Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T17:21:35.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wm. G. Bennett (2015). The phonology of consonants: harmony, dissimilation, and correspondence. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 147.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. xix+394.

Review products

Wm. G. Bennett (2015). The phonology of consonants: harmony, dissimilation, and correspondence. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 147.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. xix+394.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2017

Juliet Stanton
Juliet Stanton*
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
*
E-mail: juliets@mit.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Phonology , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , December 2016 , pp. 533 - 544
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balusu, Rahul (2011). OCP effects in Telugu. In Lee, Wai-Sum & Zee, Eric (eds.) Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong 2011. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong. 284–287.Google Scholar
Bennett, William G. (2013). Dissimilation, consonant harmony, and surface correspondence. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Berent, Iris & Shimron, Joseph (2003). Co-occurrence restrictions on identical consonants in the Hebrew lexicon: are they due to similarity? JL 39. 31–55.Google Scholar
Coetzee, Andries W. & Pater, Joe (2008). Weighted constraints and gradient restrictions on place co-occurrence in Muna and Arabic. NLLT 26. 289–337.Google Scholar
Cohn, Abigail (1992). The consequences of dissimilation in Sundanese. Phonology 9. 199–220.Google Scholar
Colavin, Rebecca S., Levy, Roger & Rose, Sharon (2010). Modeling OCP-Place in Amharic with the Maximum Entropy phonotactic learner. CLS 46:2. 27–41.Google Scholar
Frisch, Stefan A., Pierrehumbert, Janet B. & Broe, Michael B. (2004). Similarity avoidance and the OCP. NLLT 22. 179–228.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Gillian (2011). Acoustic and auditory features in phonology: the case for [long VOT]. The Linguistic Review 28. 281–303.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Gillian (2013). Learning the identity effect as an artificial language: bias and generalisation. Phonology 30. 253–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Gillian & Coon, Jessica (2009). Distinguishing total and partial identity: evidence from Chol. NLLT 27. 545–582.Google Scholar
Graff, Peter & Jaeger, T. Florian (2009). Locality and feature specificity in OCP effects: evidence from Aymara, Dutch, and Javanese. CLS 45. 127–141.Google Scholar
Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur (2010). Consonant harmony: long-distance interaction in phonology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto, Ono, Hajime & Sudo, Kiyoshi (2006). Consonant co-occurrence restrictions in Yamato Japanese. In Vance, Timothy J. & Jones, Kimberly (eds.) Japanese/Korean linguistics 14. Palo Alto: CLSI. 27–38.Google Scholar
Lee, Borim (1991). Prosodic structures in Takelma phonology and morphology. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (1988). Feature geometry and dependency: a review. Phonetica 45. 84–108.Google Scholar
MacEachern, Margaret (1997). Laryngeal cooccurrence restrictions. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Mester, R. Armin (1986). Studies in tier structure. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Mustafawi, Eiman (2011). The OCP as a synchronic constraint in Qatari Arabic. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 56. 229–246.Google Scholar
Odden, David (1994). Adjacency parameters in phonology. Lg 70. 289–330.Google Scholar
Padgett, Jaye (1991). Stricture in feature geometry. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (1993). Dissimilarity in the Arabic verbal roots. NELS 23. 367–381.Google Scholar
Rose, Sharon & King, Lisa (2007). Speech error elicitation and co-occurrence restrictions in two Ethiopian Semitic languages. Language and Speech 50. 451–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, Sharon & Walker, Rachel (2004). A typology of consonant agreement as correspondence. Lg 80. 475–531.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Keiichiro (1998). A typological investigation of dissimilation. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Thomas, Jacqueline M. C. (1963). Le parler Ngbaka de Bokanga: phonologie, morphologie, syntaxe. Paris: Paillart.Google Scholar
Walker, Rachel, Byrd, Dani & Mpiranya, Fidèle (2008). An articulatory view of Kinyarwanda coronal harmony. Phonology 25. 499–535.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira (1989). Feature geometry and cooccurrence restrictions. Phonology 6. 349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuraw, Kie (2002). Aggressive reduplication. Phonology 19. 395–439.Google Scholar
Zymet, Jesse (2014). Distance-based decay in long-distance phonological processes: a probabilistic model for Malagasy, Latin, English, and Hungarian. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar