Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:21:08.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prospects for a Dual Inheritance Model of Emotional Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Stefan Linquist
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A common objection to adaptationist accounts of human emotions is that they ignore the influence of culture. If complex emotions like guilt, shame and romantic jealousy are largely culturally determined, how could they be biological adaptations? Dual inheritance models of gene/culture coevolution provide a potential answer to this question. If complex emotions are developmentally ‘scaffolded’ by norms that are transmitted from parent to offspring with reasonably high fidelity, then these emotions can evolve to promote individual reproductive interests. This paper draws on case studies of emotional development to illustrate how complex emotions satisfy these conditions. Many of the norms and parenting strategies influencing emotional development are absorbed during the early stages of life when a child is in primary contact with its parents and before the onset of complex cognition. These conditions make it likely that emotion-governing norms are transmitted vertically and with relatively little cognitive ‘contamination’.

Type
Evolutionary Models and Evolutionary Psychology
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 74 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2006 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers. Edited by Cristina Bicchieri and Jason Alexander , December 2007 , pp. 848 - 859
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Thanks to Mark Colyvan, Paul Griffiths, Alexander Rosenberg, and John Wilkins for helpful comments on previous drafts.

References

Avital, Eytan, and Jablonka, Eva (2000), Animal Traditions: Behavioral Inheritance in Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Robert, and Richerson, Peter (2004), Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bretherton, Inge, Fritz, Janet, Zahn-Waxler, Carolyn, and Ridgeway, Doreen (1986), “Learning to Talk about Emotions: A Functionalist Perspective”, Learning to Talk about Emotions: A Functionalist Perspective 57:529–548.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. (1994), Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Kochanska, Graznya (1991), “Socialization and Temperament in the Development of Guilt and Conscience”, Socialization and Temperament in the Development of Guilt and Conscience 62:1379–1392.Google ScholarPubMed
Lutz, Catherine (1983), “Parental Goals, Ethnopsychology and the Development of Emotional Meaning”, Parental Goals, Ethnopsychology and the Development of Emotional Meaning 11:246–262.Google Scholar
Mascolo, Michael F., and Fischer, Kurt W. (1995), “Developmental Transformations in Appraisals for Pride, Shame and Guilt”, in Fischer, Kurt W. and Tangney, Judith (eds.), Self-Conscious Emotions: The Psychology of Shame, Guilt, Embarrassment and Pride. New York: Guilford, 64–113.Google Scholar
Meaney, Michael J. (2001), “Maternal Care, Gene Expression, and the Transmission of Individual Differences in Stress Reactivity across Generations”, Maternal Care, Gene Expression, and the Transmission of Individual Differences in Stress Reactivity across Generations 24:1161–1192.Google Scholar
Prinz, Jesse (2004), Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sterelny, Kim (2003), Thought in a Hostile World: The Evolution of Human Cognition. Carlton, Australia: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sterelny, Kim (2008), “The Evolution and Evolvability of Culture”, forthcoming in Walsh, Dennis (ed.), Twenty Five Years of Spandrels. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zahn-Waxler, Carolyn (1992), “Development of Concern for Others”, Development of Concern for Others 23:126–136.Google Scholar