Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:21:39.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Leadership of Philosophy1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Extract

The positions that I would support in regard to the question whether philosophy has any relation to practice are as follows. In the first place, there are certain problems of modern civilization, and those amongst the most crucial, with which philosophy alone can deal. In the second place, in spite of appearances to the contrary, the present age will not be deaf to the voice of philosophy, if it can speak with sufficient clearness and power to secure a hearing. The problems to which I refer do not belong to the sphere of science, in the strict modern sense. Science is triumphant in its own sphere, but it is not concerned primarily with the values of human existence, or the activity of the mind by which they are discovered, pursued, enjoyed.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 138 note 1 Das Problem des geistigen Seins.

page 139 note 1 The Sophist, 234. Jowett's, translation.Google Scholar

page 140 note 1 Republic, II. 382.

page 140 note 2 Republic, VII.

page 141 note 1 Science and the Modern World, Chapter V.

page 142 note 1 Book III. 82.

page 142 note 2 Adventures of Ideas, Part I, Chapter I.

page 143 note 1 Cf. Scientific Thought, C. D. Broad, Part I, Chapter II. The Mind and its Place in Nature, Chapter V.

page 144 note 1 Ethics, translated by Coit, Stanton, Vol. II, p. 337.Google Scholar

page 144 note 2 A History of the Ancient World, Rostovtzeff, M., translated by Duff, J. D., Vol. II (Rome).Google Scholar