Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:39:13.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low-temperature exposure has immediate and lasting effects on the stress tolerance, chemotaxis and proteome of entomopathogenic nematodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2022

Peter E. Lillis
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, County Kildare, Ireland
Ian P. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, County Kildare, Ireland
James C. Carolan
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, County Kildare, Ireland
Christine T. Griffin*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, County Kildare, Ireland
*
Author for correspondence: Christine T. Griffin, E-mail: Christine.Griffin@mu.ie

Abstract

Temperature is one of the most important factors affecting soil organisms, including the infective stages of parasites and entomopathogenic nematodes, which are important biological control agents. We investigated the response of 2 species of entomopathogenic nematodes to different storage regimes: cold (9°C), culture temperature (20°C) and temperature swapped from 9 to 20°C. For Steinernema carpocapsae, cold storage had profound effects on chemotaxis, stress tolerance and protein expression that were retained in temperature-swapped individuals. These effects included reversal of chemotactic response for 3 (prenol, methyl salicylate and hexanol) of the 4 chemicals tested, and enhanced tolerance to freezing (−10°C) and desiccation (75% RH). Label-free quantitative proteomics showed that cold storage induced widespread changes in S. carpocapsae, including an increase in heat-shock proteins and late embryogenesis abundant proteins. For Heterorhabditis megidis, cold storage had a less dramatic effect on chemotaxis (as previously shown for proteomic expression) and changes were not maintained on return to 20°C. Thus, cold temperature exposure has significant effects on entomopathogenic nematodes, but the nature of the change depends on the species. Steinernema carpocapsae, in particular, displays significant plasticity, and its behaviour and stress tolerance may be manipulated by brief exposure to low temperatures, with implications for its use as a biological control agent.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Many nematode parasites of plants and animals achieve transmission by means of a free-living infective larva or infective juvenile (IJ). Temperature can profoundly impact the success of IJs in many ways, with moderate temperatures affecting the rates of dispersal or host finding, while extreme temperatures are lethal or damaging (Grewal et al., Reference Grewal, Lewis, Gaugler and Campbell1994; O'Connor et al., Reference O'Connor, Walkden-Brown and Kahn2006; Bryant and Hallem, Reference Bryant and Hallem2018; Aleuy and Kutz, Reference Aleuy and Kutz2020). Less extreme temperatures may also affect survival, for example, by slowing metabolism (Andaló et al., Reference Andaló, Moino, Maximiniano, Campos and Mendonça2011). Conditions experienced in the past may affect current activities; for species occurring at higher latitudes, the most widely documented effects are those of low temperature which may protect against subsequent more damaging conditions through acclimatization, or act to induce diapause or quiescence (Sommerville and Davey, Reference Sommerville and Davey2002; McSorley, Reference McSorley2003; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Wei, Kulhavy, Zhang and Sun2007; Evans and Perry, Reference Evans, Perry, Perry, Moens and Starr2009; Aleuy and Kutz, Reference Aleuy and Kutz2020). Here, we explore the effects of prior temperature conditions on entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN).

EPN Steinernema and Heterorhabditis have received much attention in recent years due to their usefulness both as model parasites and as biological control agents (Hallem et al., Reference Hallem, Rengarajan, Ciche and Sternberg2007; Koppenhöfer et al., Reference Koppenhöfer, Shapiro-Ilan and Hiltpold2020). Their IJs seek out and infect living insects, typically in soil. The IJ of EPN is similar to that of other plant and animal parasites (where present), and to the dauer juvenile of free-living nematodes such as Caenorhabditis elegans (Bubrig and Fierst, Reference Bubrig and Fierst2021), being a developmentally arrested, non-feeding stage with sealed mouth and anus, depending on lipid and glycogen stores for survival. The IJ, being a dauer stage, is more resistant than other life stages to abiotic stressors such as ultraviolet radiation, desiccation and extreme temperatures (Gaugler et al., Reference Gaugler, Bednarek and Campbell1992; Hibshman et al., Reference Hibshman, Clegg and Goldstein2020). EPN have a mutualistic relationship with insect pathogenic bacteria (Xenorhabdus spp. for steinernematids and Photorhabdus spp. for heterorhabditids), which are released by the IJ once inside a host (Forst et al., Reference Forst, Dowds, Boemare and Stackebrandt1997). The bacteria multiply, killing the insect (in conjunction with the nematodes) and converting it to a food source for 1 or more generations of nematodes; newly developed IJs emerge from depleted cadavers and disperse in search of new hosts. Heterorhabditis and Steinernema are not closely related (Blaxter et al., Reference Blaxter, De Ley, Garey, Liu, Scheldeman, Vierstraete, Vanfleteren, Mackey, Dorris, Frisse, Vida and Thomas1998), and have convergently evolved the entomopathogenic lifestyle (Poinar, Reference Poinar1993). EPN occur widely in nature, and several species are promising biocontrol agents, which are mass-produced and then stored until applied against insect pests (Lacey et al., Reference Lacey, Frutos, Kaya and Vail2001).

The effects of storage temperature and time (‘age’) on behaviours such as dispersal and infection have been documented for several EPN species (Fan and Hominick, Reference Fan and Hominick1991; Griffin, Reference Griffin1996; Yoder et al., Reference Yoder, Grewal and Taylor2004; Koppenhöfer et al., Reference Koppenhöfer, Ebssa and Fuzy2013). More recently it has been shown that culture and storage temperatures have profound effects on the chemotaxis of both EPN and animal parasites, including reversals of valence between attraction and repulsion to the same chemical (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Dillman and Hallem2016), which could impact host-finding and foraging behaviour. Prior exposure to low temperatures can also enhance IJs' resistance to freezing (Brown and Gaugler, Reference Brown and Gaugler1996; Ali and Wharton, Reference Ali and Wharton2013) and desiccation (Jagdale and Grewal, Reference Jagdale and Grewal2007).

This study aims to investigate the effects of temperature and time on the behaviour, stress tolerance and proteome of Steinernema carpocapsae, the best studied and most economically important EPN species. We also include Heterorhabditis megidis in the behavioural assays; the behaviour of this species has been extensively studied with respect to storage temperature and time (Griffin, Reference Griffin1996; O'Leary et al., Reference O'Leary, Stack, Chubb and Burnell1998; Fitters and Griffin, Reference Fitters and Griffin2004; Guy et al., Reference Guy, Gaffney, Kapranas and Griffin2017). We have recently shown, using quantitative label-free proteomics, that the proteomes of S. carpocapsae and H. megidis IJs differ in their response to temperature: when newly emerged IJs were transferred from a culture temperature of 20 to 9°C, the proteome of S. carpocapsae underwent profound changes that were maintained during further storage at that temperature, while the proteome of H. megidis underwent more gradual changes over time at both 20 and 9°C (Lillis et al., Reference Lillis, Griffin and Carolan2022). Here, we extend our exploration of the effects of storage temperature and time on these 2 species, using similar conditions to those of Lillis et al. (Reference Lillis, Griffin and Carolan2022) but including phenotypic assays (chemotaxis and, for S. carpocapsae, stress tolerance), and investigating whether cold-induced changes are retained when IJs are returned to their culture temperature. Specific objectives were (1) following Lee et al. (Reference Lee, Dillman and Hallem2016), to explore how olfactory responses of both species change over time at different storage temperatures; (2) to test how 9°C storage protects S. carpocapsae IJs against stress (freezing and desiccation); (3) to investigate whether changes in olfaction and stress tolerance induced in S. carpocapsae by short-term storage at 9°C are maintained following return to culture temperature; and (4) to compare the proteome of such temperature-swapped IJs with that of IJs maintained in constant conditions.

Materials and methods

Nematode culturing and conditioning

Heterorhabditis megidis UK211 and S. carpocapsae All (both of which had been maintained in laboratory culture for several years) were cultured in last instar Galleria mellonella larvae (Mealworm Company, Sheffield, UK) using methods outlined in Woodring and Kaya (Reference Woodring and Kaya1988), at 20°C, with an inoculum density of 100 IJs per insect. The larvae died after 2–3 days, and cadavers were placed on White traps (White, Reference White1927) and monitored daily. After the first emergence of IJs, the White trap water was replaced with fresh sterile tap water. IJs that emerged into the water over 3–4 days were collected and rinsed 3 times by sedimentation. The IJs were stored at 1000 IJs mL−1 in sterile tap water in 35 mL aliquots in lidded plastic tubs (9 cm diameter). IJs were placed at constant temperatures and assayed at intervals. In some experiments, IJs were transferred from one temperature to another. Each tub of IJs was used once only.

Chemotaxis assays

Chemotaxis assays (Bargmann et al., Reference Bargmann, Hartwieg and Horvitz1993) were conducted on 60 mm Petri dishes with 20 mL of 2% nutrient agar. Test stimulus (5 μL) was added to a circle (1 cm diameter) on one side of the plate, and 5 μL of the appropriate diluent was added to a control circle on the opposite side. Sodium azide (2 μL) was added to each circle, to anaesthetize nematodes arriving there (Bargmann et al., Reference Bargmann, Hartwieg and Horvitz1993). IJs were concentrated by sedimentation and approximately 100–250 IJs in 2 μL were added to the centre of the plate. IJs were allowed to migrate for 1 h at 20°C. The chemotaxis index (CI) was calculated as (number of IJs in treatment circle–number of IJs in control circle)/total number of IJs in both circles. Plates which had fewer than 5 IJs in either scoring region were discounted to prevent small numbers from skewing the data (Hallem et al., Reference Hallem, Dillman, Hong, Zhang, Yano, DeMarco and Sternberg2011).

Putative attractants and repellents were chosen based on the literature: methyl salicylate (Chaisson and Hallem, Reference Chaisson and Hallem2012), acetone (O'Halloran and Burnell, Reference O'Halloran and Burnell2003), prenol (Baiocchi et al., Reference Baiocchi, Lee, Choe and Dillman2017, Reference Baiocchi, Braun and Dillman2019; Kin et al., Reference Kin, Baiocchi and Dillman2019) and hexanol (O'Halloran and Burnell, Reference O'Halloran and Burnell2003; Chaisson and Hallem, Reference Chaisson and Hallem2012). Prenol (3-methyl-2-buten-1-ol) was diluted to 2 m, by mixing 203 μL of 99.9% prenol (Sigma-Aldrich, UK) with 797 μL of ethanol as per Baiocchi et al. (Reference Baiocchi, Lee, Choe and Dillman2017). Dilutions (1 in 10) of acetone, hexanol and methyl salicylate were made in paraffin oil. Sodium azide (1 m) was prepared by transferring crystalline sodium azide to 1 mL MilliQ water.

There were 3 experiments utilizing chemotaxis assays. In experiment 1, IJs of S. carpocapsae and H. megidis were assayed at time 0 (immediately after collection and washing), and after 1, 3, 6 and 9 weeks at 9°C, and 1, 3 and 6 weeks at 20°C. An additional treatment was included for S. carpocapsae: after IJs were stored at 9°C for 1 week, they were transferred to 20°C, and assayed after 1 day, and 2, 5 and 8 weeks (corresponding to a total time of 3, 6 or 9 weeks from time 0).

In experiment 2, odours which elicited significantly different CIs at the 3-week timepoint in experiment 1 were chosen to assay the effect of brief exposure to low temperatures on the CI, both immediately and after subsequent storage at 20°C. Methyl salicylate and prenol were used for H. megidis and hexanol and prenol were used for S. carpocapsae. IJs were assayed at time 0 and after 1 day, 1 week or 3 weeks at 9°C, or 3 weeks at 20°C. In addition, after 1 day or 1 week at 9°C, IJs were transferred to 20°C and assayed 3 weeks from the start of the experiment. Steinernema carpocapsae IJs were also assayed and transferred to 20°C after 3 h, due to the plasticity of their chemotactic responses.

In experiment 3, IJs were assayed at time 0, and after 1 and 3 weeks at 9, 12, 15 and 20°C. As above-mentioned, chemotaxis was assessed against odours which give strong responses, methyl salicylate and prenol for H. megidis, and hexanol and prenol for S. carpocapsae IJs.

In each experiment, there were 3 culture batches of each species with either 5 (experiment 1) or 10 (experiments 2 and 3) assay plates per batch to give a total of 15 or 30 plates per treatment at each timepoint, respectively. An exception was for IJs transferred from 9 to 20°C in experiment 1, where there was a total of 5 plates per timepoint. Experiment 2 was repeated with 3 culture batches and 10 plates per batch in each run.

Freezing and desiccation assays

Assays were adapted from O'Leary et al. (Reference O'Leary, Stack, Chubb and Burnell1998) and Adhikari et al. (Reference Adhikari, Wall and Adams2010). Sterile tap water (50 μL) containing approximately 50 IJs was pipetted onto Whatman filter paper (1 cm diameter) in a 3 cm Petri dish. Plates (without lids) were transferred to either −10°C for 6 h or 75% RH for 5 days. These conditions were chosen to give approximately 50% survival in freshly harvested (time 0) IJs. Desiccation chambers were maintained at 75% RH using supersaturated sodium chloride solutions (Winston and Bates, Reference Winston and Bates1960). After the assay time, 20 mL of sterile tap water was added and IJ survival was assessed after 24 h. Experiments were conducted twice, with 3 culture batches of nematodes in each repeat of the experiment. Five plates were tested per batch of nematodes, to give a total of 30 plates per storage treatment.

Statistical analysis

Statistics were carried out in Graphpad Prism v9.0.1. Kruskal–Wallis tests were performed on data at the significance level of P < 0.05, with Dunn's multiple comparison post hoc tests to identify groups which were significantly different.

Protein sample preparation

The contents of a tub of IJs were sedimented in a 50 mL Falcon tube at their storage temperature. The pelleted IJs (150 μL) were transferred to a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. Each sample was homogenized in lysis buffer, containing 6 m urea, 2 m thiourea and a protease inhibitor cocktail (cOmplete, Mini Protease Inhibitor Cocktail, Merck), centrifuged at 10 000 × g for 1 min, and snap frozen. This step was repeated 3 times to ensure complete homogenization. Protein content was then quantified using Qubit (Invitrogen), following the manufacturer's instructions. Protein (100 μg) was purified using a 2D Clean Up Kit (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The resulting pellets were stored in the kit's wash solution at −20°C until the last samples were collected, then all were centrifuged at 13 000 × g for 5 min and the resulting pellets were resuspended in 50 μL of resuspension buffer (6 m urea, 2 m thiourea, 0.1 m Tris-HCl, pH 8). A volume of 20 μL was aliquoted from each sample for reduction, alkylation and digestion. One hundred and five microlitres of ammonium bicarbonate (50 mm) and 1 μL of dithiothreitol were added and the samples were incubated at 56°C for 20 min. Once cooled, the samples were alkylated with 2.7 μL of iodoacetamide in the dark.

One microlitre of 1% (w/v) solution of ProteaseMax (Promega) and 0.5 μμL−1 trypsin (Promega) were added to the samples and incubated at 37°C for a minimum of 16 h. Samples were removed from 37°C, centrifuged briefly and acidified with 1 μL of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) for 5 min at room temperature (20–25°C). Samples were centrifuged at 13 000 × g for 10 min and the supernatant was purified using C18 Spin Columns (Pierce, Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer's instructions and then lyophilized in a Speedyvac concentrator (Thermo Scientific Savant DNA120). Samples were resuspended in a loading buffer (2% v/v acetonitrile, 0.05% v/v TFA) and 1 μg per sample was loaded on a QExactive (Thermo Fisher Scientific) high-resolution accurate mass spectrometer connected to a Dionex Ultimate 3000 (RSLCnano) chromatography system. Peptides were separated over a 2–40% gradient of acetonitrile on a Thermo Fisher EASY-Spray, PepMap RSLC C18 column (500 mm length, 75 mm ID), using a reverse-phase gradient at a flow rate of 250 nL min−1 over 125 min. All data were acquired over 105 min with the mass spectrometer operating in automatic data-dependent switching mode. A full mass spectrometry (MS) scan at 140 000 resolution and a range of 300–1700 m/z was followed by an MS/MS scan, resolution 17 500 and a range of 200–2000 m/z, selecting the 15 most intense ions prior to MS/MS. There were 4 biological replicates (tubs of IJs) per storage treatment.

Proteomic data processing

Protein identification and label-free quantification (LFQ) normalization of MS/MS data were performed using Max-Quant v1.6.3.3 (http://www.maxquant.org) following the general procedures and settings outlined in Hubner et al. (Reference Hubner, Bird, Cox, Splettstoesser, Bandilla, Poser, Hyman and Mann2010). The Andromeda search algorithm (Cox et al., Reference Cox, Neuhauser, Michalski, Scheltema, Olsen and Mann2011) incorporated in the MaxQuant software was used to correlate MS/MS data for S. carpocapsae against the predicted protein datasets derived from the S. carpocapsae genome (Serra et al., Reference Serra, Macchietto, Macias-Muñoz, McGill, Rodriguez, Rodriguez, Murad and Mortazavi2019).

Normalized LFQ intensities were used to quantify protein abundances, and the data were filtered to remove contaminants. The LFQ intensities were log2 transformed, and each replicate was renamed to their respective groups (e.g. 3wks9°C for proteins from IJs stored at 9°C for 3 weeks). Only proteins found in 3 replicates of at least 1 group were retained. A data imputation step replaced missing values with the values of low abundant proteins chosen randomly from a distribution specified by a downshift of 2 times the mean standard deviation (s.d.) and a width of 0.3 times the s.d.

A principal component analysis (PCA) was initially performed on the normalized intensity values of all replicates. However, a number of outliers were identified, resulting in 3 replicates in each treatment group in the final datasets for analysis.

An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on all groups using a Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate of <1% to select proteins for Z-score normalization. These ANOVA significant proteins were used for hierarchical clustering of samples using Euclidean distance and average linkage pre-processed with K means.

Volcano plots were generated in Perseus by plotting negative log P values on the y-axis and log2-fold transformed differences on the x-axis for each comparison. Pairwise t-tests were performed comparing each of the cold-stored treatments (IJs stored at 9°C for 1 week and transferred to 20°C for 2 weeks, and IJs stored at 9°C for 3 weeks) to the IJs maintained at 20°C for 3 weeks, to visualize the effect of temperature change on the IJ proteome. Statistically significant (SS; P < 0.05) and differentially abundant (DA; fold change of 1.5) proteins were identified as SSDAs and selected for further analysis.

The genome of S. carpocapsae has been recently sequenced (Serra et al., Reference Serra, Macchietto, Macias-Muñoz, McGill, Rodriguez, Rodriguez, Murad and Mortazavi2019), and the protein file was downloaded from Wormbase Parasite (https://parasite.wormbase.org/Steinernema_carpocapsae_prjna202318/Info/Index) and used for detection of peptides.

The MS proteomics data and MaxQuant search output files have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (Côté et al., Reference Côté, Griss, Dianes, Wang, Wright, van den Toorn, van Breukelen, Heck, Hulstaert, Martens, Reisinger, Csordas, Ovelleiro, Perez-Rivevol, Barsnes, Hermjakob and Vizcaíno2012) via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD027609.

Results

Effect of storage at constant temperatures (9 and 20°C) on chemotaxis

The results of chemotaxis experiments 1 and 2 are shown in Figs 1–3, respectively. Steinernema carpocapsae IJs were initially (time 0) strongly attracted to hexanol and methyl salicylate, strongly repulsed by prenol, and weakly attracted to acetone (Fig. 1). When stored at 9°C for 1 week, initially strong responses (CI > ±0.8) were completely reversed and remained so for the remainder of the 9°C storage period: IJs became repulsed by hexanol (Fig. 1C) and methyl salicylate (Fig. 1B) and highly attracted towards prenol (Fig. 1A). In contrast, the initially weak attraction (CI 0.3) towards acetone was intensified after 1 week at 9°C (Fig. 1D). The responses of IJs which remained at 20°C generally followed the same trend as those at 9°C but the change was more gradual: over time, IJs slowly became attracted to prenol (Fig. 1A), repulsed by methyl salicylate (Fig. 1B), and less attracted to hexanol (Fig. 1C). The response to acetone did not follow this trend; IJs were repulsed after 1 week at 20°C but the response returned to time 0 levels thereafter (Fig. 1D).

Fig. 1. Chemotaxis index (mean ± s.e.) of S. carpocapsae IJs stored at 9 and 20°C, and those placed at 9°C for 1 week and transferred to 20°C in response to 4 odorants. Within a panel, values accompanied by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05, Dunn's multiple comparisons).

Fig. 2. Chemotaxis index (mean ± s.e.) of H. megidis IJs after temperature conditioning at 9 and 20°C in response to 4 odorants. Within a panel, values accompanied by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05, Dunn's multiple comparisons).

Fig. 3. Chemotaxis index (mean ± s.e.) of S. carpocapsae (A, B) and H. megidis (C, D) IJs stored at 9°C for periods of up to 1 week and transferred into 20°C for the remainder of a 3-week period. Control IJs were kept at 9 or 20°C and tested at intervals stated. Within a panel, values accompanied by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05, Dunn's multiple comparisons).

The reversal of chemotaxis observed following 1 week at 9°C seen in S. carpocapsae IJs in experiment 1 was explored over shorter time periods in experiment 2. Exposure to 9°C for only 3 h had a significant effect on the response to prenol, which changed from strong repulsion at time 0 to weak attraction after just 3 h at 9°C (Fig. 3A). A significant effect on the response to hexanol was first seen after 1 day at 9°C, and the response was reversed from positive to negative following 3 days at 9°C (Fig. 3B).

Heterorhabditis megidis IJs were initially (time 0) weakly attracted to methyl salicylate and hexanol and repulsed by prenol and acetone (Fig. 2). Storage at 9°C tended to enhance the response of IJs, which became more attracted to methyl salicylate (Fig. 2B) and more repulsed by prenol (Fig. 2A) and acetone (Fig. 2D). Exploration of shorter-term exposure to 9°C in experiment 2 showed that increased repulsion to prenol was seen already after just 1 day (Fig. 3C). Storage at 20°C tended to have the opposite effect to 9°C, and the greatest difference between storage temperatures was seen in the first 1–3 weeks (Fig. 2). The greatest difference between temperatures was for prenol, which also had the strongest time 0 response (CI −0.6; Fig. 2A), while little divergence was seen for hexanol which elicited a weak response (CI 0.1; Fig. 2C) at time 0.

Chemotaxis of IJs stored for up to 1 week at 9°C and then transferred to 20°C

In experiment 1, the CI of S. carpocapsae IJs which were stored at 9°C for 1 week and then transferred to 20°C for the rest of the experiment tended to remain similar to the CI of IJs which remained at 9°C throughout (Fig. 1). The similarity persisted for the full 9 weeks in the case of prenol (Fig. 1A), but the responses began to diverge at 6 weeks in the case of methyl salicylate (Fig. 1C) and at 9 weeks for hexanol (Fig. 1B). The response to acetone of transferred IJs was intermediate between that of IJs stored exclusively at 9 or 20°C (Fig. 1D).

Cold-induced changes in chemotaxis towards prenol seen in S. carpocapsae by 3 h at 9°C were maintained and even intensified following transfer to 20°C (Fig. 3A). When tested after 3 weeks, the IJs which were transferred to 20°C after 3 h, 1 day or 1 week at 9°C had the same response as IJs left at 9°C for the full 3 weeks, differing significantly from the CI of IJs kept at 20°C for 3 weeks (Fig. 3A).

In contrast, although H. megidis IJs which were at 9°C for 1 day or 1 week had an altered (intensified) chemotatic response towards prenol, this was not maintained after subsequent storage at 20°C; the CI differed from that of IJs maintained for 3 weeks at 9°C but not from that of IJs that remained at 20°C throughout (Fig. 3C). A similar pattern was seen in response to methyl salicylate (Fig. 3D).

Do all temperatures below culture temperature affect chemotaxis similarly?

For S. carpocapsae, IJs stored at 9, 12 and 15°C all showed a similar CI, differing significantly (and with opposite valence) from that of IJs stored 20°C after 1 (hexanol) or 3 (prenol) weeks (Fig. 4A and B). Similarly, H. megidis IJs stored at 9, 12 or 15°C for 3 weeks had a similar CI for prenol that differed significantly from that of IJs stored at 20°C. However, chemotaxis towards methyl salicylate showed a more graded effect of storage temperature on H. megidis. After either 1 or 3 weeks, there was a significant difference between IJs stored at 9 and 20°C, with IJs stored at 12 and 15°C showing intermediate CIs (Fig. 4C and D).

Fig. 4. Chemotaxis index (mean ± s.e.) of S. carpocapsae IJs (A, B) and H. megidis IJs (C, D) and against a repellent (left) and an attractant (right), upon emergence from the host (time 0) and after storage at 9, 12, 15 and 20°C for 1 or 3 weeks. Within a panel, values accompanied by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05, Dunn's multiple comparisons).

Effect of conditioning on freezing and desiccation tolerance of S. carpocapsae

Steinernema carpocapsae IJs stored at 9°C showed increased survival in both freezing (−10°C for 6 h) and in desiccation (75% RH for 5 days) assays relative to freshly emerged (time 0) IJs and those stored at 20°C, with significant differences in both cases (Fig. 5). IJs stored at 9°C for 1 week and transferred to 20°C for 2 weeks showed similarly high survival rates which were not statistically significantly different from those of IJs stored at 9°C for 1 or 3 weeks (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5. Survival (mean ± s.e.) of S. carpocapsae IJs exposed to freezing stress (−10°C for 6 h) or desiccation stress (75% RH for 5 days). IJs were either freshly emerged (time 0), stored at 9 or 20°C for 1 and 3 weeks, or stored at 9°C for 1 week and then swapped to 20°C for 2 weeks. Within a panel, values accompanied by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05, Dunn's multiple comparisons).

Response of S. carpocapsae proteome to storage conditions

In general, the proteome of S. carpocapsae IJs which were stored at 9°C for 1 week and transferred to 20°C for 2 weeks (temperature-swapped) was more similar to the proteome of IJs stored at 9°C than at 20°C for the full 3 weeks (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6. (A) PCA of proteins from S. carpocapsae IJs stored at 9°C for 3 weeks, at 9°C for 1 week and then swapped to 20°C for 2 weeks, and at 20°C for 3 weeks. (B) Heat map of S. carpocapsae All statistically significant proteins: 2-way unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the median Z-score normalized label-free quantification (LFQ) intensity values of all statistically significant proteins from IJs stored at 9°C for 3 weeks (left), at 9°C for 1 week and then swapped to 20°C for 2 weeks (middle), and at 20°C for 3 weeks (right). Differences in protein abundance are indicated by colour changes from low (blue) to high (red) protein abundance representative of changes in Z-score normalized log2-fold transformed LFQ intensity values.

In total, 2359 proteins were detected in the S. carpocapsae IJs, 36 of which were identified as statistically significant in a 1-way ANOVA. These 36 proteins (grouped by unsupervised hierarchical clustering in Perseus) are shown in a heat map (a visualization of the high and low abundance proteins present in the IJs; Fig. 6B) with further details shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Proteins identified in 2-way unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the median Z-score normalized label-free quantification (LFQ) intensity values of all statistically significant proteins (Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate 0.01), for S. carpocapsae IJs stored for 3 weeks, either at 9°C (3w9C) or 20°C (3w20C) throughout, or swapped from 9 to 20°C after 1 week (1w9C → 20C)

Cluster D consists of proteins which were detected at high abundance in the IJs stored at 9°C and in the temperature-swapped IJs, and low abundance in 20°C-stored IJs. This cluster is the largest of those detected, and consists primarily of molecular chaperones, such as heat-shock proteins (HSPs) and late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins, and stress proteins such as glutathione peroxidase and copper superoxide dismutase involved in reactive oxygen species protection.

Clusters A and B are comprised of 10 proteins, which show the reverse pattern to cluster D: being detected in increased abundance at 20°C and decreased abundance in both the 9°C-stored and temperature-swapped IJs. Cluster A contains proteins related to fat binding and stress proteins while cluster B contains proteins related to the ribosome.

Cluster C consists of proteins which are highest in the temperature-swapped IJs, lowest in the 20°C-stored IJs and intermediate in the 9°C-stored IJs. This cluster contains a HSP, a serine protease inhibitor, macroglobulin-related proteins and various hypothetical proteins (Table 1). There were 2 ‘clusters’ which contained 1 protein each, without a clear function (Table 1).

Highest and lowest abundance proteins

Statistically significant annotated proteins which were at least 5-fold increased or decreased in abundance (SSDAs) in the 9°C-stored and/or in the temperature-swapped IJs relative to the 20°C IJs are shown in Table 2. The proteins that showed the greatest increase in abundance in both the 9°C and temperature-swapped treatments were chaperone proteins, such as (Caenorhabditis remanii heat shock protein) CRE-HSP and LEA proteins which were 13.4- to 140.5-fold higher than in the IJs at 20°C for 3 weeks. Various enzymes were decreased in abundance relative to the 20°C-stored IJs including chitinase which was 25.6–39.2 times lower in the temperature-swapped and 9°C-stored IJs (Table 2). A number of proteins identified as SSDAs were not annotated (Supplementary Table 1), and these proteins may have important but unknown roles in temperature adaptation.

Table 2. Annotated statistically significant proteins 5-fold changed in abundance in S. carpocapsae IJs stored at 9°C for 3 weeks (3w9C) and those stored at 9°C for 1 week and transferred to 20°C (1w9C → 20C), relative to IJs stored at 20°C for 3 weeks

Proteins which were identified but could not be annotated can be found in Supplementary Table 1.

Discussion

Exposure to low temperatures had profound effects on the chemotaxis and stress tolerance of S. carpocapsae IJs, as expected based on previous research (Jagdale and Grewal, Reference Jagdale and Grewal2007; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Dillman and Hallem2016). We also showed that these changes were accompanied by major proteomic reorganization and that the changes in chemotaxis, stress tolerance and proteome induced by low-temperature storage were largely maintained on return to culture temperature for 2 weeks. These findings have implications for how we understand the seasonal adaptations of these nematodes in their natural environment, but also how cold storage of mass-produced nematodes may impact their subsequent behaviour and survival following application for biocontrol purposes.

Storage at 9°C for 1 or 3 weeks enhanced S. carpocapsae IJs' tolerance to both freezing and desiccation. Cold acclimation is known to enhance the survival of nematodes, including Steinernema IJs, at sub-zero temperatures (Brown and Gaugler, Reference Brown and Gaugler1996; Smith et al., Reference Smith, Wharton and Marshall2008; Ali and Wharton, Reference Ali and Wharton2013), and there are also reports of cold acclimation enhancing desiccation tolerance (Jagdale and Grewal, Reference Jagdale and Grewal2007). Freezing and desiccation are closely linked environmental stressors for nematodes, both in the nature of the stress and the adaptations involved, with considerable cross-tolerance between the 2 stresses (Adhikari et al., Reference Adhikari, Wall and Adams2010). The protective effect of cold acclimation has been attributed in part to the accumulation of trehalose and other low molecular weight polyols which play a protective role (Jagdale and Grewal, Reference Jagdale and Grewal2007; Ali and Wharton, Reference Ali and Wharton2015), while stress proteins are also important (Phadtare et al., Reference Phadtare, Alsina and Inouye1999; Seybold et al., Reference Seybold, Wharton, Thorne and Marshall2017). Recently, Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Chen, Yang and Zhang2021) reported widespread transcriptional programming in eggs of the plant parasite Meloidogyne incognita acclimated at 4°C, including genes involved in lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, and HSPs.

In our study, the proteins which exhibited the greatest increase in abundance in cold-stored and temperature-swapped S. carpocapsae IJs relative to those maintained at the culture temperature were chaperone proteins. The highest abundance chaperone was CRE-HSP, a short heat shock protein (sHSP) found in Caenorhabditis remanei. Members of the sHSP family enhance cold and freezing stress tolerance (Sabehat et al., Reference Sabehat, Lurie and Weiss1998; Pacheco et al., Reference Pacheco, Pereira, Almeida and Sousa2009; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Lei, Li and Oetting2011). High levels of LEA proteins were detected in both 9°C-stored IJs and temperature-swapped IJs. LEA proteins, which have been identified in several nematode species (Solomon et al., Reference Solomon, Salomon, Paperna and Glazer2000; Browne et al., Reference Browne, Dolan, Tyson, Goyal, Tunnacliffe and Burnell2004; Gal et al., Reference Gal, Glazer and Koltai2004; Goyal et al., Reference Goyal, Walton and Tunnacliffe2005), are disordered molecular chaperones which enhance an organism's survival under freezing stress (Solomon et al., Reference Solomon, Salomon, Paperna and Glazer2000; Browne et al., Reference Browne, Tunnacliffe and Burnell2002; NDong et al., Reference NDong, Danyluk, Wilson, Pocock, Huner and Sarhan2002; Reyes et al., Reference Reyes, Campos, Wei, Arora, Yang, Karlson and Covarrubias2008; Anderson et al., Reference Anderson, Ferreras, Trindade and Cowan2015). LEA proteins interact with trehalose to facilitate the formation of bioglasses (Browne et al., Reference Browne, Dolan, Tyson, Goyal, Tunnacliffe and Burnell2004) which confer resistance to desiccation (Solomon et al., Reference Solomon, Salomon, Paperna and Glazer2000) and freezing (NDong et al., Reference NDong, Danyluk, Wilson, Pocock, Huner and Sarhan2002). The increased abundance of LEA proteins and HSPs induced by low-temperature storage may also have enhanced S. carpocapsae IJs' tolerance to desiccation (Close, Reference Close1996; Adhikari et al., Reference Adhikari, Wall and Adams2009; Mizrahi et al., Reference Mizrahi, Heller, Goldenberg and Arad2010; Hand et al., Reference Hand, Menze, Toner, Boswell and Moore2011).

The protein which was decreased to the greatest extent (at least 25-fold) in cold-stored relative to 20°C-stored IJs was chitinase, the enzyme responsible for degrading chitin. Chitinases have been detected in Steinernema riobrave-infected G. mellonella and are speculated to play a role in antifungal activity (Isaacson and Webster, Reference Isaacson and Webster2002). Chitinases may also facilitate penetration of the insect cuticle and damage the host, expediting its death (Brandt et al., Reference Brandt, Adang and Spence1978; Osman et al., Reference Osman, Hussein and Abdallah2004; Hao et al., Reference Hao, Montiel, Lucena, Costa and Simoes2012). Thus, relatively low levels of chitinase in cold relative to warm-stored IJs may reflect the lower probability of IJs at low temperatures being infected by fungal pathogens, or of infecting an insect host, or both.

The ecological significance of increased stress tolerance and associated proteomic remodelling in response to cold is clear: a drop in temperature may indicate the onset of winter and the increased probability of unfavourable conditions including freezing. The changes in chemotaxis seen in response to cold are less easy to interpret, in particular the reversal of valence in which previously attractive substances become repulsive and vice versa. Similar phenomena were documented in detail by Lee et al. (Reference Lee, Dillman and Hallem2016), who showed that both culture and storage temperature affected the olfactory responses of S. carpocapsae, including a reversal of valence for several of the tested substances. In our experiments, the initial attraction of S. carpocapsae by hexanol and methyl salicylate, and repulsion by prenol, was completely reversed by 1 week at 9°C. Hexanol and methyl salicylate are released by plant roots (Roberts et al., Reference Roberts, Kundun, Rowley, Hall, Douglas and Pope2019) and so attraction might help bring IJs to the rhizosphere and associated insects. Prenol was identified in G. mellonella infected with Steinernema spp. (Baiocchi et al., Reference Baiocchi, Lee, Choe and Dillman2017), and was highly repulsive to several species of Steinernema and to Heterorhabditis indica (Baiocchi et al., Reference Baiocchi, Lee, Choe and Dillman2017, Reference Baiocchi, Braun and Dillman2019; Kin et al., Reference Kin, Baiocchi and Dillman2019), and so the initial repulsion by prenol could help IJs avoid an already infected insect. When maintained at 20°C, the response of S. carpocapsae IJs to these 3 odours declined gradually, and reached reversal of valence after 6 weeks in the case of prenol and methyl salicylate. These age-related changes were exceeded by those of cold-stored IJs within a week. The attraction of S. carpocapsae IJs to prenol with age or after short-term exposure to cold may indicate the adoption of a more risk-prone strategy, with IJs prepared to enter an already infected insect. While infection of an already-occupied host lowers fitness due to competition (Koppenhöfer and Kaya, Reference Koppenhöfer and Kaya1996; Ryder and Griffin, Reference Ryder and Griffin2003; Blanco-Pérez et al., Reference Blanco-Pérez, Bueno-Pallero, Vicente-Díez, Marco-Mancebón, Pérez-Moreno and Campos-Herrera2019), the increased protection from freezing and desiccation a cadaver confers (Lewis and Shapiro-Ilan, Reference Lewis and Shapiro-Ilan2002; Perez et al., Reference Perez, Lewis and Shapiro-Ilan2003) may offset those costs. Similarly, as an older IJ fails to find an uninfected host, invading an already occupied host may be preferable to continuing to wait for a fresh host. However, while prenol is an odorant given off by Steinernema-infected hosts, an infected host will likely release a complex variety of volatile and non-volatile chemicals, and an IJ's decision to infect will likely be the product of the blend rather than individual constituents.

Intriguingly, the changes in stress tolerance, protein expression and olfaction induced in S. carpocapsae by low temperature were not reversed following return to the culture temperature. IJs which were exposed to 9°C for 1 week retained their enhanced freezing and desiccation tolerance following storage at 20°C for 2 weeks, and the proteome of these temperature-shifted IJs was more similar to that of IJs maintained at 9°C than at 20°C. Similarly, a return of 9°C-stored IJs to 20°C did not revert their cold-induced attraction towards prenol back to the original repulsion. Even a short period at 9°C was effective in inducing long-term changes in chemotaxis, and these changes seem to have been completed during subsequent warm storage. Just 3 h at 9°C induced a significant change in response to prenol, from strong repulsion at time 0 to ambivalence when tested immediately, developing into strong attraction after a further 3 weeks at 20°C. Such rapid shifts in response valence are indicative of neuromodulatory changes rather than synaptic rewiring (Guillermin et al., Reference Guillermin, Carrillo and Hallem2017). In contrast to our findings with prenol, Lee et al. (Reference Lee, Dillman and Hallem2016) found that the alteration in olfactory response induced in S. carpocapsae IJs by a drop in temperature was reversed following return to the culture temperature. This may reflect differences in the temperatures used: 25 and 15°C in Lee et al. (Reference Lee, Dillman and Hallem2016) compared to 20 and 9°C in our experiments – as well as the specific odorants tested. In our assays, the maintenance of the cold-induced response following return to warm conditions was more clear-cut and distinct for prenol than for the other odours tested. Moreover, other factors such as age of the nematodes at the time of temperature shift can affect their olfactory plasticity (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Dillman and Hallem2016).

Like S. carpocapsae, H. megidis IJs were initially repelled by prenol and attracted (though weakly) by hexanol and methyl salicylate. However, in contrast to S. carpocapsae, the response of H. megidis IJs to odours was generally accentuated rather than reversed by storage at 9°C, and cold-induced alterations were not retained by IJs after transfer back to 20°C. The 2 species also differed in the way that different storage temperatures affected their olfactory response: while for S. carpocapsae, all storage temperatures lower than the culture temperature of 20°C had a similar effect on olfaction, resulting in a reversal of valence, the effect of different storage temperatures on H. megidis IJs was more graded: IJs stored at 12 and 15°C exhibited an intermediate response between IJs stored at 20 or 9°C. As for H. megidis in our study, a shift to a lower temperature did not result in a change in the valence of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora IJs (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Dillman and Hallem2016).

Our results support the conclusion of the comprehensive study by Lee et al. (Reference Lee, Dillman and Hallem2016) that plasticity in olfactory responses dependent on temperature and age is a broadly conserved trait across species of EPN, but that the exact nature of the changes varies between species and odorants. However, the ecological relevance of these changes remains to be understood. The behaviour of animals in response to single compounds in controlled laboratory assays may not be indicative of their response to blends of volatile and non-volatile chemicals encountered in the field (e.g. Webster et al., Reference Webster, Bruce, Pickett and Hardie2010). For IJs, the universally produced CO2 is the most important odour (Hallem et al., Reference Hallem, Dillman, Hong, Zhang, Yano, DeMarco and Sternberg2011; Dillman et al., Reference Dillman, Guillermin, Lee, Kim, Sternberg and Hallem2012) and this remained attractive to most of the EPN species tested including S. carpocapsae and H. bacteriophora, irrespective of culture and storage conditions (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Dillman and Hallem2016). Responses to live or infected insects and associated cues are the ultimate measure of how the prior storage temperature and time affect IJs in a way that is both ecologically relevant and of importance to biocontrol. The sophistication of the nematodes' responses to variables and stimuli applied singly under the highly artificial conditions of laboratory assays can only suggest the level of variation to be expected between individuals experiencing diverse combinations of factors in the soil environment.

While the ability of IJs to find and kill insects generally declines with age (Lewis et al., Reference Lewis, Selvan, Campbell and Gaugler1995b; Patel et al., Reference Patel, Stolinski and Wright1997), there is also evidence of more complex effects of prior conditions. For H. megidis, conditions similar to those used in the present study have been shown to profoundly influence infectivity (a compound trait of movement towards and entry into insects), which increased with time, especially in IJs maintained at 9°C (Griffin, Reference Griffin1996; Fitters et al., Reference Fitters, Dunne and Griffin2001). Similar effects have been documented for steinernematids (Koppenhöfer et al., Reference Koppenhöfer, Ebssa and Fuzy2013; Guy et al., Reference Guy, Gaffney, Kapranas and Griffin2017; Yadav and Eleftherianos, Reference Yadav and Eleftherianos2018). Host-finding and infection in soil involve a series of steps, including dispersal, host-finding and host-recognition and acceptance (Lewis et al., Reference Lewis, Grewal and Gaugler1995a; Griffin, Reference Griffin and Campos-Herrera2015). Odour blends may increase the probability of IJs finding an insect but undirected dispersal and attraction to CO2 will result in many IJs arriving at it anyway, after which the decision is made as to whether to infect. A decreased responsiveness to host volatiles during cold storage of heterorhabditids and steinernematids can occur concomitantly with an increase in infectivity, which possibly indicates increased tendency to penetrate into a host following arrival (Dempsey and Griffin, Reference Dempsey and Griffin2002; Koppenhöfer et al., Reference Koppenhöfer, Ebssa and Fuzy2013).

While it is tempting to explain the cold-induced changes in chemotaxis as ecologically relevant, it is also possible that they are a by-product of altered thermotactic behaviour, such as migration to warmer regions of the soil, and/or tracking seasonal vertical movements of hosts within the soil (Villani and Wright, Reference Villani and Wright1990). There is some overlap of neurons which mediate chemotaxis and thermotaxis, and these neurons may ‘memorize’ sensed temperatures (Clark et al., Reference Clark, Biron, Sengupta and Samuel2006; Kimata et al., Reference Kimata, Sasakura, Ohnishi, Nishio and Mori2012). While alterations in response to any specific odorant are difficult to interpret meaningfully in an ecological context, they are indicative of profound physiological changes brought about by temperature and by age as evidenced also in the proteomic data (present study; Lillis et al., Reference Lillis, Griffin and Carolan2022). Moreover, it is clear that the assays of chemo-attraction reflect the current status of the IJs, a product of their culture and storage conditions (present study; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Dillman and Hallem2016) as well as learning (Willett et al., Reference Willett, Alborn, Duncan and Stelinski2015). This extreme plasticity of olfactory responses needs to be taken into account in defining the role of specific volatiles for a species or strain of EPN.

Storage of S. carpocapsae and H. megidis IJs at temperatures lower than culture temperature affected each species in profoundly different ways. Steinernema carpocapsae IJs underwent reversals of valence in olfactory response while H. megidis IJs' chemotactic response to odours was generally intensified by exposure to low temperatures. Together with the proteomic profiling of Lillis et al. (Reference Lillis, Griffin and Carolan2022), it appears that while both species are affected by storage time and temperature, H. megidis undergoes more graduated changes, in contrast to the dramatic changes demonstrated for S. carpocapsae when placed at 9°C. It is unclear to what extent the differences between the 2 species are a result of phylogeny or of species-specific adaptation to ecological factors. Similar studies on a larger number of species of each genus could help resolve this.

The proteome of S. carpocapsae IJs exhibited extensive remodelling upon exposure to 9°C, as previously shown by Lillis et al. (Reference Lillis, Griffin and Carolan2022) with the novel finding that these changes were retained for weeks after their transfer to 20°C, as were changes in stress tolerance and chemotaxis. The most dramatic changes were found in chaperone proteins such as HSPs and LEA proteins which improve organisms' survival of freezing and desiccation. The demonstration that S. carpocapsae IJs' altered olfactory responses and enhanced stress tolerance induced by brief exposure to low temperature can be retained for weeks after their return to higher temperatures has implications both for laboratory testing and for their use as biocontrol agents. The rapid phenotypic adaptation of IJs also has implications for the interpretation of experiments testing genetic adaptation to different temperatures (Grewal et al., Reference Grewal, Gaugler and Shupe1996). While we only explored the effects of storage conditions on the individuals that were exposed to those conditions, possible transgenerational (including epigenetic) effects of thermal history (Klosin et al., Reference Klosin, Casas, Hidalgo-Carcedo, Vavouri and Lehner2017; McCaw et al., Reference McCaw, Stevenson and Lancaster2020) should also be investigated. Moreover, the induction by brief cold exposure of profound changes that are maintained following the return of favourable conditions has resonances with certain forms of diapause and quiescence in parasitic nematodes and may share some common pathways with these poorly understood phenomena.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182022001445.

Author's contributions

P. E. L. and C. T. G. conceived and designed the study. P. E. L. and I. P. K. did the experimental work. J. C. C. supervised the proteomic analysis. P. E. L. carried out the statistical analysis and wrote the original draft manuscript. P. E. L., J. C. C. and C. T. G. contributed to writing the manuscript. The proteomic data and output files for the present study are available at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/archive/projects/PXD027609. Other datasets generated during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Financial support

P. E. L. was funded by a Maynooth University John and Pat Hume Doctoral Fellowship. The Maynooth University Q-Exactive Quantitative Mass Spectrometer was funded under the SFI Research Infrastructure Call 2012; Grant Number: 12/RI/2346 (3).

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standards

Not applicable.

References

Adhikari, BN, Wall, DH and Adams, BJ (2009) Desiccation survival in an Antarctic nematode: molecular analysis using expressed sequenced tags. BMC Genomics 10, 69.10.1186/1471-2164-10-69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adhikari, BN, Wall, H and Adams, BJ (2010) Effect of slow desiccation and freezing on gene transcription and stress survival of an Antarctic nematode. Journal of Experimental Biology 213, 18031812.10.1242/jeb.032268CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aleuy, OA and Kutz, S (2020) Adaptations, life-history traits and ecological mechanisms of parasites to survive extremes and environmental unpredictability in the face of climate change. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 12, 308317.Google ScholarPubMed
Ali, F and Wharton, DA (2013) Cold tolerance abilities of two entomopathogenic nematodes, Steinernema feltiae and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora. Cryobiology 66, 2429.10.1016/j.cryobiol.2012.10.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ali, F and Wharton, D (2015) Infective juveniles of the entomopathogenic nematode, Steinernema feltiae produce cryoprotectants in response to freezing and cold acclimation. PLoS ONE 10, e0141810.10.1371/journal.pone.0141810CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andaló, V, Moino, A, Maximiniano, C, Campos, V and Mendonça, L (2011) Influence of temperature and duration of storage on the lipid reserves of entomopathogenic nematodes. Revista Colombiana de Entomología 37, 203209.10.25100/socolen.v37i2.9075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D, Ferreras, E, Trindade, M and Cowan, D (2015) A novel bacterial water hypersensitivity-like protein shows in vivo protection against cold and freeze damage. FEMS Microbiology Letters 362, fnv110.10.1093/femsle/fnv110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baiocchi, T, Lee, G, Choe, D-H and Dillman, AR (2017) Host seeking parasitic nematodes use specific odors to assess host resources. Scientific Reports 7, 6270.10.1038/s41598-017-06620-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baiocchi, T, Braun, L and Dillman, AR (2019) Touch-stimulation increases host-seeking behavior in Steinernema carpocapsae. Journal of Nematology 51, 15.10.21307/jofnem-2019-067CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bargmann, CI, Hartwieg, E and Horvitz, HR (1993) Odorant-selective genes and neurons mediate olfaction in C. elegans. Cell 74, 515527.10.1016/0092-8674(93)80053-HCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanco-Pérez, R, Bueno-Pallero, F, Vicente-Díez, I, Marco-Mancebón, VS, Pérez-Moreno, I and Campos-Herrera, R (2019) Scavenging behavior and interspecific competition decrease offspring fitness of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema feltiae. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 164, 515.10.1016/j.jip.2019.04.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, ML, De Ley, P, Garey, JR, Liu, LX, Scheldeman, P, Vierstraete, A, Vanfleteren, JR, Mackey, LY, Dorris, M, Frisse, LM, Vida, JT and Thomas, WK (1998) A molecular evolutionary framework for the phylum Nematoda. Nature 392, 7175.10.1038/32160CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandt, CR, Adang, MJ and Spence, KD (1978) The peritrophic membrane: ultrastructural analysis and function as a mechanical barrier to microbial infection in Orgyia pseudotsugata. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 32, 1224.10.1016/0022-2011(78)90169-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, IM and Gaugler, R (1996) Cold tolerance of steinernematid and heterorhabditid nematodes. Journal of Thermal Biology 21, 115121.10.1016/0306-4565(95)00033-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, J, Tunnacliffe, A and Burnell, A (2002) Plant desiccation gene found in a nematode. Nature 416, 3838.10.1038/416038aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, JA, Dolan, KM, Tyson, T, Goyal, K, Tunnacliffe, A and Burnell, AM (2004) Dehydration-specific induction of hydrophilic protein genes in the anhydrobiotic nematode Aphelenchus avenae. Eukaryotic Cell 3, 966975.10.1128/EC.3.4.966-975.2004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryant, AS and Hallem, EA (2018) Temperature-dependent behaviors of parasitic helminths. Neuroscience Letters 687, 290303.10.1016/j.neulet.2018.10.023CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bubrig, LT and Fierst, JL (2021) Review of the dauer hypothesis: what non-parasitic species can tell us about the evolution of parasitism. Journal of Parasitology 107, 717725.10.1645/21-40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaisson, KE and Hallem, EA (2012) Chemosensory behaviors of parasites. Trends in Parasitology 28, 427436.10.1016/j.pt.2012.07.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, DA, Biron, D, Sengupta, P and Samuel, ADT (2006) The AFD sensory neurons encode multiple functions underlying thermotactic behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. The Journal of Neuroscience 26, 7444.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1137-06.2006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Close, TJ (1996) Dehydrins: emergence of a biochemical role of a family of plant dehydration proteins. Physiologia Plantarum 97, 795803.10.1111/j.1399-3054.1996.tb00546.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Côté, RG, Griss, J, Dianes, JA, Wang, R, Wright, JC, van den Toorn, HWP, van Breukelen, B, Heck, AJR, Hulstaert, N, Martens, L, Reisinger, F, Csordas, A, Ovelleiro, D, Perez-Rivevol, Y, Barsnes, H, Hermjakob, H and Vizcaíno, JA (2012) The PRoteomics IDEntification (PRIDE) converter 2 framework: an improved suite of tools to facilitate data submission to the PRIDE database and the ProteomeXchange consortium. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 11, 16821689.10.1074/mcp.O112.021543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J, Neuhauser, N, Michalski, A, Scheltema, RA, Olsen, JV and Mann, M (2011) Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. Journal of Proteome Research 10, 17941805.10.1021/pr101065jCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dempsey, CM and Griffin, CT (2002) Phased activity in Heterorhabditis megidis infective juveniles. Parasitology 124, 605613.10.1017/S0031182002001609CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dillman, AR, Guillermin, ML, Lee, JH, Kim, B, Sternberg, PW and Hallem, EA (2012) Olfaction shapes host–parasite interactions in parasitic nematodes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, E2324.10.1073/pnas.1211436109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, AAF and Perry, RN (2009) Survival mechanisms. In Perry, RN, Moens, M and Starr, JL (eds), Root-Knot Nematodes. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing, pp. 201222.10.1079/9781845934927.0201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, X and Hominick, W (1991) Effects of low storage temperature on survival and infectivity of two Steinernema species (Nematoda : Steinernematidae). Revue de Nematologie 14, 407412.Google Scholar
Fitters, PFL and Griffin, CT (2004) Spontaneous and induced activity of Heterorhabditis megidis infective juveniles during storage. Nematology 6, 911917.Google Scholar
Fitters, PFL, Dunne, R and Griffin, CT (2001) Vine weevil control in Ireland with entomopathogenic nematodes: optimal time of application. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 40, 199213.Google Scholar
Forst, S, Dowds, B, Boemare, N and Stackebrandt, E (1997) Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus spp.: bugs that kill bugs. Annual Review of Microbiology 51, 4772.10.1146/annurev.micro.51.1.47CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gal, T, Glazer, I and Koltai, H (2004) A LEA3 family member is involved in survival of C. elegans during exposure to stress. FEBS Letters 577, 2126.10.1016/j.febslet.2004.09.049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaugler, R, Bednarek, A and Campbell, JF (1992) Ultraviolet inactivation of heterorhabditid and steinernematid nematodes. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 59, 155160.10.1016/0022-2011(92)90026-ZCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goyal, K, Walton, LJ and Tunnacliffe, A (2005) LEA proteins prevent protein aggregation due to water stress. Biochemical Journal 388, 151157.10.1042/BJ20041931CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grewal, PS, Lewis, EE, Gaugler, R and Campbell, JF (1994) Host finding behaviour as a predictor of foraging strategy in entomopathogenic nematodes. Parasitology 108, 207215.10.1017/S003118200006830XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grewal, PS, Gaugler, R and Shupe, C (1996) Rapid changes in thermal sensitivity of entomopathogenic nematodes in response to selection at temperature extremes. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 68, 6573.10.1006/jipa.1996.0059CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffin, CT (1996) Effects of prior storage conditions on the infectivity of Heterorhabditis sp. (Nematoda: Heterorhabditidae). Fundamental and Applied Nematology 19, 95102.Google Scholar
Griffin, CT (2015) Behaviour and population dynamics of entomopathogenic nematodes following application. In Campos-Herrera, R (ed.), Nematode Pathogenesis of Insect and Other Pests. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 5795.10.1007/978-3-319-18266-7_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillermin, ML, Carrillo, MA and Hallem, EA (2017) A single set of interneurons drives opposite behaviors in C. elegans. Current Biology 27, 26302639.e2636.10.1016/j.cub.2017.07.023CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guy, A, Gaffney, M, Kapranas, A and Griffin, CT (2017) Conditioning the entomopathogenic nematodes Steinernema carpocapsae and Heterorhabditis megidis by pre-application storage improves efficacy against black vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) at low and moderate temperatures. Biological Control 108, 4046.10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallem, EA, Rengarajan, M, Ciche, TA and Sternberg, PW (2007) Nematodes, bacteria, and flies: a tripartite model for nematode parasitism. Current Biology 17, 898904.10.1016/j.cub.2007.04.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallem, EA, Dillman, AR, Hong, AV, Zhang, Y, Yano, JM, DeMarco, SF and Sternberg, PW (2011) A sensory code for host seeking in parasitic nematodes. Current Biology 21, 377383.10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.048CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hand, SC, Menze, MA, Toner, M, Boswell, L and Moore, D (2011) LEA proteins during water stress: not just for plants anymore. Annual Review of Physiology 73, 115134.10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hao, YJ, Montiel, R, Lucena, MA, Costa, M and Simoes, N (2012) Genetic diversity and comparative analysis of gene expression between Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Az29 and Az36 isolates: uncovering candidate genes involved in insect pathogenicity. Experimental Parasitology 130, 116125.10.1016/j.exppara.2011.12.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hibshman, JD, Clegg, JS and Goldstein, B (2020) Mechanisms of desiccation tolerance: themes and variations in brine shrimp, roundworms, and tardigrades. Frontiers in Physiology 11, 592016.10.3389/fphys.2020.592016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubner, NC, Bird, AW, Cox, J, Splettstoesser, B, Bandilla, P, Poser, I, Hyman, A and Mann, M (2010) Quantitative proteomics combined with BAC TransgeneOmics reveals in vivo protein interactions. Journal of Cell Biology 189, 739754.10.1083/jcb.200911091CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isaacson, PJ and Webster, JM (2002) Antimicrobial activity of Xenorhabdus sp. RIO (Enterobacteriaceae), symbiont of the entomopathogenic nematode, Steinernema riobrave (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 79, 146153.10.1016/S0022-2011(02)00019-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jagdale, GB and Grewal, PS (2007) Storage temperature influences desiccation and ultra violet radiation tolerance of entomopathogenic nematodes. Journal of Thermal Biology 32, 2027.10.1016/j.jtherbio.2006.07.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimata, T, Sasakura, H, Ohnishi, N, Nishio, N and Mori, I (2012) Thermotaxis of C. elegans as a model for temperature perception, neural information processing and neural plasticity. Worm 1, 3141.10.4161/worm.19504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kin, K, Baiocchi, T and Dillman, AR (2019) Dispersal and repulsion of entomopathogenic nematodes to prenol. Biology 8, 58.10.3390/biology8030058CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klosin, A, Casas, E, Hidalgo-Carcedo, C, Vavouri, T and Lehner, B (2017) Transgenerational transmission of environmental information in C. elegans. Science 356, 320323.10.1126/science.aah6412CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koppenhöfer, AM and Kaya, HK (1996) Coexistence of two steinernematid nematode species (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) in the presence of two host species. Applied Soil Ecology 4, 221230.10.1016/S0929-1393(96)00121-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koppenhöfer, AM, Ebssa, L and Fuzy, EM (2013) Storage temperature and duration affect Steinernema scarabaei dispersal and attraction, virulence, and infectivity to a white grub host. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 112, 129137.10.1016/j.jip.2012.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koppenhöfer, AM, Shapiro-Ilan, DI and Hiltpold, I (2020) Entomopathogenic nematodes in sustainable food production. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 4, 125.10.3389/fsufs.2020.00125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, LA, Frutos, R, Kaya, HK and Vail, P (2001) Insect pathogens as biological control agents: do they have a future? Biological Control 21, 230248.10.1006/bcon.2001.0938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, JH, Dillman, AR and Hallem, EA (2016) Temperature-dependent changes in the host-seeking behaviors of parasitic nematodes. BMC Biology 14, 36.10.1186/s12915-016-0259-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, E and Shapiro-Ilan, D (2002) Host cadavers protect entomopathogenic nematodes during freezing. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 81, 2532.10.1016/S0022-2011(02)00115-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, EE, Grewal, PS and Gaugler, R (1995a) Hierarchical order of host cues in parasite foraging strategies. Parasitology 110, 207213.10.1017/S0031182000063976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, EE, Selvan, S, Campbell, JF and Gaugler, R (1995b) Changes in foraging behaviour during the infective stage of entomopathogenic nematodes. Parasitology 110, 583590.10.1017/S0031182000065306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillis, PE, Griffin, CT and Carolan, JC (2022) The effect of temperature conditioning (9°C and 20°C) on the proteome of entomopathogenic nematode infective juveniles. PLoS ONE 17, e0266164.10.1371/journal.pone.0266164CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCaw, BA, Stevenson, TJ and Lancaster, LT (2020) Epigenetic responses to temperature and climate. Integrative and Comparative Biology 60, 14691480.10.1093/icb/icaa049CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McSorley, R (2003) Adaptations of nematodes to environmental extremes. Florida Entomologist 86, 138142, 135.10.1653/0015-4040(2003)086[0138:AONTEE]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizrahi, T, Heller, J, Goldenberg, S and Arad, Z (2010) Heat shock proteins and resistance to desiccation in congeneric land snails. Cell Stress & Chaperones 15, 351363.10.1007/s12192-009-0150-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NDong, C, Danyluk, J, Wilson, KE, Pocock, T, Huner, NP and Sarhan, F (2002) Cold-regulated cereal chloroplast late embryogenesis abundant-like proteins. Molecular characterization and functional analyses. Plant Physiology 129, 13681381.10.1104/pp.001925CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Connor, LJ, Walkden-Brown, SW and Kahn, LP (2006) Ecology of the free-living stages of major trichostrongylid parasites of sheep. Veterinary Parasitology 142, 115.10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.08.035CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Halloran, DM and Burnell, AM (2003) An investigation of chemotaxis in the insect parasitic nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora. Parasitology 127, 375385.10.1017/S0031182003003688CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Leary, SA, Stack, CM, Chubb, MA and Burnell, AM (1998) The effect of day of emergence from the insect cadaver on the behavior and environmental tolerances of infective juveniles of the entomopathogenic nematode Heterorhabditis megidis (strain UK211). Journal of Parasitology 84, 665672.10.2307/3284567CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osman, G, Hussein, E and Abdallah, N (2004) Characterization and purification of a chitinolytic enzyme active against Sesamia cretica (pink borer). Arab Journal of Biotechnology 7, 6574.Google Scholar
Pacheco, A, Pereira, C, Almeida, MJ and Sousa, MJ (2009) Small heat-shock protein Hsp12 contributes to yeast tolerance to freezing stress. Microbiology-SGM 155, 20212028.10.1099/mic.0.025981-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, MN, Stolinski, M and Wright, DJ (1997) Neutral lipids and the assessment of infectivity in entomopathogenic nematodes: observations on four Steinernema species. Parasitology 114, 489496.10.1017/S0031182096008748CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perez, EE, Lewis, EE and Shapiro-Ilan, DI (2003) Impact of the host cadaver on survival and infectivity of entomopathogenic nematodes (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae) under desiccating conditions. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 82, 111118.10.1016/S0022-2011(02)00204-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phadtare, S, Alsina, J and Inouye, M (1999) Cold-shock response and cold-shock proteins. Current Opinion in Microbiology 2, 175180.10.1016/S1369-5274(99)80031-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poinar, GO (1993) Origins and phylogenetic relationships of the entomophilic rhabditids, Heterorhabditis and Steinernema. Fundamental & Applied Nematology 16, 333338.Google Scholar
Reyes, JL, Campos, F, Wei, H, Arora, R, Yang, Y, Karlson, DT and Covarrubias, AA (2008) Functional dissection of hydrophilins during in vitro freeze protection. Plant, Cell & Environment 31, 17811790.10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01879.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, JM, Kundun, J, Rowley, C, Hall, DR, Douglas, P and Pope, TW (2019) Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of adult vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), to host plant odors. Journal of Chemical Ecology 45, 858868.10.1007/s10886-019-01108-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryder, JJ and Griffin, CT (2003) Phased infectivity in Heterorhabditis megidis: the effects of infection density in the parental host and filial generation. International Journal for Parasitology 33, 10131018.10.1016/S0020-7519(03)00131-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabehat, A, Lurie, S and Weiss, D (1998) Expression of small heat-shock proteins at low temperatures. A possible role in protecting against chilling injuries. Plant Physiology 117, 651658.10.1104/pp.117.2.651CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serra, L, Macchietto, M, Macias-Muñoz, A, McGill, CJ, Rodriguez, IM, Rodriguez, B, Murad, R and Mortazavi, A (2019) Hybrid assembly of the genome of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae identifies the X-Chromosome. Genes, Genomes, Genetics 9, 26872697.10.1534/g3.119.400180CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seybold, AC, Wharton, DA, Thorne, MAS and Marshall, CJ (2017) Investigating trehalose synthesis genes after cold acclimation in the Antarctic nematode Panagrolaimus sp. DAW1. Biology Open 6, 19531959.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, T, Wharton, DA and Marshall, CJ (2008) Cold tolerance of an Antarctic nematode that survives intracellular freezing: comparisons with other nematode species. Journal of Comparative Physiology B 178, 93100.10.1007/s00360-007-0202-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solomon, A, Salomon, R, Paperna, I and Glazer, I (2000) Desiccation stress of entomopathogenic nematodes induces the accumulation of a novel heat-stable protein. Parasitology 121, 409416.10.1017/S0031182099006563CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sommerville, RI and Davey, KG (2002) Diapause in parasitic nematodes: a review. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80, 18171840.10.1139/z02-163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villani, MG and Wright, RJ (1990) Environmental influences on soil microarthropod behavior in agricultural systems. Annual Review of Entomology 35, 249269.10.1146/annurev.en.35.010190.001341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H, Lei, Z, Li, X and Oetting, RD (2011) Rapid cold hardening and expression of heat shock protein genes in the B-biotype Bemisia tabaci. Environmental Entomology 40, 132139.10.1603/EN09357CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y, Chen, Z, Yang, Y and Zhang, F (2021) Transcriptional reprogramming caused by cold acclimation in Meloidogyne incognita eggs. Genes & Genomics 43, 533541.10.1007/s13258-021-01069-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, B, Bruce, T, Pickett, J and Hardie, J (2010) Volatiles functioning as host cues in a blend become nonhost cues when presented alone to the black bean aphid. Animal Behaviour 79, 451457.10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.11.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, GF (1927) A method for obtaining infective nematode larvae from culture. Science 66, 302303.10.1126/science.66.1709.302.bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willett, DS, Alborn, HT, Duncan, LW and Stelinski, LL (2015) Social networks of educated nematodes. Scientific Reports 5, 14388.10.1038/srep14388CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winston, PW and Bates, DH (1960) Saturated solutions for the control of humidity in biological research. Ecology 41, 232237.10.2307/1931961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodring, JL and Kaya, HK (1988) Steinernematid and Heterorhabditid Nematodes: A Handbook of Biology and Techniques. Fayettesville, AR, USA: Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin 331.Google Scholar
Yadav, S and Eleftherianos, I (2018) Prolonged storage increases virulence of Steinernema entomopathogenic nematodes toward Drosophila larvae. Journal of Parasitology 104, 722725.10.1645/18-91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoder, CA, Grewal, PS and Taylor, RAJ (2004) Rapid age-related changes in infection behavior of entomopathogenic nematodes. Journal of Parasitology 90, 12291234.10.1645/GE-3315CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, LL, Wei, W, Kulhavy, DL, Zhang, XY and Sun, JH (2007) Low temperature induces two growth-arrested stages and change of secondary metabolites in Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Nematology 9, 663670.10.1163/156854107782024866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Chemotaxis index (mean ± s.e.) of S. carpocapsae IJs stored at 9 and 20°C, and those placed at 9°C for 1 week and transferred to 20°C in response to 4 odorants. Within a panel, values accompanied by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05, Dunn's multiple comparisons).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Chemotaxis index (mean ± s.e.) of H. megidis IJs after temperature conditioning at 9 and 20°C in response to 4 odorants. Within a panel, values accompanied by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05, Dunn's multiple comparisons).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Chemotaxis index (mean ± s.e.) of S. carpocapsae (A, B) and H. megidis (C, D) IJs stored at 9°C for periods of up to 1 week and transferred into 20°C for the remainder of a 3-week period. Control IJs were kept at 9 or 20°C and tested at intervals stated. Within a panel, values accompanied by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05, Dunn's multiple comparisons).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Chemotaxis index (mean ± s.e.) of S. carpocapsae IJs (A, B) and H. megidis IJs (C, D) and against a repellent (left) and an attractant (right), upon emergence from the host (time 0) and after storage at 9, 12, 15 and 20°C for 1 or 3 weeks. Within a panel, values accompanied by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05, Dunn's multiple comparisons).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Survival (mean ± s.e.) of S. carpocapsae IJs exposed to freezing stress (−10°C for 6 h) or desiccation stress (75% RH for 5 days). IJs were either freshly emerged (time 0), stored at 9 or 20°C for 1 and 3 weeks, or stored at 9°C for 1 week and then swapped to 20°C for 2 weeks. Within a panel, values accompanied by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05, Dunn's multiple comparisons).

Figure 5

Fig. 6. (A) PCA of proteins from S. carpocapsae IJs stored at 9°C for 3 weeks, at 9°C for 1 week and then swapped to 20°C for 2 weeks, and at 20°C for 3 weeks. (B) Heat map of S. carpocapsae All statistically significant proteins: 2-way unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the median Z-score normalized label-free quantification (LFQ) intensity values of all statistically significant proteins from IJs stored at 9°C for 3 weeks (left), at 9°C for 1 week and then swapped to 20°C for 2 weeks (middle), and at 20°C for 3 weeks (right). Differences in protein abundance are indicated by colour changes from low (blue) to high (red) protein abundance representative of changes in Z-score normalized log2-fold transformed LFQ intensity values.

Figure 6

Table 1. Proteins identified in 2-way unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the median Z-score normalized label-free quantification (LFQ) intensity values of all statistically significant proteins (Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate 0.01), for S. carpocapsae IJs stored for 3 weeks, either at 9°C (3w9C) or 20°C (3w20C) throughout, or swapped from 9 to 20°C after 1 week (1w9C → 20C)

Figure 7

Table 2. Annotated statistically significant proteins 5-fold changed in abundance in S. carpocapsae IJs stored at 9°C for 3 weeks (3w9C) and those stored at 9°C for 1 week and transferred to 20°C (1w9C → 20C), relative to IJs stored at 20°C for 3 weeks

Supplementary material: File

Lillis et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Lillis et al. supplementary material(File)
File 21.4 KB