Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:36:00.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chemical guidance of Onchocerca lienalis microfilariae to the thorax of Simulium vittatum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

T. Lehmann ,
S. M. Cupp  and
W. E. Cupp
T. Lehmann
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
S. M. Cupp
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
W. E. Cupp
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The behavioural responses of Onchocerca lienalis microfilariae (mf) to tissue factors of the surrogate black fly host, Simulium vittatum, were studied using a novel in vitro bioassay. Mf accumulated towards thoracic tissues to a density 4 times higher than towards abdominal tissues, despite the larger surface area and volume of abdominal tissues. Mf migrated toward thoracic tissues regardless of whether or not contact with thoracic tissues was possible. Therefore, mf directed themselves toward the thorax rather than arresting their movement after they make contact with thoracic tissues. Chemical cue(s) provided a principal guidance for mf to locate thoracic tissues. Mf lost their ability to differentiate thoracic and abdominal tissues following addition of thoracic attractant(s) to excised abdomens and reversed their differential response when excised thoraces were depleted of chemical cue(s). Mf did not respond to salivary gland product, but to other thoracic factor(s). Intact thorax that was connected to 1–2 abdominal segments attracted considerably less mf than excised thorax. However, intact thorax attracted more mf than excised abdomen. Abdominal tissue size did not affect thorax attractiveness. Involvement of a large molecular weight protein(s) was suggested by the high attractiveness of the 100 kDa Centricon concentrator retentate and complete precipitation of attractant(s) by ethanol.

Keywords

chemotaxismigrationmicrofilariaenematodeOnchocercaorientationnavigationsite location.
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 110 , Issue 3 , April 1995 , pp. 329 - 337
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Demaris, A. (1992). Logit Modeling Practical Applications. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichler, D. A. (1973). Studies on Onchocerca gutturosa (Neumann, 1910) and its development in Simulium ornatum (Meigen, 1818). 3. Factors affecting the development of the parasite in its vector. Journal of Helminthology 47, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esslinger, J. H. (1962). Behavior of microfilariae of Brugia pahangi in Anopheles quadrimaculatus. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 11, 749–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoke, D. & Burke, P. J. (1980). Log Linear Models. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurence, B. R. (1966). Intake and migration of the microfilariae of Onchocerca volvulus (Leuckart) in Simulium damnosum Theobald. Journal of Helminthology 40, 337–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laurence, B. R. & Pester, F. R. N. (1961). The behaviour and development of Brugia patei (Buckley, Nelson and Heisch, 1958) in a mosquito host, Mansonia uniformis (Theobald). Journal of Helminthology 35, 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavoipierre, M. M. J. (1958). Studies on the host-parasite relationships of filarial nematodes and their arthropod hosts. II. The arthropod as a host to the nematode: a brief appraisal of our present knowledge, based on a study of the more important literature from 1878 to 1957. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 52, 326–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, T. (1994). Onchocerca lienalis in Simulium vittatum: navigation of microfilariae and the fly defense response. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Arizona, Tucson AZ.Google Scholar
Lehmann, T., Cupp, M. S. & Cupp, E. W. (1994). Onchocerca lienalis: rapid clearance of microfilariae in Simulium vittatum. Experimental Parasitology 78, 183–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellor, P. S. (1975). Studies on Onchocerca cervicalis Railliet and Henry 1910. V. The development of Onchocerca cervicalis larvae in the vectors. Journal of Helminthology 49, 33–42.Google ScholarPubMed
Sas Institute Inc. (1990). SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6. 4th Edn. Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Shelley, A. J., Pinger, R. R., Moraes, M. A. P. & Hayes, J. (1979). Concentration of microfilariae on Onchocerca volvulus by Simulium sanguineum during feeding: use in mapping parasite distribution in the skin. Journal of Medical Entomology 16, 48–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed