Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:24:50.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

When Church Teachings and Policy Commitments Collide: Perspectives on Catholics in the U.S. House of Representatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2008

Elizabeth A. Oldmixon*
Affiliation:
University of North Texas
William Hudson
Affiliation:
Providence College
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Elizabeth A. Oldmixon, Department of Political Science, P.O. Box 305340, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203-5340. E-mail:oldmixon@unt.edu

Abstract

This article investigates the influence of religious values on domestic social policy-making, with a particular focus on Catholics. We analyze roll call votes in the 109th Congress and find that Catholic identification is associated with support for Catholic Social Teaching, but both younger Catholics and Republican Catholics are found less supportive. In followup interviews with a small sample of Catholic Republicans, we find that they justify voting contrary to Church teaching by seeing its application to most domestic social issues as less authoritative than Church moral teachings on issues like abortion.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Appleby, R. Scott. 1997. “Catholics and the Christian Right: An Uneasy Alliance.” In Sojourners in the Wilderness: The Christian Right in Comparative Perspective, ed. Smidt, Corwin and Penning, James. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Benson, Peter, and Williams, Dorothy. 1982. Religion on Capitol Hill: Myths and Realities. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Byrnes, Timothy A. 1993. Catholic Bishops in American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chressanthis, George, Gilbert, Kathie, and Grimes, Paul. 1991. “Ideology, Constituent Interests, and Senatorial Voting: The Case of Abortion.” Social Science Quarterly 72:588600.Google Scholar
Coleman, John A. 2004. “The Common Good and Catholic Social Thought.” In A Distinctive Voice: American Catholics and Civic Engagement, ed. Lanham, Margaret O'Brien SteinfelsMaryland: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Dorr, Donal. 1992. Option for the Poor: A Hundred Years of Vatican Social Teaching. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
Fastow, Chris J.Grant, Tobin, and Rudolph, Thomas J.. 1999. “Holy Roll Calls: Religious Tradition and Voting Behavior in the U.S. House.” Social Science Quarterly 80:687701.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Joel S. 2006. “Why Did House Members Vote for H.R. 4437?International Migration Review 40(3):698706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaillardetz, Richard R. 2005. “The Ecclesiological Foundations of Modern Catholic Social Teaching.” In Modern Catholic Social Teaching: Commentaries and Interpretations, ed. Himes, Kenneth R.. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Gohmann, Stephan, and Ohsfeldt, Robert. 1994. “Voting in the U.S. House On Abortion Funding Issues: The Role of Constituents' and Legislators' Ideology, Before and After the Webster Decision.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 53: 455474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graetz, Michael J. and Shapiro, Ian. 2005. Death by a Thousand Cuts: The Fight over Taxing Inherited Wealth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Green, John C. and Guth, James L.. 1991. “Religion, Representatives and Roll Calls.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16:571584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guth, James L. and Kellstedt, Lyman A.. 2001. “Religion and Congress.” In In God We Trust: Religion & American Political Life, ed. Smidt, Corwin E.Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald. 2001. “Morality in Congress? Legislative Voting on Gay Issues.” In The Public Clash of Private Values: The Politics of Morality Policy, ed. Mooney, Christopher Z.. Chatham: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Hines, Kenneth R. 2002. “The Crisis of American Democracy: A Catholic Perspective.” In American Catholic Social Teaching, ed. Massaro, Thomas J. and Shannon, Thomas. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, William E. 2005. “President Bush, the Ownership Society, and the Catholic Understanding of the Common Good.” Presented at the Teaching, Faith, and Service: The Foundation of Freedom Conference, University of Portland.Google Scholar
Jelen, Ted G. 2006. “The American Church: Of Being Catholic and American.” In The Catholic Church and the Nation-State: Comparative Perspectives, ed. Manuel, Paul Christopher, Reardon, Lawrence C. and Wilcox, Clyde. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
LandPhilip S., S.J. Philip S., S.J. 1994. Catholic Social Teaching. Chicago: Loyola University Press.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C. 1999. “ ‘Culture Wars’ in the American Party System: Religious and Cultural Change among Partisan Activists since 1972.” American Politics Quarterly 27:89121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linden, Ian. 1994. Back to Basics: Revisiting Catholic Social Teaching. London: Catholic Institute for International Relations.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J. and McFarlane, Deborah R.. 1993. “The Politics of Funding Abortion.” American Politics Quarterly 21:81101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Connor, Robert, and Berkman, Michael. 1993. “Do Women Legislators Matter? Female Legislators and State Abortion Policy.” American Politics Quarterly 21: 102124.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Robert, and Berkman, Michael. 1995. “Religious Determinants of State Abortion Policy.” Social Science Quarterly 76:447459.Google Scholar
Oldmixon, Elizabeth A., Rosenson, Beth, and Wald, Kenneth D.. 2005. “Conflict over Israel: The Role of Religion, Race, Party and Ideology in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1997–2002.” Terrorism and Political Violence 17:407426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldmixon, Elizabeth Anne. 2005. Uncompromising Positions: God, Sex, and the U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin, Shapiro, Robert, Gronke, Paul, and Rosenberg, Robert. 1984. “Constituency, Party, and Representation in Congress.” Public Opinion Quarterly 48:741756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, James, and Fox, Sandie Wrightman. 1972. “Religious Affiliation as a Predictor of Voting Behavior in Abortion Reform Legislation.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 11:347359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, James, and Fox, Sandie Wrightman. 1975. “Religion and Voting On Abortion Reform: A Follow-Up Study.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 14:159164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schecter, David. 2002. “What Drives the Voting on Abortion Policy? Investigating Partisanship and Religion in the State Legislative Arena.” Women & Politics 23:6184.Google Scholar
Tatalovich, Raymond and Schier, David. 1993. “The Persistence of Ideological Cleavage in Voting on Abortion Legislation in the House of Representatives, 1973–1988.” American Politics Quarterly 21: 125139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trice, Robert H. 1977. “Congress and the Arab-Israeli Conflict: Support for Israel in the U.S. Senate.” Political Science Quarterly 92:443463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D. 2003. Religion and Politics in the United States. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D., and Calhoun-Brown, Allison. 2006. Religion and Politics in the United States. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Weigel, George. 1992. A New Worldly Order. Washington, DC: Ethics and Public Policy Center.Google Scholar
Witt, Stephanie, and Moncrief, Gary. 1993. “Religion and Roll Call Voting in Idaho: The 1990 Abortion Controversy.” American Politics Quarterly 21:140149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamane, David and Oldmixon, Elizabeth A.. 2006. “Religion in the Legislative Arena: Affiliation, Salience, Advocacy and Public Policy-Making.” Legislative Studies Quarterly XXXI:433460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar