Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:11:01.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glacier displacement on Comfortlessbreen, Svalbard, using 2-pass differential SAR interferometry (DInSAR) with a digital elevation model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2011

Nora Jennifer Schneevoigt ,
Monica Sund ,
Wiley Bogren ,
Andreas Kääb  and
Dan Johan Weydahl
Nora Jennifer Schneevoigt
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1047, Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway (njs@geo.uio.no)
Monica Sund
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1047, Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway (njs@geo.uio.no)
Wiley Bogren
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1047, Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway (njs@geo.uio.no)
Andreas Kääb
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1047, Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway (njs@geo.uio.no)
Dan Johan Weydahl
Affiliation:
Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, Land and Air Systems Division, PO Box 25, NO-2027 Kjeller, Norway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Differential synthetic aperture radar interferometry (DInSAR) exploits the coherence between the phases of two or more satellite synthetic aperture radar (SAR) scenes taken from the same orbit to separate the phase contributions from topography and movement by subtracting either phase. Hence pure terrain displacement can be derived without residual height information in it, but only the component of movement in line-of-sight direction is represented in a differential interferogram. Comfortlessbreen, a recently surging glacier, flows predominantly in this direction with respect to the European Remote Sensing satellites ERS-1 and ERS-2. Four C-band SAR scenes from spring 1996 were selected because of the high coherence between the respective pairs of the 1-day repeat-pass tandem mission of the ERS sensors. 2-pass DInSAR is performed in combination with a SPOT5 (Satéllite pour l'Observation de la Terre 5) SPIRIT (SPOT5 stereoscopic survey of Polar Ice: Reference Images and Topography) digital elevation model (DEM) from 2007. The different processing steps and intermediate image products, including unwrapping and generation of displacement maps, are detailed in order to convey the DInSAR processing chain to the beginner in the field of interferometry. Maximum horizontal displacements of 18 to 20 cm d−1 in ground range direction can be detected at the glacier terminus, while a few centimetres per day characterised most of the middle and upper portions of Comfortlessbreen in spring 1996.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 48 , Special Issue 1: Papers from the 11th Circumpolar Remote Sensing Symposium , January 2012 , pp. 17 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Costantini, M. 1998. A novel phase unwrapping method based on network programming. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 36 (3): 813–821.Google Scholar
Crosetto, M., Monserrat, O., Bremmer, C., Hanssen, R., Capes, R., and Marsh, S.. 2008. Ground motion monitoring using SAR interferometry: quality assessment. European Geologist 26: 12–15.Google Scholar
Cumming, I., Valero, J.L., Vachon, P.W., Mattar, K., Geudtner, D., and Gray, L.. 1997. Glacier flow measurements with ERS tandem mission data. ESA Fringe 1996 Proceedings, Zurich (ESA SP–406): 353–362.Google Scholar
Dowdeswell, J.A., Hamilton, G.S., and Hagen, J.O.. 1991. The duration of the active phase on surge–type glaciers: contrasts between Svalbard and other regions. Journal of Glaciology 37 (127): 388–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldhuset, K., Andersen, P.H., Hauge, S., Isaksson, E., and Weydahl, D.J.. 2003. ERS tandem InSAR processing for DEM generation, glacier motion estimation and coherence analysis on Svalbard. International Journal of Remote Sensing 24 (7): 1415–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, A.K., Goldstein, R.M., and Zebker, H.A.. 1989. Mapping small elevation changes over large areas: differential radar interferometry. Journal of Geophysical Research 94 (B7): 9183–9191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gens, R., and van Genderen, J.L.. 1996. SAR interferometry – issues, techniques, applications.International Journal of Remote Sensing 17 (10): 1803–1835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, R.M., Zebker, H.A., and Werner, C.L.. 1988. Satellite radar interferometry: two–dimensional phase unwrapping. Radio Science 23 (4): 713–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, R.M., Engelhard, R., Kamb, B., and Frolich, R.. 1993. Satellite radar interferometry for monitoring ice sheet motion: application to an Antarctic ice stream. Science 262: 1525–1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, J.O., Liestøl, O., Roland, E., and Jørgensen, T.. 1993. Glacier atlas of Svalbard and Jan Mayen. Oslo: Norwegian Polar Institute (Meddelelser 129).Google Scholar
Hanssen, R.F. 2001. Radar interferometry: data interpretation and error analysis. Remote sensing and digital image processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Joughin, I., Tulaczyk, S., Fahnestock, M.A., and Kwok, R.. 1996. A mini–surge on the Ryder Glacier, Greenland, observed by satellite radar interferometry. Science 274: 228–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korona, J., Berthier, E., Bernard, M., Remy, F., and Thouvenot, E.. 2009. SPIRIT. SPOT 5 stereoscopic survey of polar ice: reference images and topographies during the fourth International Polar Year (2007–2009). ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 64: 204–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwok, R., and Fahnestock, M.A.. 1996. Ice sheet motion and topography from radar interferometry. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 34 (1): 189–200.Google Scholar
Meier, M.F., and Post, A.. 1969. What are glacier surges? Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 6 (4): 807–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melvold, K., and Hagen, J.O.. 1998. Evolution of a surge–type glacier in its quiescent phase: Kongsvegen, Spitsbergen, 1964–95. Journal of Glaciology 44 (147): 394–404.Google Scholar
Moholdt, G. 2010. Elevation change and mass balance of Svalbard glaciers from geodetic data. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Oslo: University of Oslo, Department of Geosciences.Google Scholar
Murray, T., Luckman, A., Strozzi, T., and Nuttall, A.M.. 2003. The initiation of glacier surging at Fridjovbreen. Annals of Glaciology 36: 110–116.Google Scholar
Nuttall, A.M., Hagen, J.O., and Dowdeswell, J.. 1997. Quiescent–phase changes in velocity and geometry of Finsterwalderbreen, a surge–type glacier in Svalbard. Annals of Glaciology 24: 249–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, H., Murray, T., Strozzi, T., Barr, S., and Luckman, A.. 2005. Surge–related topographic change of the glacier Sortebræ, east Greenland, derived from synthetic aperture radar Interferometry. Journal of Glaciology 49 (166): 381–390.Google Scholar
Rosen, P. A., Hensley, S., Joughin, I.R., Li, F.K., Madsen, S.N., Rodriguez, E., and Goldstein, R.M.. 2000. Synthetic aperture radar interferometry. Proceedings of the IEEE 88 (3): 333–382.Google Scholar
Rott, H. 2009. Advances in interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) in earth system science. Progress in Physical Geography 33 (6): 769–791.Google Scholar
Strozzi, T., Delaloye, R., Kääb, A., Ambrosi, C., Perruchoud, E., and Wegmüller, U.. 2010. Combined observations of rock mass movements using satellite SAR interferometry, differential GPS, airborne digital photogrammetry, and airborne photography interpretation. Journal of Geophysical Research 115: F01014(doi:10.1029/2009JF001311).Google Scholar
Sund, M., and Eiken, T.. 2010. Recent surges of Blomstrandbreen, Comfortlessbreen and Nathorstbreen, Svalbard. Journal of Glaciology 56 (195): 182–184.Google Scholar
Sund, M., Eiken, T., Hagen, J.O., and Kääb, A.. 2009. Svalbard surge dynamics derived from geometric changes. Annals of Glaciology 50 (52): 50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vieli, A., Jania, J., Blatter, H., and Funk, M.. 2004. Short–term velocity variations on Hansbreen, a tidewater glacier in Spitsbergen. Journal of Glaciology 50 (170): 389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wangensteen, B., Weydahl, D.J., and Hagen, J.O.. 2005. Mapping glacier velocities on Svalbard using ERS tandem DInSAR data. Norwegian Journal of Geography 59: 276–285.Google Scholar
Wegmüller, U., and Werner, C.. 1997. Gamma SAR processor and interferometry software. Florence: ERS (Third ERS symposium on space at the service of our environment, Florence, Italy): 1687–1692.Google Scholar
Weydahl, D.J. 2001. Analysis of ERS tandem SAR coherence from glaciers, valleys, and fjord ice on Svalbard. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 39 (9): 2029–2039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weydahl, D.J., Eldhuset, K., and Hauge, S.. 2001. Atmospheric effects on advanced modes. Kjeller: Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (report 2001/04826).Google Scholar