Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:34:39.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: Rescher on the Goodman Paradox

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

B. L. Bunch
B. L. Bunch*
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , March 1980 , pp. 119 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Goodman, N. (1965), Fact Fiction and Forecast, New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Kyburg, H., (1964), “Recent Work in Inductive Logic.” American Philosophical Quarterly, 1: 249–287.Google Scholar
Prior, A. (1957), Time and Modality, London: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rescher, N., (1976), “Peirce and the Economy of Research.” Philosophy of Science, 43: 71–98.10.1086/288670CrossRefGoogle Scholar