Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T01:31:43.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Catholicism, Rawlsian Political Liberalism, and Reciprocity: Insights from the Travails of Bishop Henry of Calgary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2011

John Soroski*
Affiliation:
Grant MacEwan University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: John Soroski, Grant MacEwan University, 7-360F, 10700—104 Ave., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T2E 1W6. E-mail: soroskij@macewan.ca

Abstract

John Rawls contended that an overlapping consensus for “political liberalism” could be found in different ways across the range of comprehensive systems of value in western societies. Three recent conflicts concerning the relationship of church and state in Canada involving the Catholic Bishop of Calgary, Frederick Henry, provide an opportunity to consider Rawls' ideas in a specific societal context. The first of these conflicts — Henry's call for the excommunication of Catholic Prime Minister Paul Martin for legalizing same-sex marriage — suggests that the resources for a Rawlsian overlapping consensus may be difficult to find in Catholicism. The refusal of the Calgary Catholic School Board to obey Henry's order to end the use of gambling related school fund-raising, the second of the Bishop's “travails,” undercuts that conclusion, but the moral emptiness of the vocabulary of cultural liberalism, which the Board deployed in its self-justifications, suggests that too much liberalism might be almost as regrettable as too little. Henry's third travail — a call before the Human Rights Commission to answer charges of “discriminatory public speech” for his public criticisms of homosexuality — suggests the merit of recognizing an alternative to overlapping consensus as the source of Catholic recognition of Rawlsian political liberalism: reciprocity.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackerman, Bruce A. 1980. Social Justice in the Liberal State. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Aquinas. 1981 [1274]. Summa Theologica. Broken Arrow, OK: Christian Classics.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert N. et al. 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Blais, Andre. 2005. “Accounting for the Electoral Success of the Liberal Party in Canada: Presidential Address to the Canadian Political Science Association.”Canadian Journal of Political Science 38:821–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botting, Gary. 1993. Fundamental Freedoms and Jehovah's Witnesses. Calgary, Canada: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Calgary Catholic School District. 2006. “Calgary Catholic School District School-Based Fundraising: A Briefing Paper.”Google Scholar
Catholic World News. 2005a. “Calgary Bishop Would Refuse Canada PM Communion.” http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=35640? (Accessed on February 15, 2008).Google Scholar
Catholic World News. 2005b. “Human Rights Complaint Filed Against Canadian Bishop.” http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=36206 (Accessed on February 15, 2008).Google Scholar
CBC News. 2005. “Bishop Defends Anti-Gay Remarks.” http://www.cbc.ca/-canada/calgary/story/2005/03/31/ca-human-rights-bishop20050331.html (Accessed on February 15, 2008).Google Scholar
CBC News. 2006. “Board and Bishop Clash Over Bingo.” http://www.cbc.ca/-canada/calgary/story/2006/06/23/ca-catholicschools-2006.html (Accessed on February 15, 2008).Google Scholar
Connolly, William. 2005. Pluralism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, William. 1993. The Augustinian Imperative: A Reflection on the Politics of Morality. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Damico, Alfonso. 1997. “What's Wrong with Liberal Perfectionism?Polity 29:397420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galston, William. 1991. Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galston, William. 1982. “Defending Liberalism.”American Political Science Review 76:621629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. 1955. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, David. ed. 2008. Lived religion in America: Toward a History of Practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henry, Frederick. 2006. “‘Decision Time’: On Gambling and Schools.” June.Google Scholar
Henry, Frederick. 2004. “Scandal of Prime Minister Paul Martin's ‘moral incoherence.’” Pastoral Letter.Google Scholar
Henry, Frederick. 2005. “On Same Sex Marriage.” Pastoral Letter. May.Google Scholar
Henry, Frederick. 2006b. “The Trumping of Freedoms.” Pastoral Letter. February.Google Scholar
Hervieu-Leger, Daniele. 1997. ‘“What Scripture Tells Me’: Spontaneity and Regulation within the Catholic Charismatic Renewal.” In Lived Religion in American: Toward a History of Practice, ed. Hall, David. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kilcullen, John. 1988. Sincerity and Truth: Essays on Arnauld, Bayle and Toleration. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaSelva, Samuel. 1996. The Moral Foundations of Canadian Federalism. Kingston, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 2007 [1690]. A Letter Concerning Toleration. Cambridge, UK: FQ Classics.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1988. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
MacRae, Kenneth. 1974. Consociational Democracy. Toronto, Canada: McClelland and Stewart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magyar, Roger. 1998. “Justification of Political Liberalism and the Catholic Paradox.” Paper presented at the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. Boston, Massachusetts, August 10–15.Google Scholar
Orsi, Robert. 2003. “Is the Study of Lived Religion Irrelevant to the World We Live in?Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42: 169174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R. v. Big M Drug Mart [1985] 1 S.C.R. 295.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Reference re Same-Sex Marriage [2004] 3 S.C.R. 698.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 1982. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. 1984. Ordinary Vices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skrabanek, Petr. 1994. The Death of Humane Medicine and the Rise of Coercive Healthism. London, UK: Social Affairs Unit.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1991. The Malaise of Modernity. Concord, Canada: House of Anansi Press.Google Scholar
These Last Days Ministries. 2005. “Canadian Prime Minister Martin's self-appointment as ‘strong Catholic’ may be refuted by Vatican.” http://www.tldm.org/News8/CommunionPaulMartin.htm (Accessed on Februry 15, 2008).Google Scholar
Trudeau, Pierre. 1958. “Some Obstacles to Democracy in Quebec.”Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 24:297311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James. 1995. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James. 2000. “Struggles over Recognition and Distribution.”Constellations 7:469–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar