There has been limited organizational research applied to EMS, especially in the area of job satisfaction. In the midst of a general shortage of health care workers, effective recruitment and retention of a qualified and satisfied work force is a critical issue. The purpose of this study was to examine the factors and elements in the structure or “design” of the work of emergency medical technicians (EMTs) and paramedics that can create conditions for high levels of work motivation, satisfaction, and performance.

A modified Job Diagnostic Survey was administered to a cross section of 102 paid and volunteer EMS personnel in Pennsylvania. The relationships between measured job characteristics, experienced psychological states, and job longevity on overall job satisfaction was examined.

Significant positive relationships (p<.05) exist between a number of the job characteristic variables (such as task significance, autonomy, and job feedback) and job satisfaction. Job longevity did not have a significant relationship to job satisfaction. Volunteer EMS personnel experienced higher levels of job satisfaction than did paid providers.

The results indicate that the EMT and paramedic perform complex jobs that have high levels of the characteristics that cause internal work motivation. Methods to increase the amount of these core job characteristics to improve overall job satisfaction are discussed.

We prospectively evaluated the frequency with which advanced life support (ALS) personnel fail to attempt to measure blood pressure (BP) and/or pulse (P) during prehospital patient assessment. A single in-field observer rode on ALS rescue vehicles from 20 Emergency Medical Services (EMS) agencies throughout Arizona during a one-year study (1/89–12/89). Data were collected from urban, suburban, and rural systems. Statistical evaluation was performed by Chi Square analysis with p <0.05 considered significant.

Among 227 patient encounters, BP and/or P measurements were omitted in 84 cases (37.0%). BP and/or P were omitted in 50.0% of children (age <18 years) compared to 26.5% of adults (p=0.023). Among patients who were transported to a hospital, 19.4% had BP omitted compared to 49.1% of those not transported (p=0.00003). Seven of 58 patients in whom TVs were attempted (12.1 %) had BP omitted compared to 54 of 169 patients without IV attempts (32.0%, p=0.0055). Blood Pressure was omitted in 21.9% of patients transported Code 3 and in 24.2% of patients with Glasgow Coma Scale ≤13. Omission of BP occurred more frequently in non-urban agencies (33.9%) than in urban ones (20.0%, p=0.027).

In a statewide evaluation of prehospital patient assessment, failure to measure vital signs (VS) occurred on a frequent basis. Our data indicate that a concerning lack of attention to the most basic details of patient assessment is common. It is possible that failure to measure VS might even happen more frequently during routine patient encounters without an observer present. Medical control physicians must emphasize to EMS personnel the paramount importance of careful assessment to ensure optimal patient care.

The Society of Teachers of Emergency Medicine's, EMS Educators Committee performed a mail survey of emergency medicine residency training directors regarding their curricula for EMS. The Committee was interested in determining the quality and quantity of EMS training in emergency medicine residencies. Out of 66 programs, 48 responded (73%). The programs reported that they provide medical control for a mean of 4837 calls per year (range 0–20,000) and interact with a mean of eight EMS agencies. Ten programs (21%) do not offer any formal EMS administrative experience, while 42 (87%) programs require residents to participate in paramedic training, and 31 (65%) require participation in EMT training. Both the type and the amount of “in-field” experience reported by programs varied considerably, with some programs offering it only as an elective. Similarly, there was great diversity in the type and amount of experience with helicopter ambulances. In conclusion, there is wide disparity among the offerings from all residency programs. Each training program must evaluate its own EMS curricula and expand it to fill existing gaps. Specific topics to be covered are suggested.

Many authorities in EMS have cited the lack of data concerning the efficacy of medications administered by prehospital providers. This paper reports the results of a prospective assessment of the efficacy and safety of certain medications used by emergency medical technician-paramedics (EMT-Ps) in a three-tiered response system. Data were collected for six months using forms that were completed by the EMT-P at the conclusion of an incident. Medication efficacy was measured for: bretylium tosylate, 14 patients/3 conversions to a sustaining rhythm (21 %); diazepam, 20 patients/17 stopped seizing or converted to focal motor seizure (85 %); dopamine hydrochloride, 14 patients/9 experiencing increase of blood pressure (64%); furosemide, 49 patients/28 instances of decreased respiratory distress (57%); and terbutaline sulfate, 46 patients/34 instances of decreased respiratory distress (74%). Serious side effects were rare and well managed by the EMT-Ps. These data indicate that these medications are effective and safe when used in the prehospital environment. Analysis of more data from different delivery profiles is necessary prior to drawing appropriate scientific conclusions. Data collected should include patient follow-up through hospital discharge.

In order to identify the study designs andthe type of pre-trial peer review in published EMS research, we reviewed three refereed emergency medicine journals during the period from 1985 through 1988. All original scientific manuscripts utilizing human subjects in prehospital care were analyzed. Ninety-six issues were examined, and 79 manuscripts met the criteria for analysis. The research design was cross-sectional in 7.5%, retrospective in 51%, and prospective in 41.5%. Pre-trial peer review had been sought in nine (11%). Each was performed by a hospital or university-based Institutional Review Board (IRB). Only four (5%) manuscripts contained statements about pre-trial peer review. All reviewed trials were prospective in design (9/33, 27%). A follow-up telephone survey of the authors of the non-reviewed prospective trials indicated that 96% were unaware of the potential need for pre-trial review, 16% anticipated difficulty obtaining approval from traditional IRB committees, and 11% feared that the protocol would be interfered with by the review committee.

We conclude that 92.5% of the current published EMS research is retrospective or prospective in design, and that pre-trial peer review is not obtained in the majority of prehospital EMS research. Guidelines should be developed to educate EMS researchers about the need for and the value of pre-trial peer review. Journal editors should clearly state and enforce policies about manuscripts lacking information about pre-trial peer review when human subjects are involved.

An inverse correlation has been reported between motor vehicle crash mortality rate (MVCMR) and population density. The reasons for this are unknown, but variations in prehospital and hospital resources are a possible explanation.

This study investigated the capacity of selected personal and work environment characteristics, in combination with occupational stress, to predict job satisfaction for 495 emergency medical technicians (EMTs) who provided emergency medical services in a rural area in the United States. Using data obtained during a three-year survey, multiple regression analysis identified work group cohesiveness and effective supervisory behavior as the best predictors of job satisfaction. The perceived level of occupational stress and years of experience as an EMT were inversely related to job satisfaction, but EMTs who responded to the survey as they were preparing to enroll in advanced training programs were more satisfied with their jobs than were other subgroups. These results suggest that job satisfaction can be enhanced by reinforcing cooperation and cohesiveness within EMS work groups, by establishing and maintaining effective communication networks between EMS administrators and EMTs, and by providing opportunities for professional growth and development for EMTs.