Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T00:18:53.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Review of Angela Potochnik’s Idealization and the Aims of Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Daniel C. Burnston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Essay Review
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 86 , Issue 3 , July 2019 , pp. 577 - 583
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Thanks to Alican Başdemir, Andrew Buskell, Angela Potochnik, Lachlan Walmsley, and the editors at Philosophy of Science for extremely helpful discussion and comments.

References

Bechtel, W., and Abrahamsen, A.. 2010. “Dynamic Mechanistic Explanation: Computational Modeling of Circadian Rhythms as an Exemplar for Cognitive Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A 41 (3): 321–33..Google ScholarPubMed
Bogen, J. 2005. “Regularities and Causality: Generalizations and Causal Explanations.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science C 36 (2): 397–420..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnston, D. C. 2016. “Computational Neuroscience and Localized Neural Function.” Synthese 193 (12): 3741–62..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnston, D. C.. 2017. “Real Patterns in Biological Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 84 (5): 879–91..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colaço, D. 2018. “Rip It Up and Start Again: The Rejection of a Characterization of a Phenomenon.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A 72:32–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyes, C. 2018. Cognitive Gadgets: The Cultural Evolution of Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laland, K. N., Uller, T., Feldman, M. W., Sterelny, K., Muller, G. B., Moczek, A., Jablonka, E., and Odling-Smee, J.. 2015. “The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Its Structure, Assumptions and Predictions.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 282 (1813): 20151019.Google Scholar
Ukai, H., and Ueda, H. R.. 2010. “Systems Biology of Mammalian Circadian Clocks.” Annual Review of Physiology 72:579–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weisberg, M. 2012. “Getting Serious about Similarity.” Philosophy of Science 79 (5): 785–94..CrossRefGoogle Scholar