Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:13:06.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Natural nanoparticle structure, properties and reactivity from X-ray studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2012

G. A. Waychunas
Affiliation:
Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, One Cyclotron Rd., Berkeley, CA 94720

Abstract

Synthetic analogs of naturally occurring nanoparticles have been studied by a range of X-ray techniques to determine their structure and chemistry, and relate these to their novel chemical properties and physical behavior. ZnS nanoparticles, formed in large concentrations naturally bymicrobial action, have an interesting core-shell structure with a highly distorted and strained outer layer. The strain propagates through the particles and produces unusual stiffness but can be relieved by changing the nature of the surface ligand binding. Weaker bound ligands allow high surface distortion, but strongly bound ligands relax this structure and reduce the overall strain. Only small amounts of ligand exchange causes transformations from the strained to the relaxed state. Most remarkably, minor point contacts between strained nanoparticles also relax the strain. Fe oxyhydroxide nanoparticles appear to go through structural transformations dependent on their size and formation conditions, and display a crystallographically oriented form of aggregation at the nanoscale that alters growth kinetics. At least one Fe oxyhydroxide mineral may only be stable on the nanoscale, and nonstoichiometry observed on the hematite surface suggests that for this phase and possibly other natural metal oxides, chemistry may be size dependent. Numerous questions exist on nanominerals formed in acid mine drainage sites and by reactions at interfaces.

Type
X-Ray Diffraction
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banfield, J. F. and Navrotsky, A. (2001). Nanoparticles and the Environment (Mineralogical Society of America, Chantilly, VA).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, H. L. (1996). Geomicrobiology (Marcel Dekker, New York).Google Scholar
Gilbert, B., Huang, F., Zhang, H., Waychunas, G. A., and Banfield, J. F. (2004). “Nanoparticles: strained and stiff,” ScienceSCIEAS 305, 651654.10.1126/science.1098454Google Scholar
Guyodo, Y., Mostrom, A., Penn, R. L., and Banerjee, S. (2003). “From nanodots to nanorods: oriented aggregation and magnetic evolution of nanocrystalline goethite,” Geophys. Res. Lett.GPRLAJ 30, 1512.10.1029/2003GL017021Google Scholar
Huang, F., Gilbert, G., Zhang, H., and Banfield, J. F. (2004). “Reversible, surface-controlled structure transformation in nanoparticles induced by an aggregation state,” Phys. Rev. Lett.PRLTAO 92, 155501.10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.155501CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michel, F. M., Ehm, L., Antao, S. M., Lee, P. L., Chupas, P. J., Liu, G., Strongin, D. R., Schoonen, M. A. A., Phillips, B. L., and Parise, J. B. (2007). “The structure of ferrihydrite: a nanocrystalline material,” ScienceSCIEAS 316, 17261729.10.1126/science.1142525Google Scholar
Navrotsky, A., Mazeina, L., and Majzlan, J. (2008). “Size-driven structural and thermodynamic complexity in iron oxides,” ScienceSCIEAS 319, 16351638.10.1126/science.1148614CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanwar, K. S., Lo, C. S., Eng, P. J., Catalano, J. G., Walko, D. A., Brown, G. E., Waychunas, G. A., Chaka, A. M., and Trainor, T. P. (2007). “Surface diffraction study of the hydrated hematite (1102) surface,” Surf. Sci.SUSCAS 601, 460474.10.1016/j.susc.2006.10.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waychunas, G. A., Kim, C. S., and Banfield, J. F. (2005). “Nanoparticulate iron oxide minerals in soils and sediments: unique properties and contaminant scavenging mechanisms,” J. Nanopart. Res.JNARFA 7, 409433.10.1007/s11051-005-6931-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar