Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:41:16.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in agronomically important traits in natural populations of wild emmer wheat, Triticum dicoccoides, in Israel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2024

Alex Beharav  and
Eviatar Nevo
Alex Beharav*
Affiliation:
Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Mt Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel
Eviatar Nevo
Affiliation:
Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Mt Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel
*
* Corresponding author. E-mail: beharav@research.haifa.ac.il
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Diversity in agronomically important traits of wild emmer wheat, Triticum dicoccoides, the progenitor of most cultivated wheats, was examined in l60 genotypes representing 16 populations derived from a wide ecogeographical spectrum of climate, soil and water availability in Israel and Turkey. The analysis included 14 quantitative economic characters including heading date, culm length, biomass, grain yield and its components, and grain protein percentage.

The results led to two major conclusions: (i) agronomically important traits varied genetically: ecogeographic diversity in these traits is dramatically displayed when populations are grown in a relatively standardized environment; and (ii) genetic diversity is revealed not only between, but also within populations. Thus, genotypes excelling in some of these characters were found in several populations.

Keywords

agronomic traitsgenetic diversityTriticum dicoccoideswheat breedingwild emmer wheat
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , August 2004 , pp. 81 - 84
Copyright
© NIAB 2004

References

Beharav, A, Cahaner, A and Pinthus, MJ (1998) Genetic correlations between culm length, grain yield and seedling elongation within tall (rht1) and semi-dwarf (Rht1) spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L). European Journal of Agronomy 9: 35–40.Google Scholar
Nevo, E and Beiles, A (1989) Genetic diversity of wild emmer wheat in Israel and Turkey. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 77: 421–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nevo, E, Beiles, A, Gutterman, Y, Storch, N and Kaplan, D (1984) Genetic resources of wild cereals in Israel and vicinity: I. Phenotypic variation within and between populations of wild wheat, Triticum dicoccoides. Euphytica 33: 717–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevo, E, Grama, A, Beiles, A and Golenberg, EM (1986) Resources of high-protein genotypes in wild wheat, Triticum dicoccoides in Israel: predictive method by ecology and allozyme markers. Genetica 68: 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevo, E, Korol, AB, Beiles, A and Fahima, T (2002) Evolution of Wild Emmer and Wheat Improvement. Population Genetics, Genetic Resources, and Genome Organization of Wheat's Progenitor, Triticum dicoccoides. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Rharrabti, Y, Elhani, S, Martos-Núñez, V and del Moral, LFG (2001) Protein and lysine content, grain yield, and other technological traits in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 49: 3802–3807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed