Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T10:30:22.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing the Psychosocial Elements of Crowds at Mass Gatherings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2012

Alison Hutton ,
Kathryn Zeitz ,
Steve Brown  and
Paul Arbon
Alison Hutton*
Affiliation:
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Kathryn Zeitz
Affiliation:
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia St John Ambulance Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Steve Brown
Affiliation:
Tourism Department, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Paul Arbon
Affiliation:
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
*
Correspondence: Alison Hutton, RN, PhD School of Nursing and Midwifery, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide Sturt Road, Adelaide, South Australia 5049, Australia E-mail: alison.hutton@flinders.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction: The environmental aspects of mass gatherings that can affect the health and safety of the crowd have been well described. Although it has been recognized that the nature of the crowd will directly impact the health and safety of the crowd, the majority of research focuses on crowd behavior in a negative context such as violence or conflict. Within the mass gathering literature, there is no agreement on what crowd behavior, crowd mood and crowd type actually mean. At the same time, these elements have a number of applications, including event management and mass gathering medicine. These questions are worthy of exploration.

Methods: This paper will report on a pilot project undertaken to evaluate how effective current crowd assessment tools are in understanding the psychosocial domain of a mass gathering event.

Results: The pilot project highlighted the need for a more consistent descriptive data set that focuses on crowd behavior.

Conclusions: The descriptive data collected in this study provide a beginning insight into the science of understanding crowds at a mass gathering event. This pilot has commenced a process of quantifying the psychosocial nature of an event. To maximize the value of this work, future research is required to understand the interplay among the three domains of mass gatherings (physical, environmental and psychological), along with the effects of each element within the domains on safety and health outcomes for participants at mass gatherings.

Keywords

crowdsmass gatheringpsychosocial
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 26 , Issue 6 , December 2011 , pp. 414 - 421
Copyright
Copyright Hutton © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Milsten, AM, Maguire, BJ, Bissell, RA, Seaman, KG. Mass-gathering medical care: a review of the literature. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2002;17(3):151–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Arbon, PA. Mass gathering medicine: a review of the evidence and future directions for research. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007:22(2):131–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Arbon, P.The development of conceptual models for mass-gathering health. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2004;19(3):208–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Berlonghi, A.Understanding and planning for different spectator crowds. Safety Science. 1995:18:239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Earl, C.Promoting health in Australian mosh pits. Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 2001;12(3);213–216.Google Scholar
6.Doukas, S. Crowd Management, Past and Contemporary Issues, The Sports Journal. Undated. http://thesportjournal.org/article/crowd-management-past-and-contemporary-issues. Accessed May 9, 2010.Google Scholar
7.Zeitz, K, Tan, HM, Grief, M, Couns, PC, Zeitz, CJ. Crowd behavior at mass gatherings: A literature review. PreHosp Disaster Med. 2009;14(1):32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Zeitz, K, Bolton, S, Dippy, R, et al. . Measuring emergency services workloads at mass gathering events. Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 2007;22(4):24–30.Google Scholar
9.Pines, A, Maslach, C.Experiencing Social Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1993.Google Scholar
10.Emergency Management Australia. Safe and Healthy Mass Gatherings: A Health Medical and Safety Planning Manual for Public Events. http://www.ag.gov.au/www/emaweb/rwpattach.nsf/VAP/(3273BD3F76A7A5DEDAE36942A54D7D90)~Manual12-SafeAndHealthyMassGatherings.pdf/$file/Manual12-SafeAndHealthyMassGatherings.pdf. Published 1999. Accessed November 16, 2011.Google Scholar
11.Getz, D. Creating Knowledge in Event Studies. In: Getz, D, Event Studies Theory, Research and Policy for Planned Events. Oxford: Elsevier; 2007.Google Scholar