Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T11:23:03.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Federal Trauma Legislation: The 101st United States Congress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Extract

The United States Congress presently is considering comprehensive legislation regarding emergency medical services (EMS) and trauma systems planning. This legislation amends the Public Health Service Act and, if enacted, would represent the federal government's first significant statutory mandate to exercise a leadership role in EMS since the federal EMS program was abolished in the early 1980s. On 14 November 1989, the House passed House Resolution (H.R.) 1602, Trauma Care Systems Planning and Development Act of 1989, authored by Representative Jim Bates. The Senate is considering similar legislation (S. 15) by Senator Alan Cranston, titled the Emergency Medical Services and Trauma Care Improvement Act of 1989. The Senate Bill is awaiting final action by the full Senate. If the Senate approves S. 15, a joint House and Senate conference committee will meet to present its own conference report to each of those bodies for consideration and passage.

Type
The Legislator
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. The 1981 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act eliminated the categorical federal EMS program and incorporated it into the Preventative Health and Human Services block grant program.Google Scholar
2. National Research Council: Injury in America. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1985.Google Scholar
3. Rice, D P, Mackenzie, EJ, and Associates. Cost Of Injury in the United States: A Report to Congress. San Francisco: Institute for Health & Aging, University of California and Injury Prevention Center, The Johns Hopkins University, 1989.Google Scholar