Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:07:38.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Tempest to Epilogue: Augustine's Allegory in Shakespeare's Drama

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

James Walter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Tempest is an allegory of the process of interpretation in a tradition that derives from Augustine's Confessions. Allegory calls attention to signs as signs and examines their adequacy to represent truth. Shakespeare's play begins in the realm of allegory's arbitrariness. Just as the imposition of Prospero's art on nature creates a storm to disorient characters in the play, Shakespeare's drama enthralls viewers in the theater, tempting them to an error like Prospero's retreat into his study in Milan. Gradually, however, by art attuned to a providential design working in events, Prospero resolves the conflicts among the characters. The symbolic unity of life finally suggested remains nevertheless an expression more of desire and promise than of realization. To remind his audience of this truth, Shakespeare makes Prospero in the Epilogue rupture the imagined world of art and insist on the audience's relating the play's ideal meanings to their historical lives.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 98 , Issue 1 , January 1983 , pp. 60 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Abrams, Richard. “The Tempest and the Concept of the Machiavellian Playwright.” English Literary Renaissance 8 (1978): 43–66.Google Scholar
Augustine. The Confessions. Trans. Pusey, Edward B. New York: Collier Books, 1961.Google Scholar
Battenhouse, Roy W. Shakespearean Tragedy: Its Art and Its Christian Premises. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “Allegory and Trauerspiel.” In The Origin of German Tragic Drama. Trans. Osborne, John. London: NLB, 1977, 159–235.Google Scholar
Brower, Reuben. The Fields of Light. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, Sigurd. Shakespearean Meanings. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemen, Wolfgang. The Development of Shakespeare's Imagery. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Lectures and Notes on Shakspere and Other English Poets. Ed. Ashe, T. London: George Bell, 1884.Google Scholar
“A Conversation with Lee Strasberg.” U.S. News and World Report. 16 June 1980, 94.Google Scholar
Cowan, Bainard. “Moby-Dick as Allegory of the Allegorical Process.” Diss. Yale 1975.Google Scholar
de Man, Paul. “The Rhetoric of Temporality.” In Interpretation: Theory and Practice. Ed. Singleton, Charles S. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1969, 173–209.Google Scholar
Devereux, E. J. “Sacramental Imagery in The Tempest.” Humanities Association Bulletin 19 (1968): 50–62.Google Scholar
Egan, Robert. “This Rough Magic: Perspectives of Art and Morality in The Tempest.” Shakespeare Quarterly 23 (1972):171–82.Google Scholar
Grant, Patrick. Images and Ideas in Literature of the English Renaissance. Amherst: Univ. of Massachusetts Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Gayle. “‘Excellent Dumb Discourse’: Silence and Grace in Shakespeare's Tempest.” Studia Neophilologica 50 (1978): 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hugh of St. Victor. The Didascalion of Hugh of St. Victor. Trans. Taylor, Jerome. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1968.Google Scholar
James, Henry. “Introduction to The Tempest” (1907). In Henry James: Selected Literary Criticism. Ed. Shapira, Morris. New York: Horizon, 1964, 297–310.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. The Prison-House of Language. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewkes, W. T. “‘Excellent Dumb Discourse’: The Limits of Language in The Tempest.” In Essays on Shakespeare. Ed. Smith, Gordon Ross. University Park: Pennsylvania State Univ. Press, 1965, 196–210.Google Scholar
Knight, G. Wilson. The Crown of Life: Essays in Interpretation of Shakespeare's Final Plays. London: Methuen, 1948.Google Scholar
Kott, Jan. “The Tempest, or Repetition: I. Plantation on a Mythical Island; II. The Three Hours or Purgatory.” Trans. Daniela Miedzyrzecka. Mosaic 10 (1977):9–36.Google Scholar
Machiavelli. The Prince. Trans. Musa, Mark. New York: St. Martin's, 1964. Bk. 25.Google Scholar
Mazzotta, Giuseppe. Dante, Poet of the Desert. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel E. de. The Essayes of Montaigne. Trans. John Florio. New York: Random, n.d.Google Scholar
Peterson, Douglas L. Time, Tide and Tempest. San Marino, Calif.: Huntington Library, 1973.Google Scholar
Rockett, William. “Labor and Virtue in The Tempest.” Shakespeare Quarterly 24 (1973): 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Complete Signet Classic Shakespeare. Ed. Barnet, Sylvan. New York: Harcourt, 1972.Google Scholar
Smith, Irwin. “Ariel and the Masque in The Tempest.” Shakespeare Quarterly 21 (1970): 213–22.Google Scholar
Tillyard, E. M. W. “The Tragic Pattern.” In his Shakespeare's Last Plays. 1938. Rpt. in Shakespeare, The Tempest: A Casebook. Ed. Palmer, D. J. London: Macmillan, 1968.Google Scholar
Vance, Eugene. “Augustine's Confessions and the Poetics of the Law.” Modern Language Notes 93 (1978):618–34.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Richard. The Poems of Richard Wilbur. New York: Harcourt, 1947.Google Scholar
Yeats, W. B. The Collected Poems of W. B. Yeats. New York: Macmillan, 1954.Google Scholar
Ysseling, Samuel. “Structuralism and Psychoanalysis in the Work of Jacques Lacan.” International Philosophical Quarterly 10 (1970): 102–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar