Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:22:24.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weaknesses of the Post-Soviet Religious Model: The Kremlin and “Traditional” Religions in face of Interethnic Tensions in Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2014

Alicja Curanović*
Affiliation:
University of Warsaw
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Alicja Curanović, Institute of International Relations, University of Warsaw, Zurawia 4, 00–503 Warsaw, Poland. E-mail: a.curanovic@uw.edu.pl

Abstract

This article examines interethnic tensions in Russia within the framework of the “post-Soviet religious model.” This term is understood as a set of mechanisms of cooperation between the state and representatives of “traditional” religious organizations. The article includes an analytical overview of the state of interethnic relations in Russia and how this issue is approached by the state and “traditional” religions. Based on this analysis, the author tries to expose weaknesses of the model and point out possible future problems.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allensworth, Wayne. 1998. The Russian Question: Nationalism, Modernization, and Post-Communist Russia, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Bavin, Peter S. 2007. “Social Geography of Xenophobia and Tolerance.Russian Politics and Law 45: 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brugger, Winfred. 2007. “On the Relationship between Structural Norms and Constitutional Rights in Church-State Relations.” In Religion in the Public Sphere: A Comparative Analysis of German, Israeli, American and International Law, eds. Brugger, Winfred, and Michael, Karayanni. Heidelberg: Springer, 3148.Google Scholar
Brugger, Winfred. 2010. “From Hostility through Recognition to Identification: State-Church Models and Their Relationship to Freedom Of Religion..”In Secularization and the World Religions, eds. Joas, Hans, and Klaus, Wiegandt. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 169170.Google Scholar
Curanović, Alicja. 2012. The Religious Factor in Russia's Foreign Policy, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Curanović, Alicja. 2013. “The Post-Soviet Religious Model: Reflections on Relations between the State and Religious Institutions in the CIS Are.” Religion, State and Society 41: 330351.Google Scholar
Dannreuther, Roland 2010. “Islamic Radicalization in Russia: an assessment.International Affairs 86: 1.Google Scholar
Dubin, Boris 2000. “Orthodoxy in a Social Context.Russian Social Science Review 39: 4546.Google Scholar
Dubin, Boris. 2011. Rossiya nulevykh. Politicheskaya kul'tura. Istoricheskaya pamyat. Povsednevnaya zhizn. Moscow: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya.Google Scholar
Duncan, Peter. 1998. Russian Nationalism and the New Foreign Policy (Former Soviet South). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Hosking, Geoffrey A., and Robert, Service, eds. 1998. Russian Nationalism Past and Present, Basingstoke: New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Carla, and Lewis-Coles, Ma'at E. 2004. “Coping with racism: A spirit-based psychological Perspective.” In: The Psychology of Prejudice and Discrimination: Racism in America, Vol. 1, ed. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group, 207222.Google Scholar
Karpov, Viacheslav, and Elena, Lisovskaya. 2008. “Religious Intolerance among Orthodox Christians and Muslims in Russia.Religion, State and Society 36: 361377.Google Scholar
Laruelle, Marlene. 2009. Russian Nationalism and the National Reassertion of Russia. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Malashenko, Aleksei, and Sergei, Filatov, eds. 2012. Pravoslavnaya tserkov’ pri novom patriarkhe. Moscow: Rosspen.Google Scholar
Mukomel, Vladimir. 2011. “Integratsiya migrantov: vyzovy, politika, sotsial'nyye praktiki.” Mir Rossii 1.Google Scholar
Pain, Emil. 2007. “Xenophobia and Ethnopolitical Extremism in Post-soviet Russia Dynamics and Growth Factors.Nationalities Papers 35: 895911.Google Scholar
Pain, Emil. 2011. “Trudnyy put’ ot mul'tikul'turalizma k internkul'turalizmu.Vestnik Instituta Kennana v Rossii 20.Google Scholar
Ponkin, Igor. 2005. Sovremennoe svetskoe gosudarstvo: konstitucionno-pravovoe issledovanie. Moscow: Institut gosudarstvenno-konfessional'nyh otnoshenij i prava.Google Scholar
Rancour-Laferriere, Daniel. 2001. Russian Nationalism from an Interdisciplinary Perspective. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Savielev, Andrei N. 2010. Russofobiya v Rossii. Аnaliticheskiy doklad 2006–2009 gg.. Moscow: Traditsiya.Google Scholar
Schnirelman, Viktor. 2011. Porog tolerantnosti: ideologiya i praktika novogo rasizma, Vol. I. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye.Google Scholar
The Levada Center Report: Obshchestvennoye mneniye 2010. http://www.levada.ru/books/obshchestvennoe-mnenie-2010 (Accessed on August 13, 2013).Google Scholar
The Levada Center Report: Obshchestvennoye mneniye 2012. http://www.levada.ru/sites/default/files/om-2012_0.pdf (Accessed on June 6, 2013).Google Scholar
Verkhovsky, Alexander. 2004. “Who is the Enemy Now? Islamophobia and Antisemitism among Russian Orthodox nationalists before and after September 11.Patterns of Prejudice 38: 127143.Google Scholar
Verkhovsky, Alexander. 2012. Natsionalizm rukovodstva Russkoy pravoslavnoy tserkvi v desyatiletii XXI v.” In Pravoslavnaya tserkov’ pri novom patriarkhe, eds. Malashenko, Aleksei, and Sergei, Filatov. Moscow: Rosspen.Google Scholar
Verkhovsky, Alexander, ed. 2007. Verkhi i nizy russkogo natsionalizma. Moscow: Informatsionno-analiticheskiy tsentr «Sova.Google Scholar
Verkhovsky, Alexander, and Emil, Pain. 2007. “ TSivilizatsionnyy natsionalizm: rossiyskaya versiya «osobogo puti».In Ideologiya “osobogo puti” v Rossii i Germanii: istoki, soderzhaniye, posledstviya, ed. Pain, Emil. Moscow: Kennan Institute.Google Scholar