Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T01:38:36.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tale and Parable: Theorizing Fictions in the Old English Boethius

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2021

Jennifer A. Lorden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scholarship has often considered the concept of fiction a modern phenomenon. But the Old English Boethius teaches us that medieval people could certainly tell that a fictional story was a lie, although it was hard for them to explain why it was all right that it was a lie—this is the problem the Old English Boethius addresses for the first time in the history of the English language. In translating Boethius's sixth-century Consolation of Philosophy, the ninth-century Old English Boethius offers explanatory comments on its source's narrative exempla drawn from classical myth. While some of these comments explain stories unfamiliar to early medieval English audiences, others consider how such “false stories” may be read and experienced by those properly prepared to encounter them. In so doing, the Old English Boethius must adopt and adapt a terminology for fiction that is unique in the extant corpus of Old English writing.

Type
Essays
Information
PMLA , Volume 136 , Issue 3 , May 2021 , pp. 340 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Ashe, Laura. Fiction and History in England, 1066–1200. Cambridge UP, 2007.Google Scholar
Ashe, Laura. Introduction. Early Fiction in England from Geoffrey of Monmouth to Chaucer, Penguin, 2015, pp. xiii–xxvi.Google Scholar
Augustine. Soliliquiorum libri duo. Soliliquiorum libri duo; De immortalitate animae; De quantitate animae, edited by Wolfgang Hörmann, Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky, 1986, pp. 1–98.Google Scholar
Avianus. “Fabulae.” Minor Latin Poets, vol. 2, translated by Wight Duff, J. and Duff, Arnold M., Harvard UP, 1934, pp. 680–749.Google Scholar
Bately, Janet. “Did King Alfred Actually Translate Anything? The Integrity of the Alfredian Canon Revisited.” Medium Ævum, vol. 78, no. 2, 2009, pp. 189–215.Google Scholar
Bately, Janet, editor. The Old English Orosius. Oxford UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Beechy, Tiffany. The Poetics of Old English. Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar
Bieler, Ludwig, editor. Anicii Manlii Severini Boethii Philosophiae Consolatio. Brepols, 1957.Google Scholar
“Bigspell.” DOE: A to I Online, edited by Cameron, Angus et al. , Dictionary of Old English Project, 2018, tapor.library.utoronto.ca/doe/.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne C. The Rhetoric of Fiction. U of Chicago P, 1961.Google Scholar
Bosworth, Joseph, and Toller, T. Northcote. An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. 1898. Oxford UP, 1972.Google Scholar
Brooks, Britton. “Intimacy, Interdependence, and Interiority in the Old English Prose Boethius.” Neophilologus, vol. 102, no. 4, 2018, pp. 525–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bynum, Caroline Walker. Christian Materiality: An Essay on Religion in Late Medieval Europe. Zone, 2011.Google Scholar
Carnicelli, Thomas A., editor. King Alfred's Version of St. Augustine's Soliloquies. Harvard UP, 1969.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Mary. The Experience of Beauty in the Middle Ages. Oxford UP, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cervone, Cristina Maria. Poetics of the Incarnation: Middle English Writing and the Leap of Love. U of Pennsylvania P, 2012.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Ian. “Boethius’ De consolatione philosophiae.” The Oxford History of Classical Reception in English Literature, vol. 1 (800–1558), edited by Copeland, Rita, Oxford UP, 2016, pp. 269–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Discenza, Nicole Guenther. The King's English: Strategies of Translation in the Old English Boethius. State U of New York P, 2005.Google Scholar
Discenza, Nicole Guenther. “The Old English Boethius.” A Companion to Alfred the Great, edited by Discenza, Paul E. Szarmach, , Brill, 2014, pp. 200–26.Google Scholar
Dronke, Peter. Fabula: Explorations into the Uses of Myth in Medieval Platonism. Brill, 1974.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. Nobody's Story: The Vanishing Acts of Women Writers in the Marketplace, 1670–1820. Clarendon Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godden, Malcolm. “Alfredian Prose: Myth and Reality.” Filologia Germanica / Germanic Philology, vol. 5, 2013, pp. 131–58.Google Scholar
Godden, Malcolm. “Did King Alfred Write Anything?” Medium Ævum, vol. 76, no. 1, 2007, pp. 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godden, Malcolm. “The Player King: Identification and Self-Representation in King Alfred's Writings.” Alfred the Great: Papers from the Eleventh-Centenary Conferences, edited by Reuter, Timothy, Ashgate, 2003, pp. 137–50.Google Scholar
Godden, Malcolm. “Prologues and Epilogues in the Pastoral Care, and Their Carolingian Models.” The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, vol. 110, no. 4, 2011, pp. 441–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godden, Malcolm, and Irvine, Susan, editors. The B Text. Godden and Irvine, The Old English Boethius, vol. 1, pp. 239–382.Google Scholar
Godden, Malcolm, and Irvine, Susan, editors. The C Text. Godden and Irvine, The Old English Boethius, vol. 1, pp. 383–541.Google Scholar
Godden, Malcolm, and Irvine, Susan, editors. The Old English Boethius: An Edition of the Old English Versions of Boethius's De consolatione philosophiae. 2 vols. Oxford UP, 2009.Google Scholar
Harris, Carissa. “Pastourelle Fictionalities.” New Literary History, vol. 51, no. 1, 2020, pp. 239–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Michael J., and Murphy, Patrick D.. Introduction. Essentials of the Theory of Fiction, edited by Hoffman, and Murphy, , 3rd ed., Duke UP, 2005, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Irvine, Susan. “Ulysses and Circe in King Alfred's Boethius: A Classical Myth Transformed.” Studies in English Language and Literature: “Doubt Wisely”: Papers in Honour of E. G. Stanley, edited by Toswell, M. J. and Tyler, E. M., Routledge, 1996, pp. 387–401.Google Scholar
Isidore, . Isidori Hispalensis episcopi etymologiarum sive originum libri XX. Edited by Lindsay, W. M., vol. 1, Oxford UP, 1911.Google Scholar
Jayatilaka, Rohini. “Old English Manuscripts and Readers.” A Companion to Medieval Poetry, edited by Saunders, Corinne, Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 51–64.Google Scholar
Johnson, Eleanor. Practicing Literary Theory in the Middle Ages: Ethics and the Mixed Form in Chaucer, Gower, Usk, and Hoccleve. U of Chicago P, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapidge, Michael. The Anglo-Saxon Library. Oxford UP, 2006.Google Scholar
Lapidge, Michael. “The Study of Latin Texts in Late Anglo-Saxon England: The Evidence of Latin Glosses.” Latin and the Vernacular Languages in Early Medieval Britain, edited by Brooks, Nicholas, Leicester UP, 1982, pp. 99–140.Google Scholar
“Leás, Adj. (2).” Bosworth and Toller, p. 626.Google Scholar
Lockett, Leslie. Anglo-Saxon Psychologies in the Vernacular and Latin Traditions. U of Toronto P, 2011.Google Scholar
Love, Rosalind. “Latin Commentaries on Boethius's Consolation of Philosophy.” A Companion to Alfred the Great, edited by Discenza, Nicole Guenther and Szarmach, Paul E., Brill, 2015, pp. 82–109.Google Scholar
Love, Rosalind. “The Latin Commentaries on Boethius's De consolatione philosophiae from the Ninth to the Eleventh Centuries.” A Companion to Boethius in the Middle Ages, edited by Kaylor, Noel Harold Jr., and Phillips, Philip Edward, Brill, 2012, pp. 75–133.Google Scholar
Macrobius, . Commentary on the Dream of Scipio. Translated by Stahl, William Harris, Columbia UP, 1952.Google Scholar
Miller, Thomas, editor. The Old English Version of Bede's Ecclesiastical History of the English People. Oxford UP, 1891.Google Scholar
“Mod, N. (1).” Bosworth and Toller, p. 693.Google Scholar
Momma, Haruko. “Purgatoria Clementia: Philosophy and Principles of Pain in the Old English Boethius.” The Legacy of Boethius in Medieval England: The Consolation and Its Afterlives, edited by Joseph McMullen, A. and Weaver, Erica, ACMRS, 2018, pp. 53–69.Google Scholar
O'Brien O'Keeffe, Katherine. “Listening to the Scenes of Reading: King Alfred's Talking Prefaces.” Orality and Literacy in the Middle Ages: Essays on a Conjunction of Consequences in Honour of D. H. Green, edited by Chinca, Mark and Young, Christopher, Brepols, 2005, pp. 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orchard, Andy. Pride and Prodigies: Studies in the Monsters of the Beowulf Manuscript. D. S. Brewer, 1995.Google Scholar
Orlemanski, Julie. “Who Has Fiction? Modernity, Fictionality, and the Middle Ages.” New Literary History, vol. 50, no. 2, 2019, pp. 145–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papahagi, Adrian. Boethiana Mediaevalia: A Collection of Studies on the Early Medieval Fortune of Boethius’ Consolation of Philosophy. Zeta, 2010.Google Scholar
Pavel, Thomas G. Fictional Worlds. Harvard UP, 1996.Google Scholar
Plato, . The Republic. Edited by Ferrari, G. R. F. and translated by Griffith, Tom, Cambridge UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Schröer, A. Die angelsächsischen Prosabearbeitungen der Benediktinerregel. Wigand, Georg H., 1885.Google Scholar
“Spell, N. (1, 2, 4).” Bosworth and Toller, pp. 900–01.Google Scholar
Szarmach, Paul. “The Old English Boethius and Speculative Thought.” The Legacy of Boethius in Medieval England: The Consolation and Its Afterlives, edited by Joseph McMullen, A. and Weaver, Erica, ACMRS, 2018, pp. 35–52.Google Scholar
Thornbury, Emily V. Becoming a Poet in Anglo-Saxon England. Cambridge UP, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Elizabeth. England in Europe: English Royal Women and Literary Patronage, c. 1000–c. 1150. U of Toronto P, 2017.Google Scholar
Weaver, Erica. “Hybrid Forms: Translating Boethius in Anglo-Saxon England.” Anglo-Saxon England, vol. 45, 2016, pp. 213–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieland, Gernot R. “The Glossed Manuscript: Classbook or Library Book?” Anglo-Saxon England, vol. 14, 1985, pp. 153–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar