Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:29:55.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theory Confirmation in Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Chris Swoyer  and
Thomas C. Monson
Chris Swoyer
Affiliation:
Universities of Oklahoma and Minnesota
Thomas C. Monson
Affiliation:
Universities of Oklahoma and Minnesota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , December 1975 , pp. 487 - 502
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

We are indebted to Paul Meehl for numerous discussions on these and other topics. He is, however, not responsible for any errors contained in this paper.

References

Bakan, D. “The Test of Significance in Psychological Research.” In On Method. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1967. Pages 1-29. (Reprinted in [14])Google Scholar
Bandt, C. L. and Boen, J.R. “A Prevalent Misconception about Sample Size, Statistical Significance, and Clinical Importance.” Journal of Period ontology 43 (1972) : 181-183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolles, R. C. “The Difference between Statistical Hypotheses and Scientific Hypotheses.” Psychological Reports 11 (1962): 639-645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camilleri, S.F. “Theory, Probability, and Induction in Social Research.” American Sociological Redell' 27 (1962): 170-178. (Reprinted in [14])CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, W., Lindman, H. and Savage, L. J., “Bayesian Statistical Inference for Psychological Research.” Psychological Review 70 (1963): 193-242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, W. L. Statistics for the Social Sciences, (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.Google Scholar
Hempel,C. G. “Deductive-Nomological vs. Statistical Explanation.” In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. III. Edited by H. Feigl and G. Maxwell. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 1966. Pages 98-169.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, R. The Logic of Decision. New York: McGraw-Hili, 1965.Google Scholar
Keuth, H. “On Prior Probabilities of Rejecting Statistical Hypotheses.” Philosophy of Science 40(1973): 538-546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi,I. Gambling with Truth. Cambridge, Massachuseus: M.I.T. Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Lykken, D, “Statistical Significance in Psychological Research.” Psychological Bulletin 70 (1968)151-159, (Reprinted in [14])Google Scholar
Maxwell, G, “Corroboration with Demarcation.“ In The Philosophy of Karl Popper. Edited by P.A. Schilpp. Laxalle, Illinois: OpenCourt, 1974. Pages 292-321.Google Scholar
Meehl, P.E. “Theory Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox.” Philosophy of Science 34(1967):103-115, (Reprinted in [14])CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, D., and Henkel, R.E. (eds.). The Significance Test Controversy: A Reader, Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co., 1970.Google Scholar
Popper, K. Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach. H. Experience and Prediction. Chicago: University Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R. and Gaito, J. “The Interpretationof Levels of Significance by Psychological Researchers.” Journal of Psychology 55 (1963):33-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozeboom. W.W. “The Fallacy of the Null Hypothesis Significance Test.” Psychological Blilletin 57 (1960): 416-428. (Reprinted in [14])CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, W. The Foundations of Scientiiic Inference. Pittsburgh: University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Savage, L. J. et al. The Founndations of Statistical Inference. New York: John Riley and Sons, 1962.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. “Belief in the Law of Small Numbers.” Psychological Bulletin 76 (1971): 105-110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodson, C. E., “Parameter Estimation vs. Hypothesis Testing.” Philosophy of Science 36 (1969): 203-204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar