Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T20:21:21.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mechanical Philosophy and Newton’s Mechanical Force

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Hylarie Kochiras
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How does Newton approach the challenge of mechanizing gravity and, more broadly, natural philosophy? By adopting the simple machine tradition’s mathematical approach to a system’s covarying parameters of change, he retains natural philosophy’s traditional goal while specifying it in a novel way as the search for impressed forces. He accordingly understands the physical world as a divinely created machine possessing intrinsically mathematical features and mathematical methods as capable of identifying its real features. The gravitational force’s physical cause remains an outstanding problem, however, as evidenced by Newton’s onetime reference to active principles as the “genuine principles of the mechanical philosophy.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 80 , Issue 4 , October 2013 , pp. 557 - 578
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

This article was written primarily during my stay as a visiting scholar at the University of Athens, and for that I would like to express my gratitude to Stathis Psillos, along with Dionysios Anapolitanos, Costas Dimitracopoulos, and the rest of the faculty of ΜΙΘΕ. I am indebted to Peter Machamer and Ted McGuire for our discussions at Pittsburgh; much of this article elaborates my contribution to our coauthored paper, and the discussions benefited me for both works. I am also grateful to Mary Domski for comments on the coauthored paper and to Alan Gabbey for comments on both. An initial version of this article was presented at the University of Pisa, and for that opportunity I thank Pierluigi Barrotta as well as New Europe College and the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme within the European Institutes for Advanced Study Programme, for their support and financial contribution, respectively, during that presentation’s preparation. I also extend my appreciation to the audience at the University of Athens, for discussion of a later version. Finally, for their close reading and comments, I thank the anonymous referees for this journal; shortcomings are my own, as always.

References

Alexander, H. G., ed. 1956. The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Peter, and Goldstein, Bernard R.. 1998. “Realism and Instrumentalism in Sixteenth Century Astronomy: A Reappraisal.” Perspectives on Science 6 (3): 232–58..Google Scholar
Berryman, Sylvia. 2009. The Mechanical Hypothesis in Ancient Greek Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. 2006. “Mechanics.” In The Cambridge History of Science, Vol. 3, Early Modern Science, ed. Park, Katherine and Daston, Lorraine, 632–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biagioli, Mario. 2006. Galileo’s Instruments of Credit: Telescopes, Images, Secrecy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Marie. 1952. “The Establishment of the Mechanical Philosophy.” Osiris 10:412–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Robert. 1666. The Origine of Formes and Qualities (According to the Corpuscular Philosophy). Oxford: Hall.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert 1725. Philosophical Works. ed. Shaw, Peter. 3 vols. London: Printed for Innys and Osborn & Longman.Google Scholar
Shaw, Peter 1991a. “About the Excellency and Grounds of the Mechanical Hypothesis.” In Selected Philosophical Papers of Robert Boyle, ed. and intro. Stewart, M. A., 138–54. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
and intro. Stewart, M. A. 1991b. “The Origine of Formes and Qualities.” In Selected Philosophical Papers of Robert Boyle, ed. and intro. Stewart, M. A.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard. 1980. The Newtonian Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard 1999. “A Guide to Newton’s Principia.” With contributions by Michael Nauenberg and George E. Smith. In Newton 1726/1999, 1–370.Google Scholar
Costabel, Pierre. 1970. “Newton’s and Leibniz’s Dynamics.” Trans. Briggs, J. M. Jr. In The Annus Mirabilis of Sir Isaac Newton, 1666–1966, ed. Palter, Robert, 109–16. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
De Gandt, Francois. 1995. Force and Geometry in Newton’s “Principia.” Trans. Curtis Wilson. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, René. 1990. Oeuvres de Descartes. ed. Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul. 11 vols. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Des Chene, Dennis. 2005. “Mechanisms of Life in the Seventeenth Century: Borelli, Perrault, Régis.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Sciences 36:245–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Dijksterhuis, Eduard Jan. 1950/1950. The Mechanization of the World Picture. Trans. Dikshoorn, C.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Domski, Mary. 2003. “The Constructible and the Intelligible in Newton’s Philosophy of Geometry.” Philosophy of Science 70 (Proceedings): 1114–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbey, Alan. 1971/1971. “Force and Inertia in the Seventeenth Century: Descartes and Newton.” Repr. in Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics, ed. Gaukroger, Stephen, 230–320. Sussex: Harvester.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen 1985. “The Mechanical Philosophy and Its Problems: Mechanical Explanations, Impenetrability, and Perpetual Motion.” In Change and Progress in Modern Science, ed. Pitt, J., 9–84. Dodrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Pitt, J. 1990. “Henry More and the Limits of Mechanism.” In Henry More, 1614–1687, ed. Hutton, Sarah, 19–35. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Hutton, Sarah 1992. “Newton’s Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy: A Treatise on ‘Mechanics’?” In The Investigation of Difficult Things: Essays on Newton and the History of the Exact Sciences, ed. Harman, P. M. and Shapiro, Alan, 305–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Alan 1993. “Descartes’s Physics and Descartes’s Mechanics: Chicken and Egg?” In Essays on the Philosophy and Science of Rene Descartes, ed. Voss, Stephen. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Voss, Stephen 2002. “Newton, Active Powers, and the Mechanical Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Newton, ed. Cohen, I. Bernard and Smith, George E., 329–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, George E. 2004. “What Was ‘Mechanical’ about ‘The Mechanical Philosophy’?” In The Reception of Galilean Science of Motion in Seventeenth-Century Europe, ed. Palmerino, Carla Rita and Thijssen, J. M. M. H., 11–23. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 239. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel. 2002. “Descartes, Mechanics, and the Mechanical Philosophy.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 26:185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, Daniel 2013. “Remarks on the Pre-history of the Mechanical Philosophy.” In The Mechanization of Natural Philosophy, ed. Roux, Sophie, 3–26. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science 282. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Michael R. 1983. “Realism and Instrumentalism in Pre-Newtonian Astronomy.” In Testing Scientific Theories, ed. Earman, John, 201–65. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Garrison, James W. 1987. “Newton and the Relation of Mathematics to Natural Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Ideas 48 (4): 609–27..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guicciardini, Niccolò. 2009. Isaac Newton on Mathematical Certainty and Method. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A. Rupert, and Hall, Marie Boas. 1995. “Newton and the Theory of Matter.” In Newton: Texts, Backgrounds, Commentaries, ed. Cohen, I. B. and Westfall, R. S.. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Hattab, Helen. 2005. “From Mechanics to Mechanism: The Quaestiones Mechanicae and Descartes’ Physics.” In The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century, ed. Anstey, Peter. R. and Schuster, John A., 99–130. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, John. 1994. “‘Pray do not ascribe that notion to me’: God and Newton’s Gravity.” In The Books of Nature and Scripture: Recent Essays on Natural Philosophy, Theology and Biblical Criticism in the Netherlands of Spinoza’s Time and the British Isles of Newton’s Time, ed. Force, J. and Popkin, R., 123–47. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Hill, James. 2004. “Locke’s Account of Cohesion and Its Philosophical Significance.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (4): 611–30..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janiak, Andrew. 2008. Newton as Philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, Nicholas. 1988. “Epistemology of the Sciences.” In Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, ed. Skinner, Quentin and Kessler, Eckhard, 685–711. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochiras, Hylarie. 2009. “Gravity and Newton’s Substance Counting Problem.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A 40 (3): 267–80..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochiras, Hylarie 2011. “Gravity’s Cause and Substance Counting: Contextualizing the Problems.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A 42 (1): 167–84..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochiras, Hylarie 2013. “By ye Divine Arm: God and Substance in De gravitatione.” Religious Studies 49 (3): 327–56..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laird, William R. 1986. “The Scope of Renaissance Mechanics.” Osiris 2:43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laird, William R. 2000. “Mixed Sciences.” In The Encyclopedia of the Scientific Revolution from Copernicus to Newton, ed. Applebaum, Wilbur. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, Peter H.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Machamer, Peter. 1998. “Galileo’s Machines, His Mathematics, and His Experiments.” In The Cambridge Companion to Galileo, ed. Machamer, Peter, 43–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machamer, Peter, McGuire, James E., and Kochiras, Hylarie. 2012. “Newton and the Mechanical Philosophy: Gravitation as the Balance of the Heavens.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (3): 370–88..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machamer, Peter, and Woody, Andrea. 1994. “A Model of Intelligibility in Science: Using Galileo’s Balance as a Model for Understanding the Motion of Bodies.” Science and Education 3:215–44.Google Scholar
Malet, Antoni. 1997. “Isaac Barrow on the Mathematization of Nature: Theological Voluntarism and the Rise of Geometrical Optics.” Journal of the History of Ideas 58 (2): 265–87..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, James E. 1968. “Force, Active Principles, and Newton’s Invisible Realm.” Ambix 15:154–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, James E. 1972. “Boyle’s Conception of Nature.” Journal of the History of Ideas 33 (4): 523–42..CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuire, James E. 1994. “Natural Motion and Its Causes: Newton on the ‘Vis Insita: Of Bodies.’” In Self-Motion from Aristotle to Newton, ed. Gill, M. L. and Lennox, J. G., 305–29. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McMullin, Ernan. 1978. Newton on Matter and Activity. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
More, Henry. 1668. Divine Dialogues. London: Flesher.Google Scholar
More, Henry 1671. Enchiridion metaphysicum. London: Flesher.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. 1726/1726. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Trans. Cohen, I. B. and Whitman, A.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Whitman, A. 1730/1730. Opticks; or, A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections and Colors of Light. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Whitman, A.. 1959–71. Correspondence of Isaac Newton. ed. Turnbull, H. W., Scott, J. F., Hall, A. R., and Tilling, L.. 7 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turnbull, H. W., Scott, J. F., Hall, A. R., and Tilling, L.. 7 vols 2004. Newton: Philosophical Writings. ed. Janiak, Andrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palmieri, Paolo. 2008. “Breaking the Circle: The Emergence of Archimedean Mechanics in the Late Renaissance.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 62:301–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiefsky, Mark J. 2008. “Theory and Practice in Heron’s Mechanics.” In Mechanics and Natural Philosophy before the Scientific Revolution, ed. Laird, William and Roux, Sophie, 15–49. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 254. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schliesser, Eric. 2011a. “Newton’s Substance Monism, Distant Action, and the Nature of Newton’s Empiricism: Discussion of H. Kochiras’ ‘Gravity and Newton’s Substance Counting Problem.’” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A 42 (1): 160–66..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schliesser, Eric 2011b. “Without God: Gravity as a Relational Quality of Matter in Newton’s Treatise.” In Vanishing Matter and the Laws of Motion: Descartes and Beyond, ed. Jalobeanu, D. and Anstey, P., 80–100. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stein, Howard. 1970. “On the Notion of Field in Newton, Maxwell, and Beyond.” In Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Sciences, ed. Stuewer, Roger H., 264–310. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Stuewer, Roger H. 2002. “Newton’s Metaphysics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Newton, ed. Cohen, I. Bernard and Smith, George E., 256–307. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Westfall, Richard S. 1971. Force in Newton’s Physics: The Science of Dynamics in the Seventeenth Century. London: Macdonald.Google Scholar
Westfall, Richard S. 1977. The Construction of Modern Science: Methods and Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Westfall, Richard S. 1980. Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Westfall, Richard S. 2001. “Newton.” In The Blackwell Companion to the Philosophy of Science, ed. Newton-Smith, W. H.. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wilson, Mark. 1997. “Mechanism and Fracture in Cartesian Physics.” Topoi 14:141–52.Google Scholar