Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-8cnds Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T01:29:46.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring Bias and Uncertainty in DW-NOMINATE Ideal Point Estimates via the Parametric Bootstrap

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Royce Carroll ,
Jeffrey B. Lewis ,
James Lo ,
Keith T. Poole  and
Howard Rosenthal
Royce Carroll
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, MS 24, Rice University, PO Box 1892, Houston, TX 77251-1892
Jeffrey B. Lewis
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of California—Los Angeles, Bunche Hall Los Angeles, CA 90095
James Lo*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of California—Los Angeles, Bunche Hall Los Angeles, CA 90095
Keith T. Poole
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Social Sciences Building, Room 301, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0521, University of California—San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0521
Howard Rosenthal
Affiliation:
Department of Politics, Corwin Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540
*
e-mail: jameslo@ucla.edu (corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

DW-NOMINATE scores for the U.S. Congress are widely used measures of legislators' ideological locations over time. These scores have been used in a large number of studies in political science and closely related fields. In this paper, we extend the work of Lewis and Poole (2004) on the parametric bootstrap to DW-NOMINATE and obtain standard errors for the legislator ideal points. These standard errors are in the range of 1%–4% of the range of DW-NOMINATE coordinates.

Type
Research Article
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , Summer 2009 , pp. 261 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Authors' note: We thank the National Science Foundation, Rice University, and the San Diego Supercomputer Center for their support. Replication materials are available on the Political Analysis Web site.

References

Dhrymes, P. J. 1978. Introductory econometrics. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, B. 1979. Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jacknife. Annals of Statistics 7: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R. J. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. B., and Poole, K. T. 2004. Measuring bias and uncertainty in ideal point estimates via the parametric bootstrap. Political Analysis 12: 105–27.Google Scholar
McCarty, N. M., Poole, K. T., and Rosenthal, H. 1997. Income redistribution and the realignment of American politics. Washington, DC: SEI Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, N. M., Poole, K. T., and Rosenthal, H. 2006. Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McFadden, D. 1976. Quantal choice analysis: A survey. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5: 363–90.Google Scholar
Poole, K. T. 2001. The geometry of multidimensional quadratic utility in models of parliamentary roll call voting. Political Analysis 9: 211–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, K. T., and Rosenthal, H. 1983. A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis GSIA Working Paper No. 5–83–84.Google Scholar
Poole, K. T., and Rosenthal, H. 1985. A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. American Journal of Political Science 29: 357–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, K. T., and Rosenthal, H. 1987a. Analysis of congressional coalition patterns: A unidimensional spatial model. Legislative Studies Quarterly 12: 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, K. T., and Rosenthal, H. 1987b. The unidimensional congress, 1919–84 GSIA Working Paper No. 44–84–85.Google Scholar
Poole, K. T., and Rosenthal, H. 1991. Patterns of congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science 35: 228–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, K. T., and Rosenthal, H. 1997. Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poole, K. T., and Rosenthal, H. 2001. D-nominate after 10 years: An update to congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. Legislative Studies Quarterly 26: 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, K. T., and Rosenthal, H. 2007. Ideology and congress. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Silbey, J. 1967. The shrine of party. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar