Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:34:34.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Theorems on Invariance and Causality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Nancy Cartwright
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In much recent work, invariance under intervention has become a hallmark of the correctness of a causal-law claim. Despite its importance this thesis generally is either simply assumed or is supported by very general arguments with heavy reliance on examples, and crucial notions involved are characterized only loosely. Yet for both philosophical analysis and practicing science, it is important to get clear about whether invariance under intervention is or is not necessary or sufficient for which kinds of causal claims. Furthermore, we need to know what counts as an intervention and what invariance is. In this paper I offer explicit definitions of two different kinds for the notions intervention, invariance, and causal correctness. Then, given some natural and relatively uncontroversial assumptions, I prove two distinct sets of theorems showing that invariance is indeed a mark of causality when the concepts are appropriately interpreted.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 70 , Issue 1 , January 2003 , pp. 203 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Thanks to Daniel Hausman and James Woodward for setting me off on this project and two referees for helpful suggestions. This research was funded by a grant from the Latsis Foundation, for which I am grateful, and it was conducted in conjunction with the Measurement in Physics and Economics Project at LSE. I wish to thank the members of that group for their help, especially Sang Wook Yi and Roman Frigg.

References

Balke, A., and Pearl, Judea (1995), “Counterfactuals and Policy Analysis in Structural Models”, in Besnard, P. and Hanks, S. (eds.), Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 11, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 11–18.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (1989), Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (1999), The Dappled World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (2000), Measuring Causes: Invariance, Modularity and the Causal Markov Condition. Measurement in Physics and Economics Discussion Paper Series, LSE, London.Google Scholar
Engle Robert, David Hendry, and Richard, Jean (1983), “Exogeneity”, Exogeneity 51:277–304.Google Scholar
Glymour Clark, Richard Scheines, Spirtes, Peter, and Kelly, Kevin (1987), Discovering Causal Structure. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel (1998), Causal Asymmetries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, Daniel and Woodward, James (1999), “Independence, Invariance, and the Causal Markov Condition”, Independence, Invariance, and the Causal Markov Condition 50:521–583.Google Scholar
Hoover, Kevin (2001), Causality in Macroeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, Judea (2000a), “The Logic of Counterfactuals in Causal Inference (Discussion of “Causal Inference without Counterfactuals”)”, Journal of the American Statistical Association Spring.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, Judea (2000b), Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Huw (1991), “Agency and Probabilistic Causality”, Agency and Probabilistic Causality 42:157–176.Google Scholar
Redhead, Michael (1987), Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism: A Prolegomenon to the Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spirtes Peter, Clark Glymour, and Scheines, Richard (1993), Causation, Prediction, and Search. New York: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, James (1997), “Explanation, Invariance, and Intervention”, Philosophy of Science 64 (Proceedings): S26–S41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar