Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T15:25:04.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Lack of Discipline

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

R. A. Becher
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 49 , Issue 188 , April 1974 , pp. 205 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 A fuller account of the distinction between a ‘discipline’ and a ‘field of study’ is given in Michael Oakeshott's 1961 Inaugural Lecture, where he bases his analysis on the difference between a ‘language’, or manner of thinking, and a ‘literature’, which records what has been said from time to time in a ‘language’. Disciplines are shown in these terms to be explanatory languages which entail particular modes of thought, have clear criteria of relevance, and embody certain characteristic conclusions. See ‘The Study of Politics in a University’, in Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays (Methuen, 1962).Google Scholar

2 Education and the Development of Reason edited by Dearden, R. F., Hirst, P. H. and Peters, R. S. (International Library of the Philosophy of Education: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1972. Pp. xiv + 536. £5.50).Google Scholar