Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:52:59.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responses to Maher, and to Kelly, Schulte, and Juhl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Geoffrey Hellman
Geoffrey Hellman*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Minnesota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 64 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 317 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Howson and Urbach 1989; see References to “Bayes and Beyond.”

2. See Richard Dawkins' fascinating recent book, Climbing Mount Improbable (New York: Norton, 1996).