequenced and were identical with ITS2 sequence obtained from adult A. gorillae. In 1 sample evaluated as Anoplocephala-positive by sedimentation (5 EPGS), no amplicon was obtained despite an increased effort (DNA was re-extracted, PCR was repeated with both increased and decreased DNA template volume).

Using the PCR assay targeting Bertiella ITS1, only 2 samples were detected as Bertiella-positive and in both, Bertiella-morphotype eggs were observed also in the sedimentation (Fig. 5). Sequences obtained from these samples were identical with the Bertiella sp. sequences from the original fecal sample (see the next chapter). In all remaining 97 samples, Bertiella DNA was not detected.

To conclude, in total 19 falsely cestode negative samples were detected, 14 via sedimentation method, while PCR (both assays combined) identified 18 false negatives, including 5 samples evaluated as negative in sedimentation. The information about the 19 false negatives was used to complement the anoplocephalid cestode prevalence calculations.

Bertiella sp. detected in 1 mountain gorilla individual

While initially optimizing PCR assays for the detection of A. gorillae, no amplicon was obtained by Anoplocephala-specific primers in 1 sample, despite the high egg counts recorded. Primers targeting the ITS1 region of anoplocephalid tapeworms (McLennan et al., Reference McLennan, Hasegawa, Bardi and Huffman2017) amplified a sequence (683 bp) which differed by 41.1% from ITS1 sequences obtained from our A. gorillae proglottids and closely matched Bertiella sp. H_1 (Accession number MK993273.1, host: human, country: Argentina, 90.96% identity) in BLAST. Additionally, partial 18S rDNA (714 bp) was also amplified and sequenced from the sample to allow a better characterization of this taxon. In this nuclear marker, the pairwise sequence distance between the newly detected Bertiella sp. and A. gorillae was 18.5%. The formalin-preserved aliquot of this sample was re-examined by flotation, showing eggs with morphological features corresponding to Bertiella sp. as described below.

The Bertiella-positive sample originated from a mountain gorilla male infant named Inkingi from the Hirwa group. Firstly, all samples collected from this individual (n = 4; collected in 2 sampling periods 3 months apart) were tested to verify that the Bertiella eggs in feces were not just a spurious parasite. Anoplocephala-specific PCR assay was also applied to detect possible co-infection by both cestode species. Two Inkingi's samples were positive for Bertiella only, but both A. gorillae and Bertiella sp. DNA was detected in the remaining 2 samples. Subsequently, fecal samples from the other 15 members of Inkingi's family group, were tested for presence of A. gorillae and Bertiella sp. by PCR, using 2 samples with the highest EPG from each gorilla. All individuals tested positive for A. gorillae only. Therefore, Bertiella and A. gorillae prevalence among the Hirwa group individuals was 6.6 and 100% respectively. Inkingi was the only individual infected by both anoplocephalids. Finally, another 100 samples collected from different individuals from 16 study groups were randomly selected and tested with the Bertiella-specific PCR assay; all with negative results.

ITS1 and 18s rDNA phylogenies confirm 2 anoplocephalid cestodes parasitizing mountain gorillas

Representative sequences of complete ITS1, 5.8S and ITS2 (1876 bp) and partial 18S rDNA (654 bp) were obtained from 2 selected A. gorillae adults originating from 2 deceased gorillas from 2 different groups. No difference in either marker was observed. 18S rDNA and ITS1 sequences were also obtained from 51 proglottids. At least one of the markers was sequenced in 14 proglottids (ITS1 and 18S rDNA each in 7 samples), while amplification was not successful in 4 samples even though the DNA was re-extracted, DNA template volume in the PCR was increased and annealing temperature adjusted.

All sequences of 18S rDNA (583–715 bp) were identical to each other except for 1 sequence that differed in a single nucleotide, which was ambiguous (S in position 291 in the alignment). The majority of ITS1 sequences (326–642 bp; n = 46) was also identical to the sequence obtained from adults and this haplotype was labelled as Hap1. Five more variants of ITS1 were identified in our dataset (Hap2 – Hap6), each represented by a single sequence. The haplotypes differed in 1 to 6 nucleotides from each other. Eight sequences were too short to be assigned to either haplotype Hap1 or Hap2. ITS1 sequences obtained from fecal samples (n = 5) during the optimization of PCR assays were also identical with the haplotype Hap1. The sequences were uploaded to GenBank under accession numbers OR863079-91 and OR863669-74.

Final alignment of 18S rDNA (897 bp) comprised 6 sequences obtained from Bertiella sp. and A. gorillae specimens in this study and 22 anoplocephalid cestode sequences available in GenBank. The alignment of ITS1 (1137 bp) consisted of 9 sequences from our Bertiella sp. and A. gorillae samples and 90 more sequences of anoplocephalid cestodes downloaded from GenBank. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees were calculated by TPM2 + F + G4 and TPM2 + F + I + G4 for 18S rDNA and ITS1 respectively (Fig. 6A; Supplementary files SF1, SF2).

Figure 6. Cut outs of (A) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree derived by TPM2 + F + I + G4 model from available ITS1 sequences of anoplocephalid cestodes. Sequence of Hymenolepis microstoma (Accession number AJ287525) was used as an outgroup (not shown). (B) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree derived by TIM2 + F + R5 model from available cox1 sequences (1127 bp) of anoplocephalid cestodes. The green circles mark nodes with ultrafast bootstrap and SH-like approximate likelihood ratio test higher than 75%. Size of the circle correlates to the value. Complete uncollapsed trees can be found in Supplementary files SF2 (ITS1) and SF3 (cox1). The trees were visualized and edited in iTOL v6 (Letunic and Bork, Reference Letunic and Bork2021). Sequences derived in this study are in blue boxes, sequences from GenBank are identified by accession number.

In both phylogenetic analyses, distinct clades of Anoplocephala spp. and Bertiella spp. were formed (Fig. 6A, Supplementary files SF1, SF2). All sequences originating from proglottids, and adult worms clustered with Anoplocephala spp. from equids. The difference between A. gorillae and A. perfoliata was 7.6–13.2 and 2.6–3.5% for ITS1 and 18S rDNA respectively. In the ITS1, A. gorillae differed from A. magna by 6.3–8.2%. Sequence obtained from the fecal sample with Bertiella eggs clustered within a clade comprising other Bertiella spp. sequences from non-human primates and humans (Fig. 6A), specifically in a sub-clade with sequences originating from a human and a howler monkey from Argentina, but the difference was about 11.4–11.7%. The sequences from Ugandan chimpanzees (Accession numbers LC185227-9; geographic proximity to our material) differed from our Bertiella sp. by 31.2–37.4%. In 18S rDNA phylogenetic tree (Supplementary file SF1), the mountain gorilla Bertiella clustered most closely with a sequence from a sanctuary chimpanzee from Kenya (MW741843; Supplementary file SF1), but the lowest pairwise distance (0.4%) was observed between our Bertiella and sequence of B. studeri from a monkey (most probably a long-tailed macaque) from Mauritius (GU323706). Previously published sequence of Bertiella sp. obtained from a mountain gorilla from Rwanda (MW741845) differed from our isolate by 2.1% and clustered in other Bertiella sub-clade (Supplementary file SF1).

Cox1 and 28s rDNA phylogenies confirm position of A. gorillae in the genus Anoplocephala

We obtained 11 sequences of partial cox1 (459–1064 bp) from 9 adult cestodes and 2 proglottids isolated from feces. Four haplotypes differing by 1 to 4 nucleotides were detected. The BLAST search showed 89% similarity to A. perfoliata (accession number KR054960) for isolate T7, while the other isolates showed 89.74–89.85% similarity to A. magna (accession number KU236385). The sequences were uploaded to GenBank under accession numbers OR864671-76. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree (Fig. 6B, Supplementary file SF3) was calculated from an alignment (1127 bp) of 152 anoplocephalid cestode sequences, including 6 sequences representing our isolates from mountain gorilla by TIM2 + F + R5 model with 2 Hymenolepis spp. sequences used as outgroup.

In total, 5 sequences (1169–2011 bp) of 28S rDNA 5′-end were obtained from 3 adult tapeworms and 2 proglottids collected from feces. All sequences were identical. Only in 1 adult (isolate T2), 2 haplotypes differing in a single nucleotide deletion (G at position 704) were detected. BLAST search showed 97.98–98.05% similarity (71% coverage) to A. perfoliata isolate N54 (accession number AY569769). The sequences were uploaded to GenBank under accession numbers OR863675-80. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree (Fig. 7, Supplementary file SF4) was calculated from a 1910 bp alignment of 127 anoplocephalid cestode sequences and 2 Hymenolepis spp. sequences used as outgroups by the TPM3u + F + R3 model.

Figure 7. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree derived by TPM3u + F + R3 model from 1910 bp alignment of available 28S rDNA anoplocephalid cestode sequences. The green circles mark nodes with ultrafast bootstrap and SH-like approximate likelihood ratio test higher than 75%. Size of the circle correlates to the value. When appropriate, the clades have been collapsed (the uncollapsed tree can be found in Supplementary file SF4). The tree was visualized and edited in iTOL v6 (Letunic and Bork, Reference Letunic and Bork2021). Sequences derived in this study are in blue boxes, sequences from GenBank are identified by accession number. AUS, Australia; CAR, Central African Republic.

In both trees (Fig. 6B, Fig. 7, Supplementary files SF3, SF4), clades corresponding to distinct species were formed. Sequences from mountain gorillas' A. gorillae clustered in a separate clade close to other Anoplocephala spp. Surprisingly, cox1 sequence of A. manubriata (accession number KU903287) from an Asian elephant did not cluster with other Anoplocephala spp. but with Bertiella spp. sequences obtained from primates, including humans (Fig. 6B, Supplementary file SF3). In 28S rDNA, the genus Bertiella appeared as a polyphyletic group (Fig. 7, Supplementary file SF4) with a clade comprising sequences from primates, including humans and a separate clade comprising sequences from marsupials.

Anoplocephala gorillae and Bertiella sp. egg morphology differences summarized

Three different situations were recorded within our sample set after microscopy and PCR: either (i) A. gorillae or (ii) Bertiella sp. were found as a mono-infection or (iii) co-infection of both species was detected in a sample. Five samples covering each situation were used for detailed egg morphology examination to investigate if the eggs of the 2 cestodes can be distinguished. In total 261 eggs from 5 gorilla individuals were examined, including 131 Bertiella eggs originating from a single gorilla individual and 130 A. gorillae eggs extracted from 4 individuals. Based on egg shape, maximum length, oncosphere length and PA, 2 egg morphotypes corresponding to A. gorillae and Bertiella sp. were distinguished (Fig. 8). A. gorillae egg length (mean = 67.0 μm, 95% CI 65.1–69.0, n = 130) was larger than in Bertiella sp. (mean = 48.2 μm, 95% CI 46.1–50.5; LMM: estimate ± s.e. = −0.020 ± 0.001, t = −21.4, P = 0.001). Oncosphere length did not differ between A. gorillae (mean = 16.0 μm, 95% CI 13.8–19.1) and Bertiella sp. (mean = 18.4 μm, 95% CI 14.6–24.8, n = 131; LMM: t = −1.27, P = 0.27). Eggshell thickness had a non-significant tendency to be larger in A. gorillae (mean = 6.5 μm, 95% CI 4.8–8.5, n = 100) than in Bertiella sp. (mean = 3.9 μm, 95% CI 2.0–7.2, n = 100; LMM: t = −0.63, P = 0.08). Similarly, the PA, classified on a scale from 1 (brush-like) to 10 (bifurcated), had a non-significant tendency to be more bifurcated in A. gorillae (mean = 8.0, 95% CI 6.7–9.2, n = 98) and rather brush-like in Bertiella sp. (mean = 3.6, 95% CI − 5.3–12.4, n = 99; LMM: t = −8.70, P = 0.06). Figure 8 summarizes the basic morphological characteristics and morphometry of Anoplocephala and Bertiella eggs.

Figure 8. Comparison of A. gorillae and Bertiella sp. egg morphology. The type of pyriform apparatus (PA) was classified using a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 refers to clearly Bertiella-like PA (brush-like), whereas 10 refers to the Anoplocephala-like PA (bifurcated).

Eggs of A. gorillae had various shapes, mostly quadrangular with a very thick eggshell, but a triangular or polygonal shape was also recorded. The oncosphere was mostly kidney-shaped surrounded by a clearly bifurcated PA. In Bertiella sp., oncospheres were mostly spherical and the egg wall was thinner than observed in eggs of A. gorillae. The PA of Bertiella sp. was branched into many thin fibres, resembling a brush (Fig. 9).

Figure 9. Anoplocephalid cestode eggs observed in mountain gorilla feces. (A—D) Anoplocephala morphotype typical for rectangular or polygonal shape, very thick shell (S), oncosphere (O) relatively smaller, and bifurcated pyriform apparatus (PA). (E—G) Bertiella morphotype characterized by round shape, thick shell, relatively bigger oncosphere and brush-like PA. (H) Detail of the PA fibres (arrows) visible when focusing throughout the depth of the egg. (A–G) on the same scale, both scales correspond to 20 μm.

Anoplocephala gorillae eggs detected in all studied groups with very variable EPG

Anoplocephala gorillae eggs were detected in the vast majority (95%) of the 1500 fecal samples examined and the egg counts varied from 8 to 8190 eggs per gram of feces (EPG) with a median of 203 EPG. In total, 5.5% (N = 82) of samples exceeded 1000 EPG, and 1.3% (N = 20) samples had EPG higher than 2000. We observed a great variability of EPG values within and among groups (Fig. 10). The differences between groups were statistically significant – details in Petrželková et al., Reference Petrželková, Uwamahoro, Pafčo, Červená, Samaš, Mudakikwa, Muvunyi, Uwingeli, Gilardi, Nziza, Noheri, Eckardt, Ndagijimana, Ssebide, Okwirokello, Nizeyimana, Syaluha, Nzayisenga, Girón, Bahizi, Ntwari, Lukusa, Tumushime, Mangura, Mapilanga, Kalonji, Aruho, Stryková, Tehlarová, Cameira, Lowenstine, Šlapeta, Romportl, Ferrari, Cranfield and Modrý2021.

Figure 10. Anoplocephala gorillae egg counts in studied mountain gorilla groups expressed as eggs per gram of feces (EPG) including all samples collected between 2018 and 2019. X axis shows individual gorilla groups. For statistical analyses of EPG see Petrželková et al., Reference Petrželková, Uwamahoro, Pafčo, Červená, Samaš, Mudakikwa, Muvunyi, Uwingeli, Gilardi, Nziza, Noheri, Eckardt, Ndagijimana, Ssebide, Okwirokello, Nizeyimana, Syaluha, Nzayisenga, Girón, Bahizi, Ntwari, Lukusa, Tumushime, Mangura, Mapilanga, Kalonji, Aruho, Stryková, Tehlarová, Cameira, Lowenstine, Šlapeta, Romportl, Ferrari, Cranfield and Modrý2021.

In total, 617 nest samples from 19 groups were collected and examined in 7 sampling events corresponding to dry and wet seasons of 2018 and 2019. However, the majority of groups was sampled only during the dry (Jan–Feb) and wet (Sep–Nov) season in 2018 (382 fecal samples; Table 1). As these samples do not originate from identified individuals, we avoid interpreting the data as prevalence. Considering the results from coproscopy complemented by the PCR results, A. gorillae was detected in all 19 groups with percentage of positive samples ranging from 28.5% to 100% and reaching over 70% of positive samples in 15 out of 19 groups (Table 1).

Table 1. Percentage of Anoplocephala gorillae-positive nest samples (PAPS) in dry (Jan–Feb) and wet (Sep–Oct) seasons by groups in 2018

Coproscopy results were corrected by PCR results (adding falsely negative samples). NA – no samples collected.

During 2018–2019, in total 651 fecal samples were collected from 124 identified individuals belonging to 9 gorilla groups. One to eight samples per individual were obtained within 2 sampling periods (4 to 6 weeks). Anoplocephala gorillae prevalence in the groups ranged from 76.19 to 100%. The egg counts varied from 8 to 8190 EPG, with an average of 384 EPG and a median of 248 EPG. The youngest A. gorilla-positive individual was a 3-month-old infant from Hirwa group (8 EPG). The probability of detecting A. gorillae-positive individuals significantly increased with the number of samples examined (logistic regression; estimate = 1.49 ± 0.60, F1124 = 36.8, P < 0.001). The probability to detect a positive individual increased from 68% to 98% just by increasing the number of samples from 1 to 3. Most individuals (78.6%) were found A. gorillae-positive after examination of the first sample, but up to 4 samples were required to detect A. gorillae presence.

In most animals, a considerable fluctuation of EPG values over time was observed in samples collected from the same individual (Fig. 11A). In 9 gorillas, both positive and negative samples occurred within 1 sampling period. In 2 individuals, only 1 sample was collected and found negative by coproscopy, but the PCR showed presence of A. gorillae DNA (Fig. 11A).

Figure 11. (A) Examples of Anoplocephala gorillae EPG fluctuation in selected individuals resampled during 2 sampling periods (May-July 2018 and September-November 2018). Black = A. gorillae positive sample with EPG value; grey = A. gorillae negative sample; white = animal not sampled; orange = microscopy negative, but PCR positive; M, male; F, female; INF, infant; JUV, juvenile; SAD, subadult; AD, adult; BB, blackback; SB, silverback; DSB, dominant silverback. (B) Comparison of information gained through individual sampling, providing individual prevalence (percentage of positive individuals) and nest sampling, providing percentage of positive samples (PPS). N = total number of individuals in the group, n = number of samples (nest sampling) or individuals examined

In 35 samples (5.4%) originating from 22 individuals (17.6%), the EPG exceeded 1000 EPG. These outlying individuals comprised 10 males, 12 females, 13 adults, 2 subadults, 5 juveniles and 2 infants. In most of these animals, only a single sample had such high A. gorillae EPG, while in 8 individuals (3 adult males, 2 adult females and 3 juveniles/infants), high A. gorillae EPG values were recorded repeatedly. However, repeatability of high EPGs for all individuals sampled more than once was generally low [r (95% CI) = 0.22 (0.14–0.30)].

Out of 124 individually sampled gorillas, 17 individuals from 10 different groups and between the age from 15 months and 20 years were A. gorillae negative. For the majority of these animals (N = 13), only 1 fecal sample was collected and examined. In 3 individuals (1 adult female and 2 infants), 2 samples were collected and examined. Finally, in 1 male juvenile all 3 samples were tested negative.

In 5 groups, sample sets from both, nest and individual sampling, were available from the same period allowing us to compare fecal prevalence (percentage of positive samples) and individual prevalence (percentage of positive individuals). In 3 groups, both prevalence values reached 100%, while in 2 groups, the individual prevalence was slightly higher than fecal prevalence (Fig. 11B).

Discussion

Using an extensive set of fecal samples, dozens of proglottids, and adult helminths, anoplocephalid cestodes parasitizing mountain gorillas in Rwanda were identified as A. gorillae and Bertiella sp. and characterized both morphologically and genetically. Specific PCR assays were provided for detection of both the dominant A. gorillae and the rarely occurring Bertiella sp. Prevalence and individual egg excretion trends of A. gorillae were described using fecal samples from identified individuals and nests.

Anoplocephalid cestode species are defined mainly by the morphology of proglottids and the position of genital organs (Beveridge, Reference Beveridge, Khalil, Jones and Bray1994). Although we did not examine histological sections of mature proglottids, all examined adults exhibited morphological features described by Nybelin (Reference Nybelin1927) as typical of A. gorillae, particularly the suckers, which are terminally attached to a small scolex without any rostellum. Other Anoplocephala species have a similar gross morphology, however the DNA sequence analysis showed clear differentiation of Anoplocephala from mountain gorillas and A. perfoliata, A. magna, A. rhodesiensis from equids and A. manubriata from elephants. Since A. gorillae is the only species of the genus described from mountain gorillas, we concluded that the cestodes found in mountain gorilla necropsies are A. gorillae, as named by Nybelin (Reference Nybelin1927). The 18S rDNA and ITS1 sequences obtained from all proglottids shed in feces matched the reference sequences obtained from the identified adult cestodes, and in the vast majority of the fecal samples examined, we detected A. gorillae DNA. However, we also found 1 gorilla infant that harboured A. gorillae along with an undetermined Bertiella sp.

Bertiella is another anoplocephalid cestode genus that commonly parasitizes primates, including humans, but also rodents, marsupials and dermopterans (Beveridge, Reference Beveridge, Khalil, Jones and Bray1994; Wickström et al., Reference Wickström, Haukisalmi, Varis, Hantula and Henttonen2005; Beveridge et al., Reference Beveridge, Shamsi, Hu, Chilton and and Gasser2007; Hardman et al., Reference Hardman, Haukisalmi and Beveridge2012; Sapp and Bradbury, Reference Sapp and Bradbury2020) and apparently also mountain gorillas, although rarely. The only material available for the identification of this Bertiella found in a single mountain gorilla individual was the eggs. Anoplocephalid cestode eggs are typical for the presence of a PA, which encloses the oncosphere (Beveridge, Reference Beveridge, Khalil, Jones and Bray1994), and egg morphology can be used to distinguish many of the genera within the family (e.g. Conn, Reference Conn1985; Beveridge, Reference Beveridge1985b; Galán-Puchades et al., Reference Galán-Puchades, Vicent Fuentes and Mas-Coma2000; Haukisalmi and Henttonen, Reference Haukisalmi and Henttonen2000; Tenora et al., Reference Tenora, Koubková and Feliu2002), sometimes even species (Bohórquez et al., Reference Bohórquez, Meana, Pato and Luzón2014). Detailed morphometric analysis of the 2 anoplocephalid cestode species detected in the Virunga mountain gorillas revealed that A. gorillae can be reliably distinguished from Bertiella sp. by a polymorphic shape ranging from triangular to polygonal, a larger absolute size reaching up to 90 μm, proportionally smaller oncosphere, and PA clearly bifurcated into only 2 branches. In contrast, Bertiella eggs are typically spherical or subspherical. Due to the smaller size of the egg, the oncosphere occupies a larger area of the egg and eventually, the PA branches into numerous fine, wavy filaments. It should be noted that the filamentous character of PA is typical for Bertiella spp. in primates, while in other hosts, such as marsupials, both filamentous as well as paired PA occur commonly (Beveridge, Reference Beveridge1985a). The presence of Bertiella in our sample set would not have been noticed without discrepancies in PCR results, demonstrating the need for personnel conducting the microscopy to be properly trained and experienced. In an ideal case, simultaneous DNA-based diagnostic techniques should be performed.

Although a number of Bertiella spp. sequences are available in GenBank, none of them showed conspecificity with our mountain gorilla isolate, and we are not able to assign our Bertiella sp. isolate to any sequenced species. Surprisingly, analyses of the nuclear ITS1 sequence showed that our Bertiella from Virunga gorillas is genetically closer to the South American isolates (about 11% difference) than to the Ugandan isolates (more than 30% difference), which is in agreement with the results of Doležalová et al. (Reference Doležalová, Vallo, Petrželková, Foitová, Nurcahyo, Mudakikwa, Hashimoto, Jirků, Lukeš, Scholz and Modrý2015) who showed a close relationship between isolates from Peru, Brazil and Kenya with an overall genetic distance of 0.2–12% based on cox1. Unfortunately, we were not able to obtain cox1 sequences from our sample and could not compare the results with the latter study.

While 29 species of Bertiella have been described (Beveridge, Reference Beveridge, Khalil, Jones and Bray1994), sequences from only 3 primate-associated species (B. mucronata, B. satyri, B. studeri) and 4 other species from rodents and marsupials (B. affinis, B. anapolytica, B. foederata and B. trichosuri) are available in GenBank. More than half of the Bertiella spp. sequences available in database belong to undetermined species, mostly from primates. Such a lack of sequences may impact the topology of phylogenetic trees in our ITS1 analysis. While multiple markers have been sequenced for Bertiella spp. from primates, only 28S rDNA sequences of Bertiella spp. from rodents and marsupials have been obtained. The sequences of additional markers are necessary to confirm the polyphyly of the genus Bertiella as seen in the 28S rDNA phylogenetic tree, where the sequences from primate parasites form clades separated from Bertiella spp. parasitizing rodents and marsupials by clades of Progamotaenia spp., Paramoniezia johnstoni and Phascalotaenia comani. This polyphyly would support separation of the Bertiella spp. parasitizing in primates from species occurring in marsupials, rodents and dermopterans as suggested by Baer (Reference Baer1927) who suggested the genus Prototaenia for the latter group, based mainly on the level of cirrus sac development and fine differences of other reproductive organs. These distinctions were subsequently deemed as insufficient for classification of a separate genus by Baer (1934) and thus, single genus Bertiella has been accepted ever since (Beveridge, Reference Beveridge, Khalil, Jones and Bray1994). Additional sequences from properly determined Bertiella species will help clarify the phylogeography and taxonomy of the genus.

The study by Doležalová et al. (Reference Doležalová, Vallo, Petrželková, Foitová, Nurcahyo, Mudakikwa, Hashimoto, Jirků, Lukeš, Scholz and Modrý2015) also published a sequence of Anoplocephala cf. gorillae (isolated from eggs in a single fecal sample), but the sequence clustered within the Bertiella clade. The authors suggested that A. gorillae should be moved to the genus Bertiella. In their study, sequences of 5.8S-ITS2 region (JQ771100), nad1 (JQ771117) and 18S rDNA (MW741845) were obtained from this particular cestode referred to as A. gorillae and both ITS2 region and 18S rDNA differed significantly from our A. gorillae sequences (60.3% and 18% respectively). Moreover, our Bertiella 18S rDNA sequence clustered in a different subclade than the cestode from a mountain gorilla sequenced by Doležalová et al. (Reference Doležalová, Vallo, Petrželková, Foitová, Nurcahyo, Mudakikwa, Hashimoto, Jirků, Lukeš, Scholz and Modrý2015) (Supplementary file SF1) and the pairwise sequence distance between the 2 sequences was 2.1%. Considering that our results are based on a solid sample set and that the previous study used only 1 fecal sample as DNA source, we can conclude that A. gorillae indeed is a member of Anoplocephala and that it was presumably another Bertiella sp. that was sequenced in the previous study. As the Bertiella spp. seemed to be rather rare, the mountain gorillas are most probably infected by an occasional spill-over from different hosts, as observed in Bertiella and other species within the Anoplocephalinae (Beveridge, Reference Beveridge, Khalil, Jones and Bray1994; Haukisalmi et al., Reference Haukisalmi, Wickström, Henttonen, Hantula and Gubány2004, Reference Haukisalmi, Hardman, Hardman, Rausch and Henttonen2008, Reference Haukisalmi, Henttonen, Hardman, Hardman, Laakkonen, Murueva, Niemimaa, Shulunov and Vapalahti2009; Wickström et al., Reference Wickström, Haukisalmi, Varis, Hantula and Henttonen2005; Hardman et al., Reference Hardman, Haukisalmi and Beveridge2012).

Microscopy following flotation or sedimentation techniques represents the most common approach to routine coproscopic detection of metazoan gastrointestinal parasites in wildlife (Masi et al., Reference Masi, Chauffour, Bain, Todd, Guillot and Krief2012; Vimalraj and Jayathangaraj, Reference Vimalraj and Jayathangaraj2015; Naz et al., Reference Naz, Arooj, Ali and Farooq2021; Petrželková et al., Reference Petrželková, Uwamahoro, Pafčo, Červená, Samaš, Mudakikwa, Muvunyi, Uwingeli, Gilardi, Nziza, Noheri, Eckardt, Ndagijimana, Ssebide, Okwirokello, Nizeyimana, Syaluha, Nzayisenga, Girón, Bahizi, Ntwari, Lukusa, Tumushime, Mangura, Mapilanga, Kalonji, Aruho, Stryková, Tehlarová, Cameira, Lowenstine, Šlapeta, Romportl, Ferrari, Cranfield and Modrý2021) due to its cost effectiveness and simplicity. However, sensitivity of these methods and challenging identification of detected parasites commonly lead to biased results. In our sample set, all fecal samples scored as negative using Mini-FLOTAC© were re-examined by sedimentation and PCR, which combined detected almost 20% of these samples containing either A. gorillae eggs or DNA. Egg numbers determined via sedimentation in these falsely negative samples ranged from very low (5 EPGS) to very high, reaching over 2000 EPGS. Such discrepancy may be caused partially by slightly higher sensitivity of the sedimentation method, which was 5 EPGS in our case, while the threshold for Mini-FLOTAC© was 8 EPG. On the other hand, it is not surprising that PCR detected falsely negative samples from microscopy, as eggs might be shed irregularly, while the parasite DNA is usually present in the amount sufficient for molecular detection (Wong et al., Reference Wong, Fung, Chau, Poon, Wong and Yuen2014; Rijsman et al., Reference Rijsman, Monkelbaan and Kusters2016) Nevertheless, in 1 case, we were not able to amplify A. gorillae DNA using PCR despite the eggs observed in sedimentation, though in low numbers (5 EPGS). The falsely negative samples represented only 1.3% of the total sample set and 1.5% of samples from identified individuals and, therefore, their effect on overall results is marginal. However, 2 false-negative samples were the only samples collected from 2 gorilla individuals and therefore, without PCR, these 2 gorilla males would be considered as A. gorillae negative.

Even though there are apparently 2 anoplocephalid cestodes parasitizing Rwandan mountain gorillas, Bertiella sp. was detected in a single individual, moreover in co-infection with A. gorillae. Thus, the epidemiological and ecological data of this mountain gorilla subpopulation can be related to A. gorillae. This cestode is a common symbiont in the intestine of mountain gorillas a few months after birth. Previous studies also reported a high percentage of cestode-positive fecal samples in both Virunga and Bwindi populations (Redmond, Reference Redmond and Fossey1983; Ashford et al., Reference Ashford, Lawson, Butynski and Reid1996; Sleeman et al., Reference Sleeman, Meader, Mudakikwa, Foster and Patton2000; Kalema-Zikusoka et al., Reference Kalema-Zikusoka, Rothman and Fox2005). This situation contrasts strongly with other African great apes where cestode infections are only rarely detected (Ashford et al., Reference Ashford, Reid and Wrangham2000; Lilly et al., Reference Lilly, Mehlman and Doran2002; Krief et al., Reference Krief, Huffman, Sévenet, Guillot, Bories, Hladik and Wrangham2005; Kooriyama et al., Reference Kooriyama, Hasegawa, Shimozuru, Tsubota, Nishida and Iwaki2012; McLennan and Huffman, Reference McLennan and Huffman2012; Sá et al., Reference Sá, Petrášová, Pomajbíková, Profousová, Petrželková, Sousa, Cable, Bruford and Modrý2013; Drakulovski et al., Reference Drakulovski, Bertout, Locatelli, Butel, Pion, Mpoudi-Ngole, Delaporte, Peeters and Mallieé2014; Pafčo et al., Reference Pafčo, Benavides, Pšenková-Profousová, Modrý, Červená, Shutt, Hasegawa, Fuh, Todd and Petrželková2017; Vlčková et al., Reference Vlčková, Pafčo, Petrželková, Modrý, Todd, Yeoman, Torralba, Wilson, Stumpf, White, Nelson, Leigh and Gomez2018) even though seasonal peaks of infections were observed (Wrangham, Reference Wrangham1995). Occasional infections are reported in orangutans (Mul et al., Reference Mul, Paembonan, Singleton, Wich and van Bolhuis2007), Colobus spp. (Gillespie et al., Reference Gillespie, Greiner and Chapman2005), and other non-human primates, such as red guenon (Cercopithecus ascanius; Gillespie et al., Reference Gillespie, Greiner and Chapman2004), baboons (Kooriyama et al., Reference Kooriyama, Hasegawa, Shimozuru, Tsubota, Nishida and Iwaki2012), Verreaux's sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi; Rasambainarivo et al., Reference Rasambainarivo, Junge and Lewis2014) and blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis; Appleton et al., Reference Appleton, Krecek, Verster, Bruorton and Lawes1994).

Muhangi et al. (Reference Muhangi, Gardiner, Ojok, Cranfield, Gilardi, Mudakikwa and Lowenstine2021) reported anoplocephalid cestodes in about a third of 60 mountain gorillas necropsied between 1985 and 2007 in both Virunga and Bwindi and even though simultaneous presence of cestodes and haemorrhagic and/or hyperaemic mucosa of the small intestine (8/60 individuals) and villous blunting (2/60 individuals) were detected, no lesions were observed in 14 animals with cestodiasis. Moreover, during necropsies performed on mountain gorilla individuals deceased e.g., from trauma and generally in good condition, large number of tapeworms were found in the intestines (GD, personal observation). It appears that unlike A. perfoliata, which is strongly associated with colic in horses (Mezerova et al., Reference Mezerova, Koudela and Vojtkova2007; Back et al., Reference Back, Nyman and Osterman Lind2013), A. gorillae does not have significantly negative health effects on its host.

In all anoplocephalid cestodes, gravid proglottids detach from an adult (Redmond, Reference Redmond and Fossey1983; Pafčo, Reference Pafčo, Modrý, Pafčo, Petrželková and Hasegawa2018) and are passed through the intestines with the content. Based on the species, proglottids can be shed intact, or disintegrate during their way through the gastrointestinal tract releasing the eggs. Redmond (Reference Redmond and Fossey1983) reported that A. gorillae eggs remain in proglottids, however, we did not observe any eggs in any of the 5 proglottids examined. The almost ubiquitous presence of A. gorillae eggs in feces suggests that the eggs are released from the proglottids into the intestinal content, similarly to some other anoplocephalid species (Schuster, Reference Schuster1991; Deplazes et al., Reference Deplazes, Eckert, Mathis, von Samson-Himmelstjerna and Zahner2016). As a result, coproscopy is a sufficient method for the detection of cestodes in mountain gorillas unlike A. perfoliata in horses (Traversa et al., Reference Traversa, Fichi, Campigli, Rondolotti, Iorio, Proudman, Pellegrini and Perrucci2008; Tomczuk et al., Reference Tomczuk, Kostro, Szczepaniak, Grzybek, Studzińska, Demkowska-Kutrzepa and Roczeń-Karczmarz2014). Traditionally, the egg quantities (expressed as EPG) are used as a proxy of infection intensity in helminths parasitizing both domestic animals and wildlife (Williamson et al., Reference Williamson, Beveridge and Gasser1998; Chapman et al., Reference Chapman, Speirs, Gillespie, Holland and Austad2006; Tomczuk et al., Reference Tomczuk, Kostro, Szczepaniak, Grzybek, Studzińska, Demkowska-Kutrzepa and Roczeń-Karczmarz2014; Burgunder et al., Reference Burgunder, Pafčo, Petrželková, Modrý, Hashimoto and MacIntosh2017). Individuals with high EPG would expectedly be at higher risk of clinical disease and, due to an uneven distribution of macroparasites commonly found within host populations (Shaw et al., Reference Shaw, Grenfell and Dobson1998; Wilson et al., Reference Wilson, Bjørnstad, Dobson, Merler, Poglayen, Read, Skorping, Hudson, Rizzoli, Grenfell, Heesterbeek and Dobson2001), be also the main reservoir and source of infection for other individuals when shedding most eggs to the environment. From the population management point of view, such animals would be the best targets for interventions such as anthelminthic treatment (Nielsen et al., Reference Nielsen, Mittel, Grice, Erskine, Graves, Vaala, Tully, French, Bowman and Kaplan2019). Ashford et al. (Reference Ashford, Lawson, Butynski and Reid1996) reported that mountain gorilla silverbacks in Bwindi shed most cestode eggs, while infants shed no eggs or only a low number of eggs. In our previous study (Petrželková et al., Reference Petrželková, Uwamahoro, Pafčo, Červená, Samaš, Mudakikwa, Muvunyi, Uwingeli, Gilardi, Nziza, Noheri, Eckardt, Ndagijimana, Ssebide, Okwirokello, Nizeyimana, Syaluha, Nzayisenga, Girón, Bahizi, Ntwari, Lukusa, Tumushime, Mangura, Mapilanga, Kalonji, Aruho, Stryková, Tehlarová, Cameira, Lowenstine, Šlapeta, Romportl, Ferrari, Cranfield and Modrý2021), infants in the Virunga population also shed significantly fewer eggs than all other age categories, but that was the only significant trend applicable at the population level. In certain groups, a peak of infection was detected between 10 and 20 years of age and similarly, relationship between group size and egg counts was observed in some groups and/or areas (Petrželková et al., Reference Petrželková, Uwamahoro, Pafčo, Červená, Samaš, Mudakikwa, Muvunyi, Uwingeli, Gilardi, Nziza, Noheri, Eckardt, Ndagijimana, Ssebide, Okwirokello, Nizeyimana, Syaluha, Nzayisenga, Girón, Bahizi, Ntwari, Lukusa, Tumushime, Mangura, Mapilanga, Kalonji, Aruho, Stryková, Tehlarová, Cameira, Lowenstine, Šlapeta, Romportl, Ferrari, Cranfield and Modrý2021). Closer inspection of A. gorillae egg shedding patterns in this study revealed a significant EPG fluctuation in individual mountain gorillas within short time periods. Even animals with extreme EPG values (defined in our case as more than 1000 EPG) usually had only 1 sample with such high EPG value. Among 8 individuals with repeatedly high EPG, all age categories as well as both sexes were represented, suggesting that there is no obvious trend regarding the sex or age, but as the number of such individuals was low, we did not test the hypothesis by statistical methods. Egg shedding fluctuation greatly complicates using EPG as a proxy for infection intensity in A. gorillae, and, if only a single value is considered for an individual, it may be largely misleading.

Wildlife parasitology, especially in cases of endangered and/or elusive species, relies on noninvasively collected samples. In our case, the A. gorillae prevalence in unidentified nest fecal samples and in samples from identified individuals from the same group showed comparable results, which has implication for the gorillas' health monitoring. One-time examination of easily accessible unidentified nest samples provides reliable information about helminth prevalence in the given group. However, multiple sampling of individuals confirmed that even though the cestodes commonly occur in mountain gorillas, the number of gorilla individuals detected as A. gorillae-positive further increases with the number of samples tested. It has been suggested previously that at least 3 samples should be examined from an individual primate to reliably detect the spectrum of parasites infecting given individual and to determine realistically the parasite prevalence in a primate group or population (Huffman et al., Reference Huffman, Gotoh, Turner, Hamai and Yoshida1997; Muehlenbein, Reference Muehlenbein2005). Our results confirm that such a minimum of samples is needed also for assessment of a parasite as prevalent as A. gorillae.

In conclusion, the adult cestodes collected during necropsies helped us establish the identity of A. gorillae and provide reference sequences essential for phylogenetic analyses as well as for the development of advanced diagnostic tools. We were unable to associate observed high abundance of Anoplocephala with any pathologies, suggesting that the anoplocephalid infection does not represent a threat for the studied subpopulation of G. beringei beringei.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182023001178.

Data availability statement

All sequences produced in this study are deposited in the GenBank under accession numbers OR863079-91, OR863669-80 and OR864671-76. A collection of A. gorillae adult specimens used in this study was deposited to the Museum of Environment, Karongi District, Rwanda. Contact:

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the Rwanda Development Board for their long-term support and permission to conduct this research. We are indebted to the field staff of the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund, Rwanda Development Board and Volcanoes National Park for their tireless support in collecting fecal samples.

Author's contributions

KJP, MC, KG and DM obtained funding. KJP, MC, KG, WE, BP, BČ and DM designed the study. MC, KG, JBN, JN, WE, FN, AM, RM and PU organized and supervised the fecal sample collection. JŠ, DM, BČ and BP designed and optimized field laboratory work. MC, KG, JN, JBN, GN, AEN and MB performed autopsies, collected adult cestodes and provided clinical information. CU, MB, BČ, BP, TP and RMC processed the samples in the field laboratory and performed the coproscopic examinations. TP and BČ analysed the cestode morphology. TP and RMC performed the nucleic acid amplification tests. BČ supervised the laboratory analyses, analysed the DNA sequencing data and performed phylogenetic analyses. TP created the line artwork with the egg morphology and workflow. BČ, TP, DM and MC provided photographs. PS performed statistical analyses. DR produced the map of the study area. TP prepared the first draft of the manuscript. BČ finalized the manuscript and implemented comments and suggestions from all co-authors. All authors contributed to the final version of the manuscript and approved it.

Financial support

The parasitological part of this study was supported by the Czech Science Foundation (18-24345S) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of International Affairs, Grant no. F17AP00964. Klára Petrželková and Barbora Pafčo were also supported by institutional support of the Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences (RVO:68081766).

Competing interests

None.

Ethical standards

Material used in the study comprised fecal samples non-invasively collected from night nests or during daily follows of studied animals following the Best practice guidelines for health monitoring and disease control in great ape populations (Gilardi et al., Reference Gilardi, Gillespie, Leendertz, Macfie, Travis, Whittier and Williamson2015). The studied gorillas are habituated to human presence and collection of fecal samples does not induce stress to them. Autopsies of deceased animals are routinely performed by GD as part of the mountain gorilla health monitoring.

Footnotes

The authors mourn the death (August 28, 2023) of colleague Michael R. Cranfield, whose dedication to gorilla conservation and health was unparalleled.

References

Altschul, SF, Gish, W, Miller, W, Myers, EW and Lipman, DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology 215, 403410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anisimova, M, Gil, M, Dufayard, JF, Dessimoz, C and Gascuel, O (2011) Survey of branch support methods demonstrates accuracy, power, and robustness of fast likelihood-based approximation schemes. Systematic Biology 60, 685699. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syr041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Appleton, CC, Krecek, RC, Verster, A, Bruorton, MR and Lawes, MJ (1994) Gastrointestinal parasites of the Samango monkey, Cercopithecus mitis, in Natal, South Africa. Journal of Medical Primatology 23, 5255. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0684.1994.tb00096.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashford, RW, Reid, GDF and Butynski, TM (1990) The intestinal faunas of man and mountain gorillas in a shared habitat. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 84, 337340. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1990.11812477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashford, RW, Lawson, H, Butynski, TM and Reid, GDF (1996) Patterns of intestinal parasitism in the mountain gorilla Gorilla gorilla in the Bwindi-Impenetrable Forest, Uganda. Journal of Zoology 239, 507514. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1996.tb05939.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashford, RW, Reid, GDF and Wrangham, RW (2000) Intestinal parasites of the chimpanzee Pan troglodytes in Kibale Forest, Uganda. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 94, 173179. doi: 10.1080/00034983.2000.11813526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Back, H, Nyman, A and Osterman Lind, E (2013) The association between Anoplocephala perfoliata and colic in Swedish horses- – a case control study. Veterinary Parasitology 197, 580585. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.07.020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baer, JG (1927) Monographie des Cestodes de la famille des Anoplocephalidae. Bulletin biologique de France et de Belgique, Supplément 10, 1241.Google Scholar
Beveridge, I (1985a) The genus Bertiella (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae) from Australasian mammals: new species, new records and redescriptions. Systematic Parasitology 7, 241289. doi: 10.1007/BF00009995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beveridge, I (1985b) Three new species of Progamotaenia (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae) from Australasian marsupials. Systematic Parasitology 7, 91102. doi: 10.1007/BF00009812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beveridge, I (1994) Family Anoplocephalidae Cholodkovsky, 1902. In Khalil, LF, Jones, A and Bray, RA (eds), Keys to the Cestode Parasites of Vertebrates. Oxfordshire, UK: CAB International, pp. 315366.Google Scholar
Beveridge, I, Shamsi, S, Hu, M, Chilton and, NB and Gasser, RB (2007) Genetic variation in the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 within Progamotaenia festiva (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae) from macropodid marsupials. Parasitology 134, 14651476. doi: 10.1017/S0031182007002752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohórquez, A, Meana, A, Pato, NF and Luzón, M (2014) Coprologically diagnosing Anoplocephala perfoliata in the presence of A. magna. Veterinary Parasitology 204, 396401. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.04.023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgunder, J, Pafčo, B, Petrželková, KJ, Modrý, D, Hashimoto, C and MacIntosh, AJJ (2017) Complexity in behavioural organization and strongylid infection among wild chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour 129, 257268. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, GK, Ikirezi, M, Daconto, G, Gray, M and Fawcett, K (2010) Assessing impacts from community conservation interventions around Parc National des Volcans, Rwanda. Technical Report, Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International. 131 pp.Google Scholar
Chapman, CA, Speirs, ML, Gillespie, TR, Holland, T and Austad, KM (2006) Life on the edge: gastrointestinal parasites from the forest edge and interior primate groups. American Journal of Primatology 68, 397409. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conn, BC (1985) Scanning electron microscopy and histochemistry of embryonic envelopes of the porcupine tapeworm, Monoecocestus americanus (Cyclophyllidea: Anoplocephalidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 63, 11941198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deplazes, P, Eckert, J, Mathis, A, von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G and Zahner, H (eds) (2016) Parasitology in Veterinary Medicine. Wageningen, Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers, p. 650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doležalová, J (2018) Anoplocephalid tapeworms. In Modrý, D, Pafčo, B, Petrželková, KJ and Hasegawa, H (eds), Parasites of Apes an Atlas of Coproscopic Diagnostics. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Edition Chimaira, pp. 126129.Google Scholar
Doležalová, J, Vallo, P, Petrželková, KJ, Foitová, I, Nurcahyo, W, Mudakikwa, A, Hashimoto, C, Jirků, M, Lukeš, J, Scholz, T and Modrý, D (2015) Molecular phylogeny of anoplocephalid tapeworms (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae) infecting humans and non-human primates. Parasitology 142, 12781289. doi: 10.1017/S003118201500058X.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doležalová, J, Pafčo, B, Modrý, D and Jirků-Pomajbíková, K (2018) Parasite quantification. In Modrý, D, Pafčo, B, Petrželková, KJ and Hasegawa, H (eds), Parasites of Apes an Atlas of Coproscopic Diagnostics. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Edition Chimaira, pp. 3437.Google Scholar
Drakulovski, P, Bertout, S, Locatelli, S, Butel, C, Pion, S, Mpoudi-Ngole, E, Delaporte, E, Peeters, M and Mallieé, M (2014) Assessment of gastrointestinal parasites in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) in southeast Cameroon. Parasitology Research 113, 25412550. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-3904-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drogemuller, M, Beelitz, P, Pfister, K, Schnieder, T and von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G (2004) Amplification of ribosomal DNA of Anoplocephalidae: Anoplocephala perfoliata diagnosis by PCR as a pssible alternative to coprological methods. Veterinary Parasitology 124, 205215. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.07.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galán-Puchades, MT, Vicent Fuentes, M and Mas-Coma, S (2000) Morphology of Bertiella studeri (Blanchard, 1891) sensu Stunkard (1940) (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae) of human origin and a proposal of criteria for the specific diagnosis of bertiellosis. Folia Parasitologica 47, 2328. doi: 10.14411/fp.2000.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, KV, Gillespie, TR, Leendertz, FH, Macfie, EJ, Travis, DA, Whittier, CA and Williamson, EA (2015) Best Practice Guidelines for Health Monitoring and Disease Control in Great Ape Populations. Gland, Switzerland: UCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group. doi:10.2305/IUCN.CH.2015.SSC-OP.56.en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, TR, Greiner, EC and Chapman, CA (2004) Gastrointestinal parasites of the guenons of Western Uganda. Journal of Parasitology 90, 13561360. doi: 10.1645/GE-311R.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillespie, TR, Greiner, EC and Chapman, CA (2005) Gastrointestinal parasites of the colobus monkeys of Uganda. Journal of Parasitology 91, 569573. doi: 10.1645/GE-434R.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardman, LM, Haukisalmi, V and Beveridge, I (2012) Phylogenetic relationships of the anoplocephaline cestodes of Australasian marsupials and resurrection of the genus Wallabicestus Schmidt, 1975. Systematic Parasitology 82, 4963. doi: 10.1007/s11230-012-9346-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hastings, BE, Gibbons, LM and Williams, JE (1992) Parasites of free ranging mountain gorillas: Survey and epidemiological factors. American Association of Zoo Veterinarians and American Association of Wildlife Veterinarians Annual Proceedings, pp. 301302.Google Scholar
Haukisalmi, V and Henttonen, H (2000) Description and morphometric variability of Paranoplocephala serrata n. sp. (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae) in collared lemmings (Dicrostonyx spp., Arvicolinae) from Arctic Siberia and North America. Systematic Parasitology 45, 219231. doi: 10.1023/A:1006244331243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haukisalmi, V, Wickström, LM, Hantula, J and Henttonen, H (2001) Taxonomy, genetic differentiation and Holarctic biogeography of Paranoplocephala spp. (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae) in collared lemmings (Dicrostonyx; Arvicolinae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 74, 171196. doi: 10.1006/bijl.2001.0570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haukisalmi, V, Wickström, LM, Henttonen, H, Hantula, J and Gubány, A (2004) Molecular and morphological evidence of multiple species within Paranoplocephala omphalodes (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae) in Microtus voles (Arvicolinae). Zoologica Scripta 33, 277290. doi: 10.1111/j.0300-3256.2004.00148.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haukisalmi, V, Hardman, LM, Hardman, M, Rausch, RL and Henttonen, H (2008) Molecular systematics of the Holarctic Anoplocephaloides variabilis (Douthitt, 1915) complex, with the proposal of Microcephaloides n.g. (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae). Systematic Parasitology 70, 1526. doi: 10.1007/s11230-008-9129-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haukisalmi, V, Henttonen, H, Hardman, LM, Hardman, M, Laakkonen, J, Murueva, G, Niemimaa, J, Shulunov, S and Vapalahti, O (2009) Review of tapeworms of rodents in the Republic of Buryatia, with emphasis on anoplocephalid cestodes. Zookeys 8, 118. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.8.58.Google Scholar
Hickey, JR, Granjon, AC, Vigilant, L, Eckardt, W, Gilardi, KV, Cranfield, M, Musana, A, Masozera, AB, Babaasa, D, Ruzigandekwe, F and Robbins, MM (2019) Virunga 2015-2016 Surveys: monitoring mountain gorillas, other select mammals, and illegal activities. GVTC, IGCP & partners, Kigali, Rwanda. 45 pp. Available at https://igcp.org/content/uploads/2020/09/Virunga-Census-2015-2016-Final-Report-2019-with-French-summary-2019_04_24.pdf.Google Scholar
Huffman, MA, Gotoh, S, Turner, LA, Hamai, M and Yoshida, K (1997) Seasonal trends in intestinal nematode infection and medicinal plant use among chimpanzees in the Mahale Mountains, Tanzania. Primates 38, 111125. doi: 10.1007/BF02382002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jirků-Pomajbíková, K and Hůzová, Z (2018) Coproscopic examination techniques. In Modrý, D, Pafčo, B, Petrželková, KJ and Hasegawa, H (eds), Parasites of Apes an Atlas of Coproscopic Diagnostics. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Edition Chimaira, pp. 2228.Google Scholar
Kalema-Zikusoka, G, Rothman, JM and Fox, MT (2005) Intestinal parasites and bacteria of mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei) in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda. Primates 46, 5963. doi: 10.1007/s10329-004-0103-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalyaanamoorthy, S, Minh, BQ, Wong, TKF, von Haeseler, A and Jermiin, LS (2017) ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14, 587589. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kooriyama, T, Hasegawa, H, Shimozuru, M, Tsubota, T, Nishida, T and Iwaki, T (2012) Parasitology of five primates in Mahale Mountains National Park, Tanzania. Primates 53, 365375. doi: 10.1007/s10329-012-0311-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krief, S, Huffman, MA, Sévenet, T, Guillot, J, Bories, C, Hladik, CM and Wrangham, RW (2005) Noninvasive monitoring of the health of Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii in the Kibale National Park, Uganda. International Journal of Primatology 26, 467490. doi: 10.1007/s10764-005-2934-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letunic, I and Bork, P (2021) Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Research 49, W293W296. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lilly, AA, Mehlman, PT and Doran, D (2002) Intestinal parasites in gorilla, chimpanzees, and humans at Mondika Research Site, Dzanga-Ndoki National Park, Central African Republic. International Journal of Primatology 23, 555573. doi: 10.1023/A:1014969617036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masi, S, Chauffour, S, Bain, O, Todd, A, Guillot, J and Krief, S (2012) Seasonal effects on great ape health: a case study of wild chimpanzees and western gorillas. PLoS ONE 7, e49805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLennan, MR and Huffman, MA (2012) High frequency of leaf swallowing and its relationship to intestinal parasite expulsion in “village” chimpanzees at Bulindi, Uganda. American Journal of Primatology 74, 642650. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLennan, MR, Hasegawa, H, Bardi, M and Huffman, MA (2017) Gastrointestinal parasite infections and self-medication in wild chimpanzees surviving in degraded forest fragments within an agricultural landscape mosaic in Uganda. PLoS ONE 12, e0180431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meana, A, Pato, NF, Martín, R, Mateos, A, Pérez-García, J and Luzón, M (2005) Epidemiological studies on equine cestodes in Central Spain: infection pattern and population dynamics. Veterinary Parasitology 130, 233240. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.03.040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mezerova, J, Koudela, B and Vojtkova, M (2007) Equine colic caused by tape worms – 5 clinical case reports. Praktische Tierarzt 88, 2627.Google Scholar
Minh, BQ, Nguyen, MAT and von Haeseler, A (2013) Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30, 11881195. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mudakikwa, AB, Cranfield, MR, Sleeman, JM and Eilenberger, U (2001) Clinical medicine, preventive health care and research on mountain gorillas in the Virunga Volcanoes region. In Robbins, MM, Sicotte, P and Stewart, KJ (eds), Mountain Gorillas. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 341360. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511661631.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muehlenbein, MP (2005) Parasitological analyses of the male chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda. American Journal of Primatology 65, 167179. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muhangi, D, Gardiner, CH, Ojok, L, Cranfield, MR, Gilardi, KVK, Mudakikwa, AB and Lowenstine, LJ (2021) Pathological lesions of the digestive tract in free-ranging mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei). American Journal of Primatology 83, e23290. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mul, IF, Paembonan, W, Singleton, I, Wich, SA and van Bolhuis, HG (2007) Intestinal parasites of free-ranging, semicaptive and captive Pongo abelii in Sumatra, Indonesia. International Journal of Primatology 28, 407420. doi: 10.1007/s10764-007-9119-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naz, S, Arooj, S, Ali, Z and Farooq, Z (2021) Potential consequences of captivity and environmental pollution in endoparasitic prevalence in different antelopes kept at wildlife parks. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28, 1630816313. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11561-x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, MK, Mittel, L, Grice, A, Erskine, M, Graves, E, Vaala, W, Tully, RC, French, DD, Bowman, R and Kaplan, RM (2019) AAEP Internal Parasite Control Guidelines. American Association of Equine Practitioners. Available at https://aaep.org/document/internal-parasite-control-guidelines (accessed 17 April 2023).Google Scholar
Nybelin, O (1927) Anoplocephala gorillae n. sp. Arkiv Zoologie 19B, 13.Google Scholar
Owiunji, I, Nkuutu, D, Kujirakwinja, D, Liengola, I, Plumptre, A, Nsanzurwimo, A, Fawcett, K, Gray, M and Mcneilage, A (2005) The biodiversity of the Virunga Volcanoes. Technical Report, Wildlife Conservation Society, New York. 97 pp. Available at https://library.wcs.org/doi/ctl/view/mid/33065/pubid/DMX1163000000.aspxGoogle Scholar
Pafčo, B (2018) Parasites of Gorillas. In Modrý, D, Pafčo, B, Petrželková, KJ and Hasegawa, H (eds), Parasites of Apes an Atlas of Coproscopic Diagnostics. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Edition Chimaira, pp. 6470.Google Scholar
Pafčo, B, Benavides, JA, Pšenková-Profousová, I, Modrý, D, Červená, B, Shutt, KA, Hasegawa, H, Fuh, T, Todd, AF and Petrželková, KJ (2017) Do habituation, host traits and seasonality have an impact on protist and helminth infections of wild western lowland gorillas? Parasitology Research 116, 34013410. doi: 10.1007/s00436-017-5667-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrželková, KJ, Uwamahoro, C, Pafčo, B, Červená, B, Samaš, P, Mudakikwa, A, Muvunyi, R, Uwingeli, P, Gilardi, K, Nziza, J, Noheri, JB, Eckardt, W, Ndagijimana, F, Ssebide, B, Okwirokello, R, Nizeyimana, F, Syaluha, EK, Nzayisenga, G, Girón, LF, Bahizi, M, Ntwari, EA, Lukusa, J-P, Tumushime, JC, Mangura, D, Mapilanga, J, Kalonji, A, Aruho, R, Stryková, A, Tehlarová, Z, Cameira, R, Lowenstine, L, Šlapeta, J, Romportl, D, Ferrari, N, Cranfield, M and Modrý, D (2021) Heterogeneity in patterns of helminth infections across populations of mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei). Scientific Reports 11, 10869. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89283-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrželková, KJ, Samaš, P, Romportl, D, Uwamahoro, C, Červená, B, Pafčo, B, Prokopová, T, Cameira, R, Granjon, AC, Shapiro, A, Bahizi, M, Nziza, J, Noheri, JB, Syaluha, EK, Eckardt, W, Ndagijimana, F, Šlapeta, J, Modrý, D, Gilardi, K, Muvunyi, R, Uwingeli, P, Mudakikwa, A, Mapilanga, J, Kalonji, A, Hickey, JR and Cranfield, M (2022) Ecological drivers of helminth infection patterns in the Virunga Massif mountain gorilla population. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 17, 174184. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2022.01.007.Google ScholarPubMed
Rasambainarivo, FT, Junge, RE and Lewis, RJ (2014) Biomedical evaluation of Verreaux's sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi) from Kirindi Mitea National Park in Madagascar. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 45, 247255. doi: 10.1638/2013-0038R1.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redmond, I (1983) Summary of parasitological research, November 1976 to April 1978. In Fossey, D (ed), Gorillas in the Mist. London, UK: Hodder and Stoughton, pp. 271286.Google Scholar
Rijsman, LH, Monkelbaan, JF and Kusters, JG (2016) Clinical consequences of polymerase chain reaction-based diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections: PCR-based diagnosis of enteric protozoa. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 31, 18081815. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.13412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, JM, Pell, AN and Bowman, DD (2008) Host-parasite ecology of the helminths in mountain gorillas. The Journal of Parasitology 94, 834840. doi: 10.1645/GE-1454.1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, RM, Petrášová, J, Pomajbíková, K, Profousová, I, Petrželková, KJ, Sousa, C, Cable, J, Bruford, MW and Modrý, D (2013) Gastrointestinal symbionts of chimpanzees in Cantanhez National Park, Guinea-Bissau with respect to habitat fragmentation. American Journal of Primatology 75, 10321041. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sapp, SGH and Bradbury, RS (2020) The forgotten exotic tapeworms: a review of uncommon zoonotic Cyclophyllidea. Parasitology 147, 533558. doi: 10.1017/S003118202000013X.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuster, R (1991) [Morphometric analysis of an Anoplocephala perfoliata population]. Angewandte Parasitologie 32, 105111.Google ScholarPubMed
Servián, A, Zonta, ML, Cociancic, P, Falcone, A, Ruybal, P, Capasso, S and Navone, GT (2020) Morphological and molecular characterization of Bertiella sp. (Cestoda, Anoplocephalidae) infection in a human and howler monkeys in Argentina. Parasitology Research 119, 12911300. doi: 10.1007/s00436-020-06615-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S, Lyngdoh, D, Roy, B and Tandon, V (2016) Molecular phylogeny of Cyclophyllidea (Cestoda: Eucestoda): an in-silico analysis based on mtCOI gene. Parasitology Research 115, 33293335. doi: 10.1007/s00436-016-5092-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, DJ, Grenfell, BT and Dobson, AP (1998) Patterns of macroparasite aggregation in wildlife host populations. Parasitology 117, 597610. doi: 10.1017/S0031182098003448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinayitutse, E, Modry, D, Slapeta, J, Nyiramana, A, Mudakikwa, A, Muvunyi, R and Eckardt, W (2021) Daily defecation outputs of mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei) in the Volcanoes National Park, Rwanda. Primates 62, 311320. doi: 10.1007/s10329-020-00874-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sleeman, JM, Meader, LL, Mudakikwa, AB, Foster, JW and Patton, S (2000) Gastrointestinal parasites of mountain gorillas (Gorilla gorilla beringei) in the Parc National Des Volcans, Rwanda. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 31, 322328. doi: 10.1638/1042-7260(2000)031[0322:GPOMGG]2.0.CO;2.Google ScholarPubMed
Stunkard, WH (1962) The organization, ontogeny, and orientation of the Cestoda. The Quarterly Review of Biology 37, 2334. doi: 10.1086/403568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenora, F, Koubková, B and Feliu, C (2002) Redescription of Andrya cuniculi (Blanchard, 1891) (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae), a parasite of Oryctolagus cuniculus (Lagomorpha) in Spain. Folia Parasitologica 49, 5054. doi: 10.14411/fp.2002.011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomczuk, K, Kostro, K, Szczepaniak, KO, Grzybek, M, Studzińska, M, Demkowska-Kutrzepa, M and Roczeń-Karczmarz, M (2014) Comparison of the sensitivity of coprological methods in detecting Anoplocephala perfoliata invasions. Parasitology Research 113, 24012406. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-3919-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Traversa, D, Fichi, G, Campigli, M, Rondolotti, A, Iorio, R, Proudman, CJ, Pellegrini, D and Perrucci, SA (2008) Comparison of coprological, serological and molecular methods for the diagnosis of horse infection with Anoplocephala perfoliata (Cestoda, Cyclophyllidea). Veterinary Parasitology 152, 271277. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.12.032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trifinopoulos, J, Nguyen, LT, von Haeseler, A and Minh, BQ (2016) W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 44, W232W235. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vimalraj, PG and Jayathangaraj, MG (2015) Endoparasitic infections in free-ranging Asiatic elephants of Mudumalai and Anamalai Wildlife Sanctuary. Journal of Parasitic Diseases 39, 474476. doi: 10.1007/s12639-013-0375-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vlčková, K, Pafčo, B, Petrželková, KJ, Modrý, D, Todd, A, Yeoman, CJ, Torralba, M, Wilson, BA, Stumpf, RM, White, BA, Nelson, KE, Leigh, SR and Gomez, A (2018) Relationships between gastrointestinal parasite infections and the faecal microbiome in free-ranging western lowland gorillas. Frontiers in Microbiology 9, 1202. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wickström, LM, Haukisalmi, V, Varis, S, Hantula, J and Henttonen, H (2005) Molecular phylogeny and systematics of anoplocephaline cestodes in rodents and lagomorphs. Systematic Parasitology 62, 8399. doi: 10.1007/s11230-005-5488-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williamson, R, Beveridge, I and Gasser, R (1998) Coprological methods for the diagnosis of Anoplocephala perfoliata infection of the horse. Australian Veterinary Journal 76, 618621. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1998.tb10242.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, K, Bjørnstad, ON, Dobson, AP, Merler, S, Poglayen, G, Read, AF and Skorping, A (2001) Heterogeneities in macroparasite infections: patterns and processes. In Hudson, PJ, Rizzoli, A, Grenfell, BT, Heesterbeek, H and Dobson, AP (eds), The Ecology of Wildlife Diseases. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 644.Google Scholar
Wong, SS, Fung, KS, Chau, S, Poon, RW, Wong, SC and Yuen, KY (2014) Molecular diagnosis in clinical parasitology: when and why? Experimental Biology and Medicine 239, 14431460. doi: 10.1177/1535370214523880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrangham, RW (1995) Relationship of chimpanzee leaf-swallowing to a tapeworm infection. American Journal of Primatology 37, 297303. doi: 10.1002/ajp.1350370404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map of Virunga Massif region picturing the studied gorilla group distribution and vegetation types. Adapted from Petrželková et al. (2021).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Anoplocephalid cestodes collected from mountain gorillas. (A) Individual proglottids recovered from mountain gorilla feces. Scale 1 cm. (B) Adults inside the mountain gorilla small intestine as recovered at necropsy.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Depicting of how the measurements were taken from anoplocephalid eggs. As many anoplocephalid eggs are asymmetrical, egg and oncospherical diagonals (dashed lines) were introduced as maximal dimensions used for morphology investigation.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Adult Anoplocephala recovered from the mountain gorilla small intestines and preserved in ethanol. (A) Scolexes with 4 circular suckers, very short neck and proximal part of strobila. Note the craspedote proglottids, which are significantly wider than longer. Scale 0.5 cm. (B) Detail of scolex with circular suckers. No rudiments of a rostellum are visible. Scale 2 mm.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Diagram picturing the workflow of the anoplocephalid cestode diagnostic procedure in mountain gorilla fecal samples. Out of 99 Mini-FLOTAC©-cestode-negative samples, 19 were found as falsely-negative.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Cut outs of (A) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree derived by TPM2 + F + I + G4 model from available ITS1 sequences of anoplocephalid cestodes. Sequence of Hymenolepis microstoma (Accession number AJ287525) was used as an outgroup (not shown). (B) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree derived by TIM2 + F + R5 model from available cox1 sequences (1127 bp) of anoplocephalid cestodes. The green circles mark nodes with ultrafast bootstrap and SH-like approximate likelihood ratio test higher than 75%. Size of the circle correlates to the value. Complete uncollapsed trees can be found in Supplementary files SF2 (ITS1) and SF3 (cox1). The trees were visualized and edited in iTOL v6 (Letunic and Bork, 2021). Sequences derived in this study are in blue boxes, sequences from GenBank are identified by accession number.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree derived by TPM3u + F + R3 model from 1910 bp alignment of available 28S rDNA anoplocephalid cestode sequences. The green circles mark nodes with ultrafast bootstrap and SH-like approximate likelihood ratio test higher than 75%. Size of the circle correlates to the value. When appropriate, the clades have been collapsed (the uncollapsed tree can be found in Supplementary file SF4). The tree was visualized and edited in iTOL v6 (Letunic and Bork, 2021). Sequences derived in this study are in blue boxes, sequences from GenBank are identified by accession number. AUS, Australia; CAR, Central African Republic.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Comparison of A. gorillae and Bertiella sp. egg morphology. The type of pyriform apparatus (PA) was classified using a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 refers to clearly Bertiella-like PA (brush-like), whereas 10 refers to the Anoplocephala-like PA (bifurcated).

Figure 8

Figure 9. Anoplocephalid cestode eggs observed in mountain gorilla feces. (A—D) Anoplocephala morphotype typical for rectangular or polygonal shape, very thick shell (S), oncosphere (O) relatively smaller, and bifurcated pyriform apparatus (PA). (E—G) Bertiella morphotype characterized by round shape, thick shell, relatively bigger oncosphere and brush-like PA. (H) Detail of the PA fibres (arrows) visible when focusing throughout the depth of the egg. (A–G) on the same scale, both scales correspond to 20 μm.

Figure 9

Figure 10. Anoplocephala gorillae egg counts in studied mountain gorilla groups expressed as eggs per gram of feces (EPG) including all samples collected between 2018 and 2019. X axis shows individual gorilla groups. For statistical analyses of EPG see Petrželková et al., 2021.

Figure 10

Table 1. Percentage of Anoplocephala gorillae-positive nest samples (PAPS) in dry (Jan–Feb) and wet (Sep–Oct) seasons by groups in 2018

Figure 11

Figure 11. (A) Examples of Anoplocephala gorillae EPG fluctuation in selected individuals resampled during 2 sampling periods (May-July 2018 and September-November 2018). Black = A. gorillae positive sample with EPG value; grey = A. gorillae negative sample; white = animal not sampled; orange = microscopy negative, but PCR positive; M, male; F, female; INF, infant; JUV, juvenile; SAD, subadult; AD, adult; BB, blackback; SB, silverback; DSB, dominant silverback. (B) Comparison of information gained through individual sampling, providing individual prevalence (percentage of positive individuals) and nest sampling, providing percentage of positive samples (PPS). N = total number of individuals in the group, n = number of samples (nest sampling) or individuals examined

Supplementary material: File

Červená et al. supplementary material 1

Červená et al. supplementary material
Download Červená et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 38.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Červená et al. supplementary material 2

Červená et al. supplementary material
Download Červená et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 1.2 MB
Supplementary material: File

Červená et al. supplementary material 3

Červená et al. supplementary material
Download Červená et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 6.6 MB
Supplementary material: File

Červená et al. supplementary material 4

Červená et al. supplementary material
Download Červená et al. supplementary material 4(File)
File 9.8 MB
Supplementary material: File

Červená et al. supplementary material 5

Červená et al. supplementary material
Download Červená et al. supplementary material 5(File)
File 3.6 MB
Supplementary material: File

Červená et al. supplementary material 6

Červená et al. supplementary material
Download Červená et al. supplementary material 6(File)
File 19.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Červená et al. supplementary material 7

Červená et al. supplementary material
Download Červená et al. supplementary material 7(File)
File 17.9 KB