Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:30:34.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Heuristic Role of Sewall Wright's 1932 Adaptive Landscape Diagram

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Robert A. Skipper Jr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sewall Wright's adaptive landscape is the most influential heuristic in evolutionary biology. Wright's biographer, Provine, criticized Wright's adaptive landscape, claiming that its heuristic value is dubious because of deep flaws. Ruse has defended Wright against Provine. Ruse claims Provine has not shown Wright's use of the landscape is flawed, and that, even if it were, it is heuristically valuable. I argue that both Provine's and Ruse's analyses of the adaptive landscape are defective and suggest a more adequate understanding of it.

Type
The Making of the Genetical Theory of Evolution
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 71 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2002 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers , December 2004 , pp. 1176 - 1188
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Thanks to Lindley Darden, Mike Dietrich, Roberta Millstein, and Bob Richardson. Research for this paper was supported by NSF Grant no. 9818095.

References

Coyne, Jerry A., Barton, Nicholas, and Turelli, Michael (1997), “Perspective: A Critique of Sewall Wright’s Shifting Balance Theory of Evolution”, Perspective: A Critique of Sewall Wright’s Shifting Balance Theory of Evolution 51:643–671.Google ScholarPubMed
Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1951), Genetics and the Origin of Species, 3rd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Anthony W. F. (1994), “The Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection”, The Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection 69:443–474.Google ScholarPubMed
Fisher, Ronald Aylmer (1941), “Average Excess and Average Effect of a Gene Substitution”, Average Excess and Average Effect of a Gene Substitution 11:53–63.Google Scholar
Fontana, W., Greismacher, T., Schnabl, P., Stadler, F., and Schuster, Peter (1991), “Statistics of Landscapes Based on Free Energies: Replication and Degradation Rate Constants of RNA Secondary Structures”, Statistics of Landscapes Based on Free Energies: Replication and Degradation Rate Constants of RNA Secondary Structures 122:795–819.Google Scholar
Fontana, Walter, Schnabl, P., and Schuster, Peter (1989), “Physical Aspects of Evolutionary Optimization and Adaptation”, Physical Aspects of Evolutionary Optimization and Adaptation 40:3301–3321.Google ScholarPubMed
Fontana, Walter, and Schuster, Peter (1998), “Continuity in Evolution: On the Nature of Transitions”, Continuity in Evolution: On the Nature of Transitions 280:1541–1455.Google ScholarPubMed
Fontana, Walter, Stadler, P. F., Tarazona, P., Weinberger, E., and Schuster, Peter (1993), “RNA Folding and Combinatory Landscapes”, RNA Folding and Combinatory Landscapes 47:2083–2099.Google ScholarPubMed
Futuyma, Douglas J. (1986), Evolutionary Biology, 2nd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer and Associates.Google ScholarPubMed
Gavrilets, Sergey (1997), “Evolution and Speciation on Holey Adaptive Landscapes”, Evolution and Speciation on Holey Adaptive Landscapes 12:307–312.Google ScholarPubMed
Gavrilets, Sergey (1999), “A Dynamical Theory of Speciation on Holey Adaptive Landscapes”, A Dynamical Theory of Speciation on Holey Adaptive Landscapes 154:1–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Gavrilets, Sergey, and Gravner, Janko (1997), “Percolation on the Fitness Hypercube and the Evolution of Reproductive Isolation”, Percolation on the Fitness Hypercube and the Evolution of Reproductive Isolation 184:51–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Kauffman, Stuart A. (1993), The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart A., and Levin, Simon (1987), “Towards a General Theory of Adaptive Walks on Rugged Landscapes”, Towards a General Theory of Adaptive Walks on Rugged Landscapes 128:11–45.Google ScholarPubMed
Lande, Russell (1976), “Natural Selection and Random Genetic Drift in Phenotypic Evolution”, Natural Selection and Random Genetic Drift in Phenotypic Evolution 30:314–334.Google ScholarPubMed
Lande, Russell (1979), “Effective Deme Sizes during Long-Term Evolution Estimated from Rates of Chromosomal Inversion”, Effective Deme Sizes during Long-Term Evolution Estimated from Rates of Chromosomal Inversion 33:314–334.Google Scholar
Lewontin, Richard C. (1974), The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Moran, Patrick (1964), “On the Non-existence of Adaptive Topographies”, On the Non-existence of Adaptive Topographies 27:383–393.Google Scholar
Provine, William B. (1986), Sewall Wright and Evolutionary Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ridley, Mark (1996), Evolution, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Science, Inc.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael (1996), “Are Pictures Really Necessary? The Case of Sewall Wright’s ‘Adaptive Landscapes’”, in Baigrie, Brian S. (ed.), Picturing Knowledge: Historical and Philosophical Problems Concerning the Use of Art in Science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 303–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, George Gaylord (1953), The Major Features of Evolution. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stadler, Barbel, Stadler, Peter, Wagner, Gunter, and Fontana, Walter (2001), “The Topology of the Possible: Formal Spaces Underlying Patterns of Evolutionary Change”, The Topology of the Possible: Formal Spaces Underlying Patterns of Evolutionary Change 213:241–274.Google ScholarPubMed
Stadler, Peter (2002), “Fitness Landscapes”, in Lässig, M. and Valleriani, A. (ed.), Biological Evolution and Statistical Physics. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 187–207.Google Scholar
Stebbins, George Ledyard (1969), The Basis of Progressive Evolution. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Waddington, Conrad Hal (1956), Principles of Embryology. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wright, Sewall ([1931] 1986), “Evolution in Mendelian Populations”, Evolution in Mendelian Populations 16:97–159. Reprinted in Sewall Wright, Evolution: Selected Papers, William B. Provine (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 98–160.Google Scholar
Wright, Sewall ([1932] 1986), “The Roles of Mutation, Inbreeding, Crossbreeding and Selection in Evolution”, The Roles of Mutation, Inbreeding, Crossbreeding and Selection in Evolution 1:356–366. Reprinted in Sewall Wright,Evolution: Selected Papers, William B. Provine (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 161–177.Google Scholar
Wright, Sewall ([1939] 1986), Statistical Genetics in Relation to Evolution, Actualités scientifiques et industrielles 802, Exposés de Biométrie et de la statistique biologique 13. Paris: Hermann & Cie. Reprinted in Sewall Wright, Evolution: Selected Papers, William B. Provine (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 283–341.Google Scholar
Wright, Sewall (1977), Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Vol. 3, Experimental Results and Evolutionary Deductions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Sewall ([1978] 1986), “The Relation of Livestock Breeding to Theories of Evolution”, The Relation of Livestock Breeding to Theories of Evolution 46:1192–1200. Reprinted in Sewall Wright,Evolution: Selected Papers, William B. Provine (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1–11.Google Scholar
Wright, Sewall (1988), “Surfaces of Selective Value Revisited”, Surfaces of Selective Value Revisited 131:115–123.Google Scholar