Hostname: page-component-69cd664f8f-p7d4h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-13T10:03:46.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crisis and Gender in Legislative-Executive Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2023

Corinna Kroeber Open the ORCID record for Corinna Kroeber [Opens in a new window]  and
Sarah C. Dingler Open the ORCID record for Sarah C. Dingler [Opens in a new window]
Corinna Kroeber*
Affiliation:
University of Greifswald, Germany
Sarah C. Dingler
Affiliation:
University of Innsbruck, Austria
*
*Corresponding author. Email: Corinna.Kroeber@uni-greifswald.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The interaction of the legislative and executive is gendered in nature. Gender shapes what actors in these two institutions demand from each other. This pattern is visible, for instance, in the distinct policy priorities of women and men in parliament (e.g., Allen and Childs 2019; Bäck and Debus 2019; Lowande, Ritchie, and Lauterbach 2019) and in the ways that women engage and oversee related government initiatives. At the same time, gender influences the strengths and weaknesses that actors in the legislature and executive ascribe to each other and, hence, their mutual assessment. Members of parliament (MPs) and party gatekeepers, for instance, tend to favor men for the most influential and well-resourced portfolios, since they believe that masculine traits are necessary or suitable to succeed in governmental positions, and membership in men-dominated political networks remains an important route to qualify for ministerial office (see, e.g., Annesley, Beckwith, and Franceschet 2019; Krook and O’Brien 2012). Change in these dynamics is scarce or occurs only gradually, meaning that the ways in which executive-legislative interactions are gendered are usually stable.

Type
Critical Perspectives Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , September 2023 , pp. 908 - 914
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Women, Gender, and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Peter, and Childs, Sarah. 2019. “The Grit in the Oyster? Women’s Parliamentary Organizations and the Substantive Representation of Women.” Political Studies 67 (3): 618–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annesley, Claire, Beckwith, Karen, and Franceschet, Susan. 2019. Cabinets, Ministers, and Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bäck, Hanna, and Debus, Marc. 2019. “When Do Women Speak? A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Gender in Legislative Debates.” Political Studies 67 (3): 576–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, Stephan, Stegmann, Sebastian, Bark, Alina S. Hernandez, Junker, Nina M., and van Dick, Rolf. 2017. “Think Manager—Think Male, Think Follower—Think Female: Gender Bias in Implicit Followership Theories.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 47 (7): 377–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Johannesen-Schmidt, Mary C.. 2001. “The Leadership Styles of Women and Men.” Journal of Social Issues 57 (4): 781–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckel, Catherine C., and Grossman, Philip J.. 1998. “Are Women Less Selfish than Men? Evidence from Dictator Experiments.” Economic Journal 108 (448): 726–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and O’Brien, Diana Z.. 2012. “All the President’s Men? The Appointment of Female Cabinet Ministers Worldwide.” Journal of Politics 74 (3): 840–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowande, Kenneth, Ritchie, Melinda, and Lauterbach, Erinn. 2019. “Descriptive and Substantive Representation in Congress: Evidence from 80,000 Congressional Inquiries.” American Journal of Political Science 63 (3): 644–59.10.1111/ajps.12443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, Philip. 1993. Does Parliament Matter? London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Uriel, Boin, R. Arjen, and Comfort, Louise K.. 2001. Managing Crises: Threats, Dilemmas, Opportunities. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Saalfeld, Thomas. 2014. “Executive–Legislative Relations in Europe.” In Routledge Handbook of European Politics, ed. Magone, José M. Milton Park: Routledge, 346–65.Google Scholar
Strolovitch, Dara Z. 2013. “Of Mancessions and Hecoveries: Race, Gender, and the Political Construction of Economic Crises and Recoveries.” Perspectives on Politics 11 (1): 167–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strolovitch, Dara Z. 2021. “When Does a Crisis Begin? Race, Gender, and the Subprime Noncrisis of the Late 1990s.” In Critical Disaster Studies, eds. Jacob, A. C. Remes and Horowitz, Andy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 51–68.Google Scholar
Strøm, Kaare. 2000. “Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 37 (3): 261–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar