Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T22:04:25.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human and Machine Cultures of Reading: A Cognitive-Assemblage Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

N. Katherine Hayles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The concept “cultures of reading” should be expanded to include machines that read. Machine reading is exemplified by the computer system called Never-Ending Language Learning (NELL). Because NELL lacks real-world experience, its semantic comprehension is limited to forming categories of words. This process illustrates a major difference between human and machine reading: whereas human reading involves causal reasoning, machine reading relies more on correlations. Human-machine hybrid reading, for example the kind done with an e-book, can be understood as a cognitive assemblage through which information, interpretations, and meanings circulate. The introduction of mechanical cognition into printing can be seen in the Paige Compositor, from 1878. The transition from electromechanical cognition to more flexible digital and electronic computational media marks the movement from print, understood as a technology involving the arrangement of type pieces to impress ink on paper, to postprint, in which inked products originate as computer files. This change, which signals an ontological rupture in writing and reading practices, is addressed through a cognitive-assemblage approach emphasizing the distribution of cognition among technical and human actors.

Type
Special Topic: Cultures of Reading
Information
PMLA , Volume 133 , Issue 5: Special Topic Cultures of Reading , October 2018 , pp. 1225 - 1242
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Amoore, Louise. “Data Derivatives: On the Emergence of a Security Risk Calculus for Our Time”. Theory, Culture and Society, no. 28, 2011, pp. 24–43.Google Scholar
Bogost, Ian. Alien Phenomenology; or, What It's Like to Be a hing. U of Minnesota P, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, Fredson. Principles of Bibliographical Description. 1949. St. Paul's Bibliographies/Oak Knoll Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Bruner, Jerome. Acts of Meaning: Four Lectures on Mind and Culture. Harvard UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Carlson, Andrew, et al. “Toward an Architecture for Never-Ending Language Learning.” Carnegie Melon University, 2010, www.cs.cmu.edu/~acarlson/papers/carlson-aaai10.pdf.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel. The Rise of the Network Society. 2nd ed., Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. Vol. 1 of he Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture.Google Scholar
Clark, Andy. Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford UP, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Composition No. 1 by Marc Saporta.” Visual Editions, Aug. 2011, visual-editions.com/composition-no-1.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert. What Computers Can't Do. MIT P, 1972.Google Scholar
Emmott, Catherine. Narrative Comprehension: A Discourse Perspective. Oxford UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Ernst, Wolfgang. Memory and the Digital Archive. U of Minnesota P, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foer, Jonathan Safran. Tree of Codes. Visual Editions, 2010.Google Scholar
Frish, Ian. “Lessons from America's First Memory World Champion”. The New Yorker, 18 May 2016, www.newyorker.com/news/sporting-scene/lessons-from-americas-first-memory-world-champion.Google Scholar
Goldin, Rebecca. “Causation vs Correlation”. Sense about Science USA, 19 Aug. 2015, senseaboutscienceusa.org/causation -vs- correlation.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine. “Cognitive Assemblages: Technical Agency and Human Interactions.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 43, no. 1, Autumn 2016, pp. 32–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine. “The Cognitive Nonconscious: Enlarging the Mind of the Humanities.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 42, no. 4, 2016, pp. 783–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. U of Chicago P, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine. “Narrative and Database: Natural Symbionts.” PMLA, vol. 122, no. 5, Oct. 2007, pp. 1603–08.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine. Unthought: The Power of the Cognitive Nonconscious. U of Chicago P, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine. “Virtual Bodies and Flickering Signifiers.” October, no. 66, Fall 1993, pp. 66–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, David. Storytelling and the Sciences of Mind. MIT P, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin. Cognition in the Wild. MIT P, 2016. Kirschenbaum, Matthew G. Track Changes: A Literary History of Word Processing. Belknap Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Kováč, Ladislav. “Fundamental Principles of Cognitive Biology”. Evolution and Cognition, vol. 6, no. 1, 2000, pp. 51–69.Google Scholar
Lee, Joonseok, et al. “A Comparative Study of Collaborative Filtering Algorithms.” ArXiv, 14 May 2012, arxiv.org/pdf/1205.3193.pdf.Google Scholar
Levy, Steven. “Siri's Inventors Are Building a Radical New AI hat Does Anything You Ask”. Wired Magazine, 12 Aug. 2014, www.wired.com/2014/08/viv/.Google Scholar
Linotype Machine Principles. Mergenthaler Linotype Company, 1940.Google Scholar
Manovich, Lev. The Language of New Media. MIT P, 2001.Google Scholar
“Mark Twain, James W. Paige and the Paige Typesetter.” Twain Quotes, www.twainquotes.com/paige.html. Excerpt from Typographical Printing Surfaces: The Technology and Mechanism of Their Production, by Lucien Alphonse Legros and John Cameron Grant, Longmans, Green, 1916, pp. 376–91.Google Scholar
Masnick, Mike. “Another Reminder hat You Don't Own Your Ebooks: Amazon Removing More Ebooks You ‘Bought’ from Archives”. Techdirt, 15 Dec. 2010, www.techdirt.com/articles/20101215/02571612282/another-reminder-that-you-dont-own-your-ebooks-amazon-removing-more-ebooks-you-bought-archives.shtml.Google Scholar
Maxwell, John M. E-mail to N. Katherine Hayles, 16 Apr. 2014.Google Scholar
McGann, Jerome. Radiant Textuality: Literary Studies after the World Wide Web. Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D.F.“Printers of the Mind: Some Notes on Bibliographical heories and Printing House Practices”. Studies in Bibliography, no. 22, 1969, pp. 1–75.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. Distant Reading. Verso, 2013.Google Scholar
Mumford, Lewis. “Emerson behind Barbed Wire”. he New York Review of Books, 18 Jan. 1968, www.nybooks.com/articles/1968/01/18/emerson-behind-barbed-wire/.Google Scholar
“NELL: Never-Ending Language Learning.” Read the Web. Carnegie Mellon University, rtw.ml.cmu.edu/rtw. Accessed 19 July 2016.Google Scholar
“NELL: The Computer That Learns.” Carnegie Mellon University, www.cmu.edu/homepage/computing/2010/fall/nell-computer-that-learns.shtml.Google Scholar
Nelson, Katherine. “Narrative and the Emergence of a Consciousness of Self”. Narrative and Consciousness: Literature, Psychology and the Brain, edited by Fireman, Gary D. et al., Oxford UP, 2003, pp. 17–36.Google Scholar
Parikka, Jussi. What Is Media Archaeology? Polity Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Queneau, Raymond. Cent mille milliards de poèmes. Gallimard, 1961.Google Scholar
Raley, Rita. “Interferences: [Net. Writing] and the Practice of Codework.” Electronic Book Review, Sept. 2002, www.electronicbookreview.com/thread/electropoetics/net.writing.Google Scholar
Rose, Mark. Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright. Revised ed., Harvard UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Rowe, Beverley Charles. “Queneau.” Beverley Charles Rowe, 2006, www.bevrowe.info/Queneau/QueneauHome_v2.html.Google Scholar
Saporta, Marc. Composition No. 1. Visual Editions, 2011.Google Scholar
Saporta, Marc. Composition No. 1. Visual Editions, 2011. iPad app.Google Scholar
Shannon, Claude E. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. U of Illinois P, 1949.Google Scholar
Siegert, Bernhard. Cultural Techniques: Grids, Filters, Doors, and Other Articulations of the Real. translated by Winthrop-Young, Geoffrey, Fordham UP, 2015.Google Scholar
Singh, Anita. “Jonathan Franzen: E-books Are Damaging Society”. The Telegraph, 21 July 2016, www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/hay-festival/9047981/Jonathan-Franzen-e-books-are-damaging-society.html.Google Scholar
Striphas, Ted. The Late Age of Print: Everyday Book Culture from Consumerism to Control. Columbia UP, 2009.Google Scholar
Tanselle, G. Thomas. Selected Studies in Bibliography. UP of Virginia, 1979.Google Scholar
Thompson, John B. Merchants of Culture: The Publishing Business in the Twenty-First Century. Plume/Penguin, 2012.Google Scholar
Thrift, Nigel. “Remembering the Technological Unconscious by Foregrounding Knowledges of Position”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, no. 22, 2004, pp. 175–90.Google Scholar
Varela, Francisco J., et al. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT P, 1992.Google Scholar
Editions, Visual. “Making Tree of Codes: Three Months in Three Minutes.” YouTube, uploaded by VisualEdi-tions, 7 Mar. 2011, www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0GcB0PYKjY.Google Scholar
Wardrip-Fruin, Noah. “Reading Digital Literature: Surface, Data, Interaction, and Expressive Processing”. A Companion to Digital Literary Studies, edited by Schreibman, Susan and Siemens, Ray, Blackwell Publishing, 2008, pp. 163–82.Google Scholar
Weaver, Warren. Introduction. Shannon, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar