Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T05:56:56.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soybean PI 675847 A as a new source of salt tolerance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2018

Truyen Ngoc Quach ,
Lan-Anh Thi Nguyen ,
Nga Thi Nguyen ,
Cuc Thi Nguyen ,
Thang Quang Dam ,
Linh Thu Dinh  and
Hoan Tri Nguyen
Truyen Ngoc Quach*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Physiology, Biochemistry and Product Quality, Field Crops Research Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam Center for Plant Science Innovation, University of Nebraska Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
Lan-Anh Thi Nguyen
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Physiology, Biochemistry and Product Quality, Field Crops Research Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam
Nga Thi Nguyen
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Physiology, Biochemistry and Product Quality, Field Crops Research Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam
Cuc Thi Nguyen
Affiliation:
Faculty of Plant Biotechnology, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, Vietnam
Thang Quang Dam
Affiliation:
Agricare Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam
Linh Thu Dinh
Affiliation:
Faculty of Plant Biotechnology, University of Science, Hanoi, Vietnam
Hoan Tri Nguyen
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Physiology, Biochemistry and Product Quality, Field Crops Research Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: Tquach2@unl.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Soil salinity is a major limitation to legume production in many areas of the world. Identification of the genetic source of salt tolerance is critical in soybean breeding for improving soybean production in salt-affected regions. Vietnam has unique sources of soybean germplasm and varieties are grown in the area where exposure to salinity is frequent. However, there is little research on the identification of salt tolerant sources in the Vietnamese gene pool. The present study compared 18 Vietnamese soybean cultivars for their differences in salt tolerance. Under a range of NaCl stress from 0 to 200 mM NaCl, there was a large variation in salt tolerance among the 18 soybean lines evaluated. The soybean accession PI 675847 A (Vietnamese variety DT2008), was identified as a useful source of salt tolerance. During vegetative growth, PI 675847 A had lower leaf scorch scores, higher cell membrane stability, better photosynthesis and biomass accumulation under NaCl stress than the other 17 strains evaluated. In addition, PI 675847 A maintained better growth and seed yield in salt-affected soils compared with the sensitive lines. Analyses of ion contents in plant leaves under saline conditions showed that PI 675847 A was able to limit uptake and transport of Na+ and Cl−. Because of its higher productivity under saline conditions, PI 675847 A will be a useful germplasm source in soybean improvement programs for salt tolerance.

Keywords

DT2008germplasmsalinity toleranceVietnam
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , February 2019 , pp. 33 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abel, GHH (1969). Inheritance of the capacity for chloride inclusion and chloride exclusion by soybeans. Crop Science 9(6): 697–698.Google Scholar
Abel, GH and MacKenzie, AJ (1964) Salt tolerance of soybean varieties (Glycine Max L. Merrill) during germination and later growth. Crop Science 4: 157–161.Google Scholar
Amtmann, A (2009) Learning from evolution: thellungiella generates new knowledge on essential and critical components of abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Molecular Plant 2(1): 3–12.Google Scholar
Horwitz, W (2003) Metals and other elements in plants and pet foods. Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) spectroscopic method. In: Official Methods of Analysis of OAOC International, 17th ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD: chapter 3: 10–12; chapter 42: 7–8.Google Scholar
Ashraf, M (1994) Breeding for salinity tolerance in plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 13(1): 17–42.Google Scholar
Bernard, RL and Cremeens, CR (1988) Registration of ‘Williams 82’ soybean. Crop Science 28: 1027–1028.Google Scholar
Chen, H, Cui, S, Fu, S, Gai, J and Yu, D (2008) Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with salt tolerance during seedling growth in soybean (Glycine Max L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59(12): 1086–1091.Google Scholar
Dantas, SA, da Silva, FL, Volpato, L, Barbosa, RM, de Sousa Paula, G, do Nascimento, HR and de Resende, MD (2017) Breeding for tolerance to abiotic stress. In Lopes da Silva F., Borém A., Sediyama T., Ludke W. (eds) Soybean Breeding, Springer, Cham, 359–373.Google Scholar
Do, TD, Vuong, TD, Dunn, D, Smothers, S, Patil, G, Yungbluth, DC, Chen, P, Scaboo, A, Xu, D, Carter, TE and Nguyen, HT (2018) Mapping and confirmation of loci for salt tolerance in a novel soybean germplasm, Fiskeby III. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 131(3): 513–524.Google Scholar
Goldberg, B (2008) In Gary Stacey (ed) Genetics and Genomics of Soybean. Vol. 2, Springer Science and Business Media, LLC. 2: 17–34.Google Scholar
Guan, R, Chen, J, Jiang, J, Liu, G, Liu, Y, Tian, L, Yu, L, Chang, R and Qiu, LJ (2014) Mapping and validation of a dominant salt tolerance gene in the cultivated soybean (Glycine Max) variety Tiefeng 8. Crop Journal 2(6): 358–365.Google Scholar
Konishi, T (2011) Climate Change on the Vietnam, Mekong Delta Expected Impacts and Adaptations. World Bank, East Asia Infrastructure. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/rome2007initiative/FAO_WB_TCIO_CC_Meeting_May_2011/TORUKO_1.PDF.Google Scholar
Lang, NT, Yanagihara, S and Bui, CB (2001) A microsatellite marker for a gene conferring salt tolerance on rice at the vegetative and reproductive stages. Sabrao 33: 1–10.Google Scholar
Lee, GJ, Boerma, HR, Villagarcia, MR, Zhou, X, Carter, TE, Li, Z and Gibbs, MO (2004) A major QTL conditioning salt tolerance in S-100 soybean and descendent cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109(8): 1610–1619.Google Scholar
Lee, JD, Smothers, SL, Dunn, D, Villagarcia, M, Shumway, CR, Carter, TE Jr and Shannon, JG (2008) Evaluation of a simple method to screen soybean genotypes for salt tolerance. Crop Science 48(6): 2194–2200Google Scholar
Lenis, JM, Ellersieck, M, Blevins, DG, Sleper, DA, Nguyen, HT, Dunn, D, Lee, JD and Shannon, JG (2011) Differences in ion accumulation and salt tolerance among Glycine accessions. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 197(4): 302–310.Google Scholar
Li, Z (2017) Soybean Germplasm Committee Report. https://soybase.org/meeting_presentations/soybean_breeders_workshop/SBW_2017/presentations/SoybeanGermplasmCommitteeReport-ZengluLi.pdf.Google Scholar
Maas, EV (1993) Testing crops for salinity tolerance. Workshop on Adaptation of Plants to Soil Stresses 94: 234–247.Google Scholar
Munns, R and Tester, M (2008) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology 59(1): 651–681Google Scholar
Nguyen, B (2013) Effects of Salinity Intrusion on Agriculture and Farmers Livelihood in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. In International Young Scientists’ Conference on Integrated Research on Disaster Risk, Future Earth & Sustainability.Google Scholar
Nguyen, DK, Kotera, A, Sakamoto, T and Okozawa, M (2008) Sensitivity of salinity intrusion to sea level rise and river flow change in Vietnamese Mekong Delta-impacts on availability of irrigation water for rice cropping. Journal of Agriculture Meteorology 64(3): 167–176.Google Scholar
Peregrine, E and Nelson, R (2017) USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection Report – 2016. https://www.ars-grin.gov/npgs/cgc_reports/soybeanstatus2017.pdf.Google Scholar
Pham, TA, Hill, CB, Miles, MR, Nguyen, BT, Vu, TT, Vuong, TD, VanToai, TT, Nguyen, HT and Hartman, GL (2010) Evaluation of soybean for resistance to soybean rust in Vietnam. Field Crops Research 117(1): 131–138.Google Scholar
Phang, TH, Shao, G and Lam, HM (2008) Salt tolerance in soybean. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 50(10): 1196–1212.Google Scholar
Qi, X, Li, M-W, Xie, M, Liu, X, Ni, M, Shao, G, Song, C et al. (2014) Identification of a novel salt tolerance gene in wild soybean by whole-genome sequencing. Nature Communications 5. Nature Publishing Group: 22032–22037. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5340.Google Scholar
Qu, Y, Guan, R, Qiu, L and Gilliham, M (2015) Improving the Salinity Tolerance of Soybean. ISB News Report, no. April.Google Scholar
Sulieman, S, Van Ha, C, Nasr Esfahani, M, Watanabe, Y, Nishiyama, R, Bao Pham, CT, Van Dong, N and Phan Tran, LS (2015) DT2008: a promising new genetic resource for improved drought tolerance in soybean when solely dependent on symbiotic N2 Fixation. BioMed Research International doi: 10.1155/2015/687213.Google Scholar
Thu, NBA, Nguyen, QT, Thi Hoang, XL, Phuong Thao, N and Phan Tran, LS (2014) Evaluation of drought tolerance of the Vietnamese soybean cultivars provides potential resources for soybean production and genetic engineering. BioMed Research International doi: 10.1155/2014/809736.Google Scholar
Tuyen, DD, Lal, SK and Xu, DH (2010) Identification of a Major QTL allele from wild soybean (Glycine Soja Sieb. & Zucc.) for increasing alkaline salt tolerance in soybean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 121(2): 229–236.Google Scholar
Van Ha, C, Le, DT, Nishiyama, R, Watanabe, Y, Tran, UT, Van Nguyen, D and Phan Tran, LS (2013) Characterization of the newly developed soybean cultivar DT2008 in relation to the model variety W82 reveals a new genetic resource for comparative and functional genomics for improved drought tolerance. BioMed Research International doi: 10.1155/2013/759657.Google Scholar
Van Ha, C, Watanabe, Y, Tran, UT, Le, DT, Tanaka, M, Nguyen, KH, Seki, M, Van Dong, N and Phan Tran, L-S (2015) Comparative analysis of root transcriptomes from Two contrasting drought-responsive williams 82 and DT2008 soybean cultivars under normal and dehydration conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science 6(5551). doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00551.Google Scholar
Vantoai, TT, Thi, T, Hoa, C, Thi, N, Hue, N, Nguyen, HT, Grover, J and Atiqur Rahman, M (2010) Flooding tolerance of soybean [Glycine Max. (L) Merr.] Germplasm from Southeast Asia under field and screen-house environments. Open Agriculture Journal 4: 38–46.Google Scholar
Wei, P, Wang, L, Liu, A, Yu, B and Lam, H-M (2016) GmCLC1 confers enhanced salt tolerance through regulating chloride accumulation in soybean. Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 1082.Google Scholar
Zeng, A, Lara, L, Chen, P, Luan, X, Hancock, F, Korth, K, Brye, K, Pereira, A and Wu, C (2017) Quantitative trait loci for chloride tolerance in ‘Osage’ soybean. Crop Science 57(5): 2345–2353.Google Scholar
Zhu, JK (2001) Plant salt tolerance. Trends in Plant Science 6(2): 66–71.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Quach et al. supplementary material

Quach et al. supplementary material 1

Download Quach et al. supplementary material(File)
File 3.4 MB