Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:33:04.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inclusion, Solidarity, and Social Movements: The Global Movement against Gender Violence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2006

S. Laurel Weldon
S. Laurel Weldon
Affiliation:
Purdue University (weldon@polsci.purdue.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Women's movements are increasingly divided along lines of race, sexuality, ethnicity, and class. When such division obstructs cooperation, women lose their most effective advocates in the public sphere. How can movements overcome these divisions and improve their influence on policy and society? In some contexts, it seems that activists are able to overcome such divisions without denying politically salient conflicts. The transnational movement against gender violence, for example, mobilizes people not only across differences of race, class and sexuality but also across differences of language, national context, level of development, and the like. How do they do this? I argue that the movement against gender violence has achieved cooperation through the development of norms of inclusivity. Such norms include a commitment to descriptive representation, the facilitation of separate organization for disadvantaged social groups, and a commitment to building consensus with institutionalized dissent. Developing such norms is not the only possible path to cooperation, but it is an important and overlooked one. It illuminates a way of maintaining solidarity and improving policy influence without denying or sublimating the differences and conflicts among activists. Existing scholarship on social movements that attributes successful cooperation to shared interests, identities, or opportunities, is incomplete because it does not take account of relations of domination among activists who cooperate. Attending to the context of structural inequality in which social movements operate improves our understanding of social mobilization and illuminates overlooked paths to cooperation.S. Laurel Weldon is associate professor of political science at Purdue University (weldon@polsci.purdue.edu). The author thanks Jane Mansbridge for her help. Thanks also to Karen Beckwith, Elisabeth Clemens, Jennifer Hochschild, Aaron Hoffman, Debra Liebowitz, and Iris Young for comments on earlier drafts. Thanks to Anne Walker and Vicki Semler for helpful conversations, and to Charlotte Bunch, Arvonne Fraser, and Jutta Joachim for helping with key details. Reviewers for Perspectives provided many valuable suggestions. Errors and shortcomings remain my responsibility.

Type
Research Article
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 55 - 74
Copyright
© 2006 American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramovitz, Mimi. 1988. Regulating the lives of women: Social welfare policy from colonial times to the present. Boston, MA: South End Press.
Barry, K., C. Bunch, and S. Castley. 1984. International feminism: Networking against female sexual slavery. Report of the Global Feminist Workshop to Organize Against Traffic in Women, April 6–15, 1983. New York.
Beckwith, Karen. 2000. Beyond compare? Women's movements in comparative perspective. European Journal of Political Research 37 (4): 431–68.Google Scholar
Benford, Robert D., and David A. Snow. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26:611–39.Google Scholar
Blofeld, Merike. 2003. The Impact of inequality on democratic politics: The Catholic Church, feminists and policy reform on abortion and divorce in Chile, Argentina and Spain. Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Department of Political Science.
Borchorst, Annette, and Birte Siim. 1987. Women and the Advanced Welfare State. In Woman and the state: The shifting boundaries of public and private, ed. Anne Showstack Sassoon. New York: Routledge.
Brown, Carol. 1981. Mothers, fathers and children: From private to public patriarchy. In Women and revolution: A discussion of the unhappy marriage of marxism and feminism, ed. Lydia Sargent. Boston: South End Press.
Brown, Wendy. 1992. Finding the man in the state. Feminist Studies 18 (1): 7–34.Google Scholar
Brownmiller, Susan. 1975. Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Brush, Lisa D. 1994. The curious courtship of feminist jurisprudence and feminist state theory: Smart on the power of Law. Law and Social Inquiry 19 (4).Google Scholar
Bunch, Charlotte. 1990. Women's rights as human rights: Toward a re-vision of human rights. Human Rights Quarterly 12 (4): 486.Google Scholar
Bunch, Charlotte, ed. 1991. Violence against women. New York: Ford Foundation.
Bunch, Charlotte, and Niamh Reilly. 1994. Demanding accountability: The global campaign for women's human rights. New Jersey: CWGL, Rutgers University.
Burnham, Linda. 2001. Doing double duty. Colorlines 4 (3): 23.Google Scholar
Busch, Diane Mitsch. 1992. Women's movements and state policy reform aimed at domestic violence against women: A comparison of the consequences of movement mobilization in the United States and India. Gender and Society 6 (4): 587–608.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
Bystydzienski, Jill M., and Joti Sekhon. 1999. Democratization and women's grassroots movements. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Center for Reproductive Rights. 2003. Breaking the silence: The global gag rule's impact on unsafe abortion. http://www.reproductiverights.org/pub_bo_ggr.html.
Center for Women's Global Leadership. 1992. 1991 Women's Leadership Institute Report: Women, Violence and Human Rights. New Jersey: CWGL, Rutgers University.
Center for Women's Global Leadership. 1993. International Campaign for Women's Human Rights 1992–1993 Report. New Jersey: CWGL, Rutgers University.
Chew, Sally. 1985. Ten Years Later. Interpress Service, New York, September 7.
Clark, Ann Marie. 2001. Diplomacy of conscience: Amnesty International and changing human rights norms. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Collier, David, and James Mahoney. 1996. Research Note: Insights and pitfalls: Selection bias in qualitative research. World Politics 49 (1): 56–91.Google Scholar
Combahee River Collective. 1984. Combahee River Collective statement 1977: A black feminist statement. Reprinted in Feminist frameworks: Alternative theoretical accounts of the relations between men and women, eds. Alison Jaggar and Paula S. Rothenberg. NY: McGraw Hill.
Cooper, Mary. 1999. Women and human rights: Is the global anti-violence campaign succeeding? CQ Researcher 9 (16): 355–75.Google Scholar
Costain, Anne N., and Andrew S. McFarland, eds. 1998. Social movements and American political institutions. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams. 1994. Mapping the margins. In The public nature of private violence. eds. M. Fineman and R. Mykitiuk. New York: Routledge, 93–118.
Daniels, Cynthia R., ed. 1997. Feminists negotiate the state: The politics of domestic violence. Lanham: University Press of America.
Davis, Angela Y. 1984. Women, culture and politics. New York: Random House.
Davis, Angela Y. 1998. Interview. In The Angela Y. Davis Reader, ed. Joy James, 297–328. Oxford: Blackwell.
Deen, Thalif. 1999. Rights: Special UN day to fight violence against women. Interpress Service. New York: United Nations. November 9.
Dryzek, John S. 1990. Discursive democracy: Politics, policy and political science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia. 1989. The government's role in building the women's movement. Political Science Quarterly 104 (3): 249–68.Google Scholar
Echols, Alice. 1989. Daring to be bad: Radical feminism in America, 1967–1975. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case-study and theory in Political Science.” In Handbook of political science, eds. Fred Greenstein and Nelson Polsby, vol. 7. 79–138.
Elman, R. Amy. 1996. Sexual subordination and state intervention: Comparing Sweden and the United States. Providence, Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1981. Public man, private woman: Women in social and political thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Epstein, Julia, and Kristina Straub, eds. 1995. Body guards: The cultural politics of gender ambiguity. New York and London: Routledge.
Faul, Michelle. 1985. “Controversial issues bog women's conference.” Associated Press. Nairobi. July 24.
Ferguson, Kathy E. 1984. The feminist case against bureaucracy. Women in Political Economy Series. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. “International norm dynamics and political change.” International Organization Vol. 52, No. 4, Autumn 887–918.Google Scholar
Fong, Pang Yin. 1999. “No to violence against women.” New Straits Times (Malaysia) April 26.
Fraser, Arvonne S. 1987. The U.N. Decade for Women: Documents and dialogue. Westview Special Studies on Women in Contemporary Society. Boulder and London: Westview.
Fraser, Arvonne S. 1993. “The feminization of human rights.” Foreign Service Journal 31 (4): 70.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1989. Unruly practices: Power, discourse and gender in contemporary social theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Fraser, Nancy. 1992. “Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy,” In Habermas and the public sphere, ed. Craig Calhoun. Cambridge: MIT Press. 109–42.
Fraser, Nancy. 1995. “Politics, culture, and the public sphere: Toward a postmodern conception.” In Social postmodernism: Beyond identity politics. eds. Linda Nicholson and Steven Seidman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, Elisabeth. 1995. Women's human rights: The emergence of a movement. In Women's Rights, Human Rights, eds. Julie Peters and Andrea Wolper. UK: Routledge.
George, Alexander L. 1979. Case studies and theory development: The method of structured focused comparison. In Diplomacy: New approaches, ed. P.G. Lauren. New York: Free Press.
George, Alexander L., and Timothy McKeown. 1985. Case studies and theories of organizational decision making. In Advances in information processing in organizations, Volume 2, JAI Press.
Gitlin, Todd. 1995. The twilight of common dreams: Why America is wracked by culture wars. NY: Metropolitan Books.
Gordon, Linda, ed. 1990. Women, the state and welfare, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Gray, Jerry. 1985a. Untitled. (International News Section) Associated Press. July 26.
Gray, Jerry. 1985b. AP SPOTLIGHT—Women's decade: A controversial ending. Associated Press. June 22.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1987. The theory of communicative action: Volume Two, trans. Thomas McCarthy, Boston: Beacon Press.
Heyzer, Noeleen. 2003. International Women's Day 8 March 2003 Statement by Noeleen Heyzer, Executive Director, UNIFEM. http://www.suomenunifem.fi/pdf/kvnp2.pdf
Higer, Amy J. 1999. International women's activism and the 1994 Cairo Population Conference. In Gender Politics in Global Governance, eds. Meyer and Prugl. Boulder: Rowman and Littlefield.
Hoffman, Aaron M. 2005. Building trust: Overcoming suspicion in international conflict. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hooks, Bell. 1981. Ain't I a woman: black women and feminism, Boston: South End Press.
Hooks, Bell. 2000. Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End Press.
Hosken, Fran. 1976. Editorial and Women and rape/Women and violence. Women's International Network News. 1975. Vol. 2, No. 1. Lexington, MA, USA.
Joachim, Jutta. 1999. Shaping the human rights agenda: The case of violence against women. In Gender politics in global governance, eds. Meyer and Prugl. Boulder: Rownam and Littlefield.
Joachim, Jutta. 2003. Framing issues and seizing opportunities: The UN, NGOs, and women's rights. International Studies Quarterly 47 (2): 247–274.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret, and K. Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Klotz, Audie. 1995. Norms in international relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
King, Gary, Robert Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kingdon, John. W. 1984. Agendas, alternatives, and public policy. 2d ed. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Kishwar, Madhu, and Ruth Vanita (eds.). 1984. In search of answers: Women's voices from Manushi. London: Zed Books.
Krasner, Stephen D. 1976. State power and the structure of international trade. World Politics 28 (3): 317–347.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1983. Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables. In International regimes, ed. Stephen D. Krasner. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1989. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1980. Beyond adversary democracy. New York: Basic Books.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent “yes”. Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.Google Scholar
Marx, Anthony. 1998. Making race and nation: A comparison of South Africa, the United States, and Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matthews, Nancy. 1993. Surmounting a legacy: The expansion of racial diversity in a local anti-rape movement. In Violence against women: The bloody footprints, eds. Pauline B. Bart and Eileen Gail Moran. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
McQueen, Ann Marie. 2000. To change the world: 15,000 on hill to seek end to poverty, violence against women, children. Ottawa Sun, Oct. 16.
Meyer, Mary K. 1999. Negotiating international norms: The Inter-American Commission of Women and the Convention on Violence Against Women. In Gender politics in global governance, eds. Meyer and Prugl. Boulder: Rowman and Littlefield.
Meyer, Mary K., and Elisabeth Prugl. 1999. Gender politics in global governance. Boulder: Rowman and Littlefield.
Minkoff, Debra G. 1997. Organizational mobilizations, institutional access, and institutional change. Women transforming politics, eds. C. Cohen et al. New York: NYU Press. 477–96.
Molyneux, Maxine. 1998. Analyzing women's movements. In Feminist visions of development: Gender analysis and policy, eds. Cecile Jackson and Ruth Pearson. London; NY: Routledge.
Morgenthau, Hans. 1967. Politics among nations; the struggle for power and peace. 3d ed. New York, Knopf.
Narayan, Uma. 1997. Dislocating cultures: Identities, traditions and third world feminism. NY: Routledge.
Ngara, Abigail Urey. 1985. Women: African women fight circumcision. Interpress Service. Harare Zimbabwe, August 15.
Nguyen, Tram. 2001. North-South differences challenge women at the UN. Colorlines 4 (3): 25.Google Scholar
Nzwili, Frederick. 1998. Africa-at-large: Focus on eliminating violence against women. Africa News, August 17.
O'Brien, Robert, Anne Marie Goetz, Jan Aart Scholte, and Marc Williams. 2000. Contesting global governance: Multilateral economic institutions and global social movements. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Peters, B. Guy. 1998. Comparative politics: Theory and methods. NY: NYU Press.
Piven, Frances Fox, and Richard A. Cloward. 1993. Regulating the poor: The functions of public welfare. Updated edition. New York: Vintage.
Ragin, Charles C., and Howard S. Becker. 1992. What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Riddell-Dixon, Elizabeth. 2001. Canada and the Beijing Conference on Women: Governmental Politics and NGO Participation. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1994. Ideas do not float freely: Transnational coalitions, domestic structures and the end of the cold war. International Organization 48 (2): 185–214.Google Scholar
Rochon, Thomas R., and Daniel A. Mazmanian. 1993. Social movements and the policy process. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 528 (July) 75–87.Google Scholar
Rupp, Leila J., and Verta Taylor. 1999. Forging feminist identity in an international movement: A collective identity approach to twentieth century feminism. Signs 24 (2): 363–386.Google Scholar
Russell, Diana E. H., and Nicole Van de Ven. 1976. The Proceedings of the International Tribunal on Crimes Against Women. East Palo Alto, CA: Frog in the Well.
Sawer, Marian. 1995. Femocrats in glass towers? The Office of the Status of Women in Australia. In Comparative State Feminism, eds. Dorothy McBride Stetson and Amy G. Mazur. California: Sage Publications.
Sharma, Yojana. 1985a. Women: African countries call for increased family planning sid. Interpress Service. NAIROBI, July 27.
Sharma, Yojana. 1985b. Women: The men behind the women at the women's conference. Interpress Service. Nairobi. July 24.
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting mothers and soldiers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Snow, David, and Doug McAdam. 2000. Identity work processes in the context of social movements. In Self, identity and social movements, eds. Sheldon Stryker, Timothy J. Owens, and Robert W. White. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Spelman, Elizabeth. Inessential woman. Boston: Beacon Press, 1988.
Sternbach, Nancy, Marysa Navarro-Aranguren, Patricia Chuchryk, and Sonia E. Alvarez, 1992. Feminisms in Latin America: From Bogota to San Bernardo. Signs Winter 1992.
Stivers, Camilla. 1993. Gender images in public administration: Legitimacy and the administrative state. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. 2nd ed. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, Verta, and Nancy Whittier. 1999. Collective identity in social movement communities. In Waves of protest, eds. Jo Freeman and Victoria Johnson. NY: Rowman and Littlefield.
Thompson, Karen Brown. 2002. Women's rights are human rights. In Restructuring world politics: Transnational social movements, networks and norms, eds. Sanjeev Khagram, James V. Riker, and Kathryn Sikkink. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 96–122.
Tinker, Irene. 1999. Nongovernmental organizations: An alternative power base for women? In Gender politics in global governance, eds. Meyer and Prugl. Boulder: Rowman and Littlefield.
Toronto Star (Canada). 2000. World's women on the march against poverty. October 7.
Tripp, Aili Mari. 2003. African feminisms: New agendas. Prepared for Delivery at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 28–August 31.
Tripp, Aili Mari. 2004. Transnational feminism and political representation in Africa. Prepared for the 2004 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, September 2–5.
United Nations. 1975a. The meeting in Mexico: the story of the World Conference of the International Women's Year (Mexico City, 19 June-2 July 1975). New York: United Nations.
United Nations. 1975b. Report of the World Conference of the International Women's Year Mexico City 19 June–2 July 1975. New York: United Nations.
United Nations. 1980. Report of the World Conference of the United Nations Decade for Women: Equality, Development and Peace. Copenhagen 14 to 30 July 1980. New York: United Nations.
United Nations. 1985. Report of the World Conference to review and Appraise the Achievements of the United Nations Decade for Women: Equality, Development and Peace. Nairobi, 15–26 July 1985. New York: United Nations.
United Nations. 1999. General Assembly. Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, A/Res/54/4 15 October 1999.
United Nations. 1995. The Platform for Action: 12 Critical Areas of Concern and The Beijing Declaration. Fourth World Conference on Women, September 4–15, 1995, Beijing, http://www.un.org.womenwatch/daw/Beijing/platform/declar.htm.
United Nations. 2003. Human Development Report 2003 Millennium Development Goals: A compact among nations to end human poverty. http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2003/
United Nations. 2004. Division for the Advancement of Women. Optional Protocol to the Convention. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/protocol (accessed August, 2004).
United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM). 1999 A world free of violence. Video (edited version of Global Videoconference).
Voeten, Erik. 2000. Clashes in the assembly. International Organization 54 (2): 185–216.Google Scholar
Walker, Gillian. 1990. Family violence and the women's movement: The conceptual politics of struggle. Toronto: U of Toronto Press.
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of international politics. Reading, MA.: Addison-Wesley.
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2002. Protest, policy and the problem of violence against women: A cross-national comparison. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, Melissa. 1998. Voice, trust and memory: Marginalized groups and the failings of liberal representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Women's International Network News. 1975. Vol. 1, No. 4. Lexington, MA, USA.
Xinhua News Agency. 1998. Campaign starts in South Asia against gender-based violence. September 11.
Yin, Robert K. 1994. Case study research: Design and methods. Second Edition. Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 5, Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage Publications.
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford Series in Political Theory. Oxford University Press.