Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T13:27:19.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paternal-Fetal Conflict: An Idea Whose Time Should Never Come

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Lynn M. Paltrow
Lynn M. Paltrow*
Affiliation:
Center for Reproductive Law and Policy, USA
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Paternal-Fetal Conflict
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , August 1994 , pp. 253 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee (1987). Patient Choice: Maternal-Fetal Conflict. Opinion No. 55.Google Scholar
American Medical Association Board of Trustees (1990). “Legal Interventions During Pregnancy.” Journal of the American Medical Association 264:2663.Google Scholar
Annas, G.J. (1990). “Foreclosing the Use of Force: A.C. Reversed.” Hastings Center Report 27 (July/August).Google Scholar
Center for Reproductive Law and Policy (1992). Punishing Women For Their Behavior During Pregnancy: A Public Health Disaster. New York: Fact sheet produced by Center for Reproductive Law and Policy.Google Scholar
Curran v. Bosze (1990). 566 N.E. 2d 1319 (III.).Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. (1987). “Prenatal Intrusions and Interventions: What's Wrong with Fetal Rights.” Harvard Women's Law Journal 10:9.Google Scholar
In re AC (1990). 573 A.2d (D.C. App.).Google Scholar
In re Pescinski (1975). 67 Wis 2d 4.Google Scholar
In re Steven S. (1981). 126 Cal. App. 3d 23; 178 Cal. Rpt. 525.Google Scholar
In the Interest of Baby Boy Doe v. Doe (1994). III. App. Lexis 501.Google Scholar
Jefferson v. Griffin Spaulding County Hospital (1981). 274 S.E.2d 457 (Ga.).Google Scholar
Johnsen, D.E. (1986). “The Creation of Fetal Rights: Conflicts with Women's Constitutional Rights to Liberty, Privacy, and Equal Protection.” Yale Law Journal 95:599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnsen, D.E. (1992). “Shared Interests: Promoting Healthy Births Without Sacrificing Women's Liberty.” Hastings Law Journal 43:569.Google Scholar
King, P.A. (1989). “Should Mom be Constrained in the Best Interest of the Fetus?” Nova Law Review 13:393–404.Google Scholar
King, P.A. (1991). “Helping Women Helping Children: Drug Policy and Future Generations.” The Milbank Quarterly 69:595.Google Scholar
Kolder, V. et al.(1987). “Court Ordered Obstetrical Interventions.” New England Journal of Medicine 316:1191.Google Scholar
Losco, J. and Shublak, M. (1994). “Paternal Fetal Conflict: An Examination of Paternal Responsibilities to the Fetus.” Politics and the Life Sciences 13:63–75.Google Scholar
Marshall, A.B. (1993). “Perinatal Addiction Research and Education Update.” 1993 Legislative Update. New York: Fact sheet produced by Center for Reproductive Law and Policy.Google Scholar
McFall v. Shimp (1978). 10 Pa. D. & C. Bd. 90 (Allegheny Cty.).Google Scholar
Nelson, L.J. et al.(1986). “Forced Medical Treatment of Pregnant Women: ‘Compelling Each to Live as Seems Good to the Rest.’” Hastings Law Journal 37:703.Google Scholar
People v. Stewart (1987). Points and Authorities in Opposition to Defendant's Demurrer and Motion to Dismiss. No. M508197.Google Scholar
Poland, M. et al.(1993). “Punishing Pregnant Drug Users: Enhancing the Flight from Care.” Drug and Alcohol Dependence 31:199.Google Scholar
Roberts, D.E. (1991). “Punishing Drug Addicts Who Have Babies: Women of Color, Equality, and the Right of Privacy.” Harvard Law Review 104:1419–83.Google Scholar
Stallman v. Youngquist (1988). 531 N.E. 2d 355 (III.).Google Scholar
State v. Luster (1992). No. A92A0233. Brief of Appellant in the Court of Appeals.Google Scholar
Strunk v. Strunk (1969). 445 S.W.2d 145 (Ky. Ct. App.).Google Scholar
Thornton, T. et al.(1991). “The Rights of Pregnant Patients Brings Bold Policy Initiatives.” Healthspan 8:10.Google Scholar
United States General Accounting Office (1991). Women's Set-Aside Does Not Assure Drug Treatment for Pregnant Women. Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Health and Environment, Committee on Energy and Commerce, United States House of Representatives. GAO/HRD-91-80.Google Scholar