Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T10:29:33.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Net Work: Area Studies, Comparison, and Connectivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Vilashini Cooppan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Area studies and world literature share a spirit of comparison, despite their distinct historical formations in cold war tactics of knowledge for power and the flurry of globalization theory that accompanied the neoliberal 1990s vision of open market as world stage, and notwithstanding recent critical narratives that cleave area studies' particularized zones of specialized, philologically deep knowledge from world literature's globe-spanning yet difference-erasing ambition. That spirit will not speak in these brief remarks, nor can I promise a report, readable or otherwise, to one disciplinary field (the comparative) from any other field (e.g., area studies). Area studies was always comparative. It emerged alongside a host of comparative methodologies whose slicing spatial divisions (continents, spheres of influences, West/East) and stealth temporal ladders (civilization, modernity, development) later comparatists of the literary-critical persuasion may question but whose gestures we are perhaps condemned to repeat in cutting the globe to new spatio-temporal measures. The task is not to redress historical error in the name of comparison (as if the verbal sense of discipline was intended and comparative literature could complete area studies) but rather to re-cognize comparison, which we are always learning how to do, through the remembrance of area studies' ambitions and omissions.

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 128 , Issue 3 , May 2013 , pp. 615 - 621
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Routledge, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Ed. Holquist, Michael. Trans. Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, . Austin: U of Texas P, 1981. Print.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “On the Concept of History.” Selected Writings. Vol. 4. Trans. Edmund Jephcott et al. Ed. Howard Eiland and Michael W. Jennings. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2004. 389–400. Print.Google Scholar
Bose, Sugata. A Hundred Horizons: The Indian Ocean in the Age of Global Empire. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2006. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooppan, Vilashini. “Hauntologies of Form: Race, Writing, and the Literary World System.” Gramma: A Journal of Theory and Criticism / 13 (2005): 153. Print.Google Scholar
Cooppan, Vilashini. “World Literature between History and Theory.” The Routledge Companion to World Literature. Ed. Damrosch, David, D'haen, Theo, and Kadir, Djelal. New York: Routledge, 2011. 195–203. Print.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. A Thousand Plateaus. Trans. Massumi, Brian. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1987. Print.Google Scholar
Ghosh, Amitav. The Hungry Tide. Boston: Houghton, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Ghosh, Amitav. In an Antique Land: History in the Guise of a Traveler's Tale. New York: Vintage Departures, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Ghosh, Amitav. Sea of Poppies. New York: Farrar, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Ghosh, Devleena, and Muecke, Stephen. “Natural Logics of the Indian Ocean.” Cultures of Trade: Indian Ocean Exchanges. Ed. Ghosh, and Muecke, . Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars, 2007. 150–63. Print.Google Scholar
Gilroy, Paul. The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Glissant, Édouard. Poetics of Relation. Trans. Betsy Wing. 1990. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1997. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harootunian, Harry. “Some Thoughts on Comparability and the Space-Time Problem.” Boundary 2 32.2 (2005): 23–46. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, John, ed. India in Africa, Africa in India: Indian Ocean Cosmopolitanisms. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Marianne. The Generation of Postmemory: Visual Culture after the Holocaust. New York: Columbia UP, 2012. Print.Google Scholar
Huyssen, Andreas. Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Metcalf, Thomas R. Imperial Connections: India in the Indian Ocean Arena, 1860-1920. Berkeley: U of California P, 2007. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nora, Pierre. “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire.” Trans. Marc Roudebush. Representations 26 (1989): 7–24. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothberg, Michael. Multidirectional Memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2009. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia UP, 2003. Print. Wellek Lib. Lectures in Critical Theory.Google Scholar
Torabully, Khal, and Carter, Marina. Coolitude: An Anthology of the Indian Labour Diaspora. London: Anthem, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Vergès, Françoise. “Writing on Water: Peripheries, Flows, Capital, and Struggles in the Indian Ocean.” Positions 11.1 (2003): 241–57. Print.Google Scholar
Walcott, Derek. “The Sea Is History.” Collected Poems, 1948-1984. New York: Farrar, 1986. 366. Print.Google Scholar