Hostname: page-component-669899f699-b58lm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T21:40:07.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mineral riches: a route to Greenland's independence?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2016

Jørgen Taagholt  and
Kent Brooks
Jørgen Taagholt
Affiliation:
Danish Arctic Institute, Strandgade 102, DK-1401 København K, Denmark
Kent Brooks
Affiliation:
Museum of Natural History of Denmark, Øster Voldgade 5–7, DK 1350 København K, Denmark (kent2039@live.com)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a brief history of Greenland which sets the scene for unprecedented recent developments, both materially and politically. After the war, in 1953, the political status of Greenland was changed from colony to an integral part of Denmark. Greenland gained home rule [Hjemmestyre] in 1979 and greater devolution to self rule [Selvstyre] in 2009. The population is becoming centralised, increasingly resembling consumer societies worldwide. In recent years the economy has been mainly based upon fish and mining, although at present there is no active mine and the economy is declining, making the country increasingly dependent on subsidies from Denmark. The former president recently predicted that Greenland would leave Denmark within her life-time, a view based upon her vision of the development of a rich mining industry. Additionally she established a reconciliation committee to examine supposed ill-treatment by Denmark. The present situation and the unrealistic expectations of huge production of different minerals are discussed based upon accepted predictions of mineral resources, world market prices, logistic problems (lack of infrastructure and tiny population) and environmental concerns. During the past year, a more realistic and less confrontational debate on the relations between Denmark and Greenland has been evident.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , May 2016 , pp. 360 - 371
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anon. (Anonymous). 2014. Partial submission of the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark together with the Government of Greenland to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf: the northern continental shelf of Greenland. Executive summary. Copenhagen: GEUS (Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland).Google Scholar
Bach, H.C. and Taagholt, J.. 1982. Greenland and the Arctic region – resources and security policy. Copenhagen: Danish Defence Command.Google Scholar
Boersma, T. and Foley, K.. 2014. The Greenland gold rush: promise and pitfalls of Greenland's energy and mineral resources. Washington, Brookings Institution. URL: http://www.brookings.edu/search?start=1&q=Greenland+gold+rush (accessed 9 October 2015).Google Scholar
Dawes, P. 1985. Hans Ø og Hans Ø. Tidskriftet Grønland 1985 (2): 47–59.Google Scholar
Hansen, K. 2002. Farewell to Greenland's wildlife. Copenhagen: Gads Forlag.Google Scholar
Kirkegaard, J.-E. and Kielsen, K.. 2014. Vores råstoffer skal skabe velstand: Grønlands olie- og mineralstrategi 2014–2018. Sammenfatning [Our natural resources will create prosperity: Greenlands oil and mineral stratergy 2014–2018, summary] (in Greenlandic and Danish). Nuuk: Naalakkersuisut/Government of Greenland.Google Scholar
Laursen, L. 2015. Russian claim heats up battle to control Arctic sea floor. Science 349: 678.Google Scholar
Lyck, L. and Taagholt, J.. 1987. Greenland – its economy and resources. Arctic 40 (1): 50–59.Google Scholar
Marcussen, C., Mørk, F., Funck, T.and others. 2015. The continental shelf project of the Kingdom of Denmark – status and issues. Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Bulletin 33: 41–44.Google Scholar
Nares, G.S. 1978. Narrative of a voyage to the polar sea 1875–76. 2 vols. London: Sampson Low, Marston, Searle and Rivington.Google Scholar
Nuttall, M. 2012. The Isukasia iron ore mine controversy: extractive industries and public consultation in Greenland. Nordia Geographical Publications 41: 23–41.Google Scholar
Rosing, M., Mosbech, A., Mortensen, B.O.G. and others. 2014. To the benefit of Greenland. The committee for Greenlandic mineral resources to the benefit of society. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen. URL: http://nyheder.ku.dk/groenlands-naturressourcer/ (accessed 9 October 2015).Google Scholar
Showstack, R. 2014. Greenland premier calls for balanced development of natural resources. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union (EOS) 95: 361 and 363.Google Scholar
Steenfos, H. P. and Taagholt, J.. 2012. Grønlands teknologihistorie [Greenlands technological history] Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Taagholt, J. 1982. Greenland future development: a historical and political perspective. Polar Record 21 (130): 23–32.Google Scholar
Taagholt, J. 1992. International law of the sea: an Arctic perspective. In Lyck, L. (editor). Proceedings from Nordic Arctic Research Forum Symposium 1992. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press, 93–104.Google Scholar
Taagholt, J, and Hansen, J.C.. 2001. Greenland security perspectives. (translator: Lufkin, D.). Fairbanks, Alaska: Arctic Research Consortium of the United States.Google Scholar