Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:55:16.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Terrorists and biological weapons: Forging the linkage in the Clinton Administration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Susan Wright
Susan Wright*
Affiliation:
History of Science and International Relations Institute for Research on Women and Gender University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1290 USA spwright@umich.edu
Get access

Abstract

By the end of the Clinton administration, the claim that terrorists armed with biological weapons represented a huge threat to the security of the United States had achieved the status of received knowledge. How this linkage was forged, despite informed dissent not only outside the Clinton administration but also within it, and how it was used to justify a radical reframing of biological knowledge, especially in genetic engineering and genomics, in terms of military goals is the subject of this essay. My method is historical. I assume that no category is fixed but, rather, that key terms, such as “weapons of mass destruction,” “biological weapon,” and “terrorism” itself, are contingent, shaped under specific historical and political circumstances, and are therefore more fluid than often thought. This account draws on a wide variety of sources including government documents, policy papers and books, conference records, media materials, memoirs, and detailed interviews with nine subjects selected from among participants in the events examined. It shows that the nature of a linkage between terrorism and biological weaponry was debated at many levels in Washington, and it offers reasons why, ultimately, a counterbioterrorism “bandwagon” was constructed and began rolling at the end of the second Clinton administration.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 25 , Issue 1-2 , March 2006 , pp. 56 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.PresidentBush, George W., Remarks, National Defense University, 11 February 2004.Google Scholar
2.Cirincione, Joseph et al., WMD in Iraq: Evidence and Implications (New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, January 2004).Google Scholar
3.Friel, Howard and Falk, Richard, The Record of the Paper: How the New York Times Misreports US Foreign Policy (London: Verso Books, 2004).Google Scholar
4.Leitenberg, Milton, “Assessing the Biological Weapons and Bioterrorism Threat,” Report for the Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, December 2005; http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/PUB639.pdf, accessed 16 February 2006.Google Scholar
5.Kochler, Hans, Hans Kochler Lecturers 2002: Terrorism and the Quest for a Just World Order (Quezon City, Philippines: Foundation for Social Justice, c. 2002), p. 15.Google Scholar
6.Herman, Edward and O'Sullivan, Gerry, The Terrorism Industry (New York: Pantheon, 1989), p. 46.Google Scholar
7.Hoffman, Bruce, Inside Terrorism (London: Victor Gollancz, 1998), p. 13.Google Scholar
8.Ibid, p. 31.Google Scholar
9.Falk, Richard, “Terrorist Foundations of US Foreign Policy,” in George, Alexander, ed., Western State Terrorism, p. 109.Google Scholar
10.Saikal, Amin, “Islam, the West, and the War on Terror,” 30 August 2005; www.cranlana.org.au/PDF0000000347.pdf, accessed 16 January 2007.Google Scholar
11.Said, Edward, “The Essential Terrorist,” The Nation, 14 June 1986; http://www.thenation.com/doc/19860614/said, accessed 16 January 2007.Google Scholar
12.U.K. Foreign Office, “Record of Informal Talks Between British and United States Officials on Arms Control Prospects for Biological and Chemical Weapons held at the Foreign Office, London, 12–13 October 1967,” 15 November 1967, originally classified “secret,” FCO 10/170, Public Record Office, cited inWright, Susan, “The Biological Weapons Convention: Geopolitical Origins,” in Wright, S., ed., Biological Warfare and Disarmament: New Problems/New Perspectives (Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002), p. 325.Google Scholar
13.Carus, Seth, The Poor Man's Atomic Bomb? Biological Weapons in the Middle East (Washington, D.C.: Washington Institute for Near Eastern Studies, 1991).Google Scholar
14.Ibid.Google Scholar
15.Carus, Seth, “Working Paper: Bioterrorism and Biocrimes: The Illicit Use of Biological Agents Since 1900,” Center for Counterproliferation Research, National Defense University, Washington, D.C., rev. ed., February 2001.Google Scholar
16.U.K. Foreign Office, R. Hope-Jones to Mr. Moss, 4 July 1968, FCO 10/181, Public Record Office, cited inWright, , “The Biological Weapons Convention: Geopolitical Origins,” p. 320.Google Scholar
17.Tucker, Jonathan, “A Farewell to Germs,” International Security, Summer 2002, 27(1): 122, n. 54.Google Scholar
18.American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the Salk Institute, Proceedings of the Conference on Chemical and Biological Warfare (25 July 1969), in U.S. House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Hearings on Chemical-Biological Warfare: U.S. Policies and International Effects, pp. 454, 467.Google Scholar
19.Preston, Richard, “The Bioweaponeers,” The New Yorker, 9 March 1998, p. 60.Google Scholar
20.Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, The Problem of Chemical and Biological Warfare, vol. 2 (Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, 1973), p. 316.Google Scholar
21.Feld, Bernard, comment, Proceedings of the Conference on Chemical and Biological Warfare, p. 494.Google Scholar
22.U.S. Senate, Committee on Foreign Relations, Hearing: Prohibition of Chemical and Biological Weapons, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess., 10 December 1974, pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
23.Keller, Evelyn Fox, The Century of the Gene (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Strohman, Richard, “The Coming Kuhnian Revolution in Biology,” Nature Biotechnology, 1997, 15:194–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.E.g., Block, Steven, “The Growing Threat of Biological Weapons,” American Scientist, January/February 2001, 89(1):28.Google Scholar
26.Patrick, William C. III, “Potential Incident Scenarios,” presentation, U.S. Public Health Service, Office of Emergency Preparedness, Proceedings, Seminar, Responding to Consequences of Chemical and Biological Terrorism, 11–14 July 1995, 1:58–63; http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS15853/Proceedings.pdf, accessed 13 September 2006.Google Scholar
27.Carus, , Bioterrorism and Biocrimes, pp. 22–24.Google Scholar
28.U.S. Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989.Google Scholar
29.Wright, Susan, ed., Preventing a Biological Arms Race (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990).Google Scholar
30.Choffnes, Eileen, “Bioweapons: New Labs, More Terror?” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, September/October 2002, 58(5):29–32.Google Scholar
31.The Sunshine Project, “Emerging Technologies — Genetic Engineering and Biological Weapons,” Background Paper No. 12, November 2003; http://www.sunshine-project.org/publications/bk/bk12.htm, accessed 21 February 2006.Google Scholar
32.Wheelis, Mark and Dando, Malcolm, “Back to Bioweapons?” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, January/February 2003, 59(1):40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, The Problem of Chemical and Biological Warfare, Vol. IV: CB Disarmament Negotiations, 1920–1970 (Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, 1971–1975), chapter 7.Google Scholar
34.Klare, Michael, Rogue States and Nuclear Outlaws: America's Search for a New Foreign Policy (New York: Hill and Wang, 1995), chs. 1 and 2.Google Scholar
35.Weinberger, Caspar to Sasser, Senator James, 20 November 1984, cited inWright, , Preventing a Biological Arms Race, p. 67, n. 75.Google Scholar
36.Reagan, President Ronald, Remarks at the Annual Convention of the American Bar Association, 8 July 1985; 20. http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeches/1985/70885a.htm, accessed 11 November 2005.Google Scholar
37.Krauthammer, Charles, “The Reagan Doctrine,” Washington Post, 18 July 1985.Google Scholar
38.Klare, Michael and Kornbluh, Peter, eds., Low Intensity Warfare: Counterinsurgency, Proinsurgency, and Antiterrorism in the Eighties (New York: Pantheon, 1988), pp. 49–79.Google Scholar
39.Klare, Michael, Rogue States and Nuclear Outlaws, pp. 46–47.Google Scholar
40.“Shaking Hands With Saddam Hussein: The United States Tilts Towards Iraq, 1980–1984,” Battle, Joyce, ed., 25 February 2003, National Security Archives, George Washington University; www.gwu.edu/∼nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/, accessed 7 December 2005.Google Scholar
41.U.S. Defense Science Board Task Force, Report, Chemical Warfare/Biological Defense, 1985, quoted in U.S. Department of the Army, Army Science Board, Final Report of the Ad Hoc Group on Army Biological Defense Research Program, July 1987, p. 6.Google Scholar
42.National Academy of Sciences, Ad Hoc Meeting, sponsored by the N.A.S. Committee on International Security and Arms Control, Summary Minutes, 18 October 1985.Google Scholar
43.Joshua Lederberg papers, National Library of Medicine; http://www.profiles.nlm.nih.gov/BB, accessed 23 September 2006.Google Scholar
44.Defense Intelligence Agency, Soviet Biological Warfare Threat, DST-1610F-057-86 (1986), p. iii.Google Scholar
45.U.S. Commission on Integrated Long-Term Strategy, Discriminate Deterrence (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1988).Google Scholar
46.Herman, Edward S.O'Sullivan, Gerry, The Terrorism Industry: The Experts and Institutions that Shape Our View of Terror (New York: Pantheon, 1989), p. 163 ff.Google Scholar
47.Douglas, JosephLivingstone, Neil, America the Vulnerable: The Threat of Chemical and Biological Warfare (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1987).Google Scholar
48.Simon, Jeffrey, “Terrorists and the Potential Use of Biological Weapons: A Discussion of Possibilities,” RAND Corporation Report, prepared for the U.S. Armed Forces Medical Intelligence Center, December 1989, pp. vi–vii.Google Scholar
49.Zilinskas, Raymond, “Terrorism and Biological Weapons: Inevitable Alliance?” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, Autumn 1990, 34(1):44–72.Google Scholar
50.Miller, Judith, Engelberg, Stephen, and Broad, William, Germs: Biological Weapons and America's Secret War (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2001), pp. 98–123.Google Scholar
51.House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Hearing: Foreign Assistance Legislation for FY92-FY93 (Part 1), Statement of Secretary of Defense Richard Cheney, 19 March 1991.Google Scholar
52.Miller, , Engelberg, , and Broad, , Germs, pp. 111–12.Google Scholar
53.U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Technology Against Terrorism: The Federal Effort (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, July 1991).Google Scholar
54.U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Technology Against Terrorism: Structuring Security (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, January 1992).Google Scholar
55.Muscatine, Alison, “Georgetown's Media Profs,” Washington Post, 11 May 1986.Google Scholar
56.O'Sullivan, Herman, The Terrorism Industry, p. 146.Google Scholar
57.Simon, , pp. 21–22.Google Scholar
58.Ibid, pp. 34–5.Google Scholar
59.Ibid, p. 39.Google Scholar
60.Ibid, pp. 43–44.Google Scholar
61.Clarke, Richard A., Against All Enemies: Inside America's War on Terror (New York: Free Press, 2004), p. 74.Google Scholar
62.Department of Defense, Annual Report to the President and the Congress, February 1995; http://www.dod.mil/execsec/adr95/index.html, accessed 14 September 2006.Google Scholar
63.OTA, Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction: Assessing the Risks (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1993), p. 54.Google Scholar
64.Clarke, , Against All Enemies, p. 74.Google Scholar
65.Benjamin, Daniel and Simon, Steven, The Age of Sacred Terror (New York: Random House, 2003), p. 220.Google Scholar
66.PresidentClinton, William J., State of the Union Address, 25 January 1994.Google Scholar
67.Benjamin, and Simon, , p. 234.Google Scholar
68.Clarke, , Against All Enemies, p. 92.Google Scholar
69.Jenkins, Brian, “International Terrorism: A New Mode of Conflict,” in Carlton, David and Schaerf, Carlo, eds., International Terrorism and World Security (London: Croon Helm, 1975), p. 15.Google Scholar
70.Lederberg, Joshua, “A Treaty Proposal on Germ Warfare,” Washington Post, 24 September 1966.Google Scholar
71.Lederberg, Joshua, testimony, U.S. Congress, House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Hearing: Chemical-Biological Warfare: U.S. Policies and International Effects, 2 December 1969.Google Scholar
72.Wright, Susan, Molecular Politics: Developing American and British Regulatory Policy for Genetic Engineering (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994), pp. 70, 119, 135, 152.Google Scholar
73.Miller, , Engelberg, , and Broad, , Germs, pp. 140–141.Google Scholar
74.National Academy of Sciences, Controlling Dangerous Pathogens: A Blueprint for U.S.-Russian Cooperation (Washington D.C.: National Academies Press, 1997).Google Scholar
75.Miller, , Engelberg, , Broad, , Germs, pp. 140, 156.Google Scholar
76.Interviews, former members of the Clinton national security staff, the CIA, and aides to members of Congress, 2006.Google Scholar
77.Miller, Engelberg, and Broad, , Germs, p. 91.Google Scholar
78.King, Nicholas, Infectious Disease in a World of Goods, Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University (2001), chapter 3.Google Scholar
79.Brown, Theodore M. and Fee, Elizabeth, “Biosecurity: The Risks of Social Myopia and Historical Analysis,” (unpublished paper, c. 2004), p. 24.Google Scholar
80.Institute of Medicine, The Future of Public Health (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1988).Google Scholar
81.Brown, and Fee, , “Biosecurity: The Risks of Social Myopia and Historical Analysis.”Google Scholar
82.Garrett, Laurie, The Coming Plague: Newly Emerging Diseases in a World Out of Balance (New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux, 1994).Google Scholar
83.U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Addressing Emerging Infectious Disease Threats: A Prevention Strategy for the United States,” 1994.Google Scholar
84.U.S. National Science and Technology Council, Committee on International Science, Engineering, and Technology Working Group on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases, Infectious Disease — A Global Health Threat, September 1995.Google Scholar
85.Barss, Peter, “Round Table: Epidemic Field Investigation as Applied to Allegations of Chemical, Biological, or Toxin Warfare” and Commentaries, Politics and the Life Sciences, February 1992, 11(1):5–34.Google Scholar
86.Lederberg, Joshua, “Our CBW Facilities Could Help Against Pestilence,” Washington Post, 7 March 1970.Google Scholar
87.King, , Infectious Disease in a World of Goods, chapter 3.Google Scholar
88.Joshua Lederberg statement in classified Defense Science Board 1993 Summer Study Task Force, quoted in Richard Danzig, “A Nation at Risk — A Time to Act,” Strategic Forum 58, January 1996; http://www.ndu.edu/inss/strforum/SF_58/forum58.html.Google Scholar
89.Wright, S., Molecular Politics, pp. 268–277.Google Scholar
90.Miller, Engelberg, and Broad, , Germs, p. 151.Google Scholar
91.Krimsky, Sheldon, former member of the NIH Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee, personal communication.Google Scholar
92.Young, Frank, testimony, House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Hearings: A Review of Federal Bioterrorism Preparedness Programs from a Public Health Perspective, 10 October 2001.Google Scholar
93.Miller, Engelberg, and Broad, , Germs, p. 138.Google Scholar
94.Ibid, pp. 156–158.Google Scholar
95.Clarke, , Against All Enemies, 73.Google Scholar
96.Coll, Steve, Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan, and bin Laden, from the Soviet Invasion to September 10, 2001 (New York: The Penguin Press, 2004), p. 388.Google Scholar
97.Benjamin, and Simon, , The Age of Sacred Terror, pp. 232–233.Google Scholar
98.Coll, , Ghost Wars, p. 388.Google Scholar
99.Miller, Engelberg, and Broad, , Germs, p. 152.Google Scholar
100.Clarke, , Against All Enemies, p. 155.Google Scholar
101.U.S. Public Health Service, Office of Emergency Preparedness, Proceedings, Seminar on Responding to Consequences of Chemical and Biological Terrorism, vol. 1, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
102.Clarke, , Against All Enemies, pp. 73–79.Google Scholar
103.Coll, Steve, Ghost Wars, pp. 257–262.Google Scholar
104.Hansen, Suzy, “We stood by while this happened,” interview with Steve Coll, Salon.com, 3 March 2004; http://dir.salon.com/story/books/int/2004/03/03/coll/index.html, accessed 14 July 06.Google Scholar
105.CIA document, “Usama bin Laden: Islamic Extremist Financier,” 1996; http://www.gwu.edu/∼nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB55/ciaubl.pdf.Google Scholar
106.Wright, Lawrence, “The Agent: Did the C.I.A. Stop an F.B.I. Detective from Preventing 9/11?” The New Yorker, 10 & 17 July 2006, pp. 70–71.Google Scholar
107.Clarke, , Against All Enemies, pp. 91–92.Google Scholar
108.Benjamin, and Simon, , The Age of Sacred Terror, p. 227.Google Scholar
109.Coll, Steve, Ghost Wars, pp. 253–256.Google Scholar
110.Wright, , “The Agent,” pp. 62–73.Google Scholar
111.Executive Order 12947, 23 January 1995.Google Scholar
112.Clarke, , Against All Enemies, pp. 93–94.Google Scholar
113.Benjamin, and Simon, , The Age of Sacred Terror, p. 238.Google Scholar
114.The White House, Fact Sheet on the Omnibus Counterterrorism Act, 10 February 1995; http://www.clintonfoundation.org/legacy/021095-fact-sheet-on-omnibus-counterterrorism-act.htm, accessed 18 May 2005.Google Scholar
115.Congressional Research Service, Charles Doyle, “President Clinton's Terrorism Proposal: Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995, H.R. 896/S.390 as Introduced: A Summary,” 3 May 1995.Google Scholar
116.Lewis, Anthony, “Abroad at Home; Back to McCarthy,” New York Times, 24 February 1995, p. 29.Google Scholar
117.Congressional Research Service, “President Clinton's Terrorism Proposal, Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995, H.R. 896/S.3909: A Summary,” Report No. 95–558 S, 3 May 1995, pp. 9–13.Google Scholar
118.Clarke, , Against All Enemies, p. 97.Google Scholar
119.Pillar, Paul, interview with author, 7 August 2006.Google Scholar
120.Miller, Engelberg, and Broad, , Germs, pp. 161–162; U.S. Senate, Committee on Governmental Affairs, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Hearing: Global Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, part I, 31 October 1995, pp. 603–607.Google Scholar
121.Clarke, , Against All Enemies, p. 156.Google Scholar
122.PDD-39, “U.S. Policy on Counterterrorism,” 21 June 1995, redacted and declassified, 24 January 1997; http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/pdd39.htm, accessed 17 February 2006.Google Scholar
123.Benjamin, and Simon, , The Age of Sacred Terror, p. 230.Google Scholar
124.PDD-39, “U.S. Policy on Counterterrorism,” 21 June 1995, redacted version athttp://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/pdd39.htm, accessed 17 February 2006.Google Scholar
125.Benjamin, and Simon, , The Age of Sacred Terror, p. 230.Google Scholar
126.Clarke, , Against All Enemies, p. 92.Google Scholar
127.Miller, Engelberg, and Broad, , Germs, p. 162.Google Scholar
128.Tucker, Jonathan, “National Health and Medical Services Response to Incidents of Chemical and Biological Terrorism,” JAMA, 6 August 1997, pp. 362–368.Google Scholar
129.Benjamin, and Simon, , The Age of Sacred Terror, p. 230.Google Scholar
130.Clinton, President Bill, “Remarks on the 50th Anniversary of the United Nations Charter in San Francisco, California, June 26, 1995.”Google Scholar
131.U.S. Public Health Service, Office of Emergency Preparedness, Proceedings of Seminar on Responding to Consequences of Chemical and Biological Terrorism, 11–14 July 1995; http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS15853, accessed 14 September 2006.Google Scholar
132.Ibid., Part 1, pp. 5–6.Google Scholar
133.Ibid., Part 1, pp. 11, 16, 17.Google Scholar
134.Ibid., Part 1, pp. 1–63at p. 63.Google Scholar
135.Ibid., Part 2, pp. 173–174.Google Scholar
136.Ibid., Part 2, pp. 173–174.Google Scholar
137.Ibid., Part 2, p. 176.Google Scholar
138.Ibid., Part 2, pp. 2–176at 176.Google Scholar
139.Ibid., Part 2, p. 177.Google Scholar
140.Ibid., Part 2, p. 179.Google Scholar
141.U.S. National Science and Technology Council, Committee on International Science, Engineering, and Technology Working Group on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases, Infectious Disease — A Global Health Threat, September 1995, p. 11.Google Scholar
142.Jenkins, Brian, “The Limits of Terror,” Harvard International Review, Summer 1995, 17(3).Google Scholar
143.Kupperman, Robert, “A Dangerous Future,” Harvard International Review, Summer 1995, 17(3).Google Scholar
144.Survey of editorials in major papers, March-May 1995, using the Lexis-Nexis news data base.Google Scholar
145.Editorial, “Tokyo Unnerved,” New York Times, 22 March 1995, p. 18.Google Scholar
146.Editorial, “A Hasty Response to Terrorism,” New York Times, 9 June 1995, p. 28.Google Scholar
147.Idelson, Holly, “Law/Judiciary: Details of Anti-Terrorism Proposals,” CQ Weekly, 29 April 1995, p. 1178.Google Scholar
148.Idelson, Holly, “Law/Judiciary: Senate Gets Started on Bill to Combat Terrorism,” CQ Weekly, 27 May 1995, p. 1509.Google Scholar
149.Congressional Research Service, Raphael Perl, “Terrorism: Background and Issues for Congress,” 15 December 1995.Google Scholar
150.Benjamin, and Simon, , The Age of Sacred Terror, pp. 227–228.Google Scholar
151.“Remarks by the President at U.S. Air Force Academy Graduation Ceremony,” U.S. Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, 5 June 1995.Google Scholar
152.U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Subcommittee on Near Eastern and South Asian Affairs, Hearing, 3 August 1995.Google Scholar
153.U.S. President Bill Clinton, address to the United Nations, 22 October 1995.Google Scholar
154.Saikal, Amin, “The Coercive Disarmament of Iraq,” and Steven Black, “UNSCOM and the Iraqi Biological Weapons Program,” in Wright, S., ed., Biological Warfare and Disarmament: New Problems/New Perspectives, pp. 265–309.Google Scholar
155.Middle East Reference, “The Interview with Hussein Kamel”; http://middleeastreference.org.uk/kamel.html, accessed 21 November 2005.Google Scholar
156.Barry, John, “The Defector's Secrets,” Newsweek, 3 March 2003, p. 6.Google Scholar
157.Donnelly, John, “Confronting Iraq/Weapons Destruction; UN, CIA Don't Accept Hussein Kin's '95 Claim,” Boston Globe, 1 March 2003.Google Scholar
158.UNSCOM/IAEA, “Note for the File,” classified “sensitive,” taken by N. Smidovich, on Debriefing of General Hussein Kamel by Ambassador Rolf Ekeus (chairman, UNSCOM), Professor M. Zifferero (IAEA) and Nikita Smidovich (UNSCOM), Amman, Jordan, 22 August 1995; http://www.casi.org.uk/info/unscom950822.pdf, accessed 22 November 2005.Google Scholar
159.UN Special Commission on Iraq, Report to the UN Security Council, S/1995/864, 11 October 1995.Google Scholar
160.Trevan, Tim, Saddam's Secrets: The Hunt for Iraq's Hidden Weapons (London: HarperCollins, 1991), pp. 329–345.
161.PresidentClinton, William J., Remarks to the 51st Session of the United Nations General Assembly, New York, September 24, 1996.Google Scholar
162.Felton, John, “The Nunn-Lugar Vision, 1992–2002, Nuclear Threat Initiative Report; http://www.nti.org/e_research/nunn-lugar_history.pdf, accessed 15 September 2006.Google Scholar
163.National Academy of Sciences, Controlling Dangerous Pathogens: A Blueprint for U.S.-Russian Cooperation (Washington D.C.: National Academies Press, 1997), preface.Google Scholar
164.Sopko, John, interview with author, 27 April 2006.Google Scholar
165.Miller, Engelberg, and Broad, , Germs, pp. 159 ff.Google Scholar
166.Senate Government Affairs Committee, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Hearings: Global Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, October 31 and November 1, 1995; March 20 and 27, 1996.Google Scholar
167.Sopko, John, interview with author, 27 April 2006.Google Scholar
168.Nunn, Senator Sam, Prepared statement, Senate Government Affairs Committee, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Hearinsg: Global Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (31 October 1995).Google Scholar
169.Staff Statement, U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Hearing: Global Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction: A Case Study on the Aum Shinrikyo, 31 October 1995.Google Scholar
170.Mirzayanov, Val, Young, Frank, testimony, Senate Government Affairs Committee, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Hearing: Global Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, 1 November 1995.Google Scholar
171.Deutch, John, testimony, Senate Permanent Investigations Subcommittee, Hearings: Global Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, 20 March 1996.Google Scholar
172.Gordon Oehler, Testimony, Senate Armed Services Committee, 27 March 1996.Google Scholar
173.Leitenberg, Milton, testimony, Senate Government Affairs Committee, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Hearings: Global Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, 1 November 1995.Google Scholar
174.Frank Young, testimony, Senate Government Affairs Committee, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Hearings: Global Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, 1 November 1995.Google Scholar
175.Senate Minority Staff Statement, Senate Government Affairs Committee, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Hearings: Global Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, 27 March 1996.Google Scholar
176.Nunn, Senator Sam, “Terrorism Meets Proliferation: The Convergence of Threats in the Post Cold War Era,” Congressional Record, Senate, 28 September 1996, S11759–S11761.Google Scholar
177.Kennedy, Joseph, testimony, “Senate Judiciary Committee, Hearing: Interstate Transportation of Human Pathogens,” 6 March 1994, p. 3.Google Scholar
178.PL 104–132.Google Scholar
179.Carr, Rebecca, “Appropriations: Clinton's Terrorism Proposal Tough to Oppose in Election Year,” CQ Weekly, 14 September 1996, p. 2582.Google Scholar
180.Sopko, John, interview with author, 27 April 2006.Google Scholar
181.GAO, “Combating Terrorism: Observations on the Nunn-Lugar-Domenici Domestic Preparedness Program,” 2 October 1998. GAO/T-NSAID-99-16], p. 2.Google Scholar
182.GAO, “Combating Terrorism: Spending on Governmentwide Programs Requires Better Management and Coordination,” December 1997, GAO/NSIAD-98-39, p. 6.Google Scholar
183.Ibid, p. 3.Google Scholar
184.Sopko, John, interview with author, 27 April 2006.Google Scholar
185.Kaplan, David E., “Everyone Gets Into the Terrorism Game,” U.S. News and World Report, 17 November 1997, quoting John Sopko.Google Scholar
186.Sopko, John, interview with author, 27 April 2006.Google Scholar
187.Department of Health and Human Services, Health and Medical Services Support Flan for the Federal Response to Acts of Chemical/Biological (C/B) Terrorism, 21 June 1996.Google Scholar
188.General Accounting Office, Combating Terrorism: Spending on Governmentwide Programs Requires Better Management and Coordination Report No.GAO/NSIAD-98–39, December 1997, pp. 5–6.Google Scholar
189.Lederberg, Joshua, “Infectious Disease — A Threat to Global Health and Security,” JAMA, 7 August 1996, 276(5): 417–419.Google Scholar
190.Lederberg, Joshua and Flanagin, Annette, “The Threat of Biological Weapons — Prophylaxis and Mitigation,” JAMA, 7 August 1996, 276(5):419–420.Google Scholar
191.Ibid.Google Scholar
192.Coll, , Ghost Wars, pp. 367; 367, n. 32; 301–307.Google Scholar
193.Roberts, Brad, ed., Terrorism with Chemical and Biological Weapons (Alexandria, VA.: Chemical and Biological Arms Control Institute, 1997).Google Scholar
194.Ibid., pp. 113–120.Google Scholar
195.Ibid., p. 44.Google Scholar
196.Ibid., p. 45.Google Scholar
197.Parachini, John, “The World Trade Center Bombers (1993),” in Tucker, Jonathan, ed., Toxic Terror: Assessing Terrorist Use of Chemical and Biological Weapons (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2000), pp. 185–206.Google Scholar
198.Roberts, , ed., Terrorism with Chemical and Biological Weapons, p. 50.Google Scholar
199.Ibid., p. 51.Google Scholar
200.Ibid., pp. 2–3.Google Scholar
201.GAO, “Combating Terrorism: Federal Agencies' Efforts to Implement National Policy and Strategy,” GAO/NSIAD-97–254, September 1997.Google Scholar
202.GAO, “Combating Terrorism: Spending on Governmentwide Programs Requires Better Management and Coordination,” GAO/NSIAD-98-39, December 1997.Google Scholar
203.GAO, “Combating Terrorism,” September 1997, pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
204.GAO, December 1997, p. 3.Google Scholar
205.Simon, Jeffrey, “Biological Terrorism: Preparing the Meet the Threat,” JAMA, 6 August 1997, 278(5):428–430.Google Scholar
206.Danzig, Richard and Berkovsky, Pamela, “Why Should We Be Concerned About Biological Warfare?” JAMA, 6 August 1997, 278(5):431–432.Google Scholar
207.Lederberg, Joshua, “Infectious Disease and Biological Weapons: Prophylaxis and Mitigation,” JAMA, 6 August 1997, 278(5):435–436.Google Scholar
208.ABC Television, This Week, Transcript of Interview, William Cohen, 16 November 1997.Google Scholar
209.Miller, Engelberg, and Broad, , Germs, p. 203.Google Scholar
210.Forbes, Cameron, The Australian, 18 November 1997.Google Scholar
211.Cohen, William S., “In the Age of Terror Weapons,” Washington Post, 26 November 1997, p. A19.Google Scholar
212.Miller, Engelberg, and Broad, , Germs, p. 195.Google Scholar
213.Broad, William and Miller, Judith, “Scientist at Work: Bill Patrick,” New York Times, 3 November 1998.Google Scholar
214.Preston, Richard, The Cobra Event (New York: Ballantine, 1997), “Acknowledgments.”Google Scholar
215.Rimmington, Anthony, “The Soviet Union's Offensive Program: The Implications for Contemporary Arms Control,” in Wright, S., ed., Biological Warfare and Disarmament, pp. 103–148.Google Scholar
216.Weiner, Tim, “Soviet Defector Warns of Biological Weapons,” New York Times, 25 February 1998, p. A1.Google Scholar
217.Miller, Engelberg, and Broad, , Germs, p. 144.Google Scholar
218.Statements of Michael Osterholm, Bill Patrick, and Richard Preston: ABC Primetime Live, Germ Warfare: Weapons of Terror, 25 February 1998, transcript.Google Scholar
219.Ibid.Google Scholar
220.Pomerantsev, A.P. et al., “Expression of Cereolysine AB Genes in Bacillus anthracis Vaccine Strain Ensures Protection Against Experimental Hemolytic Anthrax,” Vaccine, December 1997, pp. 1846–70.Google Scholar
221.ABC Primetime Live, Germ Warfare: Weapons of Terror, 25 February 1998, transcript.Google Scholar
222.Miller, Engelberg, and Broad, , Germs, pp. 223–25, 351–52.Google Scholar
223.Clinton, William Jefferson, My Life (New York: Knopf, 2004), p. 788.Google Scholar
224.Miller, Engelberg, and Broad, , Germs, p. 226.Google Scholar
225.Department of Defense, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology, Defense Science Board, 1997 Summer Study Task Force on DoD Responses to Transitional Threats, Volume I (October 1997).Google Scholar
226.Ibid, pp. vii, xiii.Google Scholar
227.Ibid, p. 48.Google Scholar
228.Ibid, p. 50.Google Scholar
229.Ibid, p. 51.Google Scholar
230.National Defense Panel, “Transforming Defense: National Security in the 21st Century,” vol. III, December 1997.Google Scholar
231.National Academy of Sciences, Institute of Medicine, Improving Civilian Medical Response to Chemical or Biological Terrorist Incidents, Interim Report on Current Capabilities (Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 2004).Google Scholar
232.Ibid, p. 2.Google Scholar
233.Clinton, William J., State of the Union address, 27 January 1998.Google Scholar
234.Coll, Steve, Ghost Wars, p. 432.Google Scholar
235.Simon, Steven, interview with author, 26 April 2006.Google Scholar
236.Pillar, Paul, interview with author, 7 August 2006.Google Scholar
237.Pillar, Paul, Terrorism and U.S. Foreign Policy (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 2001), p. 203.Google Scholar
238.Pillar, Paul, interview with author, 7 August 2006.Google Scholar
239.Gellman, Barton, “Annan Suspicious of UNSCOM Role; U.N. Official Belies Evidence Shows Inspectors Helped U.S. Eavesdrop on Iraq,” Washington Post, 6 January 1999, p. 1.Google Scholar
240.Lynch, Colum, “US Used UN to Spy on Iraq, Aides Say,” Boston Globe, 6 January 1999, p. 1.Google Scholar
241.Gellman, Barton, “U.S. Spied on Iraqi Military Via UN,” Washington Post, 2 March 1999.Google Scholar
242.Wright, Susan, “The Hijacking of UNSCOM,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, May/June 1999, 55(3):23–25.Google Scholar
243.Saikal, Amin, “Coercive Disarmament of Iraq,” in Wright, S., ed., Biological Warfare and Disarmament, pp. 271–72.Google Scholar
244.U.S. Senate, Select Intelligence Committee, Hearings: Chemical and Biological Threats to the United States, 4 March 1998 and 23 April 1998.Google Scholar
245.Altman, Lawrence, “Smallpox Vaccine Urged to Fight Terrorist Attacks,” New York Times, 11 March 1998, p. A21.Google Scholar
246.Emerging Infectious Diseases, July-September 1998, 4(3).Google Scholar
247.Clarke, , Against All Enemies, p. 163.Google Scholar
248.Miller, Engelberg, and Broad, , Germs, p. 232.Google Scholar
249.Clarke, , Against All Enemies, pp. 163–165.Google Scholar
250.Miller, Engelberg, and Broad, , Germs, pp. 231–232.Google Scholar
251.Miller, Judith and Broad, William, “Exercise Finds U.S. Unable to Handle Germ War Threat,” New York Times, 26 April 1998, p. Al.Google Scholar
252.Crittenden, Jules, “Hub Fighters Prepared for Threats from Terrorists,” Boston Herald, 18 March 1998, p. 29.Google Scholar
253.“U.S. Military Will Set Up 10 Anti-Terrorist Teams; They Will Help Agencies Respond to Biological or Chemical Weapons Attacks,” St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 18 March 1998, p. A3.Google Scholar
254.Simon, Steven, interview with author, 26 April 2006.Google Scholar
255.Simon, Steven, interview with author, 26 April 2006.Google Scholar
256.Miller, Engelberg, and Broad, , Germs, p. 235.Google Scholar
257.Miller, Engelberg, and Broad, , Germs, p. 238.Google Scholar
258.Thränert, Oliver, “The Compliance Protocol and the Three Depositary Powers,” in Wright, S., ed., Biological Warfare and Disarmament, pp. 343–368.Google Scholar
259.Epstein, Gerald, interview with author, 18 December 2006.Google Scholar
260.Miller, Engelberg, and Broad, , Germs, pp. 242–243.Google Scholar
261.Broad, and Miller, , “Thwarting Terror: A Special Report; Germ Defense Plan in Peril As Its Flaws Are Revealed,” New York Times, 7 August 1998, p. Al.Google Scholar
262.Idem.Google Scholar
263.Marshall, Eliot and Pennisi, Elizabeth, “Sequencing: Hubris and the Human Genome,” Science, 15 May 1998, 280:994–995.Google Scholar
264.Zipkin, Ilan, “EluSys Therapeutics Inc.,” BioCentury, 20 December 1999.Google Scholar
265.Baard, Erik, “Inventing Millionaires: Silicon Alley Duo Turn Scientists Into Fat Cats,” The Village Voice, August 30-September 5, 2000.Google Scholar
266.EluSys, Press Release: EluSys Enters Collaborative Research Agreement With the U.S. Army, 27 September 2000; http://www.elusys.com_news_pr/php?article+28, accessed 9 September 2004.Google Scholar
267.Clinton, Bill, My Life, p. 789.Google Scholar
268.Clarke, , Against All Enemies, pp. 166–171.Google Scholar
269.The White House, Fact Sheet, Combating Terrorism: Presidential Decision Directive 62; http://www.fas.irp/offdocs/pdd-62.htm.Google Scholar
270.The White House, Fact Sheet, Protecting America's Critical Infrastructures: PDD 63; http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/pdd-63.htm.Google Scholar
271.PDD-NSC-67, Enduring Constitutional Government and Continuity of Government Operations, 21 October 1998 (21 October 1998), a classified directive; http://www.fas.gov/irp/offdocs/pdd-67.Google Scholar
272.Benjamin, and Simon, , The Age of Sacred Terror, pp. 232–233.Google Scholar
273.Clarke, , Against All Enemies, p. 171.Google Scholar
274.Miller, Judith, “Clinton Seeks Additional $300 Million to Fight Bioterrorism,” New York Times, 9 June 1998.Google Scholar
275.Bowman, Steve and Barel, Helit, “Weapons of Mass Destruction — the Terrorist Threat,” Congressional Research Service Report No. RS20412, 8 December 1999, p. 2.Google Scholar
276.ABC Television, Nightline, “One of America's Most Dangerous Enemies: Profile of a Saudi Businessman Turned Terrorist,” transcript, 10 June 1998.Google Scholar
277.Coll, Steve, Ghost Wars, pp. 403–407.Google Scholar
278.Gellman, Barton and Priest, Dana, “U.S. Strikes Terrorist-Link ed Sites in Afghanistan, Factory in Sudan,” Washington Post, 21 August 1998, p. A1.Google Scholar
279.Loeb, Vernon and Grunwald, Michael, “Officials Won't Detail Evidence on Bin Laden,” Washington Post, 21 August 1998, p. A19.Google Scholar
280.Schneider, Howard and Boustany, Nora, “A Barrage of Criticism in Mideast; U.S. Accused of ‘State Terrorism,”’ Washington Post, 21 August 1998, p. A20.Google Scholar
281.Coll, Steve, Ghost Wars, p. 412, n. 27.Google Scholar
282.Barletta, Michael, “Chemical Weapons in the Sudan: Allegations and Evidence,” The Nonproliferation Review (Fall, 1998), pp. 115–136.Google Scholar
283.Benjamin, Daniel and Simon, Steven, “A Failure of Intelligence?” New York Review of Books, 20 December 2001, 48(20).Google Scholar
284.Noah, Timothy, “Khartoum Revisited,” Part I, Slate, 30 March 2004, and Part II, Slate, 31 March 2004.Google Scholar
285.Cloud, David, “Colleagues Say C.I.A. Analyst Played by the Rules,” New York Times, 23 April 2006.Google Scholar
286.“Saddam Wins,” Washington Post, 28 August 1998, p. A24.Google Scholar
287.“Eliminating Hidden Weapons; Illusory Inspections in Iraq,” New York Times, 28 August 1998.Google Scholar
288.Clinton, William Jefferson, “Remarks to the United Nations General Assembly,” 21 September 1998.Google Scholar
289.National Academy of Science, Institute of Medicine, Chemical and Biological Terrorism: Research and Development to Improve Civilian Medical Response (Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 1998), p. 21.Google Scholar
290.Osterholm, Michael, testimony, Senate Appropriations Committee, Subcommittee on Labor, Health, and Human Services Hearing, Education, Epidemics, and Bioterrorism, 2 June 1998.Google Scholar
291.Atlas, Ronald, “The Medical Threat of Biological Weapons,” Critical Reviews in Microbiology, 1998, 24(3): 157–168.Google Scholar
292.The New Terror: Facing the Threat of Biological and Chemical Weapons, Drell, Sidney, Sofaer, Abraham, and Wilson, George, eds., (Stanford, CA.: Hoover Institution Press, 1999), p. 71.Google Scholar
293.Falkenrath, Richard, Newman, Robert, and Thayer, Bradley, America's Achilles Heel: Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Terrorism and Covert Attack (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1998).Google Scholar
294.Carter, Ashton, Deutch, John, and Zelikow, Philip, “Catastrophic Terrorism: Tackling the New Danger,” Foreign Affairs, November/December 1998, 77(6):80–94.Google Scholar
295.Hughes, James, testimony, Senate Appropriations Committee, Subcommittee on Labor, Health, and Human Services Hearing, Epidemics and Bioterrorism, June 2, 1998.Google Scholar
296.Cilluffo, Frank, testimony, House Government Reform and Oversight Committee, Subcommittee on National Security, International Affairs, and Criminal Justice Subcommittee Hearing, Combating Terrorism: Implementation and Status of the Deaprtment of Defense Domestic Preparedness Program, 2 October 1998.Google Scholar
297.Miller, Judith, “Clinton Seeks Additional $300 Million to Fight Bioterrorism,” New York Times, 9 June 1998, p. A16.Google Scholar
298.Marshall, Eliot, “Bioterror Defense Initiative Injects Shot of Cash,” Science, 26 February 1999, 283(5406):1234–1235.Google Scholar
299.Office of Management and Budget, “Annual Report to Congress on Combating Terrorism,” 18 May 2000, p. 49.Google Scholar
300.Parachini, John, “Federal Funding to Combat Terrorism, Including Defense Against Weapons of Mass Destruction, FY 1998–2001,” Monterey Institute of International Studies; http://cns.miis.edu/research/cbw/terfund.htm, accessed 9 October 2000.Google Scholar
301.Nesmith, Jeff, “Smallpox was Eradicated but Protection is Needed,” The Atlanta Journal and Constitution, 2 August 1998, p. 2E.Google Scholar
302.Clarke, , Against All Enemies, p. 171.Google Scholar
303.Miller, Judith and Broad, William, “Clinton Describes Terrorism Threat for 21st Century,” New York Times, 22 January 1999, p. A1.Google Scholar
304.“Keeping America Secure for the 21st Century,” (Speeches by Joshua Lederberg and President Bill Clinton), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 30 March 1999, 96(7):3486–4388.Google Scholar
305.Clarke, , Against All Enemies, pp. 171–175.Google Scholar
306.The White House, Office of the Press Secretary, “Fact Sheet: Funding for Domestic Preparedness and Critical Infrastructure Protection,” 22 January 1999.Google Scholar
307.Office of Management and Budget, “Annual Report to Congress on Combating Terrorism,” 18 May 2000, p. 49.Google Scholar
308.U.S. Information Service, Transcript: Reno, Shalala, Clarke Briefing on Terrorism, 22 January 1999; http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/program/news99/99012207_tlt.htm, accessed 12 October 2005.Google Scholar
309.New York Times, “Thwarting Tomorrow's Terrors,” 23 January 1999.Google Scholar
310.Office of Management and Budget, Annual Report to Congress on Combating Terrorism, 18 May 2000, p. 49.Google Scholar
311.King, , Infectious Disease in a World of Goods, p. 211.Google Scholar
312.Emerging Infectious Diseases, July 1999, 5(4).Google Scholar
313.Russo, Eugene, “Bioterrorism Concerns Heightened,” The Scientist, 15 March 1999.Google Scholar
314.Marshall, Eliot, “Bioterror Defense Initiative Injects Shot of Cash,” Science, 26 February 1999, 283:1234–1235.Google Scholar
315.Sprinzak, Ehud, “Terrorism, Real and Imagined,” The Washington Post, 19 August 1998, p. A21.Google Scholar
316.Sprinzak, Ehud, “The Great Superterrorism Scare,” Foreign Policy, Fall 1998, pp. 110–124.Google Scholar
317.Leitenberg, Milton, “The Experience of the Japanese Aum Shinrikyo Group and Biological Agents,” in Roberts, Brad, ed., Hype or Reality? The “New Terrorism” and Mass Casualty Attacks (Alexandria, VA: The Chemical and Biological Arms Control Institute, 2000), pp. 159–170.Google Scholar
318.Jenkins, Brian, “The WMD Terrorist Threat — Is There a Consensus View?” pp. 241–251.Google Scholar
319.Cullison, Alan, “Inside al-Qaeda's Hard Drive,” The Atlantic, September 2004.Google Scholar
320.Jenkins, , “The WMD Terrorist Threat — Is There a Consensus View?” p. 247.Google Scholar
321.Hoffman, Bruce, “The Debate Over Future Terrorist Use of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Weapons,” pp. 207–224.Google Scholar
322.Cohen, Hillel, Gould, Robert, and Sidel, Victor, “Bioterrorism Initiatives: Public Health in Reverse?” American Journal of Public Health, November 1999, 89(11): 1629–31.Google Scholar
323.Rapoport, David, “Terrorism and Weapons of the Apocalypse,” Georgetown National Security Studies Quarterly, Summer 1999, pp. 49–67.Google Scholar
324.Smithson, Amy and Levy, Leslie-Anne, Ataxia: The Chemical and Biological Terrorism Threat and the US Response (Washington, D.C.: Henry L. Stimson Center, October 2000).Google Scholar
325.Toxic Terror: Assessing Terrorist Use of Chemical and Biological Weapons, Tucker, Jonathan, ed. (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2000).Google Scholar
326.Parachini, John, Testimony, House Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations Hearing: Combating Terrorism: Assessing the Threat, 20 October 1999, pp. 2, 5–6.Google Scholar
327.GAO, Combating Terrorism: Observations on Biological Terrorism and Public Health Initiatives, Statement of Henry L. Hinton, Jr., Report No. GAO/T-NSIAD-99-112, 16 March 1999, pp. 2–3, 8.Google Scholar
328.GAO, Combating Terrorism: Need for Comprehensive Threat and Risk Assessments of Chemical and Biological Attacks, Report No. GAO/NSIAD-99-163, September 1999.Google Scholar
329.United States Commission on National Security in the 21st Century, New World Coming: American Security in the 21 stCentury, Preface; http://www.fas.org/man/docs/nwc/nwc.htm, accessed 20 February 2006.Google Scholar
330.Advisory Panel to Assess Domestic Response Capabilities for Terrorism Involving Weapons of Mass Destruction (the “Gilmore Commission”), Volume I: Assessing the Threat, 15 December 1999.Google Scholar
331.Ibid, p. viii.Google Scholar
332.Ibid, pp. 25–26.Google Scholar
333.Ibid, p. 35.Google Scholar
334.Ibid, p. viii.Google Scholar
335.Melton, R. H., “Panel Criticizes U.S. Anti-Terrorism Preparedness,” Washington Post, 16 December 1999, p. A6.Google Scholar
336.Thomas, Evan and Hirsh, Michael, “On guard: America is the dominant nation entering the new century — and the top target for extremists,” Newsweek, 10 January 2000, p. 34.Google Scholar
337.Office of Management and Budget, “Annual Report to Congress on Combating Terrorism,” 18 May 2000, p. 49.Google Scholar
338.Parachini, John, “Federal Funding to Combat Terrorism, Including Defense Against Weapons of Mass Destruction, FY 1998–2001,” Center for Non-Proliferation Studies, Monterey Institute of International Studies; http://cns.miis.edu/research/cbw/terfund/htm, accessed 22 February 2006.Google Scholar
339.Greenberg, Daniel, “The Bioterrorism Panic,” Washington Post, 16 March 1999, p. A21.Google Scholar
340.Ember, Lois, “Bioterrorism,” Chemical and Engineering News, 5 July 1999, 77(27):8–17.Google Scholar
341.Pringle, Peter, “A Deadly Cloud of Paranoia Drifts Across the US; Mr. Clinton Has Cleverly Conflated Domestic Panic Over Terrorism with an Exaggerated Report on Iraq's Arsenal,” The Independent, 20 December 1998.Google Scholar
342.Hoffman, Bruce, interview with author, 1 December 2005.Google Scholar
343.Kennedy, Senator Edward, presentation, Johns Hopkins Center for Civilian Biodefense Studies, Second National Symposium on Medical and Public Health Response to Bioterrorism, 28–29 November 2000; http://www.upmc-biosecurity.org/pages/events/2nd_symposia/presentations.html; presentation online, accessed 14 December 2005.Google Scholar
344.Falkenrath, Richard, “U.S. Domestic Preparedness and the Complex Threat of Bioterrorism,” Johns Hopkins Center for Civilian Biodefense Studies, Second National Symposium on Medical and Public Health Response to Bioterrorism, 28–29 November 2000; http://www.upmc-biosecurity.org/pages/events/2nd_symposia/presentations.html; presentation online, accessed 14 December 2005.Google Scholar
345.Pillar, Paul, Terrorism and U.S. Foreign Policy, p. 233.Google Scholar
346.Epstein, Gerald, interview with author, 18 December 2006.Google Scholar
347.Sopko, John, interview with author, 27 April 2006.Google Scholar
348.Simon, Steven and Benjamin, Daniel, “America and the New Terrorism,” Survival, Spring 2000, 42(1):59–75.Google Scholar
349.Cilluffo, Frank et al., Defending America in the 21st Century: New Challenges, New Organizations, and New Policies (Executive Summary of Four CSIS Working Group Reports on Homeland Defense), (Center for Strategic and International Studies: Washington D.C., 2000).Google Scholar
350.Lederberg, Joshua, “The Diversity of Bioweapons,” Speech, RAND Corporation Symposium, Bioterrorism: Homeland Defense: The Next Steps, Santa Monica, California, 9 February 2000; http://www.rand.org/nsrd/bioterr/agenda1.htm, accessed 24 November 2004.Google Scholar
351.Block, Steven, “The Growing Threat of Biological Weapons,” American Scientist, January/February 2001, 89(1):28.Google Scholar
352.Hoffman, Bruce, interview with author, 31 January 2006.Google Scholar
353.Block, Steven, “The Growing Threat of Biological Weapons.”Google Scholar
354.Altman, Sidney et al., “An Open Letter to Elias Zerhouni,” Science, 4 March 2005, 307:1409–10.Google Scholar
355.Working Group on Bioterrorism Preparedness, Breathing Easier? (New York: The Century Foundation, 2004).Google Scholar
356.Turnock, Bernard J., Public Health Preparedness at a Price: Illinois (New York: The Century Foundation, 2004).Google Scholar
357.Salyers, Abigail, “Science, Censorship and Public Health,” Science, 26 April 2002, 296:617.Google Scholar
358.Miller, Engelberg, and Broad, , Germs, p. 316.Google Scholar
359.Poste, George, “Advances in Biotechnology: Promise and Peril,” address at the Second National Symposium on Medical and Public Health Response to Bioterrorism, 28–29 November 2000; http://www.upmc-biosecurity.org/pages/events/2nd_symposia/presentations.html; presentation online, accessed 14 December 2005.Google Scholar