Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T06:34:28.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ‘East is red’ goes pop: commodification, hybridity and nationalism in Chinese popular song and its televisual performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Extract

In 1989 the Western media left its consumers with the romantic impression that it was merely the students who were demonstrating for ‘democracy’, as if emulating the student demonstrations of twenty years before in Europe and America. But there were workers involved too, who had illegally organised unofficial labour unions, and beyond concerns about democratic rights, there was the impetus of a socio-economic crisis. Most of those killed by the tanks in Tiananmen were workers, not students. People from all walks of life had marched and demonstrated throughout China from Canton ti Lhasa. Nine months before the Tiananmen massacre of June 1989, reversals in official economic policy put a halt to investment and constructions, and the problem of unemployment of rural migrants who had come to the towns was exacerbated. This migration was illegal but had been tolerated since labour was needed for construction. In 1989 anywhere between 60 to 100 million unemployed and homeless people were moving around the country en masse. At one time 250,000 were camped at Canton railway station.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T. W. 1941. ‘On popular music’, with the assistance of George Simpson, Studies in Philosophy and Social Science, 11/1, pp. 1748Google Scholar
Attali, J. 1977. Bruits: essai sur l'economie politique de la musique (Paris)Google Scholar
Baker, H. A. 1991. ‘Hybridity, the rap race, and pedagogy for the 1990s’, in Technoculture, ed. Penley, C. and Ross, A. (Minneapolis)Google Scholar
Bhabha, H. 1985. ‘Signs taken for wonders: questions of ambivalence and authority under a tree outside Delhi, May 1817’, Critical Inquiry, 12, autumn, pp. 144–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cixous, H. 1991. Readings: The Poetics of Blanchart, Joyce, Kafka, Kleist, Lispector and Tsvetayeva. Trans. and ed. Conley, Verena (Minneapolis)Google Scholar
Docherty, T. 1990. After Theory: Postmodernism/Postmarxism (New York)Google Scholar
Fiske, J. and Hartley, J. 1978. Reading Television. (London)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennion, A. 1983. ‘The production of success’, Popular Music 3, pp. 159–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, S. 1990. ‘Britain: the dominant ideology thesis after a decade’, in Dominant Ideologies, ed. Abercrombie, N., Hill, S. and Turner, B.S. (Winchester)Google Scholar
Kaplan, E. A. 1987, Rocking Around the Clock: Music Television, Postmodernism, and Consumer Culture (New York)Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, T. et al. 1983. Key Concepts in Communication (London)Google Scholar
Rentoul, J. 1989. Me and Mine: The Triumph of the New Individualism? (Winchester)Google Scholar
Rey, Chow, 1991. ‘Listening otherwise, music miniaturized: a different type of question about revolution’, Discourses, 13/1, pp.Google Scholar
Rey, Chow, Forthcoming. Diaspora,Google Scholar
The Story of Hua Guan Suo. 1989. Trans. and ed. King, Gail Oman (Tucson)Google Scholar
Touraine, A. 1992. Critique de la modernite (Paris)Google Scholar
Williams, A. & Hirschop, K. 1989. Review of Noise, by J. Attali, Textual Practice 3/3, pp. 462472Google Scholar