Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 December 2020
Critics have found Herman Melville's The Confidence-Man more difficult to classify than any other of his books. Melville himself refers to the narrative as “our comedy,” and at one point signals his reader that he is passing “from the comedy of thought to that of action.” He creates an unusual thematic setting by reducing the dimensions of his characters and by curtailing the scale of their actions. The shallowness of the confidence man, unfitting him for the profound pathos or even tragedy of Moby Dick or Pierre, prepares him eminently for the role of the comic racketeer, the city slicker, horn-swoggling and bamboozling the country (and city) yokels. Certainly we do not cry, perhaps we don't even laugh, but surely we smile, if a little grimly, as the confidence man swindles victim after victim in the course of his adventures, relying frequently on the innate weaknesses in human nature—the desire to get something for nothing, the willingness to traffic in the misery of others. But the confidence man exploits generous and noble impulses, too, and this apparent mockery of traditional values gives the book a complexity and at times an ambiguity that cause many readers to abandon it, bewildered.
1 Quotations from The Confidence-Man are from the edition by Elizabeth S. Foster (New York: Hendricks House, 1954).
2 For a variety of approaches in interpreting The Confidence-Man, see William Ellery Sedgwick, Herman Melville: The Tragedy of Mind (Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1944), pp. 186–193; Richard Chase, Herman Melville (New York: Macmillan, 1949), pp. 185–209; Newton Arvin, Herman Melville (New York: Sloane, 1950), pp. 246–252; Ronald Mason, The Spirit Above the Dust (London: Lehmann, 1951), pp. 198–207; Lawrance Thompson, Melville's Quarrel with God (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1952), pp. 297–328; Elizabeth S. Foster, Introd., The Confidence-Man, ed. cit.; Edward H. Rosenberry, Melville and the Comic Spirit (Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1955), pp. 141–184.
3 See Northrop Frye's “The Archetypes of Literature,” Kenyon Rev., XIII (Winter 1951), 92–110, especially p. 108.